Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.

Comments

No Comments on

  1. Scott on Tue, 7th Jun 2005 1:45 pm
  2. I just turned on these comments, so here goes!

    I enjoyed both of the Spock vs Q shows, and I agree that they are specifically tailored for Trekkies. Trekkers? Whatever. I would have liked to have been there live!

  3. Scott on Tue, 7th Jun 2005 1:45 pm
  4. I just turned on these comments, so here goes!

    I enjoyed both of the Spock vs Q shows, and I agree that they are specifically tailored for Trekkies. Trekkers? Whatever. I would have liked to have been there live!

  5. Scott on Tue, 7th Jun 2005 2:22 pm
  6. Here’s another comment for testing purposes…

  7. Scott on Tue, 7th Jun 2005 2:22 pm
  8. Here’s another comment for testing purposes…

  9. Jesse on Wed, 15th Jun 2005 12:17 pm
  10. “Dead as a Doornail” (RECORDED BOOKS) is in the same series as “Dead Until Dark” (PAPERBACK DIGITAL) which was the first book in the series. If its half as good as the original it’d be worth picking up for sure.

  11. Jesse on Wed, 15th Jun 2005 12:17 pm
  12. “Dead as a Doornail” (RECORDED BOOKS) is in the same series as “Dead Until Dark” (PAPERBACK DIGITAL) which was the first book in the series. If its half as good as the original it’d be worth picking up for sure.

  13. Scott on Wed, 15th Jun 2005 12:41 pm
  14. That brings up an interesting trend… Recorded Books picks up that series, but drops Kevin J. Anderson’s Saga of the Seven Suns. The fourth volume of that series will be published by Brilliance in July, after the first three were published by RB.

  15. Scott on Wed, 15th Jun 2005 12:41 pm
  16. That brings up an interesting trend… Recorded Books picks up that series, but drops Kevin J. Anderson’s Saga of the Seven Suns. The fourth volume of that series will be published by Brilliance in July, after the first three were published by RB.

  17. Jesse on Thu, 16th Jun 2005 1:13 pm
  18. Podcasting is huge and still heard to navigate! Great column Scott.

  19. Jesse on Thu, 16th Jun 2005 1:13 pm
  20. Podcasting is huge and still heard to navigate! Great column Scott.

  21. Jesse on Sun, 19th Jun 2005 11:31 pm
  22. Terrific review! I’m anxious to compare it to The Curse Of Chalion, which I was very impressed with as well.

  23. Jesse on Sun, 19th Jun 2005 11:31 pm
  24. Terrific review! I’m anxious to compare it to The Curse Of Chalion, which I was very impressed with as well.

  25. Cold Chilli on Thu, 30th Jun 2005 3:38 pm
  26. I Listened to the entire “book.” It was very well paced and entertaining. Production quality is very well done. The music and sound effects when introduced were balanced well with the speaking.
    4 out of 5.

  27. Cold Chilli on Thu, 30th Jun 2005 3:38 pm
  28. I Listened to the entire “book.” It was very well paced and entertaining. Production quality is very well done. The music and sound effects when introduced were balanced well with the speaking.
    4 out of 5.

  29. Jesse on Fri, 1st Jul 2005 8:51 pm
  30. Heard the first entry! Entitled “SOMEONE JUST FOR ME”. Very cool – kind of twilight zone episode and it also kind of reminded me of the Japanese movie RINGU. BTW the whole anthology series is entitled “DEEP NIGHT”.

  31. Jesse on Fri, 1st Jul 2005 8:51 pm
  32. Heard the first entry! Entitled “SOMEONE JUST FOR ME”. Very cool – kind of twilight zone episode and it also kind of reminded me of the Japanese movie RINGU. BTW the whole anthology series is entitled “DEEP NIGHT”.

  33. Jesse on Thu, 7th Jul 2005 5:47 pm
  34. Nice Find!

    I’ve heard the Frankenstein Unbound title. Its is a fair abridgement.

  35. Jesse on Thu, 7th Jul 2005 5:47 pm
  36. Nice Find!

    I’ve heard the Frankenstein Unbound title. Its is a fair abridgement.

  37. Jesse on Mon, 11th Jul 2005 1:13 pm
  38. Thanks to an wonderful reader we’ve two new images of the titles on this list and a bit more detail. Keep it coming folks!

  39. Jesse on Mon, 11th Jul 2005 1:13 pm
  40. Thanks to an wonderful reader we’ve two new images of the titles on this list and a bit more detail. Keep it coming folks!

  41. Dread Pendragon on Tue, 12th Jul 2005 4:57 pm
  42. Ah yes, the old monotone phone conversation tactic. It was used on me in ‘Nam and I think they are using it now at Gitmo. Once the Vietcong made me talk to John Kerry, and his voice . . . I’m sorry, I can’t talk about it yet. I’ve got to go to my happy place.

  43. Dread Pendragon on Tue, 12th Jul 2005 4:57 pm
  44. Ah yes, the old monotone phone conversation tactic. It was used on me in ‘Nam and I think they are using it now at Gitmo. Once the Vietcong made me talk to John Kerry, and his voice . . . I’m sorry, I can’t talk about it yet. I’ve got to go to my happy place.

  45. Dread Pendragon on Mon, 18th Jul 2005 9:50 am
  46. I like the rocket with the headphones, I’m guessing that hasn’t been done before. Is that battleschool in the background?

  47. Dread Pendragon on Mon, 18th Jul 2005 9:50 am
  48. I like the rocket with the headphones, I’m guessing that hasn’t been done before. Is that battleschool in the background?

  49. Scott on Mon, 18th Jul 2005 2:48 pm
  50. Why not? Battle School it is. :)

  51. Scott on Mon, 18th Jul 2005 2:48 pm
  52. Why not? Battle School it is. :)

  53. Jesse on Thu, 21st Jul 2005 2:09 pm
  54. I finally got a chance to listen to this one! I had a smile tatooed on my face while I listend to Spider spin his SF web. I knew I would be interested to hear this one especially because it is set in and around Vancouver, British Columbia, where I live and it is chock full of local details. But after hearing it, and realizing that most people who don’t live in BC probably couldn’t care less about the setting what I really wanted to talk about is something a lot of listeners/readers might have missed that they should care about. Spider Robinson wrote this novel as an homage to Crime Writers Of America Grandmaster Lawrence Block. Most SF readers probably don’t know who Block is but they should. Block is a prolific and talented author working in the crime genre. In VBD Robinson uses many turns of phrase that are ones Block uses almost unconciously in his many stories. Other giveaways include the theme of a horrificly understandable serial killer and a deep and abiding love of coffee. Robinson has done this sort of thing before – his novel Callahan’s Con was an homage to Block’s contemporary – fellow Crime Writers Of America Grandmaster Donald Westlake and Callahan’s Key was inspired by the writings of Robert A. Heinlein. Another neat feature of Very Bad Deaths is that it contains the only reference in fiction to the philosophical writings of Daniel Dennett that I know of – he also manages to tie Dennett’s concepts into the book’s plot.

    Spider is currently “collaborating” with Heinlein on a novel titled Variable Star, I hope Blackstone aquires the audio rights to that one and that they get Spider to Narrate! Oh and a sequel to Very Bad Deaths is also in the works.

  55. Jesse on Thu, 21st Jul 2005 2:09 pm
  56. I finally got a chance to listen to this one! I had a smile tatooed on my face while I listend to Spider spin his SF web. I knew I would be interested to hear this one especially because it is set in and around Vancouver, British Columbia, where I live and it is chock full of local details. But after hearing it, and realizing that most people who don’t live in BC probably couldn’t care less about the setting what I really wanted to talk about is something a lot of listeners/readers might have missed that they should care about. Spider Robinson wrote this novel as an homage to Crime Writers Of America Grandmaster Lawrence Block. Most SF readers probably don’t know who Block is but they should. Block is a prolific and talented author working in the crime genre. In VBD Robinson uses many turns of phrase that are ones Block uses almost unconciously in his many stories. Other giveaways include the theme of a horrificly understandable serial killer and a deep and abiding love of coffee. Robinson has done this sort of thing before – his novel Callahan’s Con was an homage to Block’s contemporary – fellow Crime Writers Of America Grandmaster Donald Westlake and Callahan’s Key was inspired by the writings of Robert A. Heinlein. Another neat feature of Very Bad Deaths is that it contains the only reference in fiction to the philosophical writings of Daniel Dennett that I know of – he also manages to tie Dennett’s concepts into the book’s plot.

    Spider is currently “collaborating” with Heinlein on a novel titled Variable Star, I hope Blackstone aquires the audio rights to that one and that they get Spider to Narrate! Oh and a sequel to Very Bad Deaths is also in the works.

  57. Patfln on Fri, 22nd Jul 2005 10:53 am
  58. “Revenge” is sweet, best at bedtime. I agree with this review but would add a few thoughts on how to best savor this set of CDs. Try them one a night at bedtime with headphones. In this audio-rich, black environment when Jonathan Davis reads “The Dark is generous,” you can really believe it. Davis has mastered all of the voices so well, including Obi-Wan Kenobi, improving since even his readings of the Jedi Quest series that this is like an extended mind movie. The use of ambient sound and drones enhances the settings considerably and the slow, corruption of Anakin Skywalker dovetailing with his own self-destructive nature brings down the Jedi and the Republic. But not your listening pleasure.

  59. Patfln on Fri, 22nd Jul 2005 10:53 am
  60. “Revenge” is sweet, best at bedtime. I agree with this review but would add a few thoughts on how to best savor this set of CDs. Try them one a night at bedtime with headphones. In this audio-rich, black environment when Jonathan Davis reads “The Dark is generous,” you can really believe it. Davis has mastered all of the voices so well, including Obi-Wan Kenobi, improving since even his readings of the Jedi Quest series that this is like an extended mind movie. The use of ambient sound and drones enhances the settings considerably and the slow, corruption of Anakin Skywalker dovetailing with his own self-destructive nature brings down the Jedi and the Republic. But not your listening pleasure.

  61. Jesse on Mon, 1st Aug 2005 8:55 pm
  62. Great interview!

    At one point JJA says “I think it might just be a matter of training your brain to process the auditory narrative in an efficient way” in regards to not losing track of a narrative amid distraction.

    A friend of mine who doesnt listen to audiobooks at all said he doesn’t listen to them because he is so easily distracted. I told him how many audiobooks I am currently listening to. He couldn’t beleive I have 7 audiobooks all in the process of being read at any given time. I have a cassette player at work, a cd player and a cassette player in my car, a walkman for transition between home and work and for use at the gym, an mp3-CD boombox in the bathroom, and another in the bedroom, and an old fashioned cassette player clock radio, in the kitchen a mini stereo, and even a cassette player in my computer. :)

  63. Jesse on Mon, 1st Aug 2005 8:55 pm
  64. Great interview!

    At one point JJA says “I think it might just be a matter of training your brain to process the auditory narrative in an efficient way” in regards to not losing track of a narrative amid distraction.

    A friend of mine who doesnt listen to audiobooks at all said he doesn’t listen to them because he is so easily distracted. I told him how many audiobooks I am currently listening to. He couldn’t beleive I have 7 audiobooks all in the process of being read at any given time. I have a cassette player at work, a cd player and a cassette player in my car, a walkman for transition between home and work and for use at the gym, an mp3-CD boombox in the bathroom, and another in the bedroom, and an old fashioned cassette player clock radio, in the kitchen a mini stereo, and even a cassette player in my computer. :)

  65. Scott on Tue, 2nd Aug 2005 9:16 am
  66. Seven at ONCE?
    You’re mad I say, MAD!!!!
    :)

  67. Scott on Tue, 2nd Aug 2005 9:16 am
  68. Seven at ONCE?
    You’re mad I say, MAD!!!!
    :)

  69. Jesse on Thu, 4th Aug 2005 1:19 pm
  70. I fondly remember Alan Maitland’s “Fireside Al” segments from As It Happens. There should be more readings by him out there somewhere. Hope CBC Audio releases them too.

  71. Jesse on Thu, 4th Aug 2005 1:19 pm
  72. I fondly remember Alan Maitland’s “Fireside Al” segments from As It Happens. There should be more readings by him out there somewhere. Hope CBC Audio releases them too.

  73. Jesse on Tue, 9th Aug 2005 12:14 pm
  74. I think Prisoners Of Gravity is my favorite television show. You can take any single episode and reap a wealth of goodness – when PoG aired an episode on Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman I spent the next three years reading it in trade paperback. When an episode on AI featured an interview with Robert J. Sawyer about his first novel Golden Fleece I went out and bought copy and have bought every Robert J. Sawyer book since. I miss it dearly.

  75. Jesse on Tue, 9th Aug 2005 12:14 pm
  76. I think Prisoners Of Gravity is my favorite television show. You can take any single episode and reap a wealth of goodness – when PoG aired an episode on Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman I spent the next three years reading it in trade paperback. When an episode on AI featured an interview with Robert J. Sawyer about his first novel Golden Fleece I went out and bought copy and have bought every Robert J. Sawyer book since. I miss it dearly.

  77. Rachelle The Teddog on Tue, 9th Aug 2005 1:08 pm
  78. Heh. Years ago, when I first started messing with audio, I asked if people were interested in MP3s of interview from the show. I didn’t get much response and never bothered with the idea again.

    I could rip large chunks of audio from series, but the earliest I’ll have all the parts to set up my little rig is late December. Right now they’re spread all over the province.

  79. Rachelle The Teddog on Tue, 9th Aug 2005 1:08 pm
  80. Heh. Years ago, when I first started messing with audio, I asked if people were interested in MP3s of interview from the show. I didn’t get much response and never bothered with the idea again.

    I could rip large chunks of audio from series, but the earliest I’ll have all the parts to set up my little rig is late December. Right now they’re spread all over the province.

  81. Jesse on Fri, 12th Aug 2005 11:53 am
  82. I’m a big fan of Pat Muphy’s short story Rachel In Love but haven’t found another tale by her that I fully connected with.

  83. Jesse on Fri, 12th Aug 2005 11:53 am
  84. I’m a big fan of Pat Muphy’s short story Rachel In Love but haven’t found another tale by her that I fully connected with.

  85. Neil on Thu, 18th Aug 2005 6:12 am
  86. The Arbiter Series is great and each episode gets better as you see the characters progress. One correction, not all of the productions they have made at conventions have been turned into CDs yet – only episodes 1 through 4 and 8.

    Neil

  87. Neil on Thu, 18th Aug 2005 6:12 am
  88. The Arbiter Series is great and each episode gets better as you see the characters progress. One correction, not all of the productions they have made at conventions have been turned into CDs yet – only episodes 1 through 4 and 8.

    Neil

  89. Jesse on Wed, 24th Aug 2005 5:27 pm
  90. Michael Kramer is one of my favorite male readers, his work in the Books-On-Tape Richard Stark novels is absolutely perfect.

  91. Jesse on Wed, 24th Aug 2005 5:27 pm
  92. Michael Kramer is one of my favorite male readers, his work in the Books-On-Tape Richard Stark novels is absolutely perfect.

  93. Dread Pendragon on Wed, 14th Sep 2005 10:10 pm
  94. I’ve always thought some kind of mp3 player would be cool to have, but they are kind of spendy and I didn’t think I would use it tons (at my desk I’ve got my computer and in my car I have a CD player — that seems adequate to cover my needs).

    Now, though, it seems like an mp3 player would be very practical for holding stuff like this or stories that are too large to fit on a disc I might burn. Is that what you do with broadcasts such as this? Do you have anything thoughts on what to look for in an mp3 player?

  95. Dread Pendragon on Wed, 14th Sep 2005 10:10 pm
  96. I’ve always thought some kind of mp3 player would be cool to have, but they are kind of spendy and I didn’t think I would use it tons (at my desk I’ve got my computer and in my car I have a CD player — that seems adequate to cover my needs).

    Now, though, it seems like an mp3 player would be very practical for holding stuff like this or stories that are too large to fit on a disc I might burn. Is that what you do with broadcasts such as this? Do you have anything thoughts on what to look for in an mp3 player?

  97. Scott Sigler on Thu, 15th Sep 2005 5:43 pm
  98. Dude, thanks for the plug!

    -Scott-

  99. Scott Sigler on Thu, 15th Sep 2005 5:43 pm
  100. Dude, thanks for the plug!

    -Scott-

  101. Dread Pendragon on Mon, 19th Sep 2005 3:08 pm
  102. Just listened to it. Excellent! That story will keep me thinking for a while. Love, lust, infidelty, commitment, and all that in a fairytale pre-quel!

  103. Dread Pendragon on Mon, 19th Sep 2005 3:08 pm
  104. Just listened to it. Excellent! That story will keep me thinking for a while. Love, lust, infidelty, commitment, and all that in a fairytale pre-quel!

  105. Jesse on Wed, 21st Sep 2005 3:55 pm
  106. Holy markdowns Batman! Tons of great stuff here. Including Robert A. Heinlein’s Stranger In A Strange Land. AWESOME!

    Although, this may be the death of cassettes format audiobooks. Goodbye friends. We loved you.

  107. Jesse on Wed, 21st Sep 2005 3:55 pm
  108. Holy markdowns Batman! Tons of great stuff here. Including Robert A. Heinlein’s Stranger In A Strange Land. AWESOME!

    Although, this may be the death of cassettes format audiobooks. Goodbye friends. We loved you.

  109. Dread Pendragon on Fri, 23rd Sep 2005 8:22 pm
  110. ” . . . it will make you want to go to Hooters for some chili cheese fries.”

    ???

    That’s like saying you go to Disneyland to enjoy the benches and air. :)

  111. Dread Pendragon on Fri, 23rd Sep 2005 8:22 pm
  112. ” . . . it will make you want to go to Hooters for some chili cheese fries.”

    ???

    That’s like saying you go to Disneyland to enjoy the benches and air. :)

  113. bluejack on Sat, 24th Sep 2005 5:44 pm
  114. Hey, thanks for the plug, Jesse.

    I’ll also recommend one other podcast, my review of Space Truckers.

    I hope to do more reviews in the near future.

    Also note, if listeners are only interested in the Science Fiction podcasts, you can always view the thing by the SciFi category, and if you want to use a rss reader or podcatcher to just grab the SciFi stuff, you can use the rss url http://overclocked.libsyn.com/rss/SciFi.

  115. bluejack on Sat, 24th Sep 2005 5:44 pm
  116. Hey, thanks for the plug, Jesse.

    I’ll also recommend one other podcast, my review of Space Truckers.

    I hope to do more reviews in the near future.

    Also note, if listeners are only interested in the Science Fiction podcasts, you can always view the thing by the SciFi category, and if you want to use a rss reader or podcatcher to just grab the SciFi stuff, you can use the rss url http://overclocked.libsyn.com/rss/SciFi.

  117. e on Sun, 25th Sep 2005 12:20 am
  118. Hello!

    I’m Eileen (aka “e”) from The Public Domain Podcast. Thanks for listing my readings of The Master of the World by Jules Verne! I just thought I’d drop you a note in case you wanted to fill in the ???? with “Eileen” or “e”.

    I’m a science fiction and fantasy fan myself so you’ll be sure to see more Verne and other sci fi greats in my line up.

  119. e on Sun, 25th Sep 2005 12:20 am
  120. Hello!

    I’m Eileen (aka “e”) from The Public Domain Podcast. Thanks for listing my readings of The Master of the World by Jules Verne! I just thought I’d drop you a note in case you wanted to fill in the ???? with “Eileen” or “e”.

    I’m a science fiction and fantasy fan myself so you’ll be sure to see more Verne and other sci fi greats in my line up.

  121. alienEthOS on Fri, 30th Sep 2005 9:06 am
  122. Hey, this is Kevin from alienEthOS: The Ethics of Sci-fi. Thanks for the mention! We’ll put that book on our to read list, since neither of us have read it. We’ll give you a shoutout on the show next time. Is there anything you’d like us to say in particular?

  123. alienEthOS on Fri, 30th Sep 2005 9:06 am
  124. Hey, this is Kevin from alienEthOS: The Ethics of Sci-fi. Thanks for the mention! We’ll put that book on our to read list, since neither of us have read it. We’ll give you a shoutout on the show next time. Is there anything you’d like us to say in particular?

  125. Jesse on Fri, 30th Sep 2005 12:38 pm
  126. Hi Kevin,

    I havent read A Case Of Conscience yet either. But certainly will if you guys plan on doing show that talks about it. :D

    The description of A Case Of Conscience in The 100 Best Science Fiction Novels book (you can search through it on Amazon.com) makes me think it will be a very appropriate meta-ethical novel for discussion by you and Kade.

    I look at good meaty science fiction as being intimately connected to philosophy of nearly every kind: Obviously the philosophy of science, the philosophy of religion, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, metaphysics and even tangentially to aesthetics.

    Looking forward to show 3 and beyond.

    Jesse

  127. Jesse on Fri, 30th Sep 2005 12:38 pm
  128. Hi Kevin,

    I havent read A Case Of Conscience yet either. But certainly will if you guys plan on doing show that talks about it. :D

    The description of A Case Of Conscience in The 100 Best Science Fiction Novels book (you can search through it on Amazon.com) makes me think it will be a very appropriate meta-ethical novel for discussion by you and Kade.

    I look at good meaty science fiction as being intimately connected to philosophy of nearly every kind: Obviously the philosophy of science, the philosophy of religion, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, metaphysics and even tangentially to aesthetics.

    Looking forward to show 3 and beyond.

    Jesse

  129. Dread Pendragon on Mon, 3rd Oct 2005 12:49 pm
  130. In case anyone else is as illiterate as me, here is an explanation of “deus ex machina”:

    http://newark.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Terms/deusexmachina.html

    Very clever, Cory.

  131. Dread Pendragon on Mon, 3rd Oct 2005 12:49 pm
  132. In case anyone else is as illiterate as me, here is an explanation of “deus ex machina”:

    http://newark.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Terms/deusexmachina.html

    Very clever, Cory.

  133. Jesse on Tue, 25th Oct 2005 3:37 pm
  134. Awesome review Cory! I too am a fan of good extras on audiobooks. This looks like it may be the definitve edition of Something Wicked.

  135. Jesse on Tue, 25th Oct 2005 3:37 pm
  136. Awesome review Cory! I too am a fan of good extras on audiobooks. This looks like it may be the definitve edition of Something Wicked.

  137. Jesse on Fri, 28th Oct 2005 12:29 pm
  138. It really does sound original! What a neat idea.

  139. Jesse on Fri, 28th Oct 2005 12:29 pm
  140. It really does sound original! What a neat idea.

  141. Jesse on Wed, 9th Nov 2005 6:21 pm
  142. Nice review Kurt.

    The theme of mathematics runs right through science fiction. From The Nine Billion Names Of God forward to the present…

    In fact tere is a neat website that talks about MATH FICTION…

    http://math.cofc.edu/faculty/kasman/MATHFICT/all.php

    I enjoy math fiction myself. But despite this I subscribe to the theory that math is not actually real, that numbers and equations – any symbolic logic system actually – can’t exist in the universe. And hence are only of marginal interest and value to things that are real (like me). So math fiction is in a way just fiction fiction. But wait if its a double falsity maybe that means it is true afterall? But that would only make sense if math were true. And that don’t make no damn sense.

    Anyway, here’s a podcasst that supports my position:

    http://www.dailyphil.ca/podcast/absurdum-hoffman.mp3

  143. Jesse on Wed, 9th Nov 2005 6:21 pm
  144. Nice review Kurt.

    The theme of mathematics runs right through science fiction. From The Nine Billion Names Of God forward to the present…

    In fact tere is a neat website that talks about MATH FICTION…

    http://math.cofc.edu/faculty/kasman/MATHFICT/all.php

    I enjoy math fiction myself. But despite this I subscribe to the theory that math is not actually real, that numbers and equations – any symbolic logic system actually – can’t exist in the universe. And hence are only of marginal interest and value to things that are real (like me). So math fiction is in a way just fiction fiction. But wait if its a double falsity maybe that means it is true afterall? But that would only make sense if math were true. And that don’t make no damn sense.

    Anyway, here’s a podcasst that supports my position:

    http://www.dailyphil.ca/podcast/absurdum-hoffman.mp3

  145. MWS Media on Sun, 4th Dec 2005 1:34 am
  146. Thanks for the kind words, Jesse — I’m so glad you’re enjoying Brave Men Run! Thanks also for the Lulu.com mention — here is the direct link to the paperback edition of the book.

    Thanks again!

  147. MWS Media on Sun, 4th Dec 2005 1:34 am
  148. Thanks for the kind words, Jesse — I’m so glad you’re enjoying Brave Men Run! Thanks also for the Lulu.com mention — here is the direct link to the paperback edition of the book.

    Thanks again!

  149. Chris Perridas on Thu, 22nd Dec 2005 4:12 am
  150. I hadn’t seen this cd. Thanks for brining it to our attention.

  151. Chris Perridas on Thu, 22nd Dec 2005 4:12 am
  152. I hadn’t seen this cd. Thanks for brining it to our attention.

  153. Jesse on Fri, 23rd Dec 2005 1:35 pm
  154. You are most welcome Chris. Lovecraft fans should check out your Blog too – lots of good stuff there!

  155. Jesse on Fri, 23rd Dec 2005 1:35 pm
  156. You are most welcome Chris. Lovecraft fans should check out your Blog too – lots of good stuff there!

  157. Adam on Wed, 4th Jan 2006 1:20 pm
  158. Thanks for listening, and sorry about the p-pops. I was using an old headseat microphone, but I’m now using a much better setup, including a pop filter. My next podcast, “The Right People,” should be up in a few weeks.

  159. Adam on Wed, 4th Jan 2006 1:20 pm
  160. Thanks for listening, and sorry about the p-pops. I was using an old headseat microphone, but I’m now using a much better setup, including a pop filter. My next podcast, “The Right People,” should be up in a few weeks.

  161. Jesse on Thu, 16th Feb 2006 4:41 pm
  162. Just listened to the first episode.

    Production values are excellent. Acting is very good. Writing is playful and direct. It was funny. I liked it. :)

    I have two critisisms.

    1. There is an inconsitency in the offensiveness. Racial slurs abound but “fuck” is replaced with “frak”. Violence is ok but “fuck” is offensive?

    2. The denegration of NPR in the frontispiece disclaimer. It may have been played for comedy rather than serious but being a socialist doesn’t have anything to do with being offended by words. Making fun of censorship would be more apt than making fun of public radio.

  163. Jesse on Thu, 16th Feb 2006 4:41 pm
  164. Just listened to the first episode.

    Production values are excellent. Acting is very good. Writing is playful and direct. It was funny. I liked it. :)

    I have two critisisms.

    1. There is an inconsitency in the offensiveness. Racial slurs abound but “fuck” is replaced with “frak”. Violence is ok but “fuck” is offensive?

    2. The denegration of NPR in the frontispiece disclaimer. It may have been played for comedy rather than serious but being a socialist doesn’t have anything to do with being offended by words. Making fun of censorship would be more apt than making fun of public radio.

  165. cbcworkerbee on Mon, 20th Feb 2006 9:35 pm
  166. Think you mean “Samm” Barnes, Jesse. :-)

    Check out http://www.assortednonsense.com for some pics of the recording session.

    Joe

  167. cbcworkerbee on Mon, 20th Feb 2006 9:35 pm
  168. Think you mean “Samm” Barnes, Jesse. :-)

    Check out http://www.assortednonsense.com for some pics of the recording session.

    Joe

  169. Ryan on Mon, 27th Feb 2006 6:18 pm
  170. Go to my blog!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go to it by clicking on my name!

  171. Ryan on Mon, 27th Feb 2006 6:18 pm
  172. Go to my blog!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go to it by clicking on my name!

  173. Jesse on Mon, 27th Feb 2006 6:49 pm
  174. Indeed quite a loss to SF. :(

    It should also be noted that there is an excellent audio dramatization of OEB’s Bloodchild. It is available on audible.com

    “Terran refugees on a foreign planet bear the children of the native inhabitants.”

    Adapted for audio by Yuri Rasovsky, with a cast featuring John Coppola, Dylan Kussman, Ann Marie Lee, Christina Pickles, Lynne Thigpen, Ira Burton, and Lorna Raver, and with guitar solos by Fred Koella.

    Hosted by award-winning writer and broadcast personality Harlan Ellison.

    Jesse

  175. Jesse on Mon, 27th Feb 2006 6:49 pm
  176. Indeed quite a loss to SF. :(

    It should also be noted that there is an excellent audio dramatization of OEB’s Bloodchild. It is available on audible.com

    “Terran refugees on a foreign planet bear the children of the native inhabitants.”

    Adapted for audio by Yuri Rasovsky, with a cast featuring John Coppola, Dylan Kussman, Ann Marie Lee, Christina Pickles, Lynne Thigpen, Ira Burton, and Lorna Raver, and with guitar solos by Fred Koella.

    Hosted by award-winning writer and broadcast personality Harlan Ellison.

    Jesse

  177. garrett baeza on Thu, 9th Mar 2006 10:14 pm
  178. Your book was the best one i read this year please keep writing because it is nice to read stories from a fellow latter-day saint

  179. garrett baeza on Thu, 9th Mar 2006 10:14 pm
  180. Your book was the best one i read this year please keep writing because it is nice to read stories from a fellow latter-day saint

  181. petdriver on Wed, 15th Mar 2006 10:29 pm
  182. Thanks, I hope to hear something soon. I can be reached at bennievirgil@sbcglobal.net

  183. petdriver on Wed, 15th Mar 2006 10:29 pm
  184. Thanks, I hope to hear something soon. I can be reached at bennievirgil@sbcglobal.net

  185. Mur Lafferty on Tue, 21st Mar 2006 8:20 am
  186. I am humbled by your extremely kind words. :) Thanks so much for posting this!

  187. Mur Lafferty on Tue, 21st Mar 2006 8:20 am
  188. I am humbled by your extremely kind words. :) Thanks so much for posting this!

  189. Medienberatung on Fri, 24th Mar 2006 12:05 pm
  190. Following Weblog informs about the scriptwriter Thea von Harbou:

    http://medienberatung.blogspot.com

    There is also a tillage-possibility for a book about the author.

  191. Medienberatung on Fri, 24th Mar 2006 12:05 pm
  192. Following Weblog informs about the scriptwriter Thea von Harbou:

    http://medienberatung.blogspot.com

    There is also a tillage-possibility for a book about the author.

  193. PaulJ on Tue, 28th Mar 2006 4:53 pm
  194. You’re too kind…

  195. PaulJ on Tue, 28th Mar 2006 4:53 pm
  196. You’re too kind…

  197. Jesse on Wed, 29th Mar 2006 4:45 pm
  198. I second that emoticon!

  199. Jesse on Wed, 29th Mar 2006 4:45 pm
  200. I second that emoticon!

  201. The Time Traveler on Sat, 15th Apr 2006 8:25 pm
  202. Fascinating stuff. All the important stuff of the 50’s and both the light and dark side of the futuristic projections of the time. Ken Hollings talks about UFO’s, The Shaver’s Mysteries, LSD, Microwaves and the Atom bomb and I’ve only listened to the first two episodes.

  203. The Time Traveler on Sat, 15th Apr 2006 8:25 pm
  204. Fascinating stuff. All the important stuff of the 50’s and both the light and dark side of the futuristic projections of the time. Ken Hollings talks about UFO’s, The Shaver’s Mysteries, LSD, Microwaves and the Atom bomb and I’ve only listened to the first two episodes.

  205. David Louis Edelman on Thu, 27th Apr 2006 1:32 pm
  206. Thanks for the pimpage, Jesse! Unfortunately, all I can do is work within the bounds of my contract, which right now says I’m limited to posting seven free chapters.

    I should point out that the entire 30-40 pages of appendices from the book are also up on the Infoquake website, and I’m trying to post original, exclusive material up there every month as well.

    Hope y’all enjoy.

  207. David Louis Edelman on Thu, 27th Apr 2006 1:32 pm
  208. Thanks for the pimpage, Jesse! Unfortunately, all I can do is work within the bounds of my contract, which right now says I’m limited to posting seven free chapters.

    I should point out that the entire 30-40 pages of appendices from the book are also up on the Infoquake website, and I’m trying to post original, exclusive material up there every month as well.

    Hope y’all enjoy.

  209. SamA on Wed, 3rd May 2006 6:35 pm
  210. Thanks Jesse, we are actually trying to get the rights to Air Raid. We are big MacLeish fans at the Workshop. Thanks for the review and the kind words, Fall of the City is one of our favorite productions, both the original and our own.

  211. SamA on Wed, 3rd May 2006 6:35 pm
  212. Thanks Jesse, we are actually trying to get the rights to Air Raid. We are big MacLeish fans at the Workshop. Thanks for the review and the kind words, Fall of the City is one of our favorite productions, both the original and our own.

  213. John Joseph Adams on Sun, 7th May 2006 10:33 pm
  214. I totally agree! That’s a top-notch audiobook right there, and Harlan was the perfect choice as narrator for that one.

  215. John Joseph Adams on Sun, 7th May 2006 10:33 pm
  216. I totally agree! That’s a top-notch audiobook right there, and Harlan was the perfect choice as narrator for that one.

  217. Jesse on Sun, 7th May 2006 10:38 pm
  218. I’m with JJA on this too. I’ve never been what you might call a mighty fan of Bova’s novels but this one stands proudly in my collection and it’s probably mostly because of Ellison – I’d say this is a prime example of a terrific narration elevating a story beyond its textual self.

  219. Jesse on Sun, 7th May 2006 10:38 pm
  220. I’m with JJA on this too. I’ve never been what you might call a mighty fan of Bova’s novels but this one stands proudly in my collection and it’s probably mostly because of Ellison – I’d say this is a prime example of a terrific narration elevating a story beyond its textual self.

  221. The Time Traveler on Tue, 9th May 2006 12:30 pm
  222. It’s funny, Harlan has a raspy, nasally voice. He doesn’t sound like a professional voice narrator. And yet he does it magnificently. One quickly becomes attuned to his voice and it does express a lot of emotion to heighten the drama. Bova’s story is strong and the two together create a synergistically rousing tale.

  223. The Time Traveler on Tue, 9th May 2006 12:30 pm
  224. It’s funny, Harlan has a raspy, nasally voice. He doesn’t sound like a professional voice narrator. And yet he does it magnificently. One quickly becomes attuned to his voice and it does express a lot of emotion to heighten the drama. Bova’s story is strong and the two together create a synergistically rousing tale.

  225. cbcworkerbee on Wed, 10th May 2006 8:03 am
  226. Okay, you were right, it’s really Sara, “Samm” being her nickname.

    According to JMS, the character of Al is based on Samm. We’re busy mixing the show today, it’s supposed to be broadcast over the summer.

    Joe

  227. cbcworkerbee on Wed, 10th May 2006 8:03 am
  228. Okay, you were right, it’s really Sara, “Samm” being her nickname.

    According to JMS, the character of Al is based on Samm. We’re busy mixing the show today, it’s supposed to be broadcast over the summer.

    Joe

  229. IndieMusicGuy on Fri, 16th Jun 2006 2:54 pm
  230. This sounds like a good idea. It seems a way around the problem. My wife is huge into audio books and we’re planning on getting an iPod here in the near future so that will be helpful. Thanks!

    -Froppo
    Liger Music
    Online Music Stores

  231. IndieMusicGuy on Fri, 16th Jun 2006 2:54 pm
  232. This sounds like a good idea. It seems a way around the problem. My wife is huge into audio books and we’re planning on getting an iPod here in the near future so that will be helpful. Thanks!

    -Froppo
    Liger Music
    Online Music Stores

  233. Pete Milan on Wed, 21st Jun 2006 3:42 pm
  234. You should, however, do what you have to do to get your hands on AV’s productions of The Time Machine and The Invisible Man. Because they are incredible.

  235. Pete Milan on Wed, 21st Jun 2006 3:42 pm
  236. You should, however, do what you have to do to get your hands on AV’s productions of The Time Machine and The Invisible Man. Because they are incredible.

  237. Jesse on Thu, 22nd Jun 2006 2:13 pm
  238. Subscribed! :D

  239. Jesse on Wed, 28th Jun 2006 8:41 pm
  240. I agree, I started listening to Star Trek audiobooks back when audiobooks were hard to get and mostly abridged. Unabridged titles will renew my interest. I think one kind of Star Trek audiobook that would work, and that has never been tried is a collection of short stories. One other thing to chuck into the mix, – we can, and I am, listening to the Star Trek Defiant fan produced shows from Pendant Productions (see the link on the online audio page).

  241. Jesse on Wed, 28th Jun 2006 8:41 pm
  242. I agree, I started listening to Star Trek audiobooks back when audiobooks were hard to get and mostly abridged. Unabridged titles will renew my interest. I think one kind of Star Trek audiobook that would work, and that has never been tried is a collection of short stories. One other thing to chuck into the mix, – we can, and I am, listening to the Star Trek Defiant fan produced shows from Pendant Productions (see the link on the online audio page).

  243. Dread Pendragon on Wed, 5th Jul 2006 1:22 pm
  244. Wow, it is great to have so much being produced. However . . . how can I say this nicely? . . . some of the amateur readers make me appreciate professional ones all the more.

  245. Dread Pendragon on Wed, 5th Jul 2006 1:22 pm
  246. Wow, it is great to have so much being produced. However . . . how can I say this nicely? . . . some of the amateur readers make me appreciate professional ones all the more.

  247. Dread Pendragon on Wed, 5th Jul 2006 1:23 pm
  248. I’m in the middle of listening to these. They are surprisingly interesting! Thanks for posting them Jesse.

  249. Dread Pendragon on Wed, 5th Jul 2006 1:23 pm
  250. I’m in the middle of listening to these. They are surprisingly interesting! Thanks for posting them Jesse.

  251. Jesse on Sat, 8th Jul 2006 2:31 pm
  252. I can get past the reading being amateurish if it is a good story. I have more trouble with novels read by multiple readers who are amateurs though. But then again, these are 100% free. ;)

  253. Jesse on Sat, 8th Jul 2006 2:31 pm
  254. I can get past the reading being amateurish if it is a good story. I have more trouble with novels read by multiple readers who are amateurs though. But then again, these are 100% free. ;)

  255. Jesse on Mon, 10th Jul 2006 1:18 pm
  256. Nice review TT. BTW, an unabridged version of The Incredible Shrinking Man was also available from Books On Tape at one time. It was bundled with the Matheson novel that most respect… I Am Legend. I suspect that it will be adapted for unabridged audio again if the recent rumblings about another movie version of it comes to pass. That’ll be cool!

  257. Jesse on Mon, 10th Jul 2006 1:18 pm
  258. Nice review TT. BTW, an unabridged version of The Incredible Shrinking Man was also available from Books On Tape at one time. It was bundled with the Matheson novel that most respect… I Am Legend. I suspect that it will be adapted for unabridged audio again if the recent rumblings about another movie version of it comes to pass. That’ll be cool!

  259. Evo Terra on Mon, 24th Jul 2006 3:27 pm
  260. Dang that guy is cute. Can I get his phone number?

  261. Evo Terra on Mon, 24th Jul 2006 3:27 pm
  262. Dang that guy is cute. Can I get his phone number?

  263. Audio Addict on Fri, 28th Jul 2006 4:39 pm
  264. That is awesome- I have made so many friends through podcasting!

    Are you in Arizona Jesse? If not, then I am a bad bad addict because I haven’t even met Evo in person yet!

    Happy late birthday!!!!! Looks like it was a blast!

    Dani

  265. Audio Addict on Fri, 28th Jul 2006 4:39 pm
  266. That is awesome- I have made so many friends through podcasting!

    Are you in Arizona Jesse? If not, then I am a bad bad addict because I haven’t even met Evo in person yet!

    Happy late birthday!!!!! Looks like it was a blast!

    Dani

  267. Scott on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 12:31 pm
  268. I just listened to this and, as a huge Firefly fan, I can say “not bad”!

    I admit, though, that I don’t quite understand the whole fanfic phenomenon. Obviously, the folks who made this audio drama have some talent in both the writing department and the production department – why not funnel their inspiration into something original and legal?

  269. Scott on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 12:31 pm
  270. I just listened to this and, as a huge Firefly fan, I can say “not bad”!

    I admit, though, that I don’t quite understand the whole fanfic phenomenon. Obviously, the folks who made this audio drama have some talent in both the writing department and the production department – why not funnel their inspiration into something original and legal?

  271. Jesse on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 12:43 pm
  272. I liked it too, some of the acting wasn’t flawless. I too am a big fan of the series.

    BTW it is legal, just so long as they don’t use it for commerical purposes.

    Fanfic is a pretty strange phenomenon,but itleads to some very cool things. The August Dereleth SOLAR PONS stories for example.

  273. Jesse on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 12:43 pm
  274. I liked it too, some of the acting wasn’t flawless. I too am a big fan of the series.

    BTW it is legal, just so long as they don’t use it for commerical purposes.

    Fanfic is a pretty strange phenomenon,but itleads to some very cool things. The August Dereleth SOLAR PONS stories for example.

  275. Scott on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 12:58 pm
  276. I disagree, Jesse. How can fanfic possibly NOT be copyright infringement? I’m certain that there’s nothing in copyright law that says I can use characters from my favorite TV show in any way I want as long as I am not making money. Of course, I’m no legal expert, but I don’t see why fanfic would be treated any differently than other fiction. I think fanfic is something that is tolerated by studios and publishing houses because, hey, these are fans of their work. Why alienate them?

  277. Scott on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 12:58 pm
  278. I disagree, Jesse. How can fanfic possibly NOT be copyright infringement? I’m certain that there’s nothing in copyright law that says I can use characters from my favorite TV show in any way I want as long as I am not making money. Of course, I’m no legal expert, but I don’t see why fanfic would be treated any differently than other fiction. I think fanfic is something that is tolerated by studios and publishing houses because, hey, these are fans of their work. Why alienate them?

  279. Jack on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 7:29 pm
  280. Hi Folks!
    Thanks so much for starting the discussion, and thanks for the comments.
    I’m Jack Ward and I wrote the first episode you just heard. I also played Simon (as best I could) and directed the project.
    Let me give you my thoughts.
    1. Scott said “Why not funnel their inspiration into something original and legal?”
    – Well Scott, as said in the Interview with Danielle Cutler on the podcast of the show, this IS a departure for us.
    If you go to http://www.soniccinema.ca you’ll see all of our stuff with the exception of FFOW is original works.
    We’re in the middle of actually producing a 15 week series that will be heard on XM Satellite Radio called “The Dead Line”. It’s a suspense series in the Hitchcockian (I think I’m seeing the genesis of a new word here) tradition.
    We’re also doing a fantasy western that you’d be interested in for next June. Also original. In fact, we’ve got a schedule filled with no less than 25 original series we are planning currently. All our series will be 15 episodes in length and could be continuing or anthology based- and are everything from suspense, horror, mystery, comedy, drama, science fiction, fantasy and just plain adventure.
    I’m thrilled to write stories of all shapes and sizes.
    I’ve never written a full fan fiction before. This was a summer project that we thought might be fun and get people thinking about all the great stories that haven’t been done yet in Firefly.
    It’s not done for a dime of profit. It’s done strictly to get people to think about getting FF back, and certainly to let people who may not have heard of us before know what we sound like.

    Jesse… We are painfully aware that the acting isn’t flawless. It’s something we’re always struggling with… perhaps the biggest issue that’s always burning on Andrew Dorfman’s and my mind is how we can get the acting better and better.
    Part of doing Old Wounds for us meant in letting some people who want to act with us but have never had the experience, learn some of their chops on this project.
    We feel that for the most part we have done a pretty decent job.
    You’ll find Andrew Dorfman’s amazing SFX abilities and the original sound track a staple in our Sonic Cinema stuff.
    And if you like the style of writing, we’re planning to put up some of our old shows Andrew and I produced a couple years ago to give folks a taste of where we were and where we’re headed.

    We play in Joss Whedon’s playground here with this series, and we’re very happy to have the opportunity.
    But we also think that our main diet is going to be the stories, and the characters we create from our own imaginations.
    Check us out… and give us feedback.. LOTS of feedback.
    I follow the JMS example of wanting to get people involved in seeing the stories grow and mature.
    If folks like a certain series…I’ll make more.
    If a certain series doesn’t resonate, I’ll go to something else.
    It’s all about telling good stories and find more folks out there who love this stuff. :)
    Thanks again… and keep listening. There’s five more episodes to go. Just wait till you see who we discover Book is!
    ;)
    Jack

  281. Jack on Fri, 11th Aug 2006 7:29 pm
  282. Hi Folks!
    Thanks so much for starting the discussion, and thanks for the comments.
    I’m Jack Ward and I wrote the first episode you just heard. I also played Simon (as best I could) and directed the project.
    Let me give you my thoughts.
    1. Scott said “Why not funnel their inspiration into something original and legal?”
    – Well Scott, as said in the Interview with Danielle Cutler on the podcast of the show, this IS a departure for us.
    If you go to http://www.soniccinema.ca you’ll see all of our stuff with the exception of FFOW is original works.
    We’re in the middle of actually producing a 15 week series that will be heard on XM Satellite Radio called “The Dead Line”. It’s a suspense series in the Hitchcockian (I think I’m seeing the genesis of a new word here) tradition.
    We’re also doing a fantasy western that you’d be interested in for next June. Also original. In fact, we’ve got a schedule filled with no less than 25 original series we are planning currently. All our series will be 15 episodes in length and could be continuing or anthology based- and are everything from suspense, horror, mystery, comedy, drama, science fiction, fantasy and just plain adventure.
    I’m thrilled to write stories of all shapes and sizes.
    I’ve never written a full fan fiction before. This was a summer project that we thought might be fun and get people thinking about all the great stories that haven’t been done yet in Firefly.
    It’s not done for a dime of profit. It’s done strictly to get people to think about getting FF back, and certainly to let people who may not have heard of us before know what we sound like.

    Jesse… We are painfully aware that the acting isn’t flawless. It’s something we’re always struggling with… perhaps the biggest issue that’s always burning on Andrew Dorfman’s and my mind is how we can get the acting better and better.
    Part of doing Old Wounds for us meant in letting some people who want to act with us but have never had the experience, learn some of their chops on this project.
    We feel that for the most part we have done a pretty decent job.
    You’ll find Andrew Dorfman’s amazing SFX abilities and the original sound track a staple in our Sonic Cinema stuff.
    And if you like the style of writing, we’re planning to put up some of our old shows Andrew and I produced a couple years ago to give folks a taste of where we were and where we’re headed.

    We play in Joss Whedon’s playground here with this series, and we’re very happy to have the opportunity.
    But we also think that our main diet is going to be the stories, and the characters we create from our own imaginations.
    Check us out… and give us feedback.. LOTS of feedback.
    I follow the JMS example of wanting to get people involved in seeing the stories grow and mature.
    If folks like a certain series…I’ll make more.
    If a certain series doesn’t resonate, I’ll go to something else.
    It’s all about telling good stories and find more folks out there who love this stuff. :)
    Thanks again… and keep listening. There’s five more episodes to go. Just wait till you see who we discover Book is!
    ;)
    Jack

  283. Jesse on Sat, 12th Aug 2006 11:42 am
  284. Scott, you asked: “How can fanfic possibly NOT be copyright infringement?”

    I’m not a lawyer, so of course my legal opinions should carry no weight unless my argument is used successfully to get some poor fanfic producer off the hook in a suit. As far as I am aware that test has not come. So here’s my answer: “When you aren’t sued it isn’t illegal.” Yes, Firefly is a copyrighted work, as are virtually all fanfic works. But the test of the legality of fanfic comes not from whether or not the law declares it as such in similar specific cases, but rather whether one is sued or not over particular cases. Copyright law is a big civil law stick that is there to be used to prevent the commerical theft of a copyholder’s property rights when the copyright holder wants to use it. If they don’t use it (or don’t want to use it) to speak of it being illegal is equivilent to saying that touching a stranger’s hand without specific permission is assault and so should never be done. I don’t want to live in that world – so if that is the world I’m in I’m outta here. If we were talking about criminal law I think we’d agree that fanfic was all but officially decriminalized. Lets looks at the facts: Fanfic is 100% legal to possess and it is about 99.9% legal (that is it is generally unprosecuted) to produce. You can also distribute it for non-commerical consumption unless you get a threatinging letter. More info on the illegality/legality of fanfic can be found here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_issues_with_fan_fiction

    Jack, and the rest of the Sonic Cinema crew:

    Up with Firefly: Old Wounds!

    Up with The Dead Line and WAVEFRONT too!

  285. Jesse on Sat, 12th Aug 2006 11:42 am
  286. Scott, you asked: “How can fanfic possibly NOT be copyright infringement?”

    I’m not a lawyer, so of course my legal opinions should carry no weight unless my argument is used successfully to get some poor fanfic producer off the hook in a suit. As far as I am aware that test has not come. So here’s my answer: “When you aren’t sued it isn’t illegal.” Yes, Firefly is a copyrighted work, as are virtually all fanfic works. But the test of the legality of fanfic comes not from whether or not the law declares it as such in similar specific cases, but rather whether one is sued or not over particular cases. Copyright law is a big civil law stick that is there to be used to prevent the commerical theft of a copyholder’s property rights when the copyright holder wants to use it. If they don’t use it (or don’t want to use it) to speak of it being illegal is equivilent to saying that touching a stranger’s hand without specific permission is assault and so should never be done. I don’t want to live in that world – so if that is the world I’m in I’m outta here. If we were talking about criminal law I think we’d agree that fanfic was all but officially decriminalized. Lets looks at the facts: Fanfic is 100% legal to possess and it is about 99.9% legal (that is it is generally unprosecuted) to produce. You can also distribute it for non-commerical consumption unless you get a threatinging letter. More info on the illegality/legality of fanfic can be found here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_issues_with_fan_fiction

    Jack, and the rest of the Sonic Cinema crew:

    Up with Firefly: Old Wounds!

    Up with The Dead Line and WAVEFRONT too!

  287. Jesse on Tue, 22nd Aug 2006 2:36 am
  288. Listened to all the available episodes so far. This show is really, really, really good. The acting is excellent, the writing is well thought out and the soundscape is very cool. Add in that it’s pretty funny and this one’s a keeper! Thanks Dani!

  289. Jesse on Tue, 22nd Aug 2006 2:36 am
  290. Listened to all the available episodes so far. This show is really, really, really good. The acting is excellent, the writing is well thought out and the soundscape is very cool. Add in that it’s pretty funny and this one’s a keeper! Thanks Dani!

  291. Jack on Wed, 23rd Aug 2006 4:45 am
  292. Lot’s of people claim to be writers… J.C. Hutchins is the real deal- giving us one of the best potboiler thrillers in years.
    Podcast or hard copy. You’d do well to treat yourself to Descent and get a glimpse in the world of the clones.

    Who knows… maybe some day we’ll see him do an audio drama treatment.
    We can only hope!
    Jack Ward
    The Sonic Society
    http://www.sonicsociety.org

  293. Jack on Wed, 23rd Aug 2006 4:45 am
  294. Lot’s of people claim to be writers… J.C. Hutchins is the real deal- giving us one of the best potboiler thrillers in years.
    Podcast or hard copy. You’d do well to treat yourself to Descent and get a glimpse in the world of the clones.

    Who knows… maybe some day we’ll see him do an audio drama treatment.
    We can only hope!
    Jack Ward
    The Sonic Society
    http://www.sonicsociety.org

  295. szrama on Sat, 26th Aug 2006 10:33 am
  296. I agree… I listen to Second Shift while working and can’t get enough… I almost wish I had found it a year down the road so I’d have a whole season to listen to all at once! Now I look forward to release dates. ^_^

  297. szrama on Sat, 26th Aug 2006 10:33 am
  298. I agree… I listen to Second Shift while working and can’t get enough… I almost wish I had found it a year down the road so I’d have a whole season to listen to all at once! Now I look forward to release dates. ^_^

  299. Nick on Sat, 2nd Sep 2006 3:24 pm
  300. I really hope these guys succeed, but I fear that by not paying attention to the details, they’ll lose too many of their potential audience. I also hope they are open to feedback. I sent them an email explaining why I’d found their registration process difficult, and they didn’t seem to get it. After they didn’t like a comment I made in another emaik, I got a sarcastic response.

    They had information on the site that the second edition would be out in July, and even in late August there was nothing to say what was happening. Any casual visitor would assume the site was dead, and maybe not come back to check.
    After they’d sent out an email saying that the second edition was live, they still didn’t update the homepage for a while.
    On their homepage they have an audio file, which plays by default, which is very annoying, especially if you happen to be listening to something else at the time.
    They are clear trying very hard to find ways of attracting subscriptions for money, or people to download. Yet, on the homepage, there are links to an RSS feed for any podcatcher, and the link just doesn’t work. There’s nothing there. The download through itunes is in m4a format, which just isn’t going to work on lots of mp3 players.
    For the first edition they used a bit rate for the mp3s of 160kbps, which is just not necessary, creating files that are far larger than they need to be.

    If you’re after as many ears as possible, these are the sort of details that need to be fixed.

  301. Nick on Sat, 2nd Sep 2006 3:24 pm
  302. I really hope these guys succeed, but I fear that by not paying attention to the details, they’ll lose too many of their potential audience. I also hope they are open to feedback. I sent them an email explaining why I’d found their registration process difficult, and they didn’t seem to get it. After they didn’t like a comment I made in another emaik, I got a sarcastic response.

    They had information on the site that the second edition would be out in July, and even in late August there was nothing to say what was happening. Any casual visitor would assume the site was dead, and maybe not come back to check.
    After they’d sent out an email saying that the second edition was live, they still didn’t update the homepage for a while.
    On their homepage they have an audio file, which plays by default, which is very annoying, especially if you happen to be listening to something else at the time.
    They are clear trying very hard to find ways of attracting subscriptions for money, or people to download. Yet, on the homepage, there are links to an RSS feed for any podcatcher, and the link just doesn’t work. There’s nothing there. The download through itunes is in m4a format, which just isn’t going to work on lots of mp3 players.
    For the first edition they used a bit rate for the mp3s of 160kbps, which is just not necessary, creating files that are far larger than they need to be.

    If you’re after as many ears as possible, these are the sort of details that need to be fixed.

  303. Jesse on Mon, 4th Sep 2006 6:58 pm
  304. Nick, you’ve clearly thought this through and I think the points you make are all valid.

    Upon closer inspection the files distributed through their free podcast are indeed as you said not MP3s (that surprised me), they are showing up as AAC files in my iTunes podcasts folder. As you say, they are probably enclosed AACs (M4As as you said). I will change the post to reflect that detail.

    Though extremely pretty the MechMuse website IS harder to navigate than I’d like too. Also, the RSS link IS currently broken as well. All valid points.

    Despite all these problems I’m extremely enthusiastic about MechMuse because of its astonishingly high quality of content. If MechMuse can get past these birthing difficulties I’d expect there to be nothing but praise headed MechMuse’s way in the months to come.

  305. Jesse on Mon, 4th Sep 2006 6:58 pm
  306. Nick, you’ve clearly thought this through and I think the points you make are all valid.

    Upon closer inspection the files distributed through their free podcast are indeed as you said not MP3s (that surprised me), they are showing up as AAC files in my iTunes podcasts folder. As you say, they are probably enclosed AACs (M4As as you said). I will change the post to reflect that detail.

    Though extremely pretty the MechMuse website IS harder to navigate than I’d like too. Also, the RSS link IS currently broken as well. All valid points.

    Despite all these problems I’m extremely enthusiastic about MechMuse because of its astonishingly high quality of content. If MechMuse can get past these birthing difficulties I’d expect there to be nothing but praise headed MechMuse’s way in the months to come.

  307. Jesse on Mon, 11th Sep 2006 2:13 pm
  308. That’d bhe an interesting audio drama actually, consider, all those clones could be played by one talented voice actor. The dramatic scene of the president being shot in the morning sunlight by a 4 year ol — I can metnally picture (or rather hear) it now. Somebody should suggest this to Hutch!

  309. Jesse on Mon, 11th Sep 2006 2:13 pm
  310. That’d bhe an interesting audio drama actually, consider, all those clones could be played by one talented voice actor. The dramatic scene of the president being shot in the morning sunlight by a 4 year ol — I can metnally picture (or rather hear) it now. Somebody should suggest this to Hutch!

  311. Jesse on Sat, 16th Sep 2006 1:53 pm
  312. Couple of things:

    I had to look it up: “Jeesh” is Orson Scott Card’s Enderverse word meaning “posse” or “clique.”

    Question for ya. Achilles was pronounced Ah-sheel in some of the other audiobooks in this series. Does that happen in this audiobook too?

  313. Jesse on Sat, 16th Sep 2006 1:53 pm
  314. Couple of things:

    I had to look it up: “Jeesh” is Orson Scott Card’s Enderverse word meaning “posse” or “clique.”

    Question for ya. Achilles was pronounced Ah-sheel in some of the other audiobooks in this series. Does that happen in this audiobook too?

  315. Wally Nut on Thu, 28th Sep 2006 9:45 pm
  316. Thanks for pulling together some of the history of this work. I have just posted some comments about the movie related to the whole issue of fear on my blog in case you are interested.

  317. Wally Nut on Thu, 28th Sep 2006 9:45 pm
  318. Thanks for pulling together some of the history of this work. I have just posted some comments about the movie related to the whole issue of fear on my blog in case you are interested.

  319. Jesse on Fri, 29th Sep 2006 1:06 am
  320. I found the ideas in V For Vendetta to be extremely powerful. Fear is a fundamental emotion, and the ideas V had about fear are extremely compelling. I don’t know if they are true in real life, but in terms of narrative they are damn true! Good on ya Wally.

  321. Jesse on Fri, 29th Sep 2006 1:06 am
  322. I found the ideas in V For Vendetta to be extremely powerful. Fear is a fundamental emotion, and the ideas V had about fear are extremely compelling. I don’t know if they are true in real life, but in terms of narrative they are damn true! Good on ya Wally.

  323. Audio Addict on Sat, 30th Sep 2006 6:14 pm
  324. And it was an excellent interview- they are the two best people to talk to! But I know this from experience. :-)

    Dani

  325. Audio Addict on Sat, 30th Sep 2006 6:14 pm
  326. And it was an excellent interview- they are the two best people to talk to! But I know this from experience. :-)

    Dani

  327. Hector on Sun, 1st Oct 2006 2:49 pm
  328. Thank you! I appreciate the link, and the feling is mutual.You rule!

    Hector

  329. Hector on Sun, 1st Oct 2006 2:49 pm
  330. Thank you! I appreciate the link, and the feling is mutual.You rule!

    Hector

  331. Scott on Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 2:26 pm
  332. Ted Chiang is one of the genre’s finest writers. He’s got a short story collection (not on audio) out called “Stories of Your Life and Others” which contains nearly everything he’s published. I can’t recommend it highly enough.

    And this recording of “Understand” (a story that is in that collection I mentioned) is first-rate.

  333. Scott on Mon, 2nd Oct 2006 2:26 pm
  334. Ted Chiang is one of the genre’s finest writers. He’s got a short story collection (not on audio) out called “Stories of Your Life and Others” which contains nearly everything he’s published. I can’t recommend it highly enough.

    And this recording of “Understand” (a story that is in that collection I mentioned) is first-rate.

  335. Scott on Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 1:56 pm
  336. Yeah! Crazy Dog!!!!

  337. Scott on Tue, 3rd Oct 2006 1:56 pm
  338. Yeah! Crazy Dog!!!!

  339. Evo Terra on Thu, 5th Oct 2006 10:14 pm
  340. Hi Scott,

    I don’t disagree with you. I’ve only been exposed to a few audio dramas in podcast form, so I can’t speak to the level of quality on the field right now.

    But I have listened to just about every podcast novel (it’s OK to call them a podiobook, I won’t sue) on the menu. Granted, some of them do sound “amateurish” and more than one sound downright awful. While the barrier to entry of creating quality audio is most certainly coming down, not everyone takes the time to get it right.

    And I think that’s a shame, because there is no reason why user generated content needs can’t meet the same level of the pro studios. There exists a stigma beyond your “free must be of lower quality” which is even worse. It’s the “you can’t possibly do as well on your own as you can do with pro-grade equipment and personnel” attitude of which I speak. But it’s not true. You can find that person with a great voice and a gift for reading. They exist. You can buy a great mic and build your own noise-free recording studio in your basement. It’s been done. You can be a rabid fan of high quality audio post production and edit like a pro with the computer you own an a couple hundred bucks in software. It happens all the time.

    But when that all does come together, then I think it’s quite acceptable to stack those shining stars up against the pro audio books. I’ve heard more than one more-than-free audio book recorded that sets my skin a-crawlin’ and much of what I’ve heard from the podiobook world is on par with the most average of audio books. Simultaneously, I’ve heard free podiobooks which I think are worthy of going up against the best $60 audio book.

    Maybe we’ll change the old saying to “don’t judge an audio book by its price tag” in the future?

  341. Evo Terra on Thu, 5th Oct 2006 10:14 pm
  342. Hi Scott,

    I don’t disagree with you. I’ve only been exposed to a few audio dramas in podcast form, so I can’t speak to the level of quality on the field right now.

    But I have listened to just about every podcast novel (it’s OK to call them a podiobook, I won’t sue) on the menu. Granted, some of them do sound “amateurish” and more than one sound downright awful. While the barrier to entry of creating quality audio is most certainly coming down, not everyone takes the time to get it right.

    And I think that’s a shame, because there is no reason why user generated content needs can’t meet the same level of the pro studios. There exists a stigma beyond your “free must be of lower quality” which is even worse. It’s the “you can’t possibly do as well on your own as you can do with pro-grade equipment and personnel” attitude of which I speak. But it’s not true. You can find that person with a great voice and a gift for reading. They exist. You can buy a great mic and build your own noise-free recording studio in your basement. It’s been done. You can be a rabid fan of high quality audio post production and edit like a pro with the computer you own an a couple hundred bucks in software. It happens all the time.

    But when that all does come together, then I think it’s quite acceptable to stack those shining stars up against the pro audio books. I’ve heard more than one more-than-free audio book recorded that sets my skin a-crawlin’ and much of what I’ve heard from the podiobook world is on par with the most average of audio books. Simultaneously, I’ve heard free podiobooks which I think are worthy of going up against the best $60 audio book.

    Maybe we’ll change the old saying to “don’t judge an audio book by its price tag” in the future?

  343. Jesse on Thu, 5th Oct 2006 10:18 pm
  344. You raise some very interesting issues here my friend.

    When I suggested Pendant Productions was one of “two rivals in my affection [as] best audio drama umbrella group” I was saying, as umbrella groups go, Pendant is in my mind, one of two rivals for top spot. An umbrella group like, as in an organization that represents and supports separate smaller bodies with common interests. One person doesn’t run all the shows, even though a promintent figure, he or she, may help produce many or all of the shows. What I’m saying is, these two groups, and I’ll just say which two…

    Pendant Productions

    http://www.pendantaudio.com

    Darker Projects

    http://www.darkerprojects.com

    are the two most reliable in terms of entertainment. There are others, to be sure, but these stand out in my mind as being THE top two (of the moment).

    That isn’t to say nobody has done audio drama better. My god, NO, there have been STUNNING efforts by the BBC, the CBC and even the Bradbury 13. Programs from these giants, which are not umbrella audio drama groups BTW, typically stand head and shoulders above Darker Projects and Pendant’s Productions.

    As to the double standard of excellence in commentary and review, I think you are correct. Firefly Old Wounds is not Firefly the former, has amateur actors. The latter had Joss Whedon. Almost enough said. The guys at Sonic Cinema know this. They know they aren’t going to achieve Firefly with Firefly: Old Wounds. Damn it, they shouldn’t be expected to! Amateur actors bring less to the stage (pun intended). As I’m sure you are aware Scott, amateur productions have their place. We don’t insist that Summer Stock actors be on the same level as National Theater actors. And yet we can enjoy and look forward to an amateur production of Romeo And Juliet in either venue. Especially when we consider those people up there on the stage cool. I think the Darker Projects people, wheoever they are, are cool. I’ve barely communicated with the guy executive producing at Pendant and I think he’s cool. He and his people are doing cool work, for love and sharing it. I like that, and you know what, it probably makes me like it more than it deserves. But if I am genuinely enjoying it as much as I am, how can I bring it down by saying… This is only my opinion. I can’t. I WON’T, my opinion is valuable damn it! ;)

    LOL!

    One point I think needs making too. Most audio drama is free anyway, or the equivilent of free, The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy was given away (on the radio). Dirk Maggs’ productions are available for purchase, but they are ususally given away on the radio first.

    Now here’s the rub, I couldn’t possibly call even half of the audio drama’s I’ve heard on the radio “excellent”! There are crappily written, badly paced, badly acted and hideously unfunny audio dramas that were done as professional productions, it’s just that there are MORE of them in podcasting. The barrier to production is lower, in some sense, and higher in others.

    Nobody at Darker Projects is doing audio drama to get rich. And yet many of the audio dramas that appear on BBC Radio are by actors who don’t have any interest in “the work,” it is a job, something they do to pay the rent. For me it all starts with story. If the story is compelling, the acting is less important. With Fan Fiction, like Pendant’s numerous superhero series or Darker Project’s Star Trek series, the story is bootstrapped, we already know the formula, the writers of the fan fic audio drama have the possibility of acheiving Star Trek like quality. And let me tell you sometimes they exceed the original by a wide margin. I cried my way through most of Star Trek Voyager. I havent’ done that with the audio fan fic.

    You suggest that people like Dirk Maggs, Roger Gregg, and Yuri Rasovsky are making quality, and I agree. But is it always 10 times better than the best of the amateurs? I think not.

    As for a single standard of excellence in reviews, I’m not sure how objective we can be. Rating each aspect of a production, story, acting, production, doesn’t seem like it’d be capable of encapsulating the feeling I get when I hear a excellent (if amateur) production.

    You said “If a piece of amateur audio drama garners a great review, it ought to compare favorably with a professional piece of audio drama that also got a great review.” I agree with this. I just happen to think there is a hell-of-a-lot of good work being done by a select group of amateurs.

    As for podcast novels. I am in complete agreement. Thus far, of the podiobooks I’ve reviewed, there hasn’t been a single podcast novel that even compared with Robert A. Heinlein’s The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, or William Gibson’s Neuromancer. But few regular audiobooks get such high praise.

    The thing of it is, right now I’m listening to a contender for best Podiobook I’ve ever heard, and thus far it is better than a signifcant number of regular audiobooks I’ve heard this year. It remains to be seen if I will feel that way when I finish it, but right now, I’m eager to hear each instalment, laughing out loud at the funny parts and marvelling at the diamond hardness of the Hard SF. I’m loving it.

    Anybody have a problem with that? ;)

  345. Jesse on Thu, 5th Oct 2006 10:18 pm
  346. You raise some very interesting issues here my friend.

    When I suggested Pendant Productions was one of “two rivals in my affection [as] best audio drama umbrella group” I was saying, as umbrella groups go, Pendant is in my mind, one of two rivals for top spot. An umbrella group like, as in an organization that represents and supports separate smaller bodies with common interests. One person doesn’t run all the shows, even though a promintent figure, he or she, may help produce many or all of the shows. What I’m saying is, these two groups, and I’ll just say which two…

    Pendant Productions

    http://www.pendantaudio.com

    Darker Projects

    http://www.darkerprojects.com

    are the two most reliable in terms of entertainment. There are others, to be sure, but these stand out in my mind as being THE top two (of the moment).

    That isn’t to say nobody has done audio drama better. My god, NO, there have been STUNNING efforts by the BBC, the CBC and even the Bradbury 13. Programs from these giants, which are not umbrella audio drama groups BTW, typically stand head and shoulders above Darker Projects and Pendant’s Productions.

    As to the double standard of excellence in commentary and review, I think you are correct. Firefly Old Wounds is not Firefly the former, has amateur actors. The latter had Joss Whedon. Almost enough said. The guys at Sonic Cinema know this. They know they aren’t going to achieve Firefly with Firefly: Old Wounds. Damn it, they shouldn’t be expected to! Amateur actors bring less to the stage (pun intended). As I’m sure you are aware Scott, amateur productions have their place. We don’t insist that Summer Stock actors be on the same level as National Theater actors. And yet we can enjoy and look forward to an amateur production of Romeo And Juliet in either venue. Especially when we consider those people up there on the stage cool. I think the Darker Projects people, wheoever they are, are cool. I’ve barely communicated with the guy executive producing at Pendant and I think he’s cool. He and his people are doing cool work, for love and sharing it. I like that, and you know what, it probably makes me like it more than it deserves. But if I am genuinely enjoying it as much as I am, how can I bring it down by saying… This is only my opinion. I can’t. I WON’T, my opinion is valuable damn it! ;)

    LOL!

    One point I think needs making too. Most audio drama is free anyway, or the equivilent of free, The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy was given away (on the radio). Dirk Maggs’ productions are available for purchase, but they are ususally given away on the radio first.

    Now here’s the rub, I couldn’t possibly call even half of the audio drama’s I’ve heard on the radio “excellent”! There are crappily written, badly paced, badly acted and hideously unfunny audio dramas that were done as professional productions, it’s just that there are MORE of them in podcasting. The barrier to production is lower, in some sense, and higher in others.

    Nobody at Darker Projects is doing audio drama to get rich. And yet many of the audio dramas that appear on BBC Radio are by actors who don’t have any interest in “the work,” it is a job, something they do to pay the rent. For me it all starts with story. If the story is compelling, the acting is less important. With Fan Fiction, like Pendant’s numerous superhero series or Darker Project’s Star Trek series, the story is bootstrapped, we already know the formula, the writers of the fan fic audio drama have the possibility of acheiving Star Trek like quality. And let me tell you sometimes they exceed the original by a wide margin. I cried my way through most of Star Trek Voyager. I havent’ done that with the audio fan fic.

    You suggest that people like Dirk Maggs, Roger Gregg, and Yuri Rasovsky are making quality, and I agree. But is it always 10 times better than the best of the amateurs? I think not.

    As for a single standard of excellence in reviews, I’m not sure how objective we can be. Rating each aspect of a production, story, acting, production, doesn’t seem like it’d be capable of encapsulating the feeling I get when I hear a excellent (if amateur) production.

    You said “If a piece of amateur audio drama garners a great review, it ought to compare favorably with a professional piece of audio drama that also got a great review.” I agree with this. I just happen to think there is a hell-of-a-lot of good work being done by a select group of amateurs.

    As for podcast novels. I am in complete agreement. Thus far, of the podiobooks I’ve reviewed, there hasn’t been a single podcast novel that even compared with Robert A. Heinlein’s The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, or William Gibson’s Neuromancer. But few regular audiobooks get such high praise.

    The thing of it is, right now I’m listening to a contender for best Podiobook I’ve ever heard, and thus far it is better than a signifcant number of regular audiobooks I’ve heard this year. It remains to be seen if I will feel that way when I finish it, but right now, I’m eager to hear each instalment, laughing out loud at the funny parts and marvelling at the diamond hardness of the Hard SF. I’m loving it.

    Anybody have a problem with that? ;)

  347. Scott on Fri, 6th Oct 2006 8:26 am
  348. Evo and Jesse,

    Evo brings up an excellent point. The simple fact that an audiobook comes in a shiny box does not make it a better audiobook. Surely there are good readers reading good work in the podiobook world. I just want to make sure that we are not giving them a free hall pass on this site just because there’s no cover art.

    Things are certainly changing. Four years ago, when Jesse and I started this site, podcasting didn’t even exist. I daresay that podcasting is well on the way to changing everything. Its main appeal to me is the its ability to find the target audience. Programs that couldn’t exist in a mainstream radio market can exist – and thrive – on the internet because eager listeners can find these shows. What does this mean to the audiobook industry? I’m not sure yet.

    Jesse:
    Yes, I certainly do think there’s a place for amateurs. Without question. Hell, I’m an amateur at nearly everything I do in the science fiction world. And yes, these folks are cool. Everyone I’ve met (in person, or via e-mail) in the podcasting world are folks I would love to hang out with. These people share my interests more often than not.

    And you are upfront in saying that perhaps you do have a bias there. You are treating it a bit different – your points about the overall quality of modern audio drama are taken. Is the stuff always “10 times better”? Absolutely not. But the best of it – 2000X, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, The Last Harbinger, Hitchhiker’s – damn, it’s wonderful stuff. (Fanfic is a completely separate issue. I still admit that I don’t understand its general appeal, audio drama or not. As such I won’t attempt to review them.)

    This is a general reviewing philosophical dilemma. If I look at myself and my own reviews and commentary, do I review a YA book differently than I do one aimed at an adult audience? Yes, I do. Do I review a piece of military SF differently than I do a piece of hard SF (my personal favorite subgenre)? Yes, I do. I probably review the hard SF a bit tighter, since my expectations are higher.

    And THERE is the crux of the issue, no? Expectations. Does the work succeed as what it is? When I listen to an audio drama, I want something that approaches the best of my experience with them. If the acting isn’t believable, the background sound too loud, the score inappropriate, the script poorly written – well, I don’t know if it’s right for me to say, OK, this is amateur work, so I’ll go ahead and review it as such.

    And I’m very eager to hear your “contender for best Podiobook you’ve ever heard”!

  349. Scott on Fri, 6th Oct 2006 8:26 am
  350. Evo and Jesse,

    Evo brings up an excellent point. The simple fact that an audiobook comes in a shiny box does not make it a better audiobook. Surely there are good readers reading good work in the podiobook world. I just want to make sure that we are not giving them a free hall pass on this site just because there’s no cover art.

    Things are certainly changing. Four years ago, when Jesse and I started this site, podcasting didn’t even exist. I daresay that podcasting is well on the way to changing everything. Its main appeal to me is the its ability to find the target audience. Programs that couldn’t exist in a mainstream radio market can exist – and thrive – on the internet because eager listeners can find these shows. What does this mean to the audiobook industry? I’m not sure yet.

    Jesse:
    Yes, I certainly do think there’s a place for amateurs. Without question. Hell, I’m an amateur at nearly everything I do in the science fiction world. And yes, these folks are cool. Everyone I’ve met (in person, or via e-mail) in the podcasting world are folks I would love to hang out with. These people share my interests more often than not.

    And you are upfront in saying that perhaps you do have a bias there. You are treating it a bit different – your points about the overall quality of modern audio drama are taken. Is the stuff always “10 times better”? Absolutely not. But the best of it – 2000X, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, The Last Harbinger, Hitchhiker’s – damn, it’s wonderful stuff. (Fanfic is a completely separate issue. I still admit that I don’t understand its general appeal, audio drama or not. As such I won’t attempt to review them.)

    This is a general reviewing philosophical dilemma. If I look at myself and my own reviews and commentary, do I review a YA book differently than I do one aimed at an adult audience? Yes, I do. Do I review a piece of military SF differently than I do a piece of hard SF (my personal favorite subgenre)? Yes, I do. I probably review the hard SF a bit tighter, since my expectations are higher.

    And THERE is the crux of the issue, no? Expectations. Does the work succeed as what it is? When I listen to an audio drama, I want something that approaches the best of my experience with them. If the acting isn’t believable, the background sound too loud, the score inappropriate, the script poorly written – well, I don’t know if it’s right for me to say, OK, this is amateur work, so I’ll go ahead and review it as such.

    And I’m very eager to hear your “contender for best Podiobook you’ve ever heard”!

  351. Jesse on Fri, 6th Oct 2006 12:55 pm
  352. There is an interesting thread on the crappity of blog reviews over on SFsignal:

    http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/004303.html

    I also note that, the PC Gamer Podcast’s 50th show ( http://www.pcgamerpodcast.com/?p=92 ) had a fascinating discussion about the use of a ratings scale and review or criticsim theory. The crux of it was, if you don’t use the full range, between 0 stars and 5 stars, for reviews (or between 0 and 100%), that this says more about you than it does the game or book. They’ve never given a game a full 100%, nearly every game that is reviewed is well above the 50% mark. The only way to suss-out what the ratings scale means is by reading all their textual reviews, which kind of makes the STAR or PERCENTAGE system only useful for marketing of the highly rated games. They typically agonize over the rating of games between 90 and 98 percent. This means that for all intents and purposes, if you’ve got a great game, there is an additional scale for just how great it is symbolized by numbers.

    Or to quote that meta-critical philosoper Nigel tufnel:
    “These go to eleven.”

    As for the Poiobook that has me so fired up, I’ll keep that under wraps (publicly) until I finish it.

  353. Jesse on Fri, 6th Oct 2006 12:55 pm
  354. There is an interesting thread on the crappity of blog reviews over on SFsignal:

    http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/004303.html

    I also note that, the PC Gamer Podcast’s 50th show ( http://www.pcgamerpodcast.com/?p=92 ) had a fascinating discussion about the use of a ratings scale and review or criticsim theory. The crux of it was, if you don’t use the full range, between 0 stars and 5 stars, for reviews (or between 0 and 100%), that this says more about you than it does the game or book. They’ve never given a game a full 100%, nearly every game that is reviewed is well above the 50% mark. The only way to suss-out what the ratings scale means is by reading all their textual reviews, which kind of makes the STAR or PERCENTAGE system only useful for marketing of the highly rated games. They typically agonize over the rating of games between 90 and 98 percent. This means that for all intents and purposes, if you’ve got a great game, there is an additional scale for just how great it is symbolized by numbers.

    Or to quote that meta-critical philosoper Nigel tufnel:
    “These go to eleven.”

    As for the Poiobook that has me so fired up, I’ll keep that under wraps (publicly) until I finish it.

  355. Kurt on Fri, 6th Oct 2006 1:48 pm
  356. Test

  357. Kurt on Fri, 6th Oct 2006 1:48 pm
  358. Test

  359. Audio Addict on Mon, 9th Oct 2006 5:04 pm
  360. Part two of that sexy devil is tomorrow night!

    Dani

  361. Audio Addict on Mon, 9th Oct 2006 5:04 pm
  362. Part two of that sexy devil is tomorrow night!

    Dani

  363. Jesse on Mon, 9th Oct 2006 10:53 pm
  364. Moriond, thanks! Do you know if the Internet Archive have the complete run of both shows?

  365. Jesse on Mon, 9th Oct 2006 10:53 pm
  366. Moriond, thanks! Do you know if the Internet Archive have the complete run of both shows?

  367. moriond on Tue, 10th Oct 2006 1:57 am
  368. There are 42 of the 46 episodes from Dimension X. Missing are 3 Heinlein shows (The Green Hills of Earth, The Roads Must Roll, and Universe) and one show (Zero Hour) by Ray Bradbury. However, you can find their counterparts under X Minus 1.

    Jesse, it’s difficult to answer your question about the X Minus 1 shows, because the episode names appear to be tagged by broadcast or recording date, and this archive appears to include the instances when X Minus 1 rebroadcast the original Dimension X episode, as in the case for The Parade. I count a total of 126 episodes in the archive for X Minus 1 and 12 titles that appear twice. It seems to me as though every show from X Minus 1 is in the archives.

  369. moriond on Tue, 10th Oct 2006 1:57 am
  370. There are 42 of the 46 episodes from Dimension X. Missing are 3 Heinlein shows (The Green Hills of Earth, The Roads Must Roll, and Universe) and one show (Zero Hour) by Ray Bradbury. However, you can find their counterparts under X Minus 1.

    Jesse, it’s difficult to answer your question about the X Minus 1 shows, because the episode names appear to be tagged by broadcast or recording date, and this archive appears to include the instances when X Minus 1 rebroadcast the original Dimension X episode, as in the case for The Parade. I count a total of 126 episodes in the archive for X Minus 1 and 12 titles that appear twice. It seems to me as though every show from X Minus 1 is in the archives.

  371. Anonymous on Tue, 10th Oct 2006 6:48 am
  372. Commenting at this stage probably amounts to talking into the wind, but I’ll give it a go anyway.

    I think there are a lot of people who are quite new to audio drama whose listening experiences are thus far limited to the readily available amateur productions highlighted here recently. Or maybe that’s just me. I suggest a series of reviews of some older productions for the audio neophyte. For instance, I only just recently discovered ZBS productions and have been listening to it non-stop ever since. To an extent the Sonic Society has really filled this gap in, introducing a number of shows that are inarguably “the good stuff” (for instance, the Soul Patrol and Crazy Dog). But it would be nice to know what the more experienced listeners here hold out as the gold standard, so the less experienced listeners may profit. And none of that is to say that there is any less value in what are being referred to here as amateur productions. I am greatly enjoying Old Wounds and my sincere thanks go out to Jack and Andrew for there efforts. But, at the same time, I’m really enjoying listening to the Fourth Tower of Inverness and Ruby Too and Bill Lizard. Again, maybe it’s just me and maybe I am not representative of your readership, but that’s what I would like to see.

  373. Anonymous on Tue, 10th Oct 2006 6:48 am
  374. Commenting at this stage probably amounts to talking into the wind, but I’ll give it a go anyway.

    I think there are a lot of people who are quite new to audio drama whose listening experiences are thus far limited to the readily available amateur productions highlighted here recently. Or maybe that’s just me. I suggest a series of reviews of some older productions for the audio neophyte. For instance, I only just recently discovered ZBS productions and have been listening to it non-stop ever since. To an extent the Sonic Society has really filled this gap in, introducing a number of shows that are inarguably “the good stuff” (for instance, the Soul Patrol and Crazy Dog). But it would be nice to know what the more experienced listeners here hold out as the gold standard, so the less experienced listeners may profit. And none of that is to say that there is any less value in what are being referred to here as amateur productions. I am greatly enjoying Old Wounds and my sincere thanks go out to Jack and Andrew for there efforts. But, at the same time, I’m really enjoying listening to the Fourth Tower of Inverness and Ruby Too and Bill Lizard. Again, maybe it’s just me and maybe I am not representative of your readership, but that’s what I would like to see.

  375. Jesse on Tue, 10th Oct 2006 2:55 pm
  376. Brad, I think you are right. Audio Drama is a strange beast. Persons in the UK, Ireland and Canada are probably more often exposed to it in the form of modern Radio Drama than are most American citizens. Yet I assume most of the SFFaudio readership is US based. Certainly most amateur Audio Drama in production seems to be coming from the USA.

    We previously posted a number of reviews to an Radio / Audio Drama section of SFFaudio…

    http://www.sffaudio.com/AudioDramaReviews.html

    But in terms of reviewing old stuff, we pretty much are limited to what audio drama we have in hardcopy.

    I will point out that there are a couple quality producers we have reviewed. RRCA, a terrific group previously unmentioned in this thread, and the ARTC, ditto, both offer some amazing modern audio drama.

    http://www.rrca.com/

    http://www.artc.org/

    As for ZBS, Ruby, Galactic Gumshoe etc. I’d be in favour. Maybe we can get in contact with ZBS.

    The Sonic Society, is a simply awesome filter for new stuff! Dani Cutler, and I’m proud to say she is now on staff here, is the podcast compiler for them.

    As for my personal gold standards…

    BBC Radio did a STUNNING adaptation of John W. Campbell’s WHO GOES THERE? which was podcast on the Tales Of Horror Podcast last year…

    http://media.libsyn.com/media/horrortales/horror11.mp3

    99% of the Seeing Ear Theater stuff is better than 99% of everything else in my book. Some of it is available in hardcopy. Most of it is listenable online in realaudio…

    http://www.scifi.com/set/

    As well I think I mentioned the Bradbury 13 (a limited series done for NPR in the 1980s).

    CBC Radio’s Vanishing Point series was really terrific. Near mpossible to get though.

    Unfortunately, that is the general rule, you will have a great deal of difficulty finding hard or even downloadable copies of most of these. :(

    As to you not being representative of our readership. I can’t say, we get a very tiny amount of feedback compared to the number of people who visit the site. If you put in requests we’ll try to fill em. :)

  377. Jesse on Tue, 10th Oct 2006 2:55 pm
  378. Brad, I think you are right. Audio Drama is a strange beast. Persons in the UK, Ireland and Canada are probably more often exposed to it in the form of modern Radio Drama than are most American citizens. Yet I assume most of the SFFaudio readership is US based. Certainly most amateur Audio Drama in production seems to be coming from the USA.

    We previously posted a number of reviews to an Radio / Audio Drama section of SFFaudio…

    http://www.sffaudio.com/AudioDramaReviews.html

    But in terms of reviewing old stuff, we pretty much are limited to what audio drama we have in hardcopy.

    I will point out that there are a couple quality producers we have reviewed. RRCA, a terrific group previously unmentioned in this thread, and the ARTC, ditto, both offer some amazing modern audio drama.

    http://www.rrca.com/

    http://www.artc.org/

    As for ZBS, Ruby, Galactic Gumshoe etc. I’d be in favour. Maybe we can get in contact with ZBS.

    The Sonic Society, is a simply awesome filter for new stuff! Dani Cutler, and I’m proud to say she is now on staff here, is the podcast compiler for them.

    As for my personal gold standards…

    BBC Radio did a STUNNING adaptation of John W. Campbell’s WHO GOES THERE? which was podcast on the Tales Of Horror Podcast last year…

    http://media.libsyn.com/media/horrortales/horror11.mp3

    99% of the Seeing Ear Theater stuff is better than 99% of everything else in my book. Some of it is available in hardcopy. Most of it is listenable online in realaudio…

    http://www.scifi.com/set/

    As well I think I mentioned the Bradbury 13 (a limited series done for NPR in the 1980s).

    CBC Radio’s Vanishing Point series was really terrific. Near mpossible to get though.

    Unfortunately, that is the general rule, you will have a great deal of difficulty finding hard or even downloadable copies of most of these. :(

    As to you not being representative of our readership. I can’t say, we get a very tiny amount of feedback compared to the number of people who visit the site. If you put in requests we’ll try to fill em. :)

  379. Jesse on Wed, 11th Oct 2006 12:41 pm
  380. I had no idea Nora Roberts was SFF!

  381. Jesse on Wed, 11th Oct 2006 12:41 pm
  382. I had no idea Nora Roberts was SFF!

  383. Scott on Wed, 11th Oct 2006 1:16 pm
  384. Normally not! Valley of Silence is the third book in her Circle Trilogy, which involves vampires.

  385. Scott on Wed, 11th Oct 2006 1:16 pm
  386. Normally not! Valley of Silence is the third book in her Circle Trilogy, which involves vampires.

  387. Scott on Wed, 11th Oct 2006 1:18 pm
  388. Perhaps I should include some description in these posts, eh? Here it is for this book:

    “Having traveled through the Dance of the Gods to the land of Geall, the circle finds themselves convincing then training the people of Geall to defeat Lilith’s vampire army. The Valley of Silence is a forbidding place for the battle of all battles, but the circle continues to prepare through magic and a few early stakeouts that test their strength individually and as a team.”

  389. Scott on Wed, 11th Oct 2006 1:18 pm
  390. Perhaps I should include some description in these posts, eh? Here it is for this book:

    “Having traveled through the Dance of the Gods to the land of Geall, the circle finds themselves convincing then training the people of Geall to defeat Lilith’s vampire army. The Valley of Silence is a forbidding place for the battle of all battles, but the circle continues to prepare through magic and a few early stakeouts that test their strength individually and as a team.”

  391. Joe on Thu, 12th Oct 2006 2:11 pm
  392. Wrong? Jesse, if you were any more wrong, you’d be on Fox News.

    You do a lot of griping, but you don’t offer any practical alternatives. If anything, once they’ve been run through five universal translators, a Babel fish, and a reconstructed Enigma machine, it becomes apparent that your suggestions don’t even make any frigging sense.

    Semantics aren’t your strong suit. That’s okay. I’ll walk you through it.

    Your item #1:
    I’ll throw you a bone. You have a point about production groups pooling their resources. Unfortunately you also make a false assumption in the same breath, which undermines your premise (well, that and your wishy-washy language; qualifying your ideas with maybe’s and admissions that you don’t have any facts doesn’t exactly build up your credibility.)

    When it comes to technical resources, the advantages of umbrella organizations are readily apparent. In every other respect, however, they have the same problems as the little guys that comprise them. Sometimes people, hardware, or money are committed elsewhere, often because of obligations. Either way, the whole production effort suffers. Personnel aren’t always available — or reliable. Sometimes their know-how goes with them. Money isn’t always there either. Putting the individual resources of 10-20 people with families, debts, and day jobs under one big circus tent doesn’t trigger the sort of alchemy you’re dreaming of, pal.

    Your item #2:
    You’re confusing distribution — the dispersing of your product — with advertising, which is about attracting consumers to your product.

    Distribution means absolutely nothing if no one knows you exist, from one who knows. By your reasoning, every podcast in the known universe is making a killing by sheer virtue of existing. No no no. You have to tell people that your product exists, that it meets certain needs, and that it’s worth acquiring. That’s advertising…otherwise known as screaming at the top of your lungs, begging for an increasingly scarce, rapidly evaporating commodity in today’s market — people’s attention.

    Here’s an example: “The Sonic Society” isn’t just podcast. It’s syndicated on radio stations throughout Canada and the northern United States. That puts their distribution on an international level. That lends them more credibility than podcasting ever could, at least for now. To the corporate mainstream, podcasting entails several thousand people with laptops blogging into a mike, so they’re quick to dismiss it. Not fair or wise, just quick.

    Meanwhile, their podcasts do serve a purpose. They make it easy for listeners to try the show out and tell other people about it. Advertising as distribution. That’s why podcasting is such an effective marketing tool, by killing two birds with one stone.

    So while you’re watching butchered Trek reruns on G4 or something, the rest of us are cold-calling programming managers and journalists, working to get podcasts done, out the door, and noticed while producing CD’s, schlepping those CD’s across the country, hawking them at conventions, desperately (but nicely) chasing people down with a pair of headphones and an MP3 player, trying to convince them we’re doing something interesting. What the hell are you doing about it?

    Your item #3:
    Who the hell am I? I’m Joe Medina, creator of the “Afterhell” audio series. Why should you care? Well, you probably won’t care. It’s not a science fiction rip-off.

    The best way for an artist to get ahead is to copy everyone else — to defer his or her creativity? What’s your idea of a suicide hotline, telling people to jump?

    This might come as a shock, but Barsoom and Tatooine were once unheard of. And if Edgar Rice Burroughs or George Lucas had listened to you, they wouldn’t have bothered inventing them. If you want the next Barsoom, give Whatshername a chance.

    Fanfic is all well and good, but it’s also a trap. Writers can push the same boulders up the same hills for years, constricted by their own obsessions with other people’s canon, only to watch it evaporate when the next Neil Gaiman or Russell T. Davies appears.

    And while I have no objection to adapting literary works, that path has pitfalls of its own. Intellectual property issues get murky, especially with material from the early 1900’s. And if Hollywood has a big-budget movie deal for the same story you’re working on, you’re often politely asked to either make your audiodrama more like the movie or put it on indefinite hold, so that two versions of the same story aren’t competing for the same fanbase.

    Promote an audiodrama with promises that it’s just like a certain TV show? Knock yourself out. Then you’ll have a hell of a time after that convincing everyone that your work is halfway original.

    So spare me your ruttin’ keywords. If you’re searching for nothing but big-brand media-SF retreads, you’ve got plenty of “audiodrama sin” on your hands.

    Your item #4:
    Yes, comedy is more challenging than drama. A loaf of bread is also more convenient when it’s pre-sliced. Are there any more examples of the scintillatingly obvious you’d like to share?

    And who are you to dictate what’s funny? No, I take it back. Anyone citing Red Dwarf as hard science is hi-larious. Would you care to link us to the physics papers that anticipates “Future Echoes” just by way of example? I love Red Dwarf, but it’s hardly Rendezvous with Rama. And hard science and “the actual tropes of SF” are hardly the same thing. No one in the scientific community is ready to swear by FTL stardrives just yet.

    Your item #5:
    You’re getting tired of the obliviousness? You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore with your functionally illiterate attempts at grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have the gall to say that?

    To paraphrase J Michael Straczynski, “If you can’t say what you mean, you can’t mean what you say.”

    Here, you’re confusing three different things: campy humor, nostalgia, and the naivete of over-enthusiastic audiodramatists. You squished them all together into a single incoherent temper tantrum and passed it off as an argument.

    Campy humor…I agree this little trick has been overused. More often than not, camp is the last refuge for the uninspired and the self-conscious. I’d sooner avoid it, myself. But if someone thinks they can put a new spin on it, I’d at least give them a chance.

    Over-enthusiastic audiodramatists… Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”? What are you, Leo Laporte? If you really want to spare people grief, you should try something a little more constructive than smashing their hands with a ballpeen hammer.

    Nostalgia…that’s not the problem. Actually you’re making the same mistake as the people who resort to campy schtick in the first place. 1930’s sensibilities weren’t “clunky” at the time, only when they’re taken out of their native context. If you want to depict them, you must understand that context — the culture at the time. When actors perform Shakespeare, when they do it well, even a modern audience can follow the dialogue without a second thought. You can tell that production nailed the context. When an OTR-style audiodrama feels clunky, that crew didn’t do their homework.

    You can’t absolve yourself from the state of the market just because you’re a consumer. You’re shaping the market with every purchase. Did you pick up the Willamette Radio Workshop’s Fall of the City? Or are you actively supporting some MacDonaldland audiodrama outfit with cheesy acting, cookie-cutter writing, and absolutely no soul whatsoever? Who’s responsible for the clunk now?

    No, no, if you want change, you should be a better consumer. Better educated. Better informed. A little more diligent. Not as shallow as you once were.

    And please, in the name of God — be more freakin’ articulate! I’m not asking for Bradbury, just legible! You don’t know what you’re talking about, let alone how to bloody say it. Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you? If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.

    I leave you with your mealy-mouthed claims of artistic virtue in tatters, your highness. Now put some clothes on.

    Joe Medina
    http://www.afterhell.com

  393. Joe on Thu, 12th Oct 2006 2:11 pm
  394. Wrong? Jesse, if you were any more wrong, you’d be on Fox News.

    You do a lot of griping, but you don’t offer any practical alternatives. If anything, once they’ve been run through five universal translators, a Babel fish, and a reconstructed Enigma machine, it becomes apparent that your suggestions don’t even make any frigging sense.

    Semantics aren’t your strong suit. That’s okay. I’ll walk you through it.

    Your item #1:
    I’ll throw you a bone. You have a point about production groups pooling their resources. Unfortunately you also make a false assumption in the same breath, which undermines your premise (well, that and your wishy-washy language; qualifying your ideas with maybe’s and admissions that you don’t have any facts doesn’t exactly build up your credibility.)

    When it comes to technical resources, the advantages of umbrella organizations are readily apparent. In every other respect, however, they have the same problems as the little guys that comprise them. Sometimes people, hardware, or money are committed elsewhere, often because of obligations. Either way, the whole production effort suffers. Personnel aren’t always available — or reliable. Sometimes their know-how goes with them. Money isn’t always there either. Putting the individual resources of 10-20 people with families, debts, and day jobs under one big circus tent doesn’t trigger the sort of alchemy you’re dreaming of, pal.

    Your item #2:
    You’re confusing distribution — the dispersing of your product — with advertising, which is about attracting consumers to your product.

    Distribution means absolutely nothing if no one knows you exist, from one who knows. By your reasoning, every podcast in the known universe is making a killing by sheer virtue of existing. No no no. You have to tell people that your product exists, that it meets certain needs, and that it’s worth acquiring. That’s advertising…otherwise known as screaming at the top of your lungs, begging for an increasingly scarce, rapidly evaporating commodity in today’s market — people’s attention.

    Here’s an example: “The Sonic Society” isn’t just podcast. It’s syndicated on radio stations throughout Canada and the northern United States. That puts their distribution on an international level. That lends them more credibility than podcasting ever could, at least for now. To the corporate mainstream, podcasting entails several thousand people with laptops blogging into a mike, so they’re quick to dismiss it. Not fair or wise, just quick.

    Meanwhile, their podcasts do serve a purpose. They make it easy for listeners to try the show out and tell other people about it. Advertising as distribution. That’s why podcasting is such an effective marketing tool, by killing two birds with one stone.

    So while you’re watching butchered Trek reruns on G4 or something, the rest of us are cold-calling programming managers and journalists, working to get podcasts done, out the door, and noticed while producing CD’s, schlepping those CD’s across the country, hawking them at conventions, desperately (but nicely) chasing people down with a pair of headphones and an MP3 player, trying to convince them we’re doing something interesting. What the hell are you doing about it?

    Your item #3:
    Who the hell am I? I’m Joe Medina, creator of the “Afterhell” audio series. Why should you care? Well, you probably won’t care. It’s not a science fiction rip-off.

    The best way for an artist to get ahead is to copy everyone else — to defer his or her creativity? What’s your idea of a suicide hotline, telling people to jump?

    This might come as a shock, but Barsoom and Tatooine were once unheard of. And if Edgar Rice Burroughs or George Lucas had listened to you, they wouldn’t have bothered inventing them. If you want the next Barsoom, give Whatshername a chance.

    Fanfic is all well and good, but it’s also a trap. Writers can push the same boulders up the same hills for years, constricted by their own obsessions with other people’s canon, only to watch it evaporate when the next Neil Gaiman or Russell T. Davies appears.

    And while I have no objection to adapting literary works, that path has pitfalls of its own. Intellectual property issues get murky, especially with material from the early 1900’s. And if Hollywood has a big-budget movie deal for the same story you’re working on, you’re often politely asked to either make your audiodrama more like the movie or put it on indefinite hold, so that two versions of the same story aren’t competing for the same fanbase.

    Promote an audiodrama with promises that it’s just like a certain TV show? Knock yourself out. Then you’ll have a hell of a time after that convincing everyone that your work is halfway original.

    So spare me your ruttin’ keywords. If you’re searching for nothing but big-brand media-SF retreads, you’ve got plenty of “audiodrama sin” on your hands.

    Your item #4:
    Yes, comedy is more challenging than drama. A loaf of bread is also more convenient when it’s pre-sliced. Are there any more examples of the scintillatingly obvious you’d like to share?

    And who are you to dictate what’s funny? No, I take it back. Anyone citing Red Dwarf as hard science is hi-larious. Would you care to link us to the physics papers that anticipates “Future Echoes” just by way of example? I love Red Dwarf, but it’s hardly Rendezvous with Rama. And hard science and “the actual tropes of SF” are hardly the same thing. No one in the scientific community is ready to swear by FTL stardrives just yet.

    Your item #5:
    You’re getting tired of the obliviousness? You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore with your functionally illiterate attempts at grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have the gall to say that?

    To paraphrase J Michael Straczynski, “If you can’t say what you mean, you can’t mean what you say.”

    Here, you’re confusing three different things: campy humor, nostalgia, and the naivete of over-enthusiastic audiodramatists. You squished them all together into a single incoherent temper tantrum and passed it off as an argument.

    Campy humor…I agree this little trick has been overused. More often than not, camp is the last refuge for the uninspired and the self-conscious. I’d sooner avoid it, myself. But if someone thinks they can put a new spin on it, I’d at least give them a chance.

    Over-enthusiastic audiodramatists… Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”? What are you, Leo Laporte? If you really want to spare people grief, you should try something a little more constructive than smashing their hands with a ballpeen hammer.

    Nostalgia…that’s not the problem. Actually you’re making the same mistake as the people who resort to campy schtick in the first place. 1930’s sensibilities weren’t “clunky” at the time, only when they’re taken out of their native context. If you want to depict them, you must understand that context — the culture at the time. When actors perform Shakespeare, when they do it well, even a modern audience can follow the dialogue without a second thought. You can tell that production nailed the context. When an OTR-style audiodrama feels clunky, that crew didn’t do their homework.

    You can’t absolve yourself from the state of the market just because you’re a consumer. You’re shaping the market with every purchase. Did you pick up the Willamette Radio Workshop’s Fall of the City? Or are you actively supporting some MacDonaldland audiodrama outfit with cheesy acting, cookie-cutter writing, and absolutely no soul whatsoever? Who’s responsible for the clunk now?

    No, no, if you want change, you should be a better consumer. Better educated. Better informed. A little more diligent. Not as shallow as you once were.

    And please, in the name of God — be more freakin’ articulate! I’m not asking for Bradbury, just legible! You don’t know what you’re talking about, let alone how to bloody say it. Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you? If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.

    I leave you with your mealy-mouthed claims of artistic virtue in tatters, your highness. Now put some clothes on.

    Joe Medina
    http://www.afterhell.com

  395. Jesse on Thu, 12th Oct 2006 4:46 pm
  396. >Your item #1:
    I’ll throw you a bone. You have a point about production groups pooling their resources.

    Huzzah!

    >Unfortunately you also make a false assumption in the same breath, which undermines your premise (well, that and your wishy-washy language; qualifying your ideas with maybe’s and admissions that you don’t have any facts doesn’t exactly build up your credibility.)

    Ouch!

    >When it comes to technical resources, the advantages of umbrella organizations are readily apparent. In every other respect, however, they have the same problems as the little guys that comprise them. Sometimes people, hardware, or money are committed elsewhere, often because of obligations. Either way, the whole production effort suffers. Personnel aren’t always available — or reliable. Sometimes their know-how goes with them. Money isn’t always there either. Putting the individual resources of 10-20 people with families, debts, and day jobs under one big circus tent doesn’t trigger the sort of alchemy you’re dreaming of, pal.

    I wasn’t talking panacea.

    >Your item #2:
    You’re confusing distribution — the dispersing of your product — with advertising, which is about attracting consumers to your product.

    I don’t think I confused the two issues. Problem 2 points out that distribution – getting your audio drama into the ears of listeners is easier done by podcast syndication than by realaudio clips on a website, streaming radio stations (in different time zones) etc.

    >Distribution means absolutely nothing if no one knows you exist, from one who knows.

    I don’t disagree, but by podcasting and submitting your feed to directories you’ll more likely get people to know you exist.

    >By your reasoning, every podcast in the known universe is making a killing by sheer virtue of existing.

    I don’t think I said anything like that.

    >No no no. You have to tell people that your product exists, that it meets certain needs, and that it’s worth acquiring. That’s advertising…otherwise known as screaming at the top of your lungs, begging for an increasingly scarce, rapidly evaporating commodity in today’s market — people’s attention.

    Robert J. Sawyer, someone who I think is a great SF writer and a marketing master, said something really interesting about this. He said that he doesn’t even try to sell his books to individuals, he puts his marketing time (his advertizing of himself and his books) into mass-media. Getting interviews with radio, TV and magazines. Talking on panels at conventions, giving readings, doing signings. In other words, he lets word of mouth take care of itself. The person to person convincing should be left to the consumers.

    >Here’s an example: “The Sonic Society” isn’t just podcast. It’s syndicated on radio stations throughout Canada and the northern United States. That puts their distribution on an international level. That lends them more credibility than podcasting ever could, at least for now.

    Don’t take this as an attack:

    “Ever could” and “at least for now” can’t co-exist in the same thought.

    >To the corporate mainstream, podcasting entails several thousand people with laptops blogging into a mike, so they’re quick to dismiss it. Not fair or wise, just quick.

    It seems to me that corporations are now taking podcasting up at fast pace. I have no stats but that’s my general read based on the volume of corporate podcasts.

    >Meanwhile, their podcasts do serve a purpose. They make it easy for listeners to try the show out and tell other people about it. Advertising as distribution. That’s why podcasting is such an effective marketing tool, by killing two birds with one stone.

    I see what your saying, I think. But can’t they be both and me not be mealy mouthed?

    >So while you’re watching butchered Trek reruns on G4 or something, the rest of us are cold-calling programming managers and journalists, working to get podcasts done, out the door, and noticed while producing CD’s, schlepping those CD’s across the country, hawking them at conventions, desperately (but nicely) chasing people down with a pair of headphones and an MP3 player, trying to convince them we’re doing something interesting. What the hell are you doing about it?

    Only SFFaudio.

    >Your item #3:
    Who the hell am I? I’m Joe Medina, creator of the “Afterhell” audio series. Why should you care? Well, you probably won’t care. It’s not a science fiction rip-off.

    Nice to meet you Joe. Never heard of you before this. Is your “Afterhell” series SFFaudio related?

    >The best way for an artist to get ahead is to copy everyone else — to defer his or her creativity?

    I didn’t say it was the best way, but I doubt you’d suggest it isn’t an effective way to bootstrap your original productions.

    For instance, I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because of his involvement in media tie in novels. Now I enjoy his original fiction. Is this just? Probably not, but did it work? I believe this was part of the rationale behind Sonic Cinema doing Firefly: Old Wounds, to better market their company.

    >This might come as a shock, but Barsoom and Tatooine were once unheard of. And if Edgar Rice Burroughs or George Lucas had listened to you, they wouldn’t have bothered inventing them.

    The latter is pretty interest, George Lucas didn’t create Star Wars in a vacuum.

    >If you want the next Barsoom, give Whatshername a chance.

    Abosultely! Without question! But how, can I even find out about Sheila Whatshername?

    >Fanfic is all well and good, but it’s also a trap. Writers can push the same boulders up the same hills for years, constricted by their own obsessions with other people’s canon, only to watch it evaporate when the next Neil Gaiman or Russell T. Davies appears.

    Doubtless that is the case. But I believe that Russell T. Davies wrote Doctor Who before he was a big name too. Fan Fic isn’t nicotine, it isn’t that difficult a hobby to give up.

    >And while I have no objection to adapting literary works, that path has pitfalls of its own. Intellectual property issues get murky, especially with material from the early 1900’s.

    Try some lapsed copyright stuff. tons of it is available, much of it excellent, and I’m not talking the standards, Dickens, Poe, or even Lovecraft (which I still think there is quite a taste for).

    >And if Hollywood has a big-budget movie deal for the same story you’re working on, you’re often politely asked to either make your audiodrama more like the movie or put it on indefinite hold, so that two versions of the same story aren’t competing for the same fanbase.

    Sounds like a good problems to have.

    >Promote an audiodrama with promises that it’s just like a certain TV show? Knock yourself out. Then you’ll have a hell of a time after that convincing everyone that your work is halfway original.

    That one’s an out and out straw man.

    >So spare me your ruttin’ keywords. If you’re searching for nothing but big-brand media-SF retreads, you’ve got plenty of “audiodrama sin” on your hands.

    I am not searching for nothing but “big-brand media-SF retreads” – not in the least.

    >Your item #4:
    Yes, comedy is more challenging than drama. A loaf of bread is also more convenient when it’s pre-sliced. Are there any more examples of the scintillatingly obvious you’d like to share?

    You get more flies with sugar? ;)

    >And who are you to dictate what’s funny?

    I’m me!

    >No, I take it back. Anyone citing Red Dwarf as hard science is hi-larious.

    Joe. Another straw man, I said Red Dwarf was “full of ridiculously impossible physics” but that in spite of this “made serious SF ideas a part of the plot.” I didn’t say Red Dwarf was HARD SF.

    >Your item #5:
    You’re getting tired of the obliviousness? You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore with your functionally illiterate attempts at grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have the gall to say that?

    I have gall. I am full of effrontery. But I’d still call that ad homenim attack, not a measured response. Incoherent? Mayhaps I do have a funny way of constructing a sentence, but truly incoherent? I doubt that the case.

    >To paraphrase J Michael Straczynski, “If you can’t say what you mean, you can’t mean what you say.”

    Will bear that in mind.

    >Here, you’re confusing three different things: campy humor, nostalgia, and the naivete of over-enthusiastic audiodramatists.

    I was talking about three things, not confusing them. I don’t think I “squished them all together into a single incoherent temper tantrum and passed it off as an argument.”
    I’m not a bully boy, and I take argumentation seriously.

    >Campy humor…I agree this little trick has been overused. More often than not, camp is the last refuge for the uninspired and the self-conscious. I’d sooner avoid it, myself. But if someone thinks they can put a new spin on it, I’d at least give them a chance.

    Of course! I didn’t dismiss out of hand the idea of listening to someone’s “campy” audio drama, I said I was full up.

    >Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”?

    Maybe I’m wrong but I look at the state of radio today and beleive there is absolutely no chance of getting millions of people to be glued to their radios listening to audio drama like they were in the 1930s and 1940s again. Magazine fiction is barely hanging on. Almost nothing left of it now. Internet audio solutions are the way to go.

    >What are you, Leo Laporte? If you really want to spare people grief, you should try something a little more constructive than smashing their hands with a ballpeen hammer.

    I think he’s a tech guy but I’ve neither heard nor seen his show.

    >If you want to depict them, you must understand that context — the culture at the time. When actors perform Shakespeare, when they do it well, even a modern audience can follow the dialogue without a second thought.

    False, they need to be trained up for Shakespeare.

    >You can’t absolve yourself from the state of the market just because you’re a consumer. You’re shaping the market with every purchase.

    And hopefully with every review!

    >Did you pick up the Willamette Radio Workshop’s Fall of the City?

    No, it was emailed to me, and I gave it a very positive review. :)

    http://www.sffaudio.com/archives/2006_05_01_sffaudio_archive.html

    >Or are you actively supporting some MacDonaldland audiodrama outfit with cheesy acting, cookie-cutter writing, and absolutely no soul whatsoever? Who’s responsible for the clunk now?

    I’d need to know who you think is “McDonaldland” before I could say.

    >No, no, if you want change, you should be a better consumer. Better educated. Better informed. A little more diligent. Not as shallow as you once were.

    I am in the process of eduicating myself. I’m told it is a lifelong process.

    >And please, in the name of God — be more freakin’ articulate! I’m not asking for Bradbury, just legible!

    Now you overinflate my faults. Clearly my commentary was legible.

    >You don’t know what you’re talking about, let alone how to bloody say it.

    I am wounded sir.

    >Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you? If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.

    I can’t both be wrong and nonsensical. As to the spelling, I can attempt more careful checking. Care to point out any corrections?

  397. Jesse on Thu, 12th Oct 2006 4:46 pm
  398. >Your item #1:
    I’ll throw you a bone. You have a point about production groups pooling their resources.

    Huzzah!

    >Unfortunately you also make a false assumption in the same breath, which undermines your premise (well, that and your wishy-washy language; qualifying your ideas with maybe’s and admissions that you don’t have any facts doesn’t exactly build up your credibility.)

    Ouch!

    >When it comes to technical resources, the advantages of umbrella organizations are readily apparent. In every other respect, however, they have the same problems as the little guys that comprise them. Sometimes people, hardware, or money are committed elsewhere, often because of obligations. Either way, the whole production effort suffers. Personnel aren’t always available — or reliable. Sometimes their know-how goes with them. Money isn’t always there either. Putting the individual resources of 10-20 people with families, debts, and day jobs under one big circus tent doesn’t trigger the sort of alchemy you’re dreaming of, pal.

    I wasn’t talking panacea.

    >Your item #2:
    You’re confusing distribution — the dispersing of your product — with advertising, which is about attracting consumers to your product.

    I don’t think I confused the two issues. Problem 2 points out that distribution – getting your audio drama into the ears of listeners is easier done by podcast syndication than by realaudio clips on a website, streaming radio stations (in different time zones) etc.

    >Distribution means absolutely nothing if no one knows you exist, from one who knows.

    I don’t disagree, but by podcasting and submitting your feed to directories you’ll more likely get people to know you exist.

    >By your reasoning, every podcast in the known universe is making a killing by sheer virtue of existing.

    I don’t think I said anything like that.

    >No no no. You have to tell people that your product exists, that it meets certain needs, and that it’s worth acquiring. That’s advertising…otherwise known as screaming at the top of your lungs, begging for an increasingly scarce, rapidly evaporating commodity in today’s market — people’s attention.

    Robert J. Sawyer, someone who I think is a great SF writer and a marketing master, said something really interesting about this. He said that he doesn’t even try to sell his books to individuals, he puts his marketing time (his advertizing of himself and his books) into mass-media. Getting interviews with radio, TV and magazines. Talking on panels at conventions, giving readings, doing signings. In other words, he lets word of mouth take care of itself. The person to person convincing should be left to the consumers.

    >Here’s an example: “The Sonic Society” isn’t just podcast. It’s syndicated on radio stations throughout Canada and the northern United States. That puts their distribution on an international level. That lends them more credibility than podcasting ever could, at least for now.

    Don’t take this as an attack:

    “Ever could” and “at least for now” can’t co-exist in the same thought.

    >To the corporate mainstream, podcasting entails several thousand people with laptops blogging into a mike, so they’re quick to dismiss it. Not fair or wise, just quick.

    It seems to me that corporations are now taking podcasting up at fast pace. I have no stats but that’s my general read based on the volume of corporate podcasts.

    >Meanwhile, their podcasts do serve a purpose. They make it easy for listeners to try the show out and tell other people about it. Advertising as distribution. That’s why podcasting is such an effective marketing tool, by killing two birds with one stone.

    I see what your saying, I think. But can’t they be both and me not be mealy mouthed?

    >So while you’re watching butchered Trek reruns on G4 or something, the rest of us are cold-calling programming managers and journalists, working to get podcasts done, out the door, and noticed while producing CD’s, schlepping those CD’s across the country, hawking them at conventions, desperately (but nicely) chasing people down with a pair of headphones and an MP3 player, trying to convince them we’re doing something interesting. What the hell are you doing about it?

    Only SFFaudio.

    >Your item #3:
    Who the hell am I? I’m Joe Medina, creator of the “Afterhell” audio series. Why should you care? Well, you probably won’t care. It’s not a science fiction rip-off.

    Nice to meet you Joe. Never heard of you before this. Is your “Afterhell” series SFFaudio related?

    >The best way for an artist to get ahead is to copy everyone else — to defer his or her creativity?

    I didn’t say it was the best way, but I doubt you’d suggest it isn’t an effective way to bootstrap your original productions.

    For instance, I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because of his involvement in media tie in novels. Now I enjoy his original fiction. Is this just? Probably not, but did it work? I believe this was part of the rationale behind Sonic Cinema doing Firefly: Old Wounds, to better market their company.

    >This might come as a shock, but Barsoom and Tatooine were once unheard of. And if Edgar Rice Burroughs or George Lucas had listened to you, they wouldn’t have bothered inventing them.

    The latter is pretty interest, George Lucas didn’t create Star Wars in a vacuum.

    >If you want the next Barsoom, give Whatshername a chance.

    Abosultely! Without question! But how, can I even find out about Sheila Whatshername?

    >Fanfic is all well and good, but it’s also a trap. Writers can push the same boulders up the same hills for years, constricted by their own obsessions with other people’s canon, only to watch it evaporate when the next Neil Gaiman or Russell T. Davies appears.

    Doubtless that is the case. But I believe that Russell T. Davies wrote Doctor Who before he was a big name too. Fan Fic isn’t nicotine, it isn’t that difficult a hobby to give up.

    >And while I have no objection to adapting literary works, that path has pitfalls of its own. Intellectual property issues get murky, especially with material from the early 1900’s.

    Try some lapsed copyright stuff. tons of it is available, much of it excellent, and I’m not talking the standards, Dickens, Poe, or even Lovecraft (which I still think there is quite a taste for).

    >And if Hollywood has a big-budget movie deal for the same story you’re working on, you’re often politely asked to either make your audiodrama more like the movie or put it on indefinite hold, so that two versions of the same story aren’t competing for the same fanbase.

    Sounds like a good problems to have.

    >Promote an audiodrama with promises that it’s just like a certain TV show? Knock yourself out. Then you’ll have a hell of a time after that convincing everyone that your work is halfway original.

    That one’s an out and out straw man.

    >So spare me your ruttin’ keywords. If you’re searching for nothing but big-brand media-SF retreads, you’ve got plenty of “audiodrama sin” on your hands.

    I am not searching for nothing but “big-brand media-SF retreads” – not in the least.

    >Your item #4:
    Yes, comedy is more challenging than drama. A loaf of bread is also more convenient when it’s pre-sliced. Are there any more examples of the scintillatingly obvious you’d like to share?

    You get more flies with sugar? ;)

    >And who are you to dictate what’s funny?

    I’m me!

    >No, I take it back. Anyone citing Red Dwarf as hard science is hi-larious.

    Joe. Another straw man, I said Red Dwarf was “full of ridiculously impossible physics” but that in spite of this “made serious SF ideas a part of the plot.” I didn’t say Red Dwarf was HARD SF.

    >Your item #5:
    You’re getting tired of the obliviousness? You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore with your functionally illiterate attempts at grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have the gall to say that?

    I have gall. I am full of effrontery. But I’d still call that ad homenim attack, not a measured response. Incoherent? Mayhaps I do have a funny way of constructing a sentence, but truly incoherent? I doubt that the case.

    >To paraphrase J Michael Straczynski, “If you can’t say what you mean, you can’t mean what you say.”

    Will bear that in mind.

    >Here, you’re confusing three different things: campy humor, nostalgia, and the naivete of over-enthusiastic audiodramatists.

    I was talking about three things, not confusing them. I don’t think I “squished them all together into a single incoherent temper tantrum and passed it off as an argument.”
    I’m not a bully boy, and I take argumentation seriously.

    >Campy humor…I agree this little trick has been overused. More often than not, camp is the last refuge for the uninspired and the self-conscious. I’d sooner avoid it, myself. But if someone thinks they can put a new spin on it, I’d at least give them a chance.

    Of course! I didn’t dismiss out of hand the idea of listening to someone’s “campy” audio drama, I said I was full up.

    >Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”?

    Maybe I’m wrong but I look at the state of radio today and beleive there is absolutely no chance of getting millions of people to be glued to their radios listening to audio drama like they were in the 1930s and 1940s again. Magazine fiction is barely hanging on. Almost nothing left of it now. Internet audio solutions are the way to go.

    >What are you, Leo Laporte? If you really want to spare people grief, you should try something a little more constructive than smashing their hands with a ballpeen hammer.

    I think he’s a tech guy but I’ve neither heard nor seen his show.

    >If you want to depict them, you must understand that context — the culture at the time. When actors perform Shakespeare, when they do it well, even a modern audience can follow the dialogue without a second thought.

    False, they need to be trained up for Shakespeare.

    >You can’t absolve yourself from the state of the market just because you’re a consumer. You’re shaping the market with every purchase.

    And hopefully with every review!

    >Did you pick up the Willamette Radio Workshop’s Fall of the City?

    No, it was emailed to me, and I gave it a very positive review. :)

    http://www.sffaudio.com/archives/2006_05_01_sffaudio_archive.html

    >Or are you actively supporting some MacDonaldland audiodrama outfit with cheesy acting, cookie-cutter writing, and absolutely no soul whatsoever? Who’s responsible for the clunk now?

    I’d need to know who you think is “McDonaldland” before I could say.

    >No, no, if you want change, you should be a better consumer. Better educated. Better informed. A little more diligent. Not as shallow as you once were.

    I am in the process of eduicating myself. I’m told it is a lifelong process.

    >And please, in the name of God — be more freakin’ articulate! I’m not asking for Bradbury, just legible!

    Now you overinflate my faults. Clearly my commentary was legible.

    >You don’t know what you’re talking about, let alone how to bloody say it.

    I am wounded sir.

    >Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you? If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.

    I can’t both be wrong and nonsensical. As to the spelling, I can attempt more careful checking. Care to point out any corrections?

  399. Scott on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 2:26 pm
  400. Jesse and Joe,

    From the original post, I really think the “pathetic dream” phrase was uncalled for. Other than that, the rest of the post was interesting but unclear in that you state at the beginning that you are going to talk about amateur audio drama, then start talking about marketing and distribution, then into the content of the audio drama itself. Are amateurs interested in that? I suppose it depends on why they are doing it.

    The truth is that there is nothing “wrong” with audio drama. There are not “too many” people doing it, and it’s certainly not pathetic. For amateurs, it’s enjoyable as heck to do it (I’ve done some live) and that’s enough. For professionals, it’s a matter of doing good work, then finding an audience amongst people that generally don’t even listen to audio drama. It’s a twofold marketing challenge – not only are you selling your specific content, but you are also selling the idea that audio drama has a special storytelling power all its own and that people should care about it.

    Though I too am full of specific types of science fiction audio drama, people will make what they want to make, which I assume is also what they like to hear. Personally, listening to something like Stephen Baxter’s “Voyage” (BBC Radio) makes me think about how much excellent SF there is out there that could be adapted to that medium. Can the market sustain that kind of thing?
    Will people buy “Ringworld” done as audio drama? I certainly would.

    And that’s another part of the key. “Buy.” Will people BUY it. The current podcast model of having people donate after downloading free content doesn’t seem sustainable to me. You said podcasting would be “bigger than television”, which makes me think that I don’t know what you mean when you say the word
    “podcasting”. Internet delivery is definitely going to be part of the future picture, as will pay-per-view (or pay-per-listen). iTunes is doing very well, and I suspect it or similar services, connected directly to home A/V equipment, will be the future. But, money will change hands before stuff is downloaded. That I guarantee.

  401. Scott on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 2:26 pm
  402. Jesse and Joe,

    From the original post, I really think the “pathetic dream” phrase was uncalled for. Other than that, the rest of the post was interesting but unclear in that you state at the beginning that you are going to talk about amateur audio drama, then start talking about marketing and distribution, then into the content of the audio drama itself. Are amateurs interested in that? I suppose it depends on why they are doing it.

    The truth is that there is nothing “wrong” with audio drama. There are not “too many” people doing it, and it’s certainly not pathetic. For amateurs, it’s enjoyable as heck to do it (I’ve done some live) and that’s enough. For professionals, it’s a matter of doing good work, then finding an audience amongst people that generally don’t even listen to audio drama. It’s a twofold marketing challenge – not only are you selling your specific content, but you are also selling the idea that audio drama has a special storytelling power all its own and that people should care about it.

    Though I too am full of specific types of science fiction audio drama, people will make what they want to make, which I assume is also what they like to hear. Personally, listening to something like Stephen Baxter’s “Voyage” (BBC Radio) makes me think about how much excellent SF there is out there that could be adapted to that medium. Can the market sustain that kind of thing?
    Will people buy “Ringworld” done as audio drama? I certainly would.

    And that’s another part of the key. “Buy.” Will people BUY it. The current podcast model of having people donate after downloading free content doesn’t seem sustainable to me. You said podcasting would be “bigger than television”, which makes me think that I don’t know what you mean when you say the word
    “podcasting”. Internet delivery is definitely going to be part of the future picture, as will pay-per-view (or pay-per-listen). iTunes is doing very well, and I suspect it or similar services, connected directly to home A/V equipment, will be the future. But, money will change hands before stuff is downloaded. That I guarantee.

  403. El Fiendo on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 3:33 pm
  404. Perhaps your remarks would gain more thoughtful consideration if a) you removed the chip from your shoulder before writing, b) edited your copy for precision and brevity, and c) knew what you were talking about.

    Yuri Rasovsky

  405. El Fiendo on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 3:33 pm
  406. Perhaps your remarks would gain more thoughtful consideration if a) you removed the chip from your shoulder before writing, b) edited your copy for precision and brevity, and c) knew what you were talking about.

    Yuri Rasovsky

  407. Jesse on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 3:52 pm
  408. Scott,

    >From the original post, I really think the “pathetic dream” phrase was uncalled for.

    Just so we’re clear, I’m not saying, nor would I say that Audio Drama, amateur or otherwise, is pathetic. I love the stuff. SOME of it is pathetic, but that isn’t even what I said. If you read “pathetic dream” in the context of “getting millions of people to be glued to their radios again” I think it is a solid claim.

    >Other than that, the rest of the post was interesting but unclear…

    I can’t be sure that your wrong about me being unclear. I ran it by someone to make sure they understood what I wrote before posting. If more than you and Joe say I’m being unclear I’ll accept that. I wanted to be clear. I thought I was clear.

    >at the beginning that you are going to talk about amateur audio drama…

    The whole post is about amateur audio drama.

    >then start talking about marketing and distribution…

    Of amateur audio drama.

    >then into the content of the audio drama itself.

    Yup. All about amateur audio drama.

    >Are amateurs interested in that? I suppose it depends on why they are doing it.

    If they don’t want people to hear it why bother recording it?

    >The truth is that there is nothing “wrong” with audio drama.

    I agree in the sense that audio drama isn’t fatally flawed.

    >There are not “too many” people doing it, and it’s certainly not pathetic.

    I TOTALLY AGREE, with the second thought. Again, the “pathetic dream” only refers to the idea that Radio Drama (not audio drama) is going to be revived like it was in its heyday. People are not going to be glued to their radios. Not in the USA. In Canada professional radio drama is done in very short segments, when it is done at all. It is typically neglected because most of the listening audience don’t make it an appointment listening event and radio is much more difficult to Tivo. I learned quite a lot about the process as it worked at the CBC Radio in the 1980s and 1990s as my uncle, now deceased, was the creator and head writer of a three day a week serial comedy show (basically an audio sitcom) that aired nationally in Canada.

    >For amateurs, it’s enjoyable as heck to do it (I’ve done some live) and that’s enough.

    I see, so maybe it’s like a sport you play for enjoyment? That actually makes a great deal of sense to me.

    >For professionals, it’s a matter of doing good work, then finding an audience amongst people that generally don’t even listen to audio drama.

    Which is most people unfortunately.

    >It’s a twofold marketing challenge – not only are you selling your specific content, but you are also selling the idea that audio drama has a special storytelling power all its own and that people should care about it.

    Definitely. The problem is that in the United States there is no over-arching public radio market for it. Canada (to a very limited degree), Britain, Ireland and even Australia have publicly funded and distributed radio, with radio stations that can play one program at a certain time nation wide. This hasn’t happened in the USA. There is some limited activity now happening on XM Sattelite but it isn’t freely accessible.

    >Though I too am full of specific types of science fiction audio drama, people will make what they want to make, which I assume is also what they like to hear.

    No doubt.

    >Personally, listening to something like Stephen Baxter’s “Voyage” (BBC Radio) makes me think about how much excellent SF there is out there that could be adapted to that medium. Can the market sustain that kind of thing?

    A public radio market as exists in the UK sure can.

    >Will people buy “Ringworld” done as audio drama? I certainly would.

    WOW great idea! Me too! Heck I’d love to listen to a fan made version!

    >And that’s another part of the key. “Buy.” Will people BUY it. The current podcast model of having people donate after downloading free content doesn’t seem sustainable to me.

    Tell that to Steve Eley or Evo Terra. There is a special relationship between you and the things in your ears. I think you’re a bit pessimistic, they can also try advertizing. It worked for radio drama in the USA, why not for podcasting? And by the way I do give money to podcasts that I want to support that have a PayPal button. One thing I was thinking last night is I’d like Second Shift, to put up a donation button.

    http://www.secondshiftpodcast.com/

    >You said podcasting would be “bigger than television”, which makes me think that I don’t know what you mean when you say the word
    “podcasting”.

    What I mean by podcasting is people, making and delivery content through RSS syndication to me and you without being filtered through a GIANT media company that picks and chooses what I can enjoy.

    >Internet delivery is definitely going to be part of the future picture, as will pay-per-view (or pay-per-listen). iTunes is doing very well, and I suspect it or similar services, connected directly to home A/V equipment, will be the future. But, money will change hands before stuff is downloaded. That I guarantee.

    I can’t deny you have to own an MP3 player (or compuer) to listen to podcasts. In almost every case MP3 players are purchased items, rather than consturcted ones. though I’ve read of a few homemade ones. ;)

    The point is those costs aren’t BURDENED onto the producer of a podcast. Podcasters only pay big $$ to syndicate their materials if they are extremely popular. Being extremely popular leads to them making money, by donations, ads etc.

  409. Jesse on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 3:52 pm
  410. Scott,

    >From the original post, I really think the “pathetic dream” phrase was uncalled for.

    Just so we’re clear, I’m not saying, nor would I say that Audio Drama, amateur or otherwise, is pathetic. I love the stuff. SOME of it is pathetic, but that isn’t even what I said. If you read “pathetic dream” in the context of “getting millions of people to be glued to their radios again” I think it is a solid claim.

    >Other than that, the rest of the post was interesting but unclear…

    I can’t be sure that your wrong about me being unclear. I ran it by someone to make sure they understood what I wrote before posting. If more than you and Joe say I’m being unclear I’ll accept that. I wanted to be clear. I thought I was clear.

    >at the beginning that you are going to talk about amateur audio drama…

    The whole post is about amateur audio drama.

    >then start talking about marketing and distribution…

    Of amateur audio drama.

    >then into the content of the audio drama itself.

    Yup. All about amateur audio drama.

    >Are amateurs interested in that? I suppose it depends on why they are doing it.

    If they don’t want people to hear it why bother recording it?

    >The truth is that there is nothing “wrong” with audio drama.

    I agree in the sense that audio drama isn’t fatally flawed.

    >There are not “too many” people doing it, and it’s certainly not pathetic.

    I TOTALLY AGREE, with the second thought. Again, the “pathetic dream” only refers to the idea that Radio Drama (not audio drama) is going to be revived like it was in its heyday. People are not going to be glued to their radios. Not in the USA. In Canada professional radio drama is done in very short segments, when it is done at all. It is typically neglected because most of the listening audience don’t make it an appointment listening event and radio is much more difficult to Tivo. I learned quite a lot about the process as it worked at the CBC Radio in the 1980s and 1990s as my uncle, now deceased, was the creator and head writer of a three day a week serial comedy show (basically an audio sitcom) that aired nationally in Canada.

    >For amateurs, it’s enjoyable as heck to do it (I’ve done some live) and that’s enough.

    I see, so maybe it’s like a sport you play for enjoyment? That actually makes a great deal of sense to me.

    >For professionals, it’s a matter of doing good work, then finding an audience amongst people that generally don’t even listen to audio drama.

    Which is most people unfortunately.

    >It’s a twofold marketing challenge – not only are you selling your specific content, but you are also selling the idea that audio drama has a special storytelling power all its own and that people should care about it.

    Definitely. The problem is that in the United States there is no over-arching public radio market for it. Canada (to a very limited degree), Britain, Ireland and even Australia have publicly funded and distributed radio, with radio stations that can play one program at a certain time nation wide. This hasn’t happened in the USA. There is some limited activity now happening on XM Sattelite but it isn’t freely accessible.

    >Though I too am full of specific types of science fiction audio drama, people will make what they want to make, which I assume is also what they like to hear.

    No doubt.

    >Personally, listening to something like Stephen Baxter’s “Voyage” (BBC Radio) makes me think about how much excellent SF there is out there that could be adapted to that medium. Can the market sustain that kind of thing?

    A public radio market as exists in the UK sure can.

    >Will people buy “Ringworld” done as audio drama? I certainly would.

    WOW great idea! Me too! Heck I’d love to listen to a fan made version!

    >And that’s another part of the key. “Buy.” Will people BUY it. The current podcast model of having people donate after downloading free content doesn’t seem sustainable to me.

    Tell that to Steve Eley or Evo Terra. There is a special relationship between you and the things in your ears. I think you’re a bit pessimistic, they can also try advertizing. It worked for radio drama in the USA, why not for podcasting? And by the way I do give money to podcasts that I want to support that have a PayPal button. One thing I was thinking last night is I’d like Second Shift, to put up a donation button.

    http://www.secondshiftpodcast.com/

    >You said podcasting would be “bigger than television”, which makes me think that I don’t know what you mean when you say the word
    “podcasting”.

    What I mean by podcasting is people, making and delivery content through RSS syndication to me and you without being filtered through a GIANT media company that picks and chooses what I can enjoy.

    >Internet delivery is definitely going to be part of the future picture, as will pay-per-view (or pay-per-listen). iTunes is doing very well, and I suspect it or similar services, connected directly to home A/V equipment, will be the future. But, money will change hands before stuff is downloaded. That I guarantee.

    I can’t deny you have to own an MP3 player (or compuer) to listen to podcasts. In almost every case MP3 players are purchased items, rather than consturcted ones. though I’ve read of a few homemade ones. ;)

    The point is those costs aren’t BURDENED onto the producer of a podcast. Podcasters only pay big $$ to syndicate their materials if they are extremely popular. Being extremely popular leads to them making money, by donations, ads etc.

  411. Scott on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 4:38 pm
  412. On the amateur audio drama – I’m saying that amateur audio drama is not a business. In your original post, you said “The industry has a number of problems. This post isn’t designed to discourage people who want to get into the business…” Amateur audio drama is not an industry, nor is it a business.

    And two things that are probably subjects for a different thread:

    1) Yes, I would love to see a “Ringworld” audio drama, but no, I’m not interested in hearing a piece of “Ringworld” fanfic.

    and

    2) On podcasting in general as business, yes, I remain pessimistic. Both Eley and Evo are definitely showing people the way. However, time will tell. Is it sustainable in the long run? Maybe it is! Maybe it isn’t. I wish them all kinds of success, but I remain convinced that when (not if, when) large publishing companies start taking advantage of the internet in a bigger way, the mechanism will look more like traditional media sales than like podcasting. Again, see iTunes.

    Your point about using advertising to finance podcasts is well taken. That is certainly a possibility.

  413. Scott on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 4:38 pm
  414. On the amateur audio drama – I’m saying that amateur audio drama is not a business. In your original post, you said “The industry has a number of problems. This post isn’t designed to discourage people who want to get into the business…” Amateur audio drama is not an industry, nor is it a business.

    And two things that are probably subjects for a different thread:

    1) Yes, I would love to see a “Ringworld” audio drama, but no, I’m not interested in hearing a piece of “Ringworld” fanfic.

    and

    2) On podcasting in general as business, yes, I remain pessimistic. Both Eley and Evo are definitely showing people the way. However, time will tell. Is it sustainable in the long run? Maybe it is! Maybe it isn’t. I wish them all kinds of success, but I remain convinced that when (not if, when) large publishing companies start taking advantage of the internet in a bigger way, the mechanism will look more like traditional media sales than like podcasting. Again, see iTunes.

    Your point about using advertising to finance podcasts is well taken. That is certainly a possibility.

  415. Joe on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 5:50 pm
  416. >>Putting the individual resources of 10-20 people with
    >>families, debts, and day jobs under one big circus
    >>tent doesn’t trigger the sort of alchemy you’re
    >>dreaming of, pal.
    >
    >I wasn’t talking panacea.

    And yet that was how it was framed. You pointed out a problem, posed an alternative, even laying down points to support it in a cursory fashion. Then you left it at that, as if that was enough. If you had offered more than one response to the problem, or explored the pros and cons of the one alternative, it would’ve been at least more thoughtful.

    >>You’re confusing distribution — the dispersing of your product —
    >>with advertising, which is about attracting consumers to your product.
    >
    >I don’t think I confused the two issues.

    If you were confused, how would you know?

    >>Distribution means absolutely nothing if no one knows
    >>you exist, from one who knows.
    >
    >I don’t disagree, but by podcasting and submitting your
    >feed to directories you’ll more likely get people to
    >know you exist.

    Submitting the RSS feed provides a distribution mechanism. It does that very well, but nothing more. If you’re trying to sell CD’s, swag, or a subscription deal, the podcast is advertising, offering free samples. But then you have to advertise the podcast and convince people to use your chosen means of distribution.

    >>By your reasoning, every podcast in the known universe is making
    >>a killing by sheer virtue of existing.
    >
    >I don’t think I said anything like that.

    You said, “Podcast distribution is the solution!” I can see the neon from here. There was no talk of drawing people to your podcast, only how great things will be once your feed is out there, just waiting to be found.

    >Robert J. Sawyer, someone who I think is a great
    >SF writer and a marketing master, [...]

    And he is, a master in all sorts of things IIRC.

    >[...]he puts his marketing time (his advertizing of himself
    >and his books) into mass-media.

    But he’s not an amateur. He’s already made his bones. Your posting was about amateur audiodrama, not the pro circuits. Amateur audiodramatists don’t have the same resources. For most, word of mouth is all they’ve got.

    >>That lends them more credibility than podcasting
    >>ever could, at least for now.
    >
    >Don’t take this as an attack:
    >
    >”Ever could” and “at least for now” can’t co-exist
    >in the same thought.

    Oh great, now you’re proofreading? I wish you’d been this on-the-ball before. Take out “ever” and give it a whirl then.

    >It seems to me that corporations are now taking
    >podcasting up at fast pace. I have no stats but
    >that’s my general read based on the volume of
    >corporate podcasts.

    The corporate sector is getting the idea, but not fully. Many have switched once-free podcasts to a subscription model without warning, alienating their customer base in the process. The sheer number of corporate podcasts has gone up, but the mishandling ends up reversing the trend. As a result, their podcasting keeps held up in committee for “re-evaluation.”

    >I see what your saying, I think. But can’t they be
    >both and me not be mealy mouthed?

    If that was the only point of concern in that respect, yes. But it’s not.

    >Nice to meet you Joe. Never heard of you before this.
    >Is your “Afterhell” series SFFaudio related?

    No, it’s dark fantasy. SF elements show up from time to time, but the overall emphasis is on horror and surrealism.

    >The best way for an artist to get ahead is to copy everyone else — to defer his or her creativity?

    >I didn’t say it was the best way, but I doubt you’d suggest it
    >isn’t an effective way to bootstrap your original productions.

    It isn’t necessarily effective by nature, either; only when the business relationships that entails are mutual. You portrayed it as such. Sometimes it’s not.

    >For instance, I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because
    >of his involvement in media tie in novels. Now I
    >enjoy his original fiction. Is this just?

    Er, not the best analogy. By the time KJA was writing media tie-in sequels, he’d already an accomplished writer of hard SF. His future prospects for publication didn’t necessarily depend on that transition. The survival of an amateur audiodrama often depends on whether it makes any sales or gets any feedback at all.

    >I believe this was part of the rationale behind Sonic
    >Cinema doing Firefly: Old Wounds, to better market
    >their company.

    Possibly. But they’re also Browncoats. We’ve have to ask Jack Ward and Andy Dorfman to find out what their greatest motivator was.

    >>This might come as a shock, but Barsoom and Tatooine were
    >>once unheard of. And if Edgar Rice Burroughs or George
    >>Lucas had listened to you, they wouldn’t have bothered
    >>inventing them.
    >
    >The latter is pretty interest, George Lucas didn’t create Star Wars in a vacuum.

    No, there was a lot of Dune in Tatooine. Wait, what does “pretty interest” mean? I need a translator in here….

    >If you want the next Barsoom, give Whatshername a chance.

    >Abosultely! Without question! But how, can I even find
    >out about Sheila Whatshername?

    >But I believe that Russell T. Davies wrote Doctor Who
    >before he was a big name too. Fan Fic isn’t nicotine,
    >it isn’t that difficult a hobby to give up.

    Davies wrote a novel for the Doctor Who New Adventures line. But by then he had several several successful TV series under his belt. And the trap is in the readers’ addictions, not the writer’s. But then considering what Davies has been up to late, sometimes a writer can get addicted too. Good thing for us too, in his case!

    >Try some lapsed copyright stuff. tons of it is available,
    >much of it excellent, and I’m not talking the standards,
    >Dickens, Poe, or even Lovecraft (which I still think
    >there is quite a taste for).

    Working on several Lovecraft adaptations myself. Not for my own series, but for another group. The legal side of it gets tricky, though. Making a good-faith effort to find a rightful owner might be enough to protect us. It might not. I’d rather not have copyright jazz hovering in the background like dread Cthulhu while I’m writing. But the prospect of introducing more people to Lovecraft is too good to pass up.

    >>And if Hollywood has a big-budget movie deal for the
    >>same story you’re working on, you’re often politely
    >>asked to either make your audiodrama more like the
    >>movie or put it on indefinite hold, so that two
    >>versions of the same story aren’t competing for the
    >>same fanbase.
    >
    >Sounds like a good problems to have.

    Your big break suddenly gets stuck in limbo? Oh yeah, that’d be a great feeling.

    >>Promote an audiodrama with promises that it’s just like
    >>a certain TV show? Knock yourself out. Then you’ll have
    >>a hell of a time after that convincing everyone that
    >>your work is halfway original.
    >
    >That one’s an out and out straw man.

    Not so. I worked on a few amateur Doctor Who audiodrama efforts years ago. Each one got pressure to conform to one fanboy canon or another. And when I started work on “Afterhell,” it took a lot of effort to convince all of those factions that it was a completely original work. Things happen even when you’re not there, Jesse.

    >>If you’re searching for nothing but big-brand media-
    >>SF retreads, you’ve got plenty of “audiodrama sin”
    >> on your hands.
    >
    >I am not searching for nothing but “big-brand media-
    >SF retreads” – not in the least.

    But in effect, you defined that action as a standard, warning that a show won’t get noticed unless it conforms to keyword searches for big-brand SF.

    >Are there any more examples of the scintillatingly
    >obvious you’d like to share?

    >You get more flies with sugar? ;)

    Too bad you didn’t try that at the beginning….

    >>And who are you to dictate what’s funny?
    >
    >I’m me!

    Overruled. Hey, if you can take a superior tone, so can I.

    >>Anyone citing Red Dwarf as hard science is hi-larious.
    >
    >Joe.

    Yes, dear?

    >Another straw man, I said Red Dwarf was “full of
    >ridiculously impossible physics” but that in
    >spite of this “made serious SF ideas a part of
    >the plot.” I didn’t say Red Dwarf was HARD SF.

    You complained (rightly so) about the dumbing down of science in comedies. Then you undermined your point by citing Red Dwarf as a positive example. Praise Red Dwarf, by all means. But that was your choice for a better implementation of science as plot. And by your own admission, it’s not a good one.

    >>You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing
    >>issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore
    >>with your functionally illiterate attempts at
    >>grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have
    >>the gall to say that?
    >
    >I have gall. I am full of effrontery. But I’d still
    >call that ad homenim attack, not a measured response.

    You get “full up,” so it’s okay for you for call people “stupid” and “pathetic”? You opened the door to cruelty, not me. If you didn’t want someone else to come in and make walk back to your side, you should’ve kept it civil.

    >Mayhaps I do have a funny way of constructing a sentence,
    >but truly incoherent? I doubt that the case.

    That the case is….? Well, I’ll rest my case on that point.

    >>To paraphrase J Michael Straczynski, “If you can’t say what
    >>you mean, you can’t mean what you say.”
    >
    >Will bear that in mind.

    I would really, really appreciate it if you could. It’s no fun to puzzle over a blog posting and wonder what someone is trying to say, especially on a topic that matters to oneself.

    >Here, you’re confusing three different things:
    >campy humor, nostalgia, and the naivete of over-
    >enthusiastic audiodramatists.
    >
    >I was talking about three things, not confusing them.

    No, you lumped them together under one banner, addressing them all as the same issue. They’re different issues, each of them requiring its own informed approach.

    >Campy humor…I’d sooner avoid it, myself. But if
    >someone thinks they can put a new spin on it, I’d
    >at least give them a chance.

    Of course! I didn’t dismiss out of hand the idea of
    listening to someone’s “campy” audio drama, I said
    I was full up.

    But you said it in the context of offering alternatives, to write serious drama instead of comedy. Instead of calling for improvement, you’re telling them to just stop. And you also said you’re “full up.” That’s not a lot of room for anything except out-of-hand dismissal.

    >Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”?

    >Maybe I’m wrong but I look at the state of radio today and
    >beleive there is absolutely no chance of getting millions
    >of people to be glued to their radios listening to audio
    >drama like they were in the 1930s and 1940s again.

    Yeah, that’s a point worth noting. But consider this: More and more people are turning their backs on mainstream TV. A significant number of those people plug their MP3 players into some speakers and listen to podcasts instead. Major lifestyle paradigm shifts like that are taking place. I don’t know whether that’ll necessarily generate huge Neilsen numbers or what have you. But after seeing it happen more than once, I’m not ready to dismiss the possibility.

    The other thing: you referred to the “pathetic dreams” of amateurs. You’re exasperated with the current state of things. I understand, but don’t take it out on other people’s dreams. The root of the word “amateur” is the Latin for “one who loves.” People in love say and do silly things. Flag them in for a safe landing on planet Earth. You don’t have shoot ‘em out of the sky.

    >Magazine fiction is barely hanging on. Almost nothing left of it now.

    Oh man, tell me about it.

    >What are you, Leo Laporte?

    >I think he’s a tech guy but I’ve neither heard nor seen his show.

    You’d claimed knowledge of podcasting. I figured you’d know about Leo Laporte. He’s in charge of some of the most popular podcasts to date, especially “This Week in Tech” and “The Daily Giz Wiz.” He’s also expressed interest in producing audiodramas.

    A recent “Daily Giz Wiz” podcast, the one I’d linked to earlier, featured a discussion about amateur inventors. At one point, Leo addressed his podcasting audience of techies and gearheads, saying, “Most of you don’t have any great ideas.”

    It’s the whole “catching flies with sugar” thing that you find so amusing.
    >>When actors perform Shakespeare, when they do it well,
    >>even a modern audience can follow the dialogue without
    >>a second thought.
    >
    >False, they need to be trained up for Shakespeare.

    Are you referring to the actors or the audience? Actors need rehearsal, obviously. But not the audience. That’s the point. When the actors do their jobs well, the audience will be able to pick up the meanings of archaic words or usage while the performance is going on. Under such circumstances, laypeople do get it. If it didn’t happen, Shakespeare’s works wouldn’t have endured as long as they have.

    >>You can’t absolve yourself from the state of the
    >>market just because you’re a consumer. You’re
    >>shaping the market with every purchase.
    >
    >And hopefully with every review!

    Well, there you are. And if they were as informed as the one you did for WRW’s “Fall of the City,” we’re all better for it.

    >>Or are you actively supporting some MacDonaldland audiodrama outfit
    >
    >I’d need to know who you think is “McDonaldland” before I could say.

    I’d sooner discuss it by e-mail, unless you insist on covering it here.

    >No, no, if you want change, you should be a better
    >consumer. Better educated.

    >I am in the process of eduicating myself. I’m told it is a lifelong process.

    Well, that didn’t stop you from posting.

    >Now you overinflate my faults. Clearly my commentary was legible.

    It had to be translated first. That took time.

    >Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you? If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.

    >I can’t both be wrong and nonsensical.

    Sure you can. Think positive. From the standpoint of accuracy, they’re synonymous, so you’re doubly covered.

    >As to the spelling, I can attempt more careful checking.
    >Care to point out any corrections?

    >it’s heyday [its]
    >Its called DISTRIBUTION [It's]
    >feeback [feedback]
    >Weitten [Written]
    >critcism [criticism]
    >It ain’t all that funny[,] buddy.
    >your in deep trouble [you're]

    And just now…
    >Abosultely [Absolutely]
    >advertizing [advertising]
    >person to person convincing [person-to-person]
    >media tie in [tie-in]
    >eduicating [educating]
    >beleive [believe]

  417. Joe on Fri, 13th Oct 2006 5:50 pm
  418. >>Putting the individual resources of 10-20 people with
    >>families, debts, and day jobs under one big circus
    >>tent doesn’t trigger the sort of alchemy you’re
    >>dreaming of, pal.
    >
    >I wasn’t talking panacea.

    And yet that was how it was framed. You pointed out a problem, posed an alternative, even laying down points to support it in a cursory fashion. Then you left it at that, as if that was enough. If you had offered more than one response to the problem, or explored the pros and cons of the one alternative, it would’ve been at least more thoughtful.

    >>You’re confusing distribution — the dispersing of your product —
    >>with advertising, which is about attracting consumers to your product.
    >
    >I don’t think I confused the two issues.

    If you were confused, how would you know?

    >>Distribution means absolutely nothing if no one knows
    >>you exist, from one who knows.
    >
    >I don’t disagree, but by podcasting and submitting your
    >feed to directories you’ll more likely get people to
    >know you exist.

    Submitting the RSS feed provides a distribution mechanism. It does that very well, but nothing more. If you’re trying to sell CD’s, swag, or a subscription deal, the podcast is advertising, offering free samples. But then you have to advertise the podcast and convince people to use your chosen means of distribution.

    >>By your reasoning, every podcast in the known universe is making
    >>a killing by sheer virtue of existing.
    >
    >I don’t think I said anything like that.

    You said, “Podcast distribution is the solution!” I can see the neon from here. There was no talk of drawing people to your podcast, only how great things will be once your feed is out there, just waiting to be found.

    >Robert J. Sawyer, someone who I think is a great
    >SF writer and a marketing master, [...]

    And he is, a master in all sorts of things IIRC.

    >[...]he puts his marketing time (his advertizing of himself
    >and his books) into mass-media.

    But he’s not an amateur. He’s already made his bones. Your posting was about amateur audiodrama, not the pro circuits. Amateur audiodramatists don’t have the same resources. For most, word of mouth is all they’ve got.

    >>That lends them more credibility than podcasting
    >>ever could, at least for now.
    >
    >Don’t take this as an attack:
    >
    >”Ever could” and “at least for now” can’t co-exist
    >in the same thought.

    Oh great, now you’re proofreading? I wish you’d been this on-the-ball before. Take out “ever” and give it a whirl then.

    >It seems to me that corporations are now taking
    >podcasting up at fast pace. I have no stats but
    >that’s my general read based on the volume of
    >corporate podcasts.

    The corporate sector is getting the idea, but not fully. Many have switched once-free podcasts to a subscription model without warning, alienating their customer base in the process. The sheer number of corporate podcasts has gone up, but the mishandling ends up reversing the trend. As a result, their podcasting keeps held up in committee for “re-evaluation.”

    >I see what your saying, I think. But can’t they be
    >both and me not be mealy mouthed?

    If that was the only point of concern in that respect, yes. But it’s not.

    >Nice to meet you Joe. Never heard of you before this.
    >Is your “Afterhell” series SFFaudio related?

    No, it’s dark fantasy. SF elements show up from time to time, but the overall emphasis is on horror and surrealism.

    >The best way for an artist to get ahead is to copy everyone else — to defer his or her creativity?

    >I didn’t say it was the best way, but I doubt you’d suggest it
    >isn’t an effective way to bootstrap your original productions.

    It isn’t necessarily effective by nature, either; only when the business relationships that entails are mutual. You portrayed it as such. Sometimes it’s not.

    >For instance, I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because
    >of his involvement in media tie in novels. Now I
    >enjoy his original fiction. Is this just?

    Er, not the best analogy. By the time KJA was writing media tie-in sequels, he’d already an accomplished writer of hard SF. His future prospects for publication didn’t necessarily depend on that transition. The survival of an amateur audiodrama often depends on whether it makes any sales or gets any feedback at all.

    >I believe this was part of the rationale behind Sonic
    >Cinema doing Firefly: Old Wounds, to better market
    >their company.

    Possibly. But they’re also Browncoats. We’ve have to ask Jack Ward and Andy Dorfman to find out what their greatest motivator was.

    >>This might come as a shock, but Barsoom and Tatooine were
    >>once unheard of. And if Edgar Rice Burroughs or George
    >>Lucas had listened to you, they wouldn’t have bothered
    >>inventing them.
    >
    >The latter is pretty interest, George Lucas didn’t create Star Wars in a vacuum.

    No, there was a lot of Dune in Tatooine. Wait, what does “pretty interest” mean? I need a translator in here….

    >If you want the next Barsoom, give Whatshername a chance.

    >Abosultely! Without question! But how, can I even find
    >out about Sheila Whatshername?

    >But I believe that Russell T. Davies wrote Doctor Who
    >before he was a big name too. Fan Fic isn’t nicotine,
    >it isn’t that difficult a hobby to give up.

    Davies wrote a novel for the Doctor Who New Adventures line. But by then he had several several successful TV series under his belt. And the trap is in the readers’ addictions, not the writer’s. But then considering what Davies has been up to late, sometimes a writer can get addicted too. Good thing for us too, in his case!

    >Try some lapsed copyright stuff. tons of it is available,
    >much of it excellent, and I’m not talking the standards,
    >Dickens, Poe, or even Lovecraft (which I still think
    >there is quite a taste for).

    Working on several Lovecraft adaptations myself. Not for my own series, but for another group. The legal side of it gets tricky, though. Making a good-faith effort to find a rightful owner might be enough to protect us. It might not. I’d rather not have copyright jazz hovering in the background like dread Cthulhu while I’m writing. But the prospect of introducing more people to Lovecraft is too good to pass up.

    >>And if Hollywood has a big-budget movie deal for the
    >>same story you’re working on, you’re often politely
    >>asked to either make your audiodrama more like the
    >>movie or put it on indefinite hold, so that two
    >>versions of the same story aren’t competing for the
    >>same fanbase.
    >
    >Sounds like a good problems to have.

    Your big break suddenly gets stuck in limbo? Oh yeah, that’d be a great feeling.

    >>Promote an audiodrama with promises that it’s just like
    >>a certain TV show? Knock yourself out. Then you’ll have
    >>a hell of a time after that convincing everyone that
    >>your work is halfway original.
    >
    >That one’s an out and out straw man.

    Not so. I worked on a few amateur Doctor Who audiodrama efforts years ago. Each one got pressure to conform to one fanboy canon or another. And when I started work on “Afterhell,” it took a lot of effort to convince all of those factions that it was a completely original work. Things happen even when you’re not there, Jesse.

    >>If you’re searching for nothing but big-brand media-
    >>SF retreads, you’ve got plenty of “audiodrama sin”
    >> on your hands.
    >
    >I am not searching for nothing but “big-brand media-
    >SF retreads” – not in the least.

    But in effect, you defined that action as a standard, warning that a show won’t get noticed unless it conforms to keyword searches for big-brand SF.

    >Are there any more examples of the scintillatingly
    >obvious you’d like to share?

    >You get more flies with sugar? ;)

    Too bad you didn’t try that at the beginning….

    >>And who are you to dictate what’s funny?
    >
    >I’m me!

    Overruled. Hey, if you can take a superior tone, so can I.

    >>Anyone citing Red Dwarf as hard science is hi-larious.
    >
    >Joe.

    Yes, dear?

    >Another straw man, I said Red Dwarf was “full of
    >ridiculously impossible physics” but that in
    >spite of this “made serious SF ideas a part of
    >the plot.” I didn’t say Red Dwarf was HARD SF.

    You complained (rightly so) about the dumbing down of science in comedies. Then you undermined your point by citing Red Dwarf as a positive example. Praise Red Dwarf, by all means. But that was your choice for a better implementation of science as plot. And by your own admission, it’s not a good one.

    >>You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing
    >>issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore
    >>with your functionally illiterate attempts at
    >>grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have
    >>the gall to say that?
    >
    >I have gall. I am full of effrontery. But I’d still
    >call that ad homenim attack, not a measured response.

    You get “full up,” so it’s okay for you for call people “stupid” and “pathetic”? You opened the door to cruelty, not me. If you didn’t want someone else to come in and make walk back to your side, you should’ve kept it civil.

    >Mayhaps I do have a funny way of constructing a sentence,
    >but truly incoherent? I doubt that the case.

    That the case is….? Well, I’ll rest my case on that point.

    >>To paraphrase J Michael Straczynski, “If you can’t say what
    >>you mean, you can’t mean what you say.”
    >
    >Will bear that in mind.

    I would really, really appreciate it if you could. It’s no fun to puzzle over a blog posting and wonder what someone is trying to say, especially on a topic that matters to oneself.

    >Here, you’re confusing three different things:
    >campy humor, nostalgia, and the naivete of over-
    >enthusiastic audiodramatists.
    >
    >I was talking about three things, not confusing them.

    No, you lumped them together under one banner, addressing them all as the same issue. They’re different issues, each of them requiring its own informed approach.

    >Campy humor…I’d sooner avoid it, myself. But if
    >someone thinks they can put a new spin on it, I’d
    >at least give them a chance.

    Of course! I didn’t dismiss out of hand the idea of
    listening to someone’s “campy” audio drama, I said
    I was full up.

    But you said it in the context of offering alternatives, to write serious drama instead of comedy. Instead of calling for improvement, you’re telling them to just stop. And you also said you’re “full up.” That’s not a lot of room for anything except out-of-hand dismissal.

    >Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”?

    >Maybe I’m wrong but I look at the state of radio today and
    >beleive there is absolutely no chance of getting millions
    >of people to be glued to their radios listening to audio
    >drama like they were in the 1930s and 1940s again.

    Yeah, that’s a point worth noting. But consider this: More and more people are turning their backs on mainstream TV. A significant number of those people plug their MP3 players into some speakers and listen to podcasts instead. Major lifestyle paradigm shifts like that are taking place. I don’t know whether that’ll necessarily generate huge Neilsen numbers or what have you. But after seeing it happen more than once, I’m not ready to dismiss the possibility.

    The other thing: you referred to the “pathetic dreams” of amateurs. You’re exasperated with the current state of things. I understand, but don’t take it out on other people’s dreams. The root of the word “amateur” is the Latin for “one who loves.” People in love say and do silly things. Flag them in for a safe landing on planet Earth. You don’t have shoot ‘em out of the sky.

    >Magazine fiction is barely hanging on. Almost nothing left of it now.

    Oh man, tell me about it.

    >What are you, Leo Laporte?

    >I think he’s a tech guy but I’ve neither heard nor seen his show.

    You’d claimed knowledge of podcasting. I figured you’d know about Leo Laporte. He’s in charge of some of the most popular podcasts to date, especially “This Week in Tech” and “The Daily Giz Wiz.” He’s also expressed interest in producing audiodramas.

    A recent “Daily Giz Wiz” podcast, the one I’d linked to earlier, featured a discussion about amateur inventors. At one point, Leo addressed his podcasting audience of techies and gearheads, saying, “Most of you don’t have any great ideas.”

    It’s the whole “catching flies with sugar” thing that you find so amusing.
    >>When actors perform Shakespeare, when they do it well,
    >>even a modern audience can follow the dialogue without
    >>a second thought.
    >
    >False, they need to be trained up for Shakespeare.

    Are you referring to the actors or the audience? Actors need rehearsal, obviously. But not the audience. That’s the point. When the actors do their jobs well, the audience will be able to pick up the meanings of archaic words or usage while the performance is going on. Under such circumstances, laypeople do get it. If it didn’t happen, Shakespeare’s works wouldn’t have endured as long as they have.

    >>You can’t absolve yourself from the state of the
    >>market just because you’re a consumer. You’re
    >>shaping the market with every purchase.
    >
    >And hopefully with every review!

    Well, there you are. And if they were as informed as the one you did for WRW’s “Fall of the City,” we’re all better for it.

    >>Or are you actively supporting some MacDonaldland audiodrama outfit
    >
    >I’d need to know who you think is “McDonaldland” before I could say.

    I’d sooner discuss it by e-mail, unless you insist on covering it here.

    >No, no, if you want change, you should be a better
    >consumer. Better educated.

    >I am in the process of eduicating myself. I’m told it is a lifelong process.

    Well, that didn’t stop you from posting.

    >Now you overinflate my faults. Clearly my commentary was legible.

    It had to be translated first. That took time.

    >Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you? If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.

    >I can’t both be wrong and nonsensical.

    Sure you can. Think positive. From the standpoint of accuracy, they’re synonymous, so you’re doubly covered.

    >As to the spelling, I can attempt more careful checking.
    >Care to point out any corrections?

    >it’s heyday [its]
    >Its called DISTRIBUTION [It's]
    >feeback [feedback]
    >Weitten [Written]
    >critcism [criticism]
    >It ain’t all that funny[,] buddy.
    >your in deep trouble [you're]

    And just now…
    >Abosultely [Absolutely]
    >advertizing [advertising]
    >person to person convincing [person-to-person]
    >media tie in [tie-in]
    >eduicating [educating]
    >beleive [believe]

  419. Jesse on Sat, 14th Oct 2006 12:13 am
  420. Scott,

    >On the amateur audio drama – I’m saying that amateur audio drama is not a business. In your original post, you said “The industry has a number of problems. This post isn’t designed to discourage people who want to get into the business…” Amateur audio drama is not an industry, nor is it a business.

    In my commentary I placed italics around “business” and “industry” to indicate that they were not the ideal terms, and that I was aware of it. And though some have complained about my typos, long-windedness and incoherence it is mty understanding it is acceptable to use italics when citing words that are being talked about, as an alternative to single quotes. Moreover, I couldn’t think of a more apt phraseology at the time. I fear using the words like “hobby” and “pastime” would probably have gotten me into deeper poo. Your idea that persons who do amateur audio drama are doing it like it is a hobby is an interesting one. I hadn’t thought of comparing amateur dramatization to playing a game of softball. One problem I forsee with it, few persons who play softball expect anybody who isn’t related to the players to be interested in watching a game. And I suspect, that for at least some amateur audio dramatists gaining a wider audience is something they do care about.

    >And two things that are probably subjects for a different thread:
    1) Yes, I would love to see a “Ringworld” audio drama, but no, I’m not interested in hearing a piece of “Ringworld” fanfic.

    Seriously? I would be very interested! If it was terrible I’d turn it off of course. And of course I’d prefer an enthusiastic professional tackle it, but if they aren’t, and they don’t appear to be, I’d definitely listen to an amateur’s attempt!

    >2) On podcasting in general as business, yes, I remain pessimistic. Both Eley and Evo are definitely showing people the way. However, time will tell. Is it sustainable in the long run? Maybe it is! Maybe it isn’t. I wish them all kinds of success, but I remain convinced that when (not if, when) large publishing companies start taking advantage of the internet in a bigger way, the mechanism will look more like traditional media sales than like podcasting. Again, see iTunes.

    The problem with your theory is that this distribution method does not work the same way cable or broadcast media does. I can’t say whether or not any individual people will be able to make a living off of freely distributed podcast content in the long run. And of course the donation model is very, very scary! But I was talking about amateur productions. If they were expecting to make a living off of it, they are going to be disappointed anyway.

    >Your point about using advertising to finance podcasts is well taken. That is certainly a possibility.

    It is just beginning. Several of my favorite regular podcasts are now experimenting with advertizing. Others advertize their own wares. To me things look extremely bright for podcasting.

  421. Jesse on Sat, 14th Oct 2006 12:13 am
  422. Scott,

    >On the amateur audio drama – I’m saying that amateur audio drama is not a business. In your original post, you said “The industry has a number of problems. This post isn’t designed to discourage people who want to get into the business…” Amateur audio drama is not an industry, nor is it a business.

    In my commentary I placed italics around “business” and “industry” to indicate that they were not the ideal terms, and that I was aware of it. And though some have complained about my typos, long-windedness and incoherence it is mty understanding it is acceptable to use italics when citing words that are being talked about, as an alternative to single quotes. Moreover, I couldn’t think of a more apt phraseology at the time. I fear using the words like “hobby” and “pastime” would probably have gotten me into deeper poo. Your idea that persons who do amateur audio drama are doing it like it is a hobby is an interesting one. I hadn’t thought of comparing amateur dramatization to playing a game of softball. One problem I forsee with it, few persons who play softball expect anybody who isn’t related to the players to be interested in watching a game. And I suspect, that for at least some amateur audio dramatists gaining a wider audience is something they do care about.

    >And two things that are probably subjects for a different thread:
    1) Yes, I would love to see a “Ringworld” audio drama, but no, I’m not interested in hearing a piece of “Ringworld” fanfic.

    Seriously? I would be very interested! If it was terrible I’d turn it off of course. And of course I’d prefer an enthusiastic professional tackle it, but if they aren’t, and they don’t appear to be, I’d definitely listen to an amateur’s attempt!

    >2) On podcasting in general as business, yes, I remain pessimistic. Both Eley and Evo are definitely showing people the way. However, time will tell. Is it sustainable in the long run? Maybe it is! Maybe it isn’t. I wish them all kinds of success, but I remain convinced that when (not if, when) large publishing companies start taking advantage of the internet in a bigger way, the mechanism will look more like traditional media sales than like podcasting. Again, see iTunes.

    The problem with your theory is that this distribution method does not work the same way cable or broadcast media does. I can’t say whether or not any individual people will be able to make a living off of freely distributed podcast content in the long run. And of course the donation model is very, very scary! But I was talking about amateur productions. If they were expecting to make a living off of it, they are going to be disappointed anyway.

    >Your point about using advertising to finance podcasts is well taken. That is certainly a possibility.

    It is just beginning. Several of my favorite regular podcasts are now experimenting with advertizing. Others advertize their own wares. To me things look extremely bright for podcasting.

  423. Jesse on Sat, 14th Oct 2006 2:15 am
  424. Joe,

    >And yet that was how it was framed. You pointed out a problem, posed an alternative, even laying down points to support it in a cursory fashion. Then you left it at that, as if that was enough. If you had offered more than one response to the problem, or explored the pros and cons of the one alternative, it would’ve been at least more thoughtful.

    So, there is a problem, and I got the problem right. I offered a solution, but I didn’t offer enough solutions. Feel free to expound, it sounds like you have more experience at production than me. How can we solve this problem?

    >Submitting the RSS feed provides a distribution mechanism. It does that very well, but nothing more.

    Wrong. When I go into iTunes and do a search I find things I didn’t know existed and click on them. When I go to Podcast Alley and Podcast Pickle, ditto.

    >If you’re trying to sell CD’s, swag, or a subscription deal, the podcast is advertising, offering free samples.

    If your saying the samples shouldn’t be complete stories I think that’s a mistake. I don’t listen to sample podcasts. I want a complete story. I still think there might be some leeway, offering an abridged podiobook and selling an unabridged audiobook.

    >But then you have to advertise the podcast and convince people to use your chosen means of distribution.

    You can do more than just one kind of distribution. Podcasting is cheap. Sell a hard copy, sell a downloadable copy (with extras), sell it to a radio station. Give it away on a podcast with ads, or ask for donations.

    >You said, “Podcast distribution is the solution!” I can see the neon from here.

    Out of context. Try putting it back in the context of “If your stuff isn’t on the radio, isn’t being reviewed by anyone or being syndicated by another podcast your audience isn’t just going to come to you.”

    >There was no talk of drawing people to your podcast, only how great things will be once your feed is out there, just waiting to be found.

    I think you’re being a trifle unfair, this was a “commentary” post. One in which I laid out 5 problems that I as a consumer of amateur audio drama saw. I didn’t make an “I’m the audio drama wizard and can solve all your problems if you read my post” post.

    >And he is, a master in all sorts of things IIRC.

    I don’t know what you mean by “IIRC.”

    >But he’s not an amateur. He’s already made his bones. Your posting was about amateur audiodrama, not the pro circuits.

    I doubt ignoring the experience of people who are professionals will help. Especailly when they are good at marketing themselves and they are talking to people who aren’t.

    >Amateur audiodramatists don’t have the same resources. For most, word of mouth is all they’ve got.

    They can get better word of mouth by teaming up. Podcast novels that would never get a second glace, because they cannot be found, will get at least cursory attention when they are shelved next to the better known ones. This is why getting on Podiobooks.com is better than trying to go it all on your own.

    >Oh great, now you’re proofreading? I wish you’d been this on-the-ball before. Take out “ever” and give it a whirl then.

    Ok. And does number of listeners = credibility? We can ask Andrew Dorfman or Jack Ward, about their numbers: “Does The Sonic Society have more listeners through podcasting or through radio?” The nice thing about podcasting, you can have a fairly good idea how many people are subscribed.

    >No, it’s dark fantasy. SF elements show up from time to time, but the overall emphasis is on horror and surrealism.

    We do cover horror on SFFaudio. And I hear that yours is the next show on The Sonic Society? If you’d be interested in sending either a squarish 150 pixel high or 120X120 pixel logo for Afterhell I’d be happy to mention it.

    >It isn’t necessarily effective by nature, either; only when the business relationships that entails are mutual. You portrayed it as such. Sometimes it’s not.

    I think you are reading in a lot more than I intended.

    >Er, not the best analogy. By the time KJA was writing media tie-in sequels, he’d already an accomplished writer of hard SF. His future prospects for publication didn’t necessarily depend on that transition.

    I didn’t say that, nor would I. What I said was “I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because of his involvement in media tie in novels”. It wasn’t an analogy, it was me showing how I came to be aware of something.

    >Possibly. But they’re also Browncoats. We’ve have to ask Jack Ward and Andy Dorfman to find out what their greatest motivator was.

    Another question for them then.

    >No, there was a lot of Dune in Tatooine. Wait, what does “pretty interest” mean? I need a translator in here….

    I was thinking more with regards to film serials and The Hidden Fortress. and what I meant type was “Interesting.”

    >And the trap is in the readers’ addictions, not the writer’s. But then considering what Davies has been up to late, sometimes a writer can get addicted too. Good thing for us too, in his case!

    Wait a second, you were saying that fan fic was a trap for writers. Slippage!

    >Working on several Lovecraft adaptations myself. Not for my own series, but for another group.

    Feel free to send an email when something is ready. I am a big Lovecraft fan.

    >But in effect, you defined that action as a standard, warning that a show won’t get noticed unless it conforms to keyword searches for big-brand SF.

    Ok, say I’m setting a bad moral example. That being the case, is it untrue? I think not. People search for things they already know about, and then stumble across new stuff they like. That’s my method.

    >You complained (rightly so) about the dumbing down of science in comedies. Then you undermined your point by citing Red Dwarf as a positive example. Praise Red Dwarf, by all means. But that was your choice for a better implementation of science as plot. And by your own admission, it’s not a good one.

    Okay, I give up, we just have incommensurate views on this one. You are not responding to what I wrote about Red Dwarf, but instead to what you think I wrote.

    >You get “full up,” so it’s okay for you for call people “stupid” and “pathetic”? You opened the door to cruelty, not me. If you didn’t want someone else to come in and make walk back to your side, you should’ve kept it civil.

    Kept it civil? I posted a commentary on a blog. It wasn’t a presidential debate. As for being cruel, the charges don’t fit. My words might have been considered harsh, stern, opinionated, but not cruel. I never attacked any audio dramatists or their activities. What I did was state the problems as I saw them. An outsider’s perspective. I called no persons, stupid. I used a familar phrase “Keep It Simple Stupid” and the idea of “Real Simple Syndication” in problem #2’s title. I didn’t invent the title of Podcasting For Dummies it is a real book, and recommending it doesn’t mean I beleive people who read it are dumb. As for being “full up” I am. I’m dreading to hear more campy stuff. I’m oversaturated my ability to absorb more camp is nil. To the charge of me calling people “pathetic,” I plead not guilty by reason of innocence. I said that I thought the dream of millions of today’s people being glued to their radios listening to Radio Drama was pathetic. Not the people. The people who said it are delusional. it is there dream that is pathetic.

    >I would really, really appreciate it if you could. It’s no fun to puzzle over a blog posting and wonder what someone is trying to say, especially on a topic that matters to oneself.

    Would you prefer to write my words for me? :(

    >No, you lumped them together under one banner, addressing them all as the same issue. They’re different issues, each of them requiring its own informed approach.

    As opposed to my uninformed and ham-fisted approach no doubt.

    >But you said it in the context of offering alternatives, to write serious drama instead of comedy. Instead of calling for improvement, you’re telling them to just stop.

    To switch, to change it, not to stop altogether.

    >And you also said you’re “full up.” That’s not a lot of room for anything except out-of-hand dismissal.

    I’m not the only person who listens to audio drama. Your milage may vary. Overall it sounds like you agree with a lot of the things I wrote. Just ask yourself this: Had I been more careful to avoid hurting feelings, would my argument have been more valid? If not, then your talking strategy, and we will have to disagree there.

    >Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”?

    I don’t know what I can say here. People who believe things that are that unlikely are doing themselves a disservice. Like hoping you are going to win the lottery if you play your numbners every week. Or like hoping you’ll become an NBA star when your only 5′2″. These are hoop dreams, and “renting the dream” of being a millionare. Sad. Pathetic, in fact.

    >Yeah, that’s a point worth noting. But consider this: More and more people are turning their backs on mainstream TV.

    Me! I don’t have cable.

    >A significant number of those people plug their MP3 players into some speakers and listen to podcasts instead.

    Me! I’m one of those people!

    >Major lifestyle paradigm shifts like that are taking place. I don’t know whether that’ll necessarily generate huge Neilsen numbers or what have you. But after seeing it happen more than once, I’m not ready to dismiss the possibility.

    Me neither. But they aren’t going to turn back the clock on conventional radio in the United States.

    >The other thing: you referred to the “pathetic dreams” of amateurs. You’re exasperated with the current state of things. I understand, but don’t take it out on other people’s dreams. The root of the word “amateur” is the Latin for “one who loves.” People in love say and do silly things. Flag them in for a safe landing on planet Earth. You don’t have shoot ‘em out of the sky.

    If I was shooting them down, then I was giving them a place to land that would be better for them. Don’t aim for an audience of millions of radio listeners, it isn’t going to happen, shoot for podcasting, where you can count heads easier. It’ll probably take you a solid weekend to get it sorted. But the good part, no cold-calling required. No unfindable webpage with streaming audio. No specialized equipment.

    >You’d claimed knowledge of podcasting. I figured you’d know about Leo Laporte. He’s in charge of some of the most popular podcasts to date, especially “This Week in Tech” and “The Daily Giz Wiz.” He’s also expressed interest in producing audiodramas.

    I’ve never watched or heard those shows.

    >Actors need rehearsal, obviously. But not the audience. That’s the point. When the actors do their jobs well, the audience will be able to pick up the meanings of archaic words or usage while the performance is going on.

    Again I think we are just working in different universes here. Shakespeare, no matter how well it is perfomed is not accessible without being trained-up. I’m a Shakespeare fan. I saw Richard III as directed by Richard Eyre for the National Theatre in London. This is the production starring Ian McKellen, well before his Gandalf days. That was a STUNNING production, way better than the awful film version (also starring McKellen). I was VERY LUCKY to have been as trained-up as I was back then. I could appreciate it. I have friends who don’t get it. Didn’t want to go see it. They didn’t get the classes, didn’t pre-read the plays. Didn’t get the feel for it.

    >Well, there you are. And if they were as informed as the one you did for WRW’s “Fall of the City,” we’re all better for it.

    That sounded nice. I think. ;)

    >I’d sooner discuss it by e-mail, unless you insist on covering it here.

    Oh I’d prefer to cover it here. Please.

    >Well, that didn’t stop you from posting.

    You are being facetious, surely? You aren’t saying I should just shut-up?

    >Sure you can. Think positive. From the standpoint of accuracy, they’re synonymous, so you’re doubly covered.

    Not all “A”s are “B”s. If I am non-sensical, you can’t understand what I am saying. If you can’t understand what I am saying you can’t know me to be wrong. If you know me to be wrong I am sensical.

    >it’s heyday [its]
    >Its called DISTRIBUTION [It's]
    >feeback [feedback]
    >Weitten [Written]
    >critcism [criticism]
    >It ain’t all that funny[,] buddy.
    >your in deep trouble [you're]

    Fixed! Thanks.

    >And just now…
    >Abosultely [Absolutely]
    >advertizing [advertising]
    >person to person convincing [person-to-person]
    >media tie in [tie-in]
    >eduicating [educating]
    >beleive [believe]

    No way to change blog reply posts, sorry.

  425. Jesse on Sat, 14th Oct 2006 2:15 am
  426. Joe,

    >And yet that was how it was framed. You pointed out a problem, posed an alternative, even laying down points to support it in a cursory fashion. Then you left it at that, as if that was enough. If you had offered more than one response to the problem, or explored the pros and cons of the one alternative, it would’ve been at least more thoughtful.

    So, there is a problem, and I got the problem right. I offered a solution, but I didn’t offer enough solutions. Feel free to expound, it sounds like you have more experience at production than me. How can we solve this problem?

    >Submitting the RSS feed provides a distribution mechanism. It does that very well, but nothing more.

    Wrong. When I go into iTunes and do a search I find things I didn’t know existed and click on them. When I go to Podcast Alley and Podcast Pickle, ditto.

    >If you’re trying to sell CD’s, swag, or a subscription deal, the podcast is advertising, offering free samples.

    If your saying the samples shouldn’t be complete stories I think that’s a mistake. I don’t listen to sample podcasts. I want a complete story. I still think there might be some leeway, offering an abridged podiobook and selling an unabridged audiobook.

    >But then you have to advertise the podcast and convince people to use your chosen means of distribution.

    You can do more than just one kind of distribution. Podcasting is cheap. Sell a hard copy, sell a downloadable copy (with extras), sell it to a radio station. Give it away on a podcast with ads, or ask for donations.

    >You said, “Podcast distribution is the solution!” I can see the neon from here.

    Out of context. Try putting it back in the context of “If your stuff isn’t on the radio, isn’t being reviewed by anyone or being syndicated by another podcast your audience isn’t just going to come to you.”

    >There was no talk of drawing people to your podcast, only how great things will be once your feed is out there, just waiting to be found.

    I think you’re being a trifle unfair, this was a “commentary” post. One in which I laid out 5 problems that I as a consumer of amateur audio drama saw. I didn’t make an “I’m the audio drama wizard and can solve all your problems if you read my post” post.

    >And he is, a master in all sorts of things IIRC.

    I don’t know what you mean by “IIRC.”

    >But he’s not an amateur. He’s already made his bones. Your posting was about amateur audiodrama, not the pro circuits.

    I doubt ignoring the experience of people who are professionals will help. Especailly when they are good at marketing themselves and they are talking to people who aren’t.

    >Amateur audiodramatists don’t have the same resources. For most, word of mouth is all they’ve got.

    They can get better word of mouth by teaming up. Podcast novels that would never get a second glace, because they cannot be found, will get at least cursory attention when they are shelved next to the better known ones. This is why getting on Podiobooks.com is better than trying to go it all on your own.

    >Oh great, now you’re proofreading? I wish you’d been this on-the-ball before. Take out “ever” and give it a whirl then.

    Ok. And does number of listeners = credibility? We can ask Andrew Dorfman or Jack Ward, about their numbers: “Does The Sonic Society have more listeners through podcasting or through radio?” The nice thing about podcasting, you can have a fairly good idea how many people are subscribed.

    >No, it’s dark fantasy. SF elements show up from time to time, but the overall emphasis is on horror and surrealism.

    We do cover horror on SFFaudio. And I hear that yours is the next show on The Sonic Society? If you’d be interested in sending either a squarish 150 pixel high or 120X120 pixel logo for Afterhell I’d be happy to mention it.

    >It isn’t necessarily effective by nature, either; only when the business relationships that entails are mutual. You portrayed it as such. Sometimes it’s not.

    I think you are reading in a lot more than I intended.

    >Er, not the best analogy. By the time KJA was writing media tie-in sequels, he’d already an accomplished writer of hard SF. His future prospects for publication didn’t necessarily depend on that transition.

    I didn’t say that, nor would I. What I said was “I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because of his involvement in media tie in novels”. It wasn’t an analogy, it was me showing how I came to be aware of something.

    >Possibly. But they’re also Browncoats. We’ve have to ask Jack Ward and Andy Dorfman to find out what their greatest motivator was.

    Another question for them then.

    >No, there was a lot of Dune in Tatooine. Wait, what does “pretty interest” mean? I need a translator in here….

    I was thinking more with regards to film serials and The Hidden Fortress. and what I meant type was “Interesting.”

    >And the trap is in the readers’ addictions, not the writer’s. But then considering what Davies has been up to late, sometimes a writer can get addicted too. Good thing for us too, in his case!

    Wait a second, you were saying that fan fic was a trap for writers. Slippage!

    >Working on several Lovecraft adaptations myself. Not for my own series, but for another group.

    Feel free to send an email when something is ready. I am a big Lovecraft fan.

    >But in effect, you defined that action as a standard, warning that a show won’t get noticed unless it conforms to keyword searches for big-brand SF.

    Ok, say I’m setting a bad moral example. That being the case, is it untrue? I think not. People search for things they already know about, and then stumble across new stuff they like. That’s my method.

    >You complained (rightly so) about the dumbing down of science in comedies. Then you undermined your point by citing Red Dwarf as a positive example. Praise Red Dwarf, by all means. But that was your choice for a better implementation of science as plot. And by your own admission, it’s not a good one.

    Okay, I give up, we just have incommensurate views on this one. You are not responding to what I wrote about Red Dwarf, but instead to what you think I wrote.

    >You get “full up,” so it’s okay for you for call people “stupid” and “pathetic”? You opened the door to cruelty, not me. If you didn’t want someone else to come in and make walk back to your side, you should’ve kept it civil.

    Kept it civil? I posted a commentary on a blog. It wasn’t a presidential debate. As for being cruel, the charges don’t fit. My words might have been considered harsh, stern, opinionated, but not cruel. I never attacked any audio dramatists or their activities. What I did was state the problems as I saw them. An outsider’s perspective. I called no persons, stupid. I used a familar phrase “Keep It Simple Stupid” and the idea of “Real Simple Syndication” in problem #2’s title. I didn’t invent the title of Podcasting For Dummies it is a real book, and recommending it doesn’t mean I beleive people who read it are dumb. As for being “full up” I am. I’m dreading to hear more campy stuff. I’m oversaturated my ability to absorb more camp is nil. To the charge of me calling people “pathetic,” I plead not guilty by reason of innocence. I said that I thought the dream of millions of today’s people being glued to their radios listening to Radio Drama was pathetic. Not the people. The people who said it are delusional. it is there dream that is pathetic.

    >I would really, really appreciate it if you could. It’s no fun to puzzle over a blog posting and wonder what someone is trying to say, especially on a topic that matters to oneself.

    Would you prefer to write my words for me? :(

    >No, you lumped them together under one banner, addressing them all as the same issue. They’re different issues, each of them requiring its own informed approach.

    As opposed to my uninformed and ham-fisted approach no doubt.

    >But you said it in the context of offering alternatives, to write serious drama instead of comedy. Instead of calling for improvement, you’re telling them to just stop.

    To switch, to change it, not to stop altogether.

    >And you also said you’re “full up.” That’s not a lot of room for anything except out-of-hand dismissal.

    I’m not the only person who listens to audio drama. Your milage may vary. Overall it sounds like you agree with a lot of the things I wrote. Just ask yourself this: Had I been more careful to avoid hurting feelings, would my argument have been more valid? If not, then your talking strategy, and we will have to disagree there.

    >Look, I’m all for setting people straight and giving them a sense of realism, if not pragmatism. But calling their aspirations a “pathetic dream”?

    I don’t know what I can say here. People who believe things that are that unlikely are doing themselves a disservice. Like hoping you are going to win the lottery if you play your numbners every week. Or like hoping you’ll become an NBA star when your only 5′2″. These are hoop dreams, and “renting the dream” of being a millionare. Sad. Pathetic, in fact.

    >Yeah, that’s a point worth noting. But consider this: More and more people are turning their backs on mainstream TV.

    Me! I don’t have cable.

    >A significant number of those people plug their MP3 players into some speakers and listen to podcasts instead.

    Me! I’m one of those people!

    >Major lifestyle paradigm shifts like that are taking place. I don’t know whether that’ll necessarily generate huge Neilsen numbers or what have you. But after seeing it happen more than once, I’m not ready to dismiss the possibility.

    Me neither. But they aren’t going to turn back the clock on conventional radio in the United States.

    >The other thing: you referred to the “pathetic dreams” of amateurs. You’re exasperated with the current state of things. I understand, but don’t take it out on other people’s dreams. The root of the word “amateur” is the Latin for “one who loves.” People in love say and do silly things. Flag them in for a safe landing on planet Earth. You don’t have shoot ‘em out of the sky.

    If I was shooting them down, then I was giving them a place to land that would be better for them. Don’t aim for an audience of millions of radio listeners, it isn’t going to happen, shoot for podcasting, where you can count heads easier. It’ll probably take you a solid weekend to get it sorted. But the good part, no cold-calling required. No unfindable webpage with streaming audio. No specialized equipment.

    >You’d claimed knowledge of podcasting. I figured you’d know about Leo Laporte. He’s in charge of some of the most popular podcasts to date, especially “This Week in Tech” and “The Daily Giz Wiz.” He’s also expressed interest in producing audiodramas.

    I’ve never watched or heard those shows.

    >Actors need rehearsal, obviously. But not the audience. That’s the point. When the actors do their jobs well, the audience will be able to pick up the meanings of archaic words or usage while the performance is going on.

    Again I think we are just working in different universes here. Shakespeare, no matter how well it is perfomed is not accessible without being trained-up. I’m a Shakespeare fan. I saw Richard III as directed by Richard Eyre for the National Theatre in London. This is the production starring Ian McKellen, well before his Gandalf days. That was a STUNNING production, way better than the awful film version (also starring McKellen). I was VERY LUCKY to have been as trained-up as I was back then. I could appreciate it. I have friends who don’t get it. Didn’t want to go see it. They didn’t get the classes, didn’t pre-read the plays. Didn’t get the feel for it.

    >Well, there you are. And if they were as informed as the one you did for WRW’s “Fall of the City,” we’re all better for it.

    That sounded nice. I think. ;)

    >I’d sooner discuss it by e-mail, unless you insist on covering it here.

    Oh I’d prefer to cover it here. Please.

    >Well, that didn’t stop you from posting.

    You are being facetious, surely? You aren’t saying I should just shut-up?

    >Sure you can. Think positive. From the standpoint of accuracy, they’re synonymous, so you’re doubly covered.

    Not all “A”s are “B”s. If I am non-sensical, you can’t understand what I am saying. If you can’t understand what I am saying you can’t know me to be wrong. If you know me to be wrong I am sensical.

    >it’s heyday [its]
    >Its called DISTRIBUTION [It's]
    >feeback [feedback]
    >Weitten [Written]
    >critcism [criticism]
    >It ain’t all that funny[,] buddy.
    >your in deep trouble [you're]

    Fixed! Thanks.

    >And just now…
    >Abosultely [Absolutely]
    >advertizing [advertising]
    >person to person convincing [person-to-person]
    >media tie in [tie-in]
    >eduicating [educating]
    >beleive [believe]

    No way to change blog reply posts, sorry.

  427. Jesse on Sat, 14th Oct 2006 3:44 pm
  428. Yuri,

    I am a great fan of your work! For those persons who don’t instantly recognize the name, this man is responsible for some of the finest professional audio drama produced in North America in modern times.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Rasovsky

    http://www.irasov.com/

    Yuri Rasovsky is a two time Peabody award winner, a Grammy Award winner, a Mark Time Lifetime Achievement Award winner, an SFWA Bradbury Award winner and much more. His 2000X series, broadcast on NPR was a stunning aural achievement. Segments from 2000X available for purchase via Audible and iTunes.

    http://www.npr.org/programs/beyond2k/

    In all seriousness, Mr. Rasovsky, you honour me with your attention, even be it derisive. I am not too
    downhearted though as to be held in contempt by you doesn’t put me in bad a company, for I fear your registered foes are some of my happiest heroes. Though I am not worthy of their company, I do enjoy dreaming…

    http://www.irasov.com/shoo.htm

    To be in your thoughts, however briefly, is enough to make me prance with some joy.

    Jesse

  429. Jesse on Sat, 14th Oct 2006 3:44 pm
  430. Yuri,

    I am a great fan of your work! For those persons who don’t instantly recognize the name, this man is responsible for some of the finest professional audio drama produced in North America in modern times.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Rasovsky

    http://www.irasov.com/

    Yuri Rasovsky is a two time Peabody award winner, a Grammy Award winner, a Mark Time Lifetime Achievement Award winner, an SFWA Bradbury Award winner and much more. His 2000X series, broadcast on NPR was a stunning aural achievement. Segments from 2000X available for purchase via Audible and iTunes.

    http://www.npr.org/programs/beyond2k/

    In all seriousness, Mr. Rasovsky, you honour me with your attention, even be it derisive. I am not too
    downhearted though as to be held in contempt by you doesn’t put me in bad a company, for I fear your registered foes are some of my happiest heroes. Though I am not worthy of their company, I do enjoy dreaming…

    http://www.irasov.com/shoo.htm

    To be in your thoughts, however briefly, is enough to make me prance with some joy.

    Jesse

  431. Jack on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 6:35 am
  432. Wow…
    This is amazing.
    I know that when passions are rising high that anyone who might suggest that Audio Drama is dead would have cause to pause.
    I’d like to thank Jesse for all his thoughts and his ideas and especially for bringing this topic up.
    I’m of the mind that more discussion is a whole lot better than less.
    I remember the folks at Space- The Imagination Station getting a little annoyed with the way fans responded to some of the station about something to do with Babylon 5.

    The way I see it, is Jesse is a lover of all things SF&F (I think that’s a safe assumption), and that includes some of the Audio Drama out there.

    I struggle with bringing my own evangelical crusade to the masses about how amazing Audio Cinema is. And in doing so, I’m always trying to listen to the criticisms and the praise equally.

    I grew up loving the Twilight Zone, and most recently have been talking a lot about of it and showing some episodes to my Grade 11 English class. Now, their reactions are both disheartening at times and exciting. Certain things they didn’t initially appreciate. But eventually, they’ve become more and more interested in what the show provides.
    But it means getting over the whole “It’s all in black and white?” simplicity.

    That’s partly what the big problem, I feel is going on with our audience today. Getting them to get out of their eyes, and back in their heads is a huge challenge for us. Not an insurmountable one, but still definitely a challenge.
    We could do one of two things:
    1. Say the hell with those who don’t get us and just do our own stuff. (Which lots of people do, and good luck to them!)
    2. Listen to the criticisms and try to bring those who are critical into the fold. Make new converts by trying to find a middle ground.

    I’m certainly capable of acting with both those options at different times depending upon the different projects I’m involved in.
    For example, Biff Straker is a straight tribute to Buck Rogers. I make no bones about that.
    Wave Front, I’m really considering polishing like an old fashioned X-Minus One style for this reason-
    One of my number one frustrations with this medium is most people love the old time radio but won’t give us new folks a chance. You’ll see tons of people subscribe to “Box Car 711″ (good work BTW!) but not nearly as many people subscribe to the Sonic Society. Why is that?
    For all the cheesiness of some of the OTR, its still familiar and people crave familiarity.

    Jesse please meet Joe. The man is an amazing writer and a phenomenal producer. If there’s one thing I would find fault in your writings, it is that you haven’t listened to the phenomenal work done by Ollin Productions and the After Hell crew.
    We can rectify that, ironically enough, by listening to next week’s The Sonic Society where we take a trip into After Hell! (Getting ready for Hallowe’en :) )

    I won’t point by point go through all of your article Jesse. Again, I’m grateful for your feedback, because I’m certain you’re opinion is not unusual for the audience of today.
    But it is worth looking into some of the issues surrounding some of the things we’ve talked about.

    1. Umbrella Organizations.
    As Andrew Dorfman points out when we talk about this. We’re all connected by the internet, and all separated by geography. I would love to move to Oregon (if I weren’t going to be shipped to Gitmo ;)) and be a part of Joe’s team, as well as the good folks at Willamette, and Marc’s from Dry Smoke and Whispers. These folks have it all and it shows. Seriously. You want the renaissance of Audio Cinema in the States- go to Oregon. I can’t stress that enough!
    But while we’re open to satellite actors, and we’re working with editors from all around the world (know anyone else who loves to edit???!) there’s nothing like having people working together, and recording under the same roof.
    The slightest change in environment in microphones sounds horrible in recordings.
    And unless you have the skills and creativity of Jonithan Patrick Russell from DreamRealm Enterprises and you put together a show like “Robots of the Company” where different microphones only ADD to the flavour and kitch of the production.

    So as much as we’d love SCP to be a huge production company (God knows we’re ready for it!), we’ve got to take the time to grow it naturally.

    Yes, The Sonic Society is a podcast and a radio show that is syndicated across North America. We do have direct numbers from the podcast as to how many people are subscribed to our feed. This doesn’t include the number of people who just direct download the shows, listen to the shows from streaming at our mother station CKDU. Nor do we have any kind of accurate numbers as to how many people are listening through our radio broadcasts. Wish that we did.
    Our hope is just to keep getting the message out there- and that message is this- Audio Cinema is alive and well, and an exciting vehicle for stories and ideas.
    People talk about video podcasts and good luck to you. But unless you’re doing an audio blog, you’re looking at enormous turnaround times, even longer than what we take to produce a product. And that’s a shame.
    Let people paint the pictures in their heads when you can.
    I’ve got nothing against visual media, and good luck if you want to go that direction. I think there’s a whole lot more legs in what we’re doing. But that’s just my own hopes speaking :)

    When it comes to Fan Fiction, we are enjoying Firefly Old Wounds, but we’re also excited to get back to what we do best- our own.
    There’s only so far one can get playing in someone else’s backyard. Eventually you still have to go home. :)

    So, to make a long story short, I’d just like to thank everyone again for their thoughts. This conversation IS important. I know I’m interested in finding ways to build the Audio audience. If it means creating a series that will please those who have never liked audio drama before- great! Because I have an unshakable faith that once you get into this stuff, it sticks with you, and you love it. And you want more.

    But that’s just me, your little audio crack dealer. Come by next week, as we’ll be cutting up pure Medina- extra blend!

    All the Best, and thanks again for the opportunity!
    Jack
    Jack Ward
    http://www.sonicsociety.org
    http://www.soniccinema.ca

  433. Jack on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 6:35 am
  434. Wow…
    This is amazing.
    I know that when passions are rising high that anyone who might suggest that Audio Drama is dead would have cause to pause.
    I’d like to thank Jesse for all his thoughts and his ideas and especially for bringing this topic up.
    I’m of the mind that more discussion is a whole lot better than less.
    I remember the folks at Space- The Imagination Station getting a little annoyed with the way fans responded to some of the station about something to do with Babylon 5.

    The way I see it, is Jesse is a lover of all things SF&F (I think that’s a safe assumption), and that includes some of the Audio Drama out there.

    I struggle with bringing my own evangelical crusade to the masses about how amazing Audio Cinema is. And in doing so, I’m always trying to listen to the criticisms and the praise equally.

    I grew up loving the Twilight Zone, and most recently have been talking a lot about of it and showing some episodes to my Grade 11 English class. Now, their reactions are both disheartening at times and exciting. Certain things they didn’t initially appreciate. But eventually, they’ve become more and more interested in what the show provides.
    But it means getting over the whole “It’s all in black and white?” simplicity.

    That’s partly what the big problem, I feel is going on with our audience today. Getting them to get out of their eyes, and back in their heads is a huge challenge for us. Not an insurmountable one, but still definitely a challenge.
    We could do one of two things:
    1. Say the hell with those who don’t get us and just do our own stuff. (Which lots of people do, and good luck to them!)
    2. Listen to the criticisms and try to bring those who are critical into the fold. Make new converts by trying to find a middle ground.

    I’m certainly capable of acting with both those options at different times depending upon the different projects I’m involved in.
    For example, Biff Straker is a straight tribute to Buck Rogers. I make no bones about that.
    Wave Front, I’m really considering polishing like an old fashioned X-Minus One style for this reason-
    One of my number one frustrations with this medium is most people love the old time radio but won’t give us new folks a chance. You’ll see tons of people subscribe to “Box Car 711″ (good work BTW!) but not nearly as many people subscribe to the Sonic Society. Why is that?
    For all the cheesiness of some of the OTR, its still familiar and people crave familiarity.

    Jesse please meet Joe. The man is an amazing writer and a phenomenal producer. If there’s one thing I would find fault in your writings, it is that you haven’t listened to the phenomenal work done by Ollin Productions and the After Hell crew.
    We can rectify that, ironically enough, by listening to next week’s The Sonic Society where we take a trip into After Hell! (Getting ready for Hallowe’en :) )

    I won’t point by point go through all of your article Jesse. Again, I’m grateful for your feedback, because I’m certain you’re opinion is not unusual for the audience of today.
    But it is worth looking into some of the issues surrounding some of the things we’ve talked about.

    1. Umbrella Organizations.
    As Andrew Dorfman points out when we talk about this. We’re all connected by the internet, and all separated by geography. I would love to move to Oregon (if I weren’t going to be shipped to Gitmo ;)) and be a part of Joe’s team, as well as the good folks at Willamette, and Marc’s from Dry Smoke and Whispers. These folks have it all and it shows. Seriously. You want the renaissance of Audio Cinema in the States- go to Oregon. I can’t stress that enough!
    But while we’re open to satellite actors, and we’re working with editors from all around the world (know anyone else who loves to edit???!) there’s nothing like having people working together, and recording under the same roof.
    The slightest change in environment in microphones sounds horrible in recordings.
    And unless you have the skills and creativity of Jonithan Patrick Russell from DreamRealm Enterprises and you put together a show like “Robots of the Company” where different microphones only ADD to the flavour and kitch of the production.

    So as much as we’d love SCP to be a huge production company (God knows we’re ready for it!), we’ve got to take the time to grow it naturally.

    Yes, The Sonic Society is a podcast and a radio show that is syndicated across North America. We do have direct numbers from the podcast as to how many people are subscribed to our feed. This doesn’t include the number of people who just direct download the shows, listen to the shows from streaming at our mother station CKDU. Nor do we have any kind of accurate numbers as to how many people are listening through our radio broadcasts. Wish that we did.
    Our hope is just to keep getting the message out there- and that message is this- Audio Cinema is alive and well, and an exciting vehicle for stories and ideas.
    People talk about video podcasts and good luck to you. But unless you’re doing an audio blog, you’re looking at enormous turnaround times, even longer than what we take to produce a product. And that’s a shame.
    Let people paint the pictures in their heads when you can.
    I’ve got nothing against visual media, and good luck if you want to go that direction. I think there’s a whole lot more legs in what we’re doing. But that’s just my own hopes speaking :)

    When it comes to Fan Fiction, we are enjoying Firefly Old Wounds, but we’re also excited to get back to what we do best- our own.
    There’s only so far one can get playing in someone else’s backyard. Eventually you still have to go home. :)

    So, to make a long story short, I’d just like to thank everyone again for their thoughts. This conversation IS important. I know I’m interested in finding ways to build the Audio audience. If it means creating a series that will please those who have never liked audio drama before- great! Because I have an unshakable faith that once you get into this stuff, it sticks with you, and you love it. And you want more.

    But that’s just me, your little audio crack dealer. Come by next week, as we’ll be cutting up pure Medina- extra blend!

    All the Best, and thanks again for the opportunity!
    Jack
    Jack Ward
    http://www.sonicsociety.org
    http://www.soniccinema.ca

  435. mark on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 11:18 am
  436. Jesse,
    You certainly seemed to have touched a nerve…your blog has been forwarded to me by a number of folks (and we do not even do SFF audio). However, as a producer of radio theatre your observations as a consumer are certainly of interest…Oh, and since this is a blog, and you are posting your own opinions, you certainly do know what you are talking about (regardless of what others might say).
    I found your perspective refreshingly cynical…which probably why I read all of it. You made some key points which are very relevant. First, there is allot of stuff out their and much of it is not very good (We at Colonial Radio have certainly contributed to both categories…but are trying to focus on releasing only good stuff). This creates a high level of “noise” which the really good stuff has to rise above. As with any entertainment option, this is pretty much a given. Much like popular music, to make it big you have to get noticed and build a brand, and rise above all that garage band racket.
    Building a brand requires building awareness, obtaining distribution, and continually releasing quality product. Here, one has to move from Hobby to business…Pod casting is certainly a low cost way to achieve some of this. While we do not currently pod cast, we do use XM radio, and offer some free down load programs to build awareness and increase trial. http://WWW.spokennetwork.com has been very helpful in regard to letting folks here sound clips.
    Once you distill everything down, the internet will allow Radio Theatre to find its audience. While it may be only a modest niche in the entertainment market, it should be big enough to support a number of production houses. Down load sales means that you can pretty much sell to anyone in the world who has a few bucks to spend, and has an interest in your genre. The more programs you have that some one wants to buy, the sooner you reach critical mass. This is a very exciting time to be building a broad and varied content library. As of today, we have over 200 productions available for download sale. This is a mix of 27 minute serials, along with or standard 2-3 hour epic. We have a couple of Ray Bradbury collaborations in the queue… (Look for Dandelion Wine come January), and are working on three other XM series with a total of 41 episodes to be completed in the next 6 months or so…not to mention other projects.
    Thanks for starting this conversation, I enjoyed the information (and do not worry about typos…your thoughts are the value here)…well, I have to get along, Fox News “Fair and Balanced” just came on.
    Best Regards,
    Mark Vanderberg
    The Colonial Radio Theatre On The Air. http://www.colonialradio.com

  437. mark on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 11:18 am
  438. Jesse,
    You certainly seemed to have touched a nerve…your blog has been forwarded to me by a number of folks (and we do not even do SFF audio). However, as a producer of radio theatre your observations as a consumer are certainly of interest…Oh, and since this is a blog, and you are posting your own opinions, you certainly do know what you are talking about (regardless of what others might say).
    I found your perspective refreshingly cynical…which probably why I read all of it. You made some key points which are very relevant. First, there is allot of stuff out their and much of it is not very good (We at Colonial Radio have certainly contributed to both categories…but are trying to focus on releasing only good stuff). This creates a high level of “noise” which the really good stuff has to rise above. As with any entertainment option, this is pretty much a given. Much like popular music, to make it big you have to get noticed and build a brand, and rise above all that garage band racket.
    Building a brand requires building awareness, obtaining distribution, and continually releasing quality product. Here, one has to move from Hobby to business…Pod casting is certainly a low cost way to achieve some of this. While we do not currently pod cast, we do use XM radio, and offer some free down load programs to build awareness and increase trial. http://WWW.spokennetwork.com has been very helpful in regard to letting folks here sound clips.
    Once you distill everything down, the internet will allow Radio Theatre to find its audience. While it may be only a modest niche in the entertainment market, it should be big enough to support a number of production houses. Down load sales means that you can pretty much sell to anyone in the world who has a few bucks to spend, and has an interest in your genre. The more programs you have that some one wants to buy, the sooner you reach critical mass. This is a very exciting time to be building a broad and varied content library. As of today, we have over 200 productions available for download sale. This is a mix of 27 minute serials, along with or standard 2-3 hour epic. We have a couple of Ray Bradbury collaborations in the queue… (Look for Dandelion Wine come January), and are working on three other XM series with a total of 41 episodes to be completed in the next 6 months or so…not to mention other projects.
    Thanks for starting this conversation, I enjoyed the information (and do not worry about typos…your thoughts are the value here)…well, I have to get along, Fox News “Fair and Balanced” just came on.
    Best Regards,
    Mark Vanderberg
    The Colonial Radio Theatre On The Air. http://www.colonialradio.com

  439. Jesse on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 11:00 pm
  440. Jack,

    >I’d like to thank Jesse for all his thoughts and his ideas and especially for bringing this topic
    up.

    My pleasure. :)

    >I’m of the mind that more discussion is a whole lot better than less.

    I agree 100%.

    >I remember the folks at Space- The Imagination Station getting a little annoyed with the way fans responded to some of the station about something to do with Babylon 5.

    Indeed. I remember there was one extremely heated discussion on Space:TIS’ old “Speaker’s Corner” message board. A big row over SPACE:TIS showing a documentary on The Titanic. That may have been the final straw in bring it down. That was an awesome board. Thanks for the reminder. :D

    >The way I see it, is Jesse is a lover of all things SF&F (I think that’s a safe assumption), and that includes some of the Audio Drama out there.

    Yes I am guilty as charged.

    >Jesse please meet Joe. The man is an amazing writer and a phenomenal producer. If there’s one thing I would find fault in your writings, it is that you haven’t listened to the phenomenal work done by Ollin Productions and the After Hell crew. We can rectify that, ironically enough, by listening to next week’s The Sonic Society where we take a trip into After Hell! (Getting ready for Hallowe’en :) )

    I’m absolutely looking forward to hearing the next Sonic Society transmission! In my defense, I don’t see how any of the criticism I gave even applies to Joe or Afterhell. He’s is afterall, wisely getting his stuff out into the podosphere (via TSS).

    >I won’t point by point go through all of your article Jesse. Again, I’m grateful for your feedback, because I’m certain you’re opinion is not unusual for the audience of today.

    You’re quite welcome. :)

    >Umbrella Organizations.
    As Andrew Dorfman points out when we talk about this. We’re all connected by the internet, and all separated by geography. I would love to move to Oregon (if I weren’t going to be shipped to Gitmo ;)) and be a part of Joe’s team, as well as the good folks at Willamette, and Marc’s from Dry Smoke and Whispers. These folks have it all and it shows. Seriously. You want the renaissance of Audio Cinema in the States- go to Oregon. I can’t stress that enough!

    Truly, Oregon is a source of much aural delight, Powells in protland, at least the last time I was there had a stunning audiobook section, and Blackstone Audiobooks is based in Ashland.

    >So as much as we’d love SCP to be a huge production company (God knows we’re ready for it!), we’ve got to take the time to grow it naturally.

    Banding together on a common website devoted to audio drama, even if you don’t pool acting, writing and such resources, seems like it would solve a lot of the awarness issues. I note, modernaudiodrama.com is not yet taken. Here at SFFaudio we can only talk about Science Fiction Fantasy and Horror audio, so though we can potentially cover a great deal of the stuff there are things left out. Mind you, if everyone banded together under the Sonic Society banner that’d accomplish the same thing.

    >Yes, The Sonic Society is a podcast and a radio show that is syndicated across North America. We do have direct numbers from the podcast as to how many people are subscribed to our feed.

    That is cool. Any chance of the numbers going public during an upcoming meeting? :)

    >This doesn’t include the number of people who just direct download the shows, listen to the shows from streaming at our mother station CKDU. Nor do we have any kind of accurate numbers as to how many people are listening through our radio broadcasts. Wish that we did.

    Presumably you’ve got, or could get, the potential audience numbers, but even with those you’re still mostly in the dark. That is one of the great things about podcasting you have a good idea regarding the number for subscribers.

    >People talk about video podcasts and good luck to you. But unless you’re doing an audio blog, you’re looking at enormous turnaround times, even longer than what we take to produce a product. And that’s a shame.
    Let people paint the pictures in their heads when you can.
    I’ve got nothing against visual media, and good luck if you want to go that direction. I think there’s a whole lot more legs in what we’re doing. But that’s just my own hopes speaking :)

    LOL! You’re preaching to the choir on this one, I doubt anyone would disagree, we’re SFFaudio
    afterall. Long live Speculative Fiction! Long live speculative fiction audio!

    >When it comes to Fan Fiction, we are enjoying Firefly Old Wounds, but we’re also excited to get back to what we do best- our own.
    There’s only so far one can get playing in someone else’s backyard. Eventually you still have to go home. :)

    And should people come for the Firefly they may stay for the all-original audio drama. :D

    >So, to make a long story short, I’d just like to thank everyone again for their thoughts. This conversation IS important. I know I’m interested in finding ways to build the Audio audience. If it means creating a series that will please those who have never liked audio drama before- great! Because I have an unshakable faith that once you get into this stuff, it sticks with you, and you love it. And you want more.

    Testify!

    >All the Best, and thanks again for the opportunity!
    Jack

    Thank you Jack!

  441. Jesse on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 11:00 pm
  442. Jack,

    >I’d like to thank Jesse for all his thoughts and his ideas and especially for bringing this topic
    up.

    My pleasure. :)

    >I’m of the mind that more discussion is a whole lot better than less.

    I agree 100%.

    >I remember the folks at Space- The Imagination Station getting a little annoyed with the way fans responded to some of the station about something to do with Babylon 5.

    Indeed. I remember there was one extremely heated discussion on Space:TIS’ old “Speaker’s Corner” message board. A big row over SPACE:TIS showing a documentary on The Titanic. That may have been the final straw in bring it down. That was an awesome board. Thanks for the reminder. :D

    >The way I see it, is Jesse is a lover of all things SF&F (I think that’s a safe assumption), and that includes some of the Audio Drama out there.

    Yes I am guilty as charged.

    >Jesse please meet Joe. The man is an amazing writer and a phenomenal producer. If there’s one thing I would find fault in your writings, it is that you haven’t listened to the phenomenal work done by Ollin Productions and the After Hell crew. We can rectify that, ironically enough, by listening to next week’s The Sonic Society where we take a trip into After Hell! (Getting ready for Hallowe’en :) )

    I’m absolutely looking forward to hearing the next Sonic Society transmission! In my defense, I don’t see how any of the criticism I gave even applies to Joe or Afterhell. He’s is afterall, wisely getting his stuff out into the podosphere (via TSS).

    >I won’t point by point go through all of your article Jesse. Again, I’m grateful for your feedback, because I’m certain you’re opinion is not unusual for the audience of today.

    You’re quite welcome. :)

    >Umbrella Organizations.
    As Andrew Dorfman points out when we talk about this. We’re all connected by the internet, and all separated by geography. I would love to move to Oregon (if I weren’t going to be shipped to Gitmo ;)) and be a part of Joe’s team, as well as the good folks at Willamette, and Marc’s from Dry Smoke and Whispers. These folks have it all and it shows. Seriously. You want the renaissance of Audio Cinema in the States- go to Oregon. I can’t stress that enough!

    Truly, Oregon is a source of much aural delight, Powells in protland, at least the last time I was there had a stunning audiobook section, and Blackstone Audiobooks is based in Ashland.

    >So as much as we’d love SCP to be a huge production company (God knows we’re ready for it!), we’ve got to take the time to grow it naturally.

    Banding together on a common website devoted to audio drama, even if you don’t pool acting, writing and such resources, seems like it would solve a lot of the awarness issues. I note, modernaudiodrama.com is not yet taken. Here at SFFaudio we can only talk about Science Fiction Fantasy and Horror audio, so though we can potentially cover a great deal of the stuff there are things left out. Mind you, if everyone banded together under the Sonic Society banner that’d accomplish the same thing.

    >Yes, The Sonic Society is a podcast and a radio show that is syndicated across North America. We do have direct numbers from the podcast as to how many people are subscribed to our feed.

    That is cool. Any chance of the numbers going public during an upcoming meeting? :)

    >This doesn’t include the number of people who just direct download the shows, listen to the shows from streaming at our mother station CKDU. Nor do we have any kind of accurate numbers as to how many people are listening through our radio broadcasts. Wish that we did.

    Presumably you’ve got, or could get, the potential audience numbers, but even with those you’re still mostly in the dark. That is one of the great things about podcasting you have a good idea regarding the number for subscribers.

    >People talk about video podcasts and good luck to you. But unless you’re doing an audio blog, you’re looking at enormous turnaround times, even longer than what we take to produce a product. And that’s a shame.
    Let people paint the pictures in their heads when you can.
    I’ve got nothing against visual media, and good luck if you want to go that direction. I think there’s a whole lot more legs in what we’re doing. But that’s just my own hopes speaking :)

    LOL! You’re preaching to the choir on this one, I doubt anyone would disagree, we’re SFFaudio
    afterall. Long live Speculative Fiction! Long live speculative fiction audio!

    >When it comes to Fan Fiction, we are enjoying Firefly Old Wounds, but we’re also excited to get back to what we do best- our own.
    There’s only so far one can get playing in someone else’s backyard. Eventually you still have to go home. :)

    And should people come for the Firefly they may stay for the all-original audio drama. :D

    >So, to make a long story short, I’d just like to thank everyone again for their thoughts. This conversation IS important. I know I’m interested in finding ways to build the Audio audience. If it means creating a series that will please those who have never liked audio drama before- great! Because I have an unshakable faith that once you get into this stuff, it sticks with you, and you love it. And you want more.

    Testify!

    >All the Best, and thanks again for the opportunity!
    Jack

    Thank you Jack!

  443. Jesse on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 11:29 pm
  444. Mark,

    >You certainly seemed to have touched a nerve…your blog has been forwarded to me by a number of folks (and we do not even do SFF audio).

    Cool! It actually looks like you have a number of SFFaudio related projects in the pipe. Feel free to join the SFFaudio Yahoo! Group…

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sffaudio/

    …and drop release info whenever there is something SFFaudio related you’d like to announce.

    >However, as a producer of radio theatre your observations as a consumer are certainly of interest…Oh, and since this is a blog, and you are posting your own opinions, you certainly do know what you are talking about (regardless of what others might say).

    Thanks!

    >I found your perspective refreshingly cynical…which probably why I read all of it. You made some key points which are very relevant. First, there is allot of stuff out their and much of it is not very good (We at Colonial Radio have certainly contributed to both categories…but are trying to focus on releasing only good stuff). This creates a high level of “noise” which the really good stuff has to rise above. As with any entertainment option, this is pretty much a given. Much like popular music, to make it big you have to get noticed and build a brand, and rise above all that garage band racket.
    Building a brand requires building awareness, obtaining distribution, and continually releasing quality product. Here, one has to move from Hobby to business…Pod casting is certainly a low cost way to achieve some of this.

    Ok, you’ve convinced me. ;)

    >While we do not currently pod cast, we do use XM radio, and offer some free down load programs to build awareness and increase trial.

    XM is probably a good way, my understansding the pay rates are abysmall, but the exposure potential is pretty good given you’d be on a dedicated station.

    >Thanks for starting this conversation, I enjoyed the information (and do not worry about typos…your thoughts are the value here)…well, I have to get along, Fox News “Fair and Balanced” just came on.

    LOL! Thanks so much. Let’s keep in touch.

  445. Jesse on Sun, 15th Oct 2006 11:29 pm
  446. Mark,

    >You certainly seemed to have touched a nerve…your blog has been forwarded to me by a number of folks (and we do not even do SFF audio).

    Cool! It actually looks like you have a number of SFFaudio related projects in the pipe. Feel free to join the SFFaudio Yahoo! Group…

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sffaudio/

    …and drop release info whenever there is something SFFaudio related you’d like to announce.

    >However, as a producer of radio theatre your observations as a consumer are certainly of interest…Oh, and since this is a blog, and you are posting your own opinions, you certainly do know what you are talking about (regardless of what others might say).

    Thanks!

    >I found your perspective refreshingly cynical…which probably why I read all of it. You made some key points which are very relevant. First, there is allot of stuff out their and much of it is not very good (We at Colonial Radio have certainly contributed to both categories…but are trying to focus on releasing only good stuff). This creates a high level of “noise” which the really good stuff has to rise above. As with any entertainment option, this is pretty much a given. Much like popular music, to make it big you have to get noticed and build a brand, and rise above all that garage band racket.
    Building a brand requires building awareness, obtaining distribution, and continually releasing quality product. Here, one has to move from Hobby to business…Pod casting is certainly a low cost way to achieve some of this.

    Ok, you’ve convinced me. ;)

    >While we do not currently pod cast, we do use XM radio, and offer some free down load programs to build awareness and increase trial.

    XM is probably a good way, my understansding the pay rates are abysmall, but the exposure potential is pretty good given you’d be on a dedicated station.

    >Thanks for starting this conversation, I enjoyed the information (and do not worry about typos…your thoughts are the value here)…well, I have to get along, Fox News “Fair and Balanced” just came on.

    LOL! Thanks so much. Let’s keep in touch.

  447. chumly on Mon, 16th Oct 2006 4:54 pm
  448. Will we ever have peace in space?

  449. chumly on Mon, 16th Oct 2006 4:54 pm
  450. Will we ever have peace in space?

  451. Joe on Mon, 16th Oct 2006 5:54 pm
  452. >So, there is a problem, and I got the problem right.
    >I offered a solution, but I didn’t offer enough
    >solutions. Feel free to expound, it sounds like you
    >have more experience at production than me. How
    >can we solve this problem?

    Are we talking about your Item #1, i.e. lots of little groups vs umbrella organizations? I could speak to a few things on that count, I suppose.

    My first thought is to consolidate the other end of the production chain — advertising and distribution. We need a farmer’s market for podcasting, a place that everybody knows. We have lots of podcast directories, but none of them have solved the real problem of “podcasts everywhere and not a drop to drink.” There is no central directory, no killer-app a la Google or Napster. No paradigm shift.

    Frankly I’d like to see a Google News type set-up for podcasters: a searchable directory with a dynamic home page that runs off an automated ranking system. Podcasters would submit their feeds to the directory. The automation would track the most active unique downloads. Those feeds would get bumped to the top 20 list. To make it really fancy, you could even personalize the front page with the user’s choice in topics. That’d refine the data even further.

    You mentioned the sharing of technical knowledge. A central clearinghouse for that would help, but it would do only so much good without a more conducive culture behind it. Once everyone gets past the usual pushing of personal dogmas, the idea that there is only one way to produce radiodrama, information will flow much more easily. As it is, amateurs get confused and discouraged, so they don’t learn anything. Make it a mutual sharing of information, a meeting of like-minded folks, and that’ll change.

    >>Submitting the RSS feed provides a distribution mechanism.
    >>It does that very well, but nothing more.
    >
    >Wrong. When I go into iTunes and do a search I find things
    >I didn’t know existed and click on them. When I go to Podcast
    >Alley and Podcast Pickle, ditto.

    Afterhell is in both directories. So much for that idea….

    >>If you’re trying to sell CD’s, swag, or a subscription deal,
    >>the podcast is advertising, offering free samples.
    >
    >If your saying the samples shouldn’t be complete stories,
    >I think that’s a mistake.

    For the sake of intellectual honesty (yes, I do believe in that), I should point out that, in effect, I’m on the fence on this issue. I’d like to think that if folks hear an Afterhell story on Limewire or KaZaa, and like what they hear, they’ll buy a CD. But we don’t have numbers that show that, so it’s a matter of faith. The first Afterhell podcast was basically an abridged story, but only because I wanted to see whether I could tighten the plot. Meanwhile our online store outlets won’t let us run complete stories on their sites, but they let users hear two free minutes of any track.

    >You can do more than just one kind of distribution. Podcasting
    >is cheap. Sell a hard copy, sell a downloadable copy (with
    >extras), sell it to a radio station. Give it away on a podcast
    >with ads, or ask for donations.

    We’re doing most of that, looking into more. But it all keeps coming back to convincing everybody else that we’re alive. We just had a table at a local conference. Every passerby didn’t know what radiodrama was. We had to tell them what it was, what podcasting is, that they really do exist, and then who the hell we are and why should they care. That’s the world we live in.

    >>You said, “Podcast distribution is the solution!”

    >Out of context. Try putting it back in the context of “If your
    >stuff isn’t on the radio [...]

    Okay: “If your stuff isn’t on the radio, isn’t being reviewed by anyone or being syndicated by another podcast your audience isn’t just going to come to you. Podcast distribution is the solution! Pendant Productions, Darker Projects and The Sonic Society all podcast, this makes them have an audience FAR bigger than if they didn’t.”

    …especially if all they do is podcast. TSS is on the radio. Are any other radio outlets running Pendant or Darker Projects? Do they want to be on the radio? For some, it’s not really a priority. In that case, podcasting will only do so much.

    >>There was no talk of drawing people to your podcast,
    >>only how great things will be once your feed is out
    >>there, just waiting to be found.
    >
    >I think you’re being a trifle unfair, this was a “commentary”
    >post. One in which I laid out 5 problems that I as a
    >a consumer of amateur audio drama saw. I didn’t make
    >an “I’m the audio drama wizard and can solve all
    >your problems if you read my post” post.

    No, it read more like a “The Wizard’s not in!” post. And problems are more easily solved when they are clearly defined and expressed. That didn’t happen the first time, just a lot of ax-grinding.

    >>And he is, a master in all sorts of things IIRC.
    >
    >I don’t know what you mean by “IIRC.”

    Sorry, it’s chatroom shorthand. IIRC = If I recall correctly.

    >>But he’s not an amateur. He’s already made his bones.
    >>Your posting was about amateur audiodrama, not the pro circuits.
    >
    >I doubt ignoring the experience of people who are
    >professionals will help. Especailly when they are
    >good at marketing themselves and they are talking
    >to people who aren’t.

    Look, you said earlier that you take argumentation seriously. But you were comparing amateurs to professionals as if their methods, motivations, desires, ambitions, and resources are the same. It’s not a fair comparison.

    An amateur will do something for fun, but their ambitions stop after a certain point. A professional continues to explore, gather more resources, to take more creative and financial risks to pursue his/her goals. My goals (I’d like to think) are leading me into the pro ranks. But Afterhell is still unknown, treated as amateur by most others.

    >>Amateur audiodramatists don’t have the same resources.
    >>For most, word of mouth is all they’ve got.
    >
    >They can get better word of mouth by teaming up.

    Ollin Productions (all two of us) teamed up with two groups here in the Pacific Northwest some time ago, namely Transdimensional Media and the Willamette Radio Workshop. Ever heard of Afterhell or Ollin Productions before all this? So much for that idea….

    >And does number of listeners = credibility?

    You tell me. You’re telling amateurs to podcast, to get on the radio, to expand.

    >If you’d be interested in sending either a squarish
    >150 pixel high or 120X120 pixel logo for Afterhell
    >I’d be happy to mention it.

    Sure, I’ll look into it as soon as I can.

    What I said was “I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because
    of his involvement in media tie in novels”. It wasn’t
    an analogy, it was me showing how I came to be aware of
    something.

    But that was in the context of comparing amateur audiodrama and their lack of exposure to KJA’s career. He wasn’t an amateur when he started the media tie-in track. They’re not accurate analogues to one another, not a fair comparison, hence a poor analogy.

    >>No, there was a lot of Dune in Tatooine. Wait, what does
    >>”pretty interest” mean? I need a translator in here….
    >
    >I was thinking more with regards to film serials and The
    >Hidden Fortress. and what I meant type was “Interesting.”

    In that case, yes, it is interesting how George Lucas took from Akira Kurosawa and Republic serials, among other things. Come to think, rumor has it that he wrote Star Wars because his requests to do a Flash Gordon remake were turned down.

    >>And the trap is in the readers’ addictions, not the writer’s.
    >>But then considering what Davies has been up to late,
    >>sometimes a writer can get addicted too. Good thing for us
    >>too, in his case!
    >
    >Wait a second, you were saying that fan fic was a trap for
    >writers. Slippage!

    [sigh] Yeah, running on a few hours of sleep and trying to type faster than Asimov will do that. Pushy readers of fanfic or anything else can entrap writers. Writing goes downhill when the writer makes a conscious effort to placate the audience, instead of simply entertain. (Look at the latter half of F Scott Fitzgerald’s work.) The quest for affirmation and ego strokes can be seductive. There’s always a loud group in the audience just dying to tell writers what to write. Fanfic is especially rife with that.

    And my bit about Russell T. Davies was a tongue-in-cheek effort to lighten up and seek common ground. Should I stop?

    >>Working on several Lovecraft adaptations myself.
    >>Not for my own series, but for another group.
    >
    >Feel free to send an email when something is ready.
    >I am a big Lovecraft fan.

    Sure, I’ll keep it in mind.

    >Okay, I give up, we just have incommensurate views
    >on this one. You are not responding to what I wrote
    >about Red Dwarf, but instead to what you think I wrote.

    Well, I told you it didn’t make any sense. A plea for better science in SF comedies, side by side with praise for a show with “ridiculously impossible physics.” Maybe you should’ve clarified or left it for another posting. It was basically a tangent anyway.

    >Kept it civil? I posted a commentary on a blog.
    >It wasn’t a presidential debate.

    Well, presidential debates are neither civil nor even proper debates. But more on the real issue at hand in a sec:

    >Overall it sounds like you agree with a lot of the things
    >I wrote. Just ask yourself this: Had I been more careful
    >to avoid hurting feelings, would my argument have been more valid?

    Do ad hominem attacks make an argument more valid or less valid? If the answer to this question is “less valid,” then the answer to your question is yes. Then there’s no point in equivocating the distinction between a person and his dreams.

    When I wounded you, did you feel better for it? When I shoot you out of the sky, do you suddenly see things my way? I mean, I’ve given you a better place to land and everything.

    >Again I think we are just working in different universes here.
    >Shakespeare, no matter how well it is perfomed is not accessible
    >without being trained-up.

    I don’t know what to tell you. I’ve even sat in on readings of Beowulf in Anglo-Saxon, where the reader gave us a quick run-through of the language, then blew everyone away with the original language. No matter how well anything is done, for some reason there’s always one person who just doesn’t get it. It just happens. And in the case of Shakespeare especially, it’s a shame.

    >You are being facetious, surely? You aren’t saying
    >I should just shut-up?

    I’m saying you’re implementing, knowingly or unknowingly, have a double standard. And you should stop. Amateurs are going through the same lifelong educational process. Venting your spleen, or me venting mine, serves that purpose and very little else, if anything. I got pissed off, so I went postal. You tell me whether that did you any good whatsoever.

    >Not all “A”s are “B”s. If I am non-sensical, you can’t
    >understand what I am saying. If you can’t understand
    >what I am saying you can’t know me to be wrong. If you
    >know me to be wrong I am sensical.

    Jesse, I had to go back over the text several times and extrapolate in a few places. Sometimes I just plain gave up and winged it, like:

    “Wait, what does ‘pretty interest’ mean? I need a translator in here….”

  453. Joe on Mon, 16th Oct 2006 5:54 pm
  454. >So, there is a problem, and I got the problem right.
    >I offered a solution, but I didn’t offer enough
    >solutions. Feel free to expound, it sounds like you
    >have more experience at production than me. How
    >can we solve this problem?

    Are we talking about your Item #1, i.e. lots of little groups vs umbrella organizations? I could speak to a few things on that count, I suppose.

    My first thought is to consolidate the other end of the production chain — advertising and distribution. We need a farmer’s market for podcasting, a place that everybody knows. We have lots of podcast directories, but none of them have solved the real problem of “podcasts everywhere and not a drop to drink.” There is no central directory, no killer-app a la Google or Napster. No paradigm shift.

    Frankly I’d like to see a Google News type set-up for podcasters: a searchable directory with a dynamic home page that runs off an automated ranking system. Podcasters would submit their feeds to the directory. The automation would track the most active unique downloads. Those feeds would get bumped to the top 20 list. To make it really fancy, you could even personalize the front page with the user’s choice in topics. That’d refine the data even further.

    You mentioned the sharing of technical knowledge. A central clearinghouse for that would help, but it would do only so much good without a more conducive culture behind it. Once everyone gets past the usual pushing of personal dogmas, the idea that there is only one way to produce radiodrama, information will flow much more easily. As it is, amateurs get confused and discouraged, so they don’t learn anything. Make it a mutual sharing of information, a meeting of like-minded folks, and that’ll change.

    >>Submitting the RSS feed provides a distribution mechanism.
    >>It does that very well, but nothing more.
    >
    >Wrong. When I go into iTunes and do a search I find things
    >I didn’t know existed and click on them. When I go to Podcast
    >Alley and Podcast Pickle, ditto.

    Afterhell is in both directories. So much for that idea….

    >>If you’re trying to sell CD’s, swag, or a subscription deal,
    >>the podcast is advertising, offering free samples.
    >
    >If your saying the samples shouldn’t be complete stories,
    >I think that’s a mistake.

    For the sake of intellectual honesty (yes, I do believe in that), I should point out that, in effect, I’m on the fence on this issue. I’d like to think that if folks hear an Afterhell story on Limewire or KaZaa, and like what they hear, they’ll buy a CD. But we don’t have numbers that show that, so it’s a matter of faith. The first Afterhell podcast was basically an abridged story, but only because I wanted to see whether I could tighten the plot. Meanwhile our online store outlets won’t let us run complete stories on their sites, but they let users hear two free minutes of any track.

    >You can do more than just one kind of distribution. Podcasting
    >is cheap. Sell a hard copy, sell a downloadable copy (with
    >extras), sell it to a radio station. Give it away on a podcast
    >with ads, or ask for donations.

    We’re doing most of that, looking into more. But it all keeps coming back to convincing everybody else that we’re alive. We just had a table at a local conference. Every passerby didn’t know what radiodrama was. We had to tell them what it was, what podcasting is, that they really do exist, and then who the hell we are and why should they care. That’s the world we live in.

    >>You said, “Podcast distribution is the solution!”

    >Out of context. Try putting it back in the context of “If your
    >stuff isn’t on the radio [...]

    Okay: “If your stuff isn’t on the radio, isn’t being reviewed by anyone or being syndicated by another podcast your audience isn’t just going to come to you. Podcast distribution is the solution! Pendant Productions, Darker Projects and The Sonic Society all podcast, this makes them have an audience FAR bigger than if they didn’t.”

    …especially if all they do is podcast. TSS is on the radio. Are any other radio outlets running Pendant or Darker Projects? Do they want to be on the radio? For some, it’s not really a priority. In that case, podcasting will only do so much.

    >>There was no talk of drawing people to your podcast,
    >>only how great things will be once your feed is out
    >>there, just waiting to be found.
    >
    >I think you’re being a trifle unfair, this was a “commentary”
    >post. One in which I laid out 5 problems that I as a
    >a consumer of amateur audio drama saw. I didn’t make
    >an “I’m the audio drama wizard and can solve all
    >your problems if you read my post” post.

    No, it read more like a “The Wizard’s not in!” post. And problems are more easily solved when they are clearly defined and expressed. That didn’t happen the first time, just a lot of ax-grinding.

    >>And he is, a master in all sorts of things IIRC.
    >
    >I don’t know what you mean by “IIRC.”

    Sorry, it’s chatroom shorthand. IIRC = If I recall correctly.

    >>But he’s not an amateur. He’s already made his bones.
    >>Your posting was about amateur audiodrama, not the pro circuits.
    >
    >I doubt ignoring the experience of people who are
    >professionals will help. Especailly when they are
    >good at marketing themselves and they are talking
    >to people who aren’t.

    Look, you said earlier that you take argumentation seriously. But you were comparing amateurs to professionals as if their methods, motivations, desires, ambitions, and resources are the same. It’s not a fair comparison.

    An amateur will do something for fun, but their ambitions stop after a certain point. A professional continues to explore, gather more resources, to take more creative and financial risks to pursue his/her goals. My goals (I’d like to think) are leading me into the pro ranks. But Afterhell is still unknown, treated as amateur by most others.

    >>Amateur audiodramatists don’t have the same resources.
    >>For most, word of mouth is all they’ve got.
    >
    >They can get better word of mouth by teaming up.

    Ollin Productions (all two of us) teamed up with two groups here in the Pacific Northwest some time ago, namely Transdimensional Media and the Willamette Radio Workshop. Ever heard of Afterhell or Ollin Productions before all this? So much for that idea….

    >And does number of listeners = credibility?

    You tell me. You’re telling amateurs to podcast, to get on the radio, to expand.

    >If you’d be interested in sending either a squarish
    >150 pixel high or 120X120 pixel logo for Afterhell
    >I’d be happy to mention it.

    Sure, I’ll look into it as soon as I can.

    What I said was “I’d heard of Kevin J. Anderson because
    of his involvement in media tie in novels”. It wasn’t
    an analogy, it was me showing how I came to be aware of
    something.

    But that was in the context of comparing amateur audiodrama and their lack of exposure to KJA’s career. He wasn’t an amateur when he started the media tie-in track. They’re not accurate analogues to one another, not a fair comparison, hence a poor analogy.

    >>No, there was a lot of Dune in Tatooine. Wait, what does
    >>”pretty interest” mean? I need a translator in here….
    >
    >I was thinking more with regards to film serials and The
    >Hidden Fortress. and what I meant type was “Interesting.”

    In that case, yes, it is interesting how George Lucas took from Akira Kurosawa and Republic serials, among other things. Come to think, rumor has it that he wrote Star Wars because his requests to do a Flash Gordon remake were turned down.

    >>And the trap is in the readers’ addictions, not the writer’s.
    >>But then considering what Davies has been up to late,
    >>sometimes a writer can get addicted too. Good thing for us
    >>too, in his case!
    >
    >Wait a second, you were saying that fan fic was a trap for
    >writers. Slippage!

    [sigh] Yeah, running on a few hours of sleep and trying to type faster than Asimov will do that. Pushy readers of fanfic or anything else can entrap writers. Writing goes downhill when the writer makes a conscious effort to placate the audience, instead of simply entertain. (Look at the latter half of F Scott Fitzgerald’s work.) The quest for affirmation and ego strokes can be seductive. There’s always a loud group in the audience just dying to tell writers what to write. Fanfic is especially rife with that.

    And my bit about Russell T. Davies was a tongue-in-cheek effort to lighten up and seek common ground. Should I stop?

    >>Working on several Lovecraft adaptations myself.
    >>Not for my own series, but for another group.
    >
    >Feel free to send an email when something is ready.
    >I am a big Lovecraft fan.

    Sure, I’ll keep it in mind.

    >Okay, I give up, we just have incommensurate views
    >on this one. You are not responding to what I wrote
    >about Red Dwarf, but instead to what you think I wrote.

    Well, I told you it didn’t make any sense. A plea for better science in SF comedies, side by side with praise for a show with “ridiculously impossible physics.” Maybe you should’ve clarified or left it for another posting. It was basically a tangent anyway.

    >Kept it civil? I posted a commentary on a blog.
    >It wasn’t a presidential debate.

    Well, presidential debates are neither civil nor even proper debates. But more on the real issue at hand in a sec:

    >Overall it sounds like you agree with a lot of the things
    >I wrote. Just ask yourself this: Had I been more careful
    >to avoid hurting feelings, would my argument have been more valid?

    Do ad hominem attacks make an argument more valid or less valid? If the answer to this question is “less valid,” then the answer to your question is yes. Then there’s no point in equivocating the distinction between a person and his dreams.

    When I wounded you, did you feel better for it? When I shoot you out of the sky, do you suddenly see things my way? I mean, I’ve given you a better place to land and everything.

    >Again I think we are just working in different universes here.
    >Shakespeare, no matter how well it is perfomed is not accessible
    >without being trained-up.

    I don’t know what to tell you. I’ve even sat in on readings of Beowulf in Anglo-Saxon, where the reader gave us a quick run-through of the language, then blew everyone away with the original language. No matter how well anything is done, for some reason there’s always one person who just doesn’t get it. It just happens. And in the case of Shakespeare especially, it’s a shame.

    >You are being facetious, surely? You aren’t saying
    >I should just shut-up?

    I’m saying you’re implementing, knowingly or unknowingly, have a double standard. And you should stop. Amateurs are going through the same lifelong educational process. Venting your spleen, or me venting mine, serves that purpose and very little else, if anything. I got pissed off, so I went postal. You tell me whether that did you any good whatsoever.

    >Not all “A”s are “B”s. If I am non-sensical, you can’t
    >understand what I am saying. If you can’t understand
    >what I am saying you can’t know me to be wrong. If you
    >know me to be wrong I am sensical.

    Jesse, I had to go back over the text several times and extrapolate in a few places. Sometimes I just plain gave up and winged it, like:

    “Wait, what does ‘pretty interest’ mean? I need a translator in here….”

  455. angela on Tue, 17th Oct 2006 12:20 pm
  456. i loved this book.. though it took so long for the 2nd one to come out, i’m probably going to have to re-read the 1st again.

  457. angela on Tue, 17th Oct 2006 12:20 pm
  458. i loved this book.. though it took so long for the 2nd one to come out, i’m probably going to have to re-read the 1st again.

  459. Jesse on Tue, 17th Oct 2006 4:44 pm
  460. Joe,

    >Are we talking about your Item #1, i.e. lots of little groups vs umbrella organizations?

    Sure.

    >My first thought is to consolidate the other end of the production chain — advertising and distribution. We need a farmer’s market for podcasting, a place that everybody knows.

    Though it no longer retains 87% marketshare, apple’s iTunes is propbably the best bet for this.

    >We have lots of podcast directories, but none of them have solved the real problem of “podcasts everywhere and not a drop to drink.” There is no central directory, no killer-app a la Google or Napster. No paradigm shift.

    If anything was, iTunes 4.9 was that, it made the mainstream take notice.

    >Frankly I’d like to see a Google News type set-up for podcasters: a searchable directory with a dynamic home page that runs off an automated ranking system.

    Perhaps Yahoo!?

    >Podcasters would submit their feeds to the directory. The automation would track the most active unique downloads. Those feeds would get bumped to the top 20 list. To make it really fancy, you could even personalize the front page with the user’s choice in topics. That’d refine the data even further.

    I think there are several of these, only problem is no central clearing house, but I see that as a strength. iTunes, as good as it is, doesn’t have everything.

    >You mentioned the sharing of technical knowledge. A central clearinghouse for that would help, but it would do only so much good without a more conducive culture behind it. Once everyone gets past the usual pushing of personal dogmas, the idea that there is only one way to produce radiodrama, information will flow much more easily. As it is, amateurs get confused and discouraged, so they don’t learn anything. Make it a mutual sharing of information, a meeting of like-minded folks, and that’ll change.

    Banding together under one group at least for recognition purposes would certainly help those who already enjoy audio drama find more.

    >Afterhell is in both directories. So much for that idea….

    I named three directories. The third and most important (in terms of podcast users is iTunes).

    >For the sake of intellectual honesty (yes, I do believe in that), I should point out that, in effect, I’m on the fence on this issue. I’d like to think that if folks hear an Afterhell story on Limewire or KaZaa, and like what they hear, they’ll buy a CD.

    Certainly a possibility.

    >We’re doing most of that, looking into more. But it all keeps coming back to convincing everybody else that we’re alive. We just had a table at a local conference. Every passerby didn’t know what radiodrama was.

    Not surprising at all. Most people don’t know what audiobooks are and most bookstores and libraries stock them.

    >We had to tell them what it was, what podcasting is, that they really do exist, and then who the hell we are and why should they care. That’s the world we live in.

    Get on as many panels at the cons too, the more people hearing your message at once the more likely you will have people interested. Person to person is much harder when the audience isn’t self-selected.

    >…especially if all they do is podcast. TSS is on the radio. Are any other radio outlets running Pendant or Darker Projects?

    I can’t say about either, but I suspect none of their fan fiction is.

    >Do they want to be on the radio? For some, it’s not really a priority. In that case, podcasting will only do so much.

    As in, 50%? You think it’s hard to convince people to listen to your radio drama? Try convincing them to get a portable media device! Even with all the marketing the lag is enormous. Many podcasts are still getting a large percentage of their listeners listening by just listening in front of their computers. All that said, why not take advantage of the market that’s easier, the people who already are looking for content. People like me, people who read SFFaudio. The podcast audience.

    >No, it read more like a “The Wizard’s not in!” post. And problems are more easily solved when they are clearly defined and expressed. That didn’t happen the first time, just a lot of ax-grinding.

    A non-denial denial.

    >Look, you said earlier that you take argumentation seriously. But you were comparing amateurs to professionals as if their methods, motivations, desires, ambitions, and resources are the same. It’s not a fair comparison.

    Uggh! It wasn’t a comparison! The professionals are taking advantage of podcasting’s promise. Most aren’t doing it because they are true beleivers, they are doing it because the opportunity costs are low and the potential rewards, as in letting people know who you are, is high. I’m sure you’ll dislike this, but the effect of podcasting seems to work for a lot of people. James Patrick Kelly attributes his Hugo nomination for Burn to his podcast of it. Established and new authors alike are using the cheap distribution and personal connection podcasting allows to create awareness of their product (namely themselves).

    >Ollin Productions (all two of us) teamed up with two groups here in the Pacific Northwest some time ago, namely Transdimensional Media and the Willamette Radio Workshop. Ever heard of Afterhell or Ollin Productions before all this? So much for that idea…

    I’d heard of Willamette before this.

    >You tell me. You’re telling amateurs to podcast, to get on the radio, to expand.

    Mostly I was telling them to podcast. I’ve basically given up on anything that isn’t public radio actually doing radio/audio drama.

    >But that was in the context of comparing amateur audiodrama and their lack of exposure to KJA’s career. He wasn’t an amateur when he started the media tie-in track. They’re not accurate analogues to one another, not a fair comparison, hence a poor analogy.

    It wasn’t a comparison, nor was it an analogy. I said that boostrapping your name, your product, to known quantities can sometimes boost your own recognition.

    >And my bit about Russell T. Davies was a tongue-in-cheek effort to lighten up and seek common ground. Should I stop?

    I know it’s not in the mainstream of popular opinion but I find the new Doctor Who tv show a little less impresive than I’d hoped. :(
    More running around, less historical and science centered plots.

    >Well, I told you it didn’t make any sense. A plea for better science in SF comedies, side by side with praise for a show with “ridiculously impossible physics.” Maybe you should’ve clarified or left it for another posting. It was basically a tangent anyway.

    I’m writing prose here, no need to read between the lines:

    RD was full of ridiculously impossible physics.

    BUT…

    RD respected the audience.

    RD knew the actual tropes of SF.

    RD made serious SF ideas a part of the plots.

    >Do ad hominem attacks make an argument more valid or less valid?

    Lesse..

    “Jesse, if you were any more wrong, you’d be on Fox News.”

    “You do a lot of griping”

    “Semantics aren’t your strong suit.”

    “your suggestions don’t even make any frigging sense.”

    “your wishy-washy language”

    “What’s your idea of a suicide hotline, telling people to jump?”

    “You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore with your functionally illiterate attempts at grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have the gall to say that?”

    “And please, in the name of God — be more freakin’ articulate! I’m not asking for Bradbury, just legible!”

    “You don’t know what you’re talking about, let alone how to bloody say it.”

    “Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you?”

    “If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.”

    “I leave you with your mealy-mouthed claims of artistic virtue in tatters, your highness. Now put some clothes on.”

    Even after all that I’d still say no. I’m not persuaded by ad homenim, but I do reject straw man arguments.

    >If the answer to this question is “less valid,” then the answer to your question is yes. Then there’s no point in equivocating the distinction between a person and his dreams.

    I disagree.

    >I don’t know what to tell you. I’ve even sat in on readings of Beowulf in Anglo-Saxon, where the reader gave us a quick run-through of the language, then blew everyone away with the original language. No matter how well anything is done, for some reason there’s always one person who just doesn’t get it. It just happens. And in the case of Shakespeare especially, it’s a shame.

    I agree.

    >I’m saying you’re implementing, knowingly or unknowingly, have a double standard. And you should stop. Amateurs are going through the same lifelong educational process. Venting your spleen, or me venting mine, serves that purpose and very little else, if anything. I got pissed off, so I went postal. You tell me whether that did you any good whatsoever.

    Indeed yes! It did do my goal some good. Your response to my commentary has attracted much attention. Thank you.

    >Jesse, I had to go back over the text several times and extrapolate in a few places.

    Maybe you need to be trained up to my writing style. Or my lack thereof? ;)

  461. Jesse on Tue, 17th Oct 2006 4:44 pm
  462. Joe,

    >Are we talking about your Item #1, i.e. lots of little groups vs umbrella organizations?

    Sure.

    >My first thought is to consolidate the other end of the production chain — advertising and distribution. We need a farmer’s market for podcasting, a place that everybody knows.

    Though it no longer retains 87% marketshare, apple’s iTunes is propbably the best bet for this.

    >We have lots of podcast directories, but none of them have solved the real problem of “podcasts everywhere and not a drop to drink.” There is no central directory, no killer-app a la Google or Napster. No paradigm shift.

    If anything was, iTunes 4.9 was that, it made the mainstream take notice.

    >Frankly I’d like to see a Google News type set-up for podcasters: a searchable directory with a dynamic home page that runs off an automated ranking system.

    Perhaps Yahoo!?

    >Podcasters would submit their feeds to the directory. The automation would track the most active unique downloads. Those feeds would get bumped to the top 20 list. To make it really fancy, you could even personalize the front page with the user’s choice in topics. That’d refine the data even further.

    I think there are several of these, only problem is no central clearing house, but I see that as a strength. iTunes, as good as it is, doesn’t have everything.

    >You mentioned the sharing of technical knowledge. A central clearinghouse for that would help, but it would do only so much good without a more conducive culture behind it. Once everyone gets past the usual pushing of personal dogmas, the idea that there is only one way to produce radiodrama, information will flow much more easily. As it is, amateurs get confused and discouraged, so they don’t learn anything. Make it a mutual sharing of information, a meeting of like-minded folks, and that’ll change.

    Banding together under one group at least for recognition purposes would certainly help those who already enjoy audio drama find more.

    >Afterhell is in both directories. So much for that idea….

    I named three directories. The third and most important (in terms of podcast users is iTunes).

    >For the sake of intellectual honesty (yes, I do believe in that), I should point out that, in effect, I’m on the fence on this issue. I’d like to think that if folks hear an Afterhell story on Limewire or KaZaa, and like what they hear, they’ll buy a CD.

    Certainly a possibility.

    >We’re doing most of that, looking into more. But it all keeps coming back to convincing everybody else that we’re alive. We just had a table at a local conference. Every passerby didn’t know what radiodrama was.

    Not surprising at all. Most people don’t know what audiobooks are and most bookstores and libraries stock them.

    >We had to tell them what it was, what podcasting is, that they really do exist, and then who the hell we are and why should they care. That’s the world we live in.

    Get on as many panels at the cons too, the more people hearing your message at once the more likely you will have people interested. Person to person is much harder when the audience isn’t self-selected.

    >…especially if all they do is podcast. TSS is on the radio. Are any other radio outlets running Pendant or Darker Projects?

    I can’t say about either, but I suspect none of their fan fiction is.

    >Do they want to be on the radio? For some, it’s not really a priority. In that case, podcasting will only do so much.

    As in, 50%? You think it’s hard to convince people to listen to your radio drama? Try convincing them to get a portable media device! Even with all the marketing the lag is enormous. Many podcasts are still getting a large percentage of their listeners listening by just listening in front of their computers. All that said, why not take advantage of the market that’s easier, the people who already are looking for content. People like me, people who read SFFaudio. The podcast audience.

    >No, it read more like a “The Wizard’s not in!” post. And problems are more easily solved when they are clearly defined and expressed. That didn’t happen the first time, just a lot of ax-grinding.

    A non-denial denial.

    >Look, you said earlier that you take argumentation seriously. But you were comparing amateurs to professionals as if their methods, motivations, desires, ambitions, and resources are the same. It’s not a fair comparison.

    Uggh! It wasn’t a comparison! The professionals are taking advantage of podcasting’s promise. Most aren’t doing it because they are true beleivers, they are doing it because the opportunity costs are low and the potential rewards, as in letting people know who you are, is high. I’m sure you’ll dislike this, but the effect of podcasting seems to work for a lot of people. James Patrick Kelly attributes his Hugo nomination for Burn to his podcast of it. Established and new authors alike are using the cheap distribution and personal connection podcasting allows to create awareness of their product (namely themselves).

    >Ollin Productions (all two of us) teamed up with two groups here in the Pacific Northwest some time ago, namely Transdimensional Media and the Willamette Radio Workshop. Ever heard of Afterhell or Ollin Productions before all this? So much for that idea…

    I’d heard of Willamette before this.

    >You tell me. You’re telling amateurs to podcast, to get on the radio, to expand.

    Mostly I was telling them to podcast. I’ve basically given up on anything that isn’t public radio actually doing radio/audio drama.

    >But that was in the context of comparing amateur audiodrama and their lack of exposure to KJA’s career. He wasn’t an amateur when he started the media tie-in track. They’re not accurate analogues to one another, not a fair comparison, hence a poor analogy.

    It wasn’t a comparison, nor was it an analogy. I said that boostrapping your name, your product, to known quantities can sometimes boost your own recognition.

    >And my bit about Russell T. Davies was a tongue-in-cheek effort to lighten up and seek common ground. Should I stop?

    I know it’s not in the mainstream of popular opinion but I find the new Doctor Who tv show a little less impresive than I’d hoped. :(
    More running around, less historical and science centered plots.

    >Well, I told you it didn’t make any sense. A plea for better science in SF comedies, side by side with praise for a show with “ridiculously impossible physics.” Maybe you should’ve clarified or left it for another posting. It was basically a tangent anyway.

    I’m writing prose here, no need to read between the lines:

    RD was full of ridiculously impossible physics.

    BUT…

    RD respected the audience.

    RD knew the actual tropes of SF.

    RD made serious SF ideas a part of the plots.

    >Do ad hominem attacks make an argument more valid or less valid?

    Lesse..

    “Jesse, if you were any more wrong, you’d be on Fox News.”

    “You do a lot of griping”

    “Semantics aren’t your strong suit.”

    “your suggestions don’t even make any frigging sense.”

    “your wishy-washy language”

    “What’s your idea of a suicide hotline, telling people to jump?”

    “You pump out this incoherent rambling, confusing issue after issue, rendering your readers eyesore with your functionally illiterate attempts at grammar, punctuation, and rhetoric…and you have the gall to say that?”

    “And please, in the name of God — be more freakin’ articulate! I’m not asking for Bradbury, just legible!”

    “You don’t know what you’re talking about, let alone how to bloody say it.”

    “Would consulting Strunk & White be too much of a burden for you?”

    “If you won’t research your points, the least you could do is run your semi-literate nonsensical rants through a spell-checker.”

    “I leave you with your mealy-mouthed claims of artistic virtue in tatters, your highness. Now put some clothes on.”

    Even after all that I’d still say no. I’m not persuaded by ad homenim, but I do reject straw man arguments.

    >If the answer to this question is “less valid,” then the answer to your question is yes. Then there’s no point in equivocating the distinction between a person and his dreams.

    I disagree.

    >I don’t know what to tell you. I’ve even sat in on readings of Beowulf in Anglo-Saxon, where the reader gave us a quick run-through of the language, then blew everyone away with the original language. No matter how well anything is done, for some reason there’s always one person who just doesn’t get it. It just happens. And in the case of Shakespeare especially, it’s a shame.

    I agree.

    >I’m saying you’re implementing, knowingly or unknowingly, have a double standard. And you should stop. Amateurs are going through the same lifelong educational process. Venting your spleen, or me venting mine, serves that purpose and very little else, if anything. I got pissed off, so I went postal. You tell me whether that did you any good whatsoever.

    Indeed yes! It did do my goal some good. Your response to my commentary has attracted much attention. Thank you.

    >Jesse, I had to go back over the text several times and extrapolate in a few places.

    Maybe you need to be trained up to my writing style. Or my lack thereof? ;)

  463. angela on Thu, 19th Oct 2006 7:46 am
  464. the book was a big disappointment compared to the movie.. changed things and left important stuff out.

  465. angela on Thu, 19th Oct 2006 7:46 am
  466. the book was a big disappointment compared to the movie.. changed things and left important stuff out.

  467. Joe on Thu, 19th Oct 2006 5:48 pm
  468. >Though it no longer retains 87% marketshare, apple’s
    >iTunes is propbably the best bet for this.

    If they could do that, in effect putting the pros and the general public distributing product under one roof, that would fantastic.

    >>Frankly I’d like to see a Google News type set-up for
    >>podcasters: [...]
    >
    >Perhaps Yahoo!?

    Yahoo Podcast, you mean? It’s still in beta, but it looks promising so far. (I also hope Yahoo has gotten better about spyware. I had to hack a few things of theirs out of my desktop several times.)

    >I named three directories. The third and most important
    >(in terms of podcast users is iTunes).

    Our first CD is on iTunes, but not the second. We’d organized each story on Volume 2 into separate tracks, which would’ve blown any chance of profit under iTunes. Making each individual scene a track, as we did on the first CD, would’ve been more profitable. Live and learn.

    >>We had to tell them what it was, what podcasting is[...]
    >
    >Get on as many panels at the cons too [...]

    Done and done. We did one at the World Horror Convention in May, and we’re working on some more. Ironically the reaction to our proposals from con-chairs has exhibited the same disbelief and confusion as person-to-person sales.

    >>Do they want to be on the radio? For some, it’s not
    >>really a priority. In that case, podcasting will only
    >>do so much.
    >
    >As in, 50%?

    As in, most fanfic groups don’t give it much thought. They’d probably worker harder for a more professional sound if they did.

    >>No, it read more like a “The Wizard’s not in!” post.
    >>And problems are more easily solved when they are
    >>clearly defined and expressed. That didn’t happen the
    >>first time, just a lot of ax-grinding.
    >
    >A non-denial denial.

    All right, let me put it this way: Calling a rant “a commentary” doesn’t absolve the writer of his obligations. You pointed out problems, “some that are fixed far easier before you start recording.” All well and good. But those problems could’ve been more clearly defined, which would’ve made it easier for anybody to engage in the problem-solving process.

    >James Patrick Kelly attributes his Hugo nomination
    >for Burn to his podcast of it. Established and new
    >authors alike are using the cheap distribution and
    >personal connection podcasting allows to create
    >awareness of their product (namely themselves).

    Okay, got it. That last point, especially with the example of James Patrick Kelly, cleared it up for me. We were talking about amateur audiodrama in relation to podcasting. Now we’re talking about podcasting and writers in general. Sorry, the tacit comparison of pro- and fanfic writers was confusing.

    >I’m sure you’ll dislike this, but the effect of
    >podcasting seems to work for a lot of people.

    Why would I dislike that? I’m all for podcasting. Desktop media creation has a democratizing effect. I just don’t think there’s any point in demanding that amateur groups fix problems which only the pros and semi-pros care about.

    >I said that boostrapping your name, your product,
    >to known quantities can sometimes boost your own
    >recognition.

    We have to agree to disagree. It’s as simple as that in my view.

    >>You tell me whether that did you any good whatsoever.
    >
    >Indeed yes! It did do my goal some good. Your response to
    >my commentary has attracted much attention. Thank you.

    Okay, in that case…”yer mother wuz a hamster, and yer father smelt of elderberries!”

    >Maybe you need to be trained up to my writing style. Or my lack thereof? ;)

    Could be. All those thee’s and thou’s can get confusing….

  469. Joe on Thu, 19th Oct 2006 5:48 pm
  470. >Though it no longer retains 87% marketshare, apple’s
    >iTunes is propbably the best bet for this.

    If they could do that, in effect putting the pros and the general public distributing product under one roof, that would fantastic.

    >>Frankly I’d like to see a Google News type set-up for
    >>podcasters: [...]
    >
    >Perhaps Yahoo!?

    Yahoo Podcast, you mean? It’s still in beta, but it looks promising so far. (I also hope Yahoo has gotten better about spyware. I had to hack a few things of theirs out of my desktop several times.)

    >I named three directories. The third and most important
    >(in terms of podcast users is iTunes).

    Our first CD is on iTunes, but not the second. We’d organized each story on Volume 2 into separate tracks, which would’ve blown any chance of profit under iTunes. Making each individual scene a track, as we did on the first CD, would’ve been more profitable. Live and learn.

    >>We had to tell them what it was, what podcasting is[...]
    >
    >Get on as many panels at the cons too [...]

    Done and done. We did one at the World Horror Convention in May, and we’re working on some more. Ironically the reaction to our proposals from con-chairs has exhibited the same disbelief and confusion as person-to-person sales.

    >>Do they want to be on the radio? For some, it’s not
    >>really a priority. In that case, podcasting will only
    >>do so much.
    >
    >As in, 50%?

    As in, most fanfic groups don’t give it much thought. They’d probably worker harder for a more professional sound if they did.

    >>No, it read more like a “The Wizard’s not in!” post.
    >>And problems are more easily solved when they are
    >>clearly defined and expressed. That didn’t happen the
    >>first time, just a lot of ax-grinding.
    >
    >A non-denial denial.

    All right, let me put it this way: Calling a rant “a commentary” doesn’t absolve the writer of his obligations. You pointed out problems, “some that are fixed far easier before you start recording.” All well and good. But those problems could’ve been more clearly defined, which would’ve made it easier for anybody to engage in the problem-solving process.

    >James Patrick Kelly attributes his Hugo nomination
    >for Burn to his podcast of it. Established and new
    >authors alike are using the cheap distribution and
    >personal connection podcasting allows to create
    >awareness of their product (namely themselves).

    Okay, got it. That last point, especially with the example of James Patrick Kelly, cleared it up for me. We were talking about amateur audiodrama in relation to podcasting. Now we’re talking about podcasting and writers in general. Sorry, the tacit comparison of pro- and fanfic writers was confusing.

    >I’m sure you’ll dislike this, but the effect of
    >podcasting seems to work for a lot of people.

    Why would I dislike that? I’m all for podcasting. Desktop media creation has a democratizing effect. I just don’t think there’s any point in demanding that amateur groups fix problems which only the pros and semi-pros care about.

    >I said that boostrapping your name, your product,
    >to known quantities can sometimes boost your own
    >recognition.

    We have to agree to disagree. It’s as simple as that in my view.

    >>You tell me whether that did you any good whatsoever.
    >
    >Indeed yes! It did do my goal some good. Your response to
    >my commentary has attracted much attention. Thank you.

    Okay, in that case…”yer mother wuz a hamster, and yer father smelt of elderberries!”

    >Maybe you need to be trained up to my writing style. Or my lack thereof? ;)

    Could be. All those thee’s and thou’s can get confusing….

  471. Jesse on Sun, 22nd Oct 2006 1:43 pm
  472. We do currently. Hopefully that will change soon. ;)

  473. Jesse on Sun, 22nd Oct 2006 1:43 pm
  474. We do currently. Hopefully that will change soon. ;)

  475. Brad on Wed, 25th Oct 2006 12:12 pm
  476. Try Video LAN client (VLC), an open source media player that doesn’t try to enslave your first born child. If that can’t play it, nothing can.

  477. Brad on Wed, 25th Oct 2006 12:12 pm
  478. Try Video LAN client (VLC), an open source media player that doesn’t try to enslave your first born child. If that can’t play it, nothing can.

  479. moriond on Wed, 25th Oct 2006 1:55 pm
  480. SpokenNetwork uses Microsoft’s PlaysForSure DRM on this book, and you can see from my link that this requires Windows Media Player 10 or above. Here is the the Microsoft FAQ on using protected files. I think you also need to install the Windows Media Player Security upgrade which is described as follows:

    “The Windows Media Security Upgrade is a process that must be performed before Microsoft Windows Media Player will allow any DRM-protected files to be played. A security measure, the security update identifies the copy of Windows Media Player with the computer on which the Player is being used. Publishers often require this sort of security in order to discourage the unlawful redistribution of digital content.”

    Another warning: you also need a DAP that supports WMA download DRMs to play this. See this list from OverDrive, which is also the source for the quote about the Windows Media Player Security upgrade.

    Reposted with corrected link for PlaysForSure

  481. moriond on Wed, 25th Oct 2006 1:55 pm
  482. SpokenNetwork uses Microsoft’s PlaysForSure DRM on this book, and you can see from my link that this requires Windows Media Player 10 or above. Here is the the Microsoft FAQ on using protected files. I think you also need to install the Windows Media Player Security upgrade which is described as follows:

    “The Windows Media Security Upgrade is a process that must be performed before Microsoft Windows Media Player will allow any DRM-protected files to be played. A security measure, the security update identifies the copy of Windows Media Player with the computer on which the Player is being used. Publishers often require this sort of security in order to discourage the unlawful redistribution of digital content.”

    Another warning: you also need a DAP that supports WMA download DRMs to play this. See this list from OverDrive, which is also the source for the quote about the Windows Media Player Security upgrade.

    Reposted with corrected link for PlaysForSure

  483. Jesse on Thu, 26th Oct 2006 3:06 pm
  484. Well I’m about done trying. I’ve spent about 20 minutes trying to make the damn thing work. It doesn’t work with the Windows Media Player 10 installed in my WIN XP OS. This is a truly sad state of affairs. I’ll just have to ignore WMA files I guess. Kind of a shitty situation, here I am trying to find cool audio goodness for myself and other people to enjoy and I have to abandon a whole class of audio file. DRM sucks.

  485. Jesse on Thu, 26th Oct 2006 3:06 pm
  486. Well I’m about done trying. I’ve spent about 20 minutes trying to make the damn thing work. It doesn’t work with the Windows Media Player 10 installed in my WIN XP OS. This is a truly sad state of affairs. I’ll just have to ignore WMA files I guess. Kind of a shitty situation, here I am trying to find cool audio goodness for myself and other people to enjoy and I have to abandon a whole class of audio file. DRM sucks.

  487. Jesse on Mon, 30th Oct 2006 3:54 pm
  488. Just listened! Nice find Dani! Glad to see that Mur has finally stepped up and put an editorial essence into the intros and outros to Pseudopod.

    Also, Mur mentioned she’d be interested in getting some Lovecraft on Pseudopod! That’d be awesome. Looks like a whole lot of good stuff by HPL is in the public domain. Halloween’s too late. Maybe for Christmas?

  489. Nick on Tue, 31st Oct 2006 3:05 pm
  490. I can’t figure out what to do here. The link takes you to a page that talks about streamning and how to get it. I assume the streaming link is to the live show, and don’t know where to go to get archived programs.

  491. Nick on Tue, 31st Oct 2006 3:05 pm
  492. I can’t figure out what to do here. The link takes you to a page that talks about streamning and how to get it. I assume the streaming link is to the live show, and don’t know where to go to get archived programs.

  493. Jesse on Wed, 1st Nov 2006 1:30 pm
  494. Nick, sorry to say that I don’t think KBOO archives their broadcasts. The live streaming event was your only chance to hear these shows.

  495. Jesse on Wed, 1st Nov 2006 1:30 pm
  496. Nick, sorry to say that I don’t think KBOO archives their broadcasts. The live streaming event was your only chance to hear these shows.

  497. SamA on Thu, 2nd Nov 2006 12:18 am
  498. Sorry about the confusion, KBOO does not archive. We will post The Outsider on either Afterhell’s website or WRW’s and will let SFFA know when we do. Thanks for your interest.
    SamA

    Through the Turnstile will be available on WRW’s website and hopefully on some other podcasts deicated to audio drama.

  499. SamA on Thu, 2nd Nov 2006 12:18 am
  500. Sorry about the confusion, KBOO does not archive. We will post The Outsider on either Afterhell’s website or WRW’s and will let SFFA know when we do. Thanks for your interest.
    SamA

    Through the Turnstile will be available on WRW’s website and hopefully on some other podcasts deicated to audio drama.

  501. SamA on Fri, 10th Nov 2006 3:02 pm
  502. Thanks for the mention Jessie, but I do have to point out that the script is abridged. Not hacked up and definately has all the Lovecraftian flavor you could want but gets the job done in 16 minutes.
    A very skillfull edit by Joe Medina with a couple of dramatic snips from me. So if your looking for the complete UNABRIDGED text try here.
    (http://mikeshea.net/lovecraft/theoutsider.htm)
    Just trying to keep the truth in advertising spirit alive. Thanks

  503. SamA on Fri, 10th Nov 2006 3:02 pm
  504. Thanks for the mention Jessie, but I do have to point out that the script is abridged. Not hacked up and definately has all the Lovecraftian flavor you could want but gets the job done in 16 minutes.
    A very skillfull edit by Joe Medina with a couple of dramatic snips from me. So if your looking for the complete UNABRIDGED text try here.
    (http://mikeshea.net/lovecraft/theoutsider.htm)
    Just trying to keep the truth in advertising spirit alive. Thanks

  505. Jesse on Fri, 10th Nov 2006 4:06 pm
  506. Thanks Sam, I will adjust the post. I followed your reading with the original text for a while the edits must have been pretty minor. Thanks!

  507. Jesse on Fri, 10th Nov 2006 4:06 pm
  508. Thanks Sam, I will adjust the post. I followed your reading with the original text for a while the edits must have been pretty minor. Thanks!

  509. Banshee on Thu, 16th Nov 2006 8:51 pm
  510. Manybooks.net apparently has the wrong version of some of those books which Gutenberg is going to post, but hasn’t posted yet. For example, the version of The Skylark of Space on manybooks.net is the _book_ version, which is still under copyright. The public domain version is the _magazine_ version, which they have over at durendal.org. Since Smith extensively revised Skylark, that’s a problem you can’t just sweep under the rug.

  511. Banshee on Thu, 16th Nov 2006 8:51 pm
  512. Manybooks.net apparently has the wrong version of some of those books which Gutenberg is going to post, but hasn’t posted yet. For example, the version of The Skylark of Space on manybooks.net is the _book_ version, which is still under copyright. The public domain version is the _magazine_ version, which they have over at durendal.org. Since Smith extensively revised Skylark, that’s a problem you can’t just sweep under the rug.

  513. Jesse on Fri, 17th Nov 2006 12:54 pm
  514. :(

    This is the saddest day in SFFaudio’s existence.

    We’ve been diminished.

    Even so, I can’t help but wish Scott all the best in his new ventures.

    I’ll also be looking forward to reviewing Deuce Audio titles. Scott knows what it takes to create GREAT SCIENCE FICTION AUDIOBOOKS!

    I wish you all the best my dear friend!

    You da man.

  515. Jesse on Fri, 17th Nov 2006 12:54 pm
  516. :(

    This is the saddest day in SFFaudio’s existence.

    We’ve been diminished.

    Even so, I can’t help but wish Scott all the best in his new ventures.

    I’ll also be looking forward to reviewing Deuce Audio titles. Scott knows what it takes to create GREAT SCIENCE FICTION AUDIOBOOKS!

    I wish you all the best my dear friend!

    You da man.

  517. The Time Traveler on Fri, 17th Nov 2006 3:51 pm
  518. Scott-

    You and Jesse have created my home on the net. About a year ago I thought about starting my own news blog about audio SF. I found your site and realized I could never do it as good. SFFaudio is the first site I go to.

    When you guys put out the call for reviewers, I jumped at it. I have no idea of how much traffic this site gets. That didn’t matter. I got to write about SF audio on the best damn site out there.

    Although our professional relationship doesn’t go back far, I’ve always felt very welcomed, and you always answered my questions and got me some mighty fine audiobooks to review too!

    I’m hoping we stay connected. I’m sure we will. Good luck on your writing and with Deuce Audio.

  519. The Time Traveler on Fri, 17th Nov 2006 3:51 pm
  520. Scott-

    You and Jesse have created my home on the net. About a year ago I thought about starting my own news blog about audio SF. I found your site and realized I could never do it as good. SFFaudio is the first site I go to.

    When you guys put out the call for reviewers, I jumped at it. I have no idea of how much traffic this site gets. That didn’t matter. I got to write about SF audio on the best damn site out there.

    Although our professional relationship doesn’t go back far, I’ve always felt very welcomed, and you always answered my questions and got me some mighty fine audiobooks to review too!

    I’m hoping we stay connected. I’m sure we will. Good luck on your writing and with Deuce Audio.

  521. PaulJ on Sun, 19th Nov 2006 5:10 am
  522. If you’re using an iPod, a Smart Playlist would solve the problem of navigating to the next chapter. Each new chapter would be automatically added to the list, in the correct order. Unlike those in ‘Podcasts’ the files in a playlist are played in a continuous sequence.

  523. PaulJ on Sun, 19th Nov 2006 5:10 am
  524. If you’re using an iPod, a Smart Playlist would solve the problem of navigating to the next chapter. Each new chapter would be automatically added to the list, in the correct order. Unlike those in ‘Podcasts’ the files in a playlist are played in a continuous sequence.

  525. Audio Addict on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 12:59 am
  526. The biggest problem with an entire podiobook in one file is size. Anything bigger than 50 megs is time-consuming to download, and most podcasters harumph* at it. Not to mention the few who might still actually have dial-up. :-)

    Can you imagine something like 7th Son as one huge file? It would lose its popularity simply because people would be frustrated trying to download the thing. It’s just not conceivable.

    It also defeats the purpose of the podiobook concept, which is to run it as a podcast. Meaning, you must wait for the next episode. But yes, you could wait for the entire podiobook to be available too.

    *that’s a technical term, you know. ;-)

    ~Dani

  527. Audio Addict on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 12:59 am
  528. The biggest problem with an entire podiobook in one file is size. Anything bigger than 50 megs is time-consuming to download, and most podcasters harumph* at it. Not to mention the few who might still actually have dial-up. :-)

    Can you imagine something like 7th Son as one huge file? It would lose its popularity simply because people would be frustrated trying to download the thing. It’s just not conceivable.

    It also defeats the purpose of the podiobook concept, which is to run it as a podcast. Meaning, you must wait for the next episode. But yes, you could wait for the entire podiobook to be available too.

    *that’s a technical term, you know. ;-)

    ~Dani

  529. Audio Addict on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 1:01 am
  530. I also hardly got a chance to know you, but our short conversations were sweet, and I could tell you are a great guy!

    Yes, I picked up on that just from the “hello and welcome to SFF audio” email. ;-)

    Good luck to you!

    ~Dani

  531. Audio Addict on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 1:01 am
  532. I also hardly got a chance to know you, but our short conversations were sweet, and I could tell you are a great guy!

    Yes, I picked up on that just from the “hello and welcome to SFF audio” email. ;-)

    Good luck to you!

    ~Dani

  533. Jesse on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 4:12 am
  534. Paul,

    Your Smart Playlist fix is a workaround for the navigation and continuous sequence problem, but it doesnt solve the bookmarking problem. iPods have the capability of marking and holding and identifying bookmarks in only two ways:

    1. AAC, which is the format Audible/iTunes audiobooks use in the audiboook directory of iTunes/iPod.

    2. Podcasts, either M4A or MP3s that show up in the podcast directory. With podcast there is a little dot beside the unplayed files.

    With a smart playlist we get the novel in a continuous sequence, which is good but we still have the problem of not being able to tell which file we were last listening to when we navigate away and then come back (there is no dot in playlists). With one giant file you don’t have that problem because there is only one file under each podcast.

    Dani,

    Large files are not for everyone, especially dial-up folks. But the download time for one large file as opposed to 12 smaller ones of the same total size is quite comparable if not identical. Podcasters and podcast listeners might as you say “harumph” at a long wait while a 90mb, 500mb or 1gb file downloads but will audiobook folk? With a decent connection were talking less than an hour in almost every case.

    Giving audiobook fanatics a more audiobook-like experience will make the idea of podcast novels more attractive. The serialized concept for podcast novels certainly has worked at attracting listeners, that I can’t dispute, but has it made significant inroads into the traditional audiobook listening audience?

    From my read on the audiobook listenership out there, no, at least not yet. There is so much good stuff available in the “try before you donate podiobook model” I’d like to see more traditional audiobook people listening to them.

    I’d like to see a giant single downloadable podcast novel be an option for completed podcast novels on podiobooks.com and librivox.org. Even if that were a premium FEE PAID option. I am willing to pay for the convenience of not having to fiddle with my ipod.

  535. Jesse on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 4:12 am
  536. Paul,

    Your Smart Playlist fix is a workaround for the navigation and continuous sequence problem, but it doesnt solve the bookmarking problem. iPods have the capability of marking and holding and identifying bookmarks in only two ways:

    1. AAC, which is the format Audible/iTunes audiobooks use in the audiboook directory of iTunes/iPod.

    2. Podcasts, either M4A or MP3s that show up in the podcast directory. With podcast there is a little dot beside the unplayed files.

    With a smart playlist we get the novel in a continuous sequence, which is good but we still have the problem of not being able to tell which file we were last listening to when we navigate away and then come back (there is no dot in playlists). With one giant file you don’t have that problem because there is only one file under each podcast.

    Dani,

    Large files are not for everyone, especially dial-up folks. But the download time for one large file as opposed to 12 smaller ones of the same total size is quite comparable if not identical. Podcasters and podcast listeners might as you say “harumph” at a long wait while a 90mb, 500mb or 1gb file downloads but will audiobook folk? With a decent connection were talking less than an hour in almost every case.

    Giving audiobook fanatics a more audiobook-like experience will make the idea of podcast novels more attractive. The serialized concept for podcast novels certainly has worked at attracting listeners, that I can’t dispute, but has it made significant inroads into the traditional audiobook listening audience?

    From my read on the audiobook listenership out there, no, at least not yet. There is so much good stuff available in the “try before you donate podiobook model” I’d like to see more traditional audiobook people listening to them.

    I’d like to see a giant single downloadable podcast novel be an option for completed podcast novels on podiobooks.com and librivox.org. Even if that were a premium FEE PAID option. I am willing to pay for the convenience of not having to fiddle with my ipod.

  537. Phil Bowman on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 10:50 am
  538. Jesse,

    I am someone who listens to a lot of audio dramas via podcast delivery (some of which are via podiobooks, some not).

    Yes, the experience here is very different from somewhere like Audible(/iTunes) where you can download the whole book at a go, but the serialisation ‘feel’, where you wait for the next episode, can be fun too.

    As you say, you can always choose to listen only to books that have completed, and are available to download all episodes.

    As far as smart lists go, I have mine set up with a criterion of ‘Play Count = 0′ so when I go to the playlist, it only lists episodes I haven’t heard yet. Yes, you have to listen to complete episodes as you don’t get the AAC Bookmarking feature, but in the serialised ‘mode’ that’s kind of the point – they break at a natural point.

    Phil

  539. Phil Bowman on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 10:50 am
  540. Jesse,

    I am someone who listens to a lot of audio dramas via podcast delivery (some of which are via podiobooks, some not).

    Yes, the experience here is very different from somewhere like Audible(/iTunes) where you can download the whole book at a go, but the serialisation ‘feel’, where you wait for the next episode, can be fun too.

    As you say, you can always choose to listen only to books that have completed, and are available to download all episodes.

    As far as smart lists go, I have mine set up with a criterion of ‘Play Count = 0′ so when I go to the playlist, it only lists episodes I haven’t heard yet. Yes, you have to listen to complete episodes as you don’t get the AAC Bookmarking feature, but in the serialised ‘mode’ that’s kind of the point – they break at a natural point.

    Phil

  541. PaulJ on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 12:59 pm
  542. There’s a setting in iTunes (Get Info|Options) on by default for podcasts: “Remember playback position” which works for mp3s as well as AACs. This, with a Smart Playlist, seems to work fine for podiobooks.

  543. PaulJ on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 12:59 pm
  544. There’s a setting in iTunes (Get Info|Options) on by default for podcasts: “Remember playback position” which works for mp3s as well as AACs. This, with a Smart Playlist, seems to work fine for podiobooks.

  545. Banshee on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 8:43 pm
  546. If you download the zip file for a Librivox or archive.org book, you get all the files at once. I suppose you could try attaching them all together; but I don’t know of any mp3 editor that could handle that big a file.

    Anyway, what is this thing you call iPod? I’m still burning mp3 CDs, you whiners! :)

  547. Banshee on Mon, 20th Nov 2006 8:43 pm
  548. If you download the zip file for a Librivox or archive.org book, you get all the files at once. I suppose you could try attaching them all together; but I don’t know of any mp3 editor that could handle that big a file.

    Anyway, what is this thing you call iPod? I’m still burning mp3 CDs, you whiners! :)

  549. Phil Bowman on Tue, 21st Nov 2006 7:41 am
  550. For attaching files together I’ve used TotalRecorder (www.highcriteria.com) – it has a ’speed record’ feature which rather neatly allows you to play a number of separate MP3 files and rerecord them into a single file, but at about 4x the normal speed. Not necessarily the fastest way of doing it, but it does work. You can then turn the bookmarking feature on in iTunes and voila.

  551. Phil Bowman on Tue, 21st Nov 2006 7:41 am
  552. For attaching files together I’ve used TotalRecorder (www.highcriteria.com) – it has a ’speed record’ feature which rather neatly allows you to play a number of separate MP3 files and rerecord them into a single file, but at about 4x the normal speed. Not necessarily the fastest way of doing it, but it does work. You can then turn the bookmarking feature on in iTunes and voila.

  553. Jesse on Tue, 21st Nov 2006 3:48 pm
  554. Phil, re-recording them, even at high speed is probably not the best way to join a podiobook together.

    “MP3 Splitter & Joiner” is probably a faster way.

    http://www.ezsoftmagic.com/

    The demoware version only allows you to join 5 mp3 files at a time, and stops working after 10 days, but joins podiobooks, or ripped CDs or MP3-CDs into one big file with elegance. You can repeat the steps for podcast novels over 5 files in length by repeating the process.

    Purchase price for the unlimited version is $20.00.

    Now to get it into the podcast directory of an iPod you’d need to podcast the file too!

  555. Jesse on Tue, 21st Nov 2006 3:48 pm
  556. Phil, re-recording them, even at high speed is probably not the best way to join a podiobook together.

    “MP3 Splitter & Joiner” is probably a faster way.

    http://www.ezsoftmagic.com/

    The demoware version only allows you to join 5 mp3 files at a time, and stops working after 10 days, but joins podiobooks, or ripped CDs or MP3-CDs into one big file with elegance. You can repeat the steps for podcast novels over 5 files in length by repeating the process.

    Purchase price for the unlimited version is $20.00.

    Now to get it into the podcast directory of an iPod you’d need to podcast the file too!

  557. Jesse on Tue, 21st Nov 2006 5:06 pm
  558. I think this is both the first Clipper audiobook and the first Iain M. Banks novel to be reviewed on SFFaudio.

    It looks like there is another unabridged version of the same novel available in the UK:

    http://www.thebookplace.com/bookplace/display.asp?ISB=1405500786&CID=TIMEWARNER

  559. Jesse on Tue, 21st Nov 2006 5:06 pm
  560. I think this is both the first Clipper audiobook and the first Iain M. Banks novel to be reviewed on SFFaudio.

    It looks like there is another unabridged version of the same novel available in the UK:

    http://www.thebookplace.com/bookplace/display.asp?ISB=1405500786&CID=TIMEWARNER

  561. Phil Bowman on Wed, 22nd Nov 2006 10:41 am
  562. Well, I happened to have TotalRecorder already, so I wanted to find a way to use it. Still sounds simpler than recursively joining files.

    And why would you want to add the file into the podcasts directory? Podcasts are a great means of delivery, but iPod Podcast management isn’t the most intuitive – once I have mine as files I just have them in an ‘Audiobooks’ playlist. You can set the ‘Remember Playback Position’ now in Get Info / ‘Remember Playback position’ for any file including MP3s.

    Don’t make this more complicated than it needs to be!

  563. Phil Bowman on Wed, 22nd Nov 2006 10:41 am
  564. Well, I happened to have TotalRecorder already, so I wanted to find a way to use it. Still sounds simpler than recursively joining files.

    And why would you want to add the file into the podcasts directory? Podcasts are a great means of delivery, but iPod Podcast management isn’t the most intuitive – once I have mine as files I just have them in an ‘Audiobooks’ playlist. You can set the ‘Remember Playback Position’ now in Get Info / ‘Remember Playback position’ for any file including MP3s.

    Don’t make this more complicated than it needs to be!

  565. Jesse on Wed, 22nd Nov 2006 5:01 pm
  566. Nice find TT! I’ve got a review of Kirinyaga by Resnick in the pipe. :)

  567. Jesse on Wed, 22nd Nov 2006 5:01 pm
  568. Nice find TT! I’ve got a review of Kirinyaga by Resnick in the pipe. :)

  569. Jesse on Fri, 24th Nov 2006 10:14 pm
  570. Let me be the first to say I’m really pleased to have you TT. At first I thought it was a little strange that I didn’t remember asking you to come on board (though I admit was thinking about it earlier this week). It all made a kind of sense though after you explained to me, as only a TRUE Time Traveler could, that I would be hiring you in the near future because you’d already been there and in that near future I’d asked you to join SFFaudio as a contributing editor. I was suprised but I probably shouldn’t have been. I guess I’ll have to set myself a note on the calendar to ask you sometime in the near future so that this present reality doesn’t disappear like grandfather paradoxed timestream. Ouch! — I’m getting a bit of a headache from trying to trace the causality — anyway, welcome aboard!

  571. Jesse on Fri, 24th Nov 2006 10:14 pm
  572. Let me be the first to say I’m really pleased to have you TT. At first I thought it was a little strange that I didn’t remember asking you to come on board (though I admit was thinking about it earlier this week). It all made a kind of sense though after you explained to me, as only a TRUE Time Traveler could, that I would be hiring you in the near future because you’d already been there and in that near future I’d asked you to join SFFaudio as a contributing editor. I was suprised but I probably shouldn’t have been. I guess I’ll have to set myself a note on the calendar to ask you sometime in the near future so that this present reality doesn’t disappear like grandfather paradoxed timestream. Ouch! — I’m getting a bit of a headache from trying to trace the causality — anyway, welcome aboard!

  573. Jesse on Mon, 27th Nov 2006 12:03 pm
  574. Woohoo! I guess I can finally rest.

    Welcome aboard Dani. :)

  575. Jesse on Mon, 27th Nov 2006 12:03 pm
  576. Woohoo! I guess I can finally rest.

    Welcome aboard Dani. :)

  577. The Time Traveler on Mon, 27th Nov 2006 2:25 pm
  578. “Rest”–I don’t think so, Jesse. Get your butt back in the chair and start posting.

    Dani, welcome aboard (sigh). It’s great that I wasn’t the only one tapped for this insanity (sigh again). I think we’ll have a lot of fun!

  579. The Time Traveler on Mon, 27th Nov 2006 2:25 pm
  580. “Rest”–I don’t think so, Jesse. Get your butt back in the chair and start posting.

    Dani, welcome aboard (sigh). It’s great that I wasn’t the only one tapped for this insanity (sigh again). I think we’ll have a lot of fun!

  581. Audio Addict on Tue, 28th Nov 2006 4:53 pm
  582. HEHE- ahhh that is what this is about. Rick and I are here to make sure Jesse keeps doing all the work!

    Yay!!! ;-)

    Yes, it will be fun- I see a great future for SFFaudio!

    ~Dani

  583. Audio Addict on Tue, 28th Nov 2006 4:53 pm
  584. HEHE- ahhh that is what this is about. Rick and I are here to make sure Jesse keeps doing all the work!

    Yay!!! ;-)

    Yes, it will be fun- I see a great future for SFFaudio!

    ~Dani

  585. PaulJ on Fri, 1st Dec 2006 4:17 pm
  586. “Poor folks outside the UK” needn’t feel too hard done by. True, here in Portsmouth we get a decent DAB signal, but it’s 80kbps mono (as it is for BBC7 on DAB throughout the UK). At least those who listen to the live stream, or ‘listen again’ can listen in stereo, despite the lower bit-rate.

    Me? I’ll be listening on Freeview, the UK’s free-to-air digital TV system, where BBC7 is broadcast in 160kbps stereo.

    Those with satellite TV apparently get the best deal: I understand that on Sky all the BBC digital radio channels are beamed down at 192kbps.

    (For a fuller rant on this subject see this letter to Ofcom.)

  587. PaulJ on Fri, 1st Dec 2006 4:17 pm
  588. “Poor folks outside the UK” needn’t feel too hard done by. True, here in Portsmouth we get a decent DAB signal, but it’s 80kbps mono (as it is for BBC7 on DAB throughout the UK). At least those who listen to the live stream, or ‘listen again’ can listen in stereo, despite the lower bit-rate.

    Me? I’ll be listening on Freeview, the UK’s free-to-air digital TV system, where BBC7 is broadcast in 160kbps stereo.

    Those with satellite TV apparently get the best deal: I understand that on Sky all the BBC digital radio channels are beamed down at 192kbps.

    (For a fuller rant on this subject see this letter to Ofcom.)

  589. Jesse on Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 12:36 am
  590. Nice review TT! I didn’t know this series even existed!

    I’ve added a link to the professor’s blog. And here’s the blog post of him talking about the lectures. :)

    http://wormtalk.blogspot.com/2006/08/science-fiction-course-on-cd-my.html

    Also, there are a couple of other SF courses that have been reviewed on SFFaudio:

    http://www.sffaudio.com/2003/08/review-of-science-fiction-literature.html

    and

    http://www.sffaudio.com/2005/04/independent-and-distance-learning.html

    and there was even a series of podcast lectures back in February…

    http://www.sffaudio.com/2006/02/sf-has-influence-in-real-world.html

    We’re Scholarly!

  591. Jesse on Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 12:36 am
  592. Nice review TT! I didn’t know this series even existed!

    I’ve added a link to the professor’s blog. And here’s the blog post of him talking about the lectures. :)

    http://wormtalk.blogspot.com/2006/08/science-fiction-course-on-cd-my.html

    Also, there are a couple of other SF courses that have been reviewed on SFFaudio:

    http://www.sffaudio.com/2003/08/review-of-science-fiction-literature.html

    and

    http://www.sffaudio.com/2005/04/independent-and-distance-learning.html

    and there was even a series of podcast lectures back in February…

    http://www.sffaudio.com/2006/02/sf-has-influence-in-real-world.html

    We’re Scholarly!

  593. moriond on Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 1:25 am
  594. The Pullman/Paolini/Pierce podcasts are also available via iTunes podcast subscription. There was an earlier 3-way interview between Pullman, Paolini, and Pierce that was hosted at Powell’s Books. And for those interested in Christopher Paolini’s work, and anticipating the movie release of Eragon, there’s also a short mp3 of Paolini reading A Brief History of Alagaesia. A free 27 minute audio interview with Paolini reading part of Eldest and with Q & A was issued last year at the iTunes Store and is still available for download.

  595. Audio Addict on Mon, 4th Dec 2006 11:25 am
  596. HEHE- it’s about time they got that going!! It’s been a long summer for them!

    A review of 7th Son NEVER gets old, that is for sure!

    ~Dani

  597. Audio Addict on Mon, 4th Dec 2006 11:25 am
  598. HEHE- it’s about time they got that going!! It’s been a long summer for them!

    A review of 7th Son NEVER gets old, that is for sure!

    ~Dani

  599. Audio Addict on Tue, 5th Dec 2006 3:55 pm
  600. How totally great this is, both for the portable media world and for the audio drama world as well!

    I was all excited to post this, because I just posted on the addict blog… and what do you know? You beat me to it!

    Which means I should probably pay closer attention to this place… oy vey!

    ~Dani

  601. Audio Addict on Tue, 5th Dec 2006 3:55 pm
  602. How totally great this is, both for the portable media world and for the audio drama world as well!

    I was all excited to post this, because I just posted on the addict blog… and what do you know? You beat me to it!

    Which means I should probably pay closer attention to this place… oy vey!

    ~Dani

  603. Jesse on Wed, 6th Dec 2006 12:10 am
  604. :) Its a race! See who can post to SFFaudio first!

  605. Jesse on Wed, 6th Dec 2006 12:10 am
  606. :) Its a race! See who can post to SFFaudio first!

  607. moriond on Fri, 8th Dec 2006 12:42 am
  608. In an Audiofile Magzine survey conducted June of last year, 27.6% of those polled (magazine readers and those visiting the magazine’s web site) designated cassettes as their preferred audio format vs. 36.2% audio CDs, 10.5% mp3 CDs, and 25.7% digital downloads. However, criteria like types of players available in their cars, and available formats from libraries were major factors behind answers. Fewer cars manufactured with cassette players and a rise in library digital download services and CDs will probably whittle this down. However, Brilliance Audio has recently started offering cassettes-on-demand at their AudioBookStand retail sales site.

  609. moriond on Fri, 8th Dec 2006 12:42 am
  610. In an Audiofile Magzine survey conducted June of last year, 27.6% of those polled (magazine readers and those visiting the magazine’s web site) designated cassettes as their preferred audio format vs. 36.2% audio CDs, 10.5% mp3 CDs, and 25.7% digital downloads. However, criteria like types of players available in their cars, and available formats from libraries were major factors behind answers. Fewer cars manufactured with cassette players and a rise in library digital download services and CDs will probably whittle this down. However, Brilliance Audio has recently started offering cassettes-on-demand at their AudioBookStand retail sales site.

  611. Scott Sigler on Sat, 9th Dec 2006 11:05 am
  612. Jesse:

    In your “online audio” section, could you update the links for my books? Ancestor and EarthCore are now on Podiobooks.com:

    ANCESTOR:
    http://www.podiobooks.com/podiobooks/book.php?ID=85

    EARTHCORE:
    http://www.podiobooks.com/podiobooks/book.php?ID=24

    I also am currently running THE ROOKIE:
    http://scottsigler.podshow.com

    And I’ll let you know when INFECTION moves to Podiobooks.com, probably this month.

    Any chance for a review?

  613. Scott Sigler on Sat, 9th Dec 2006 11:05 am
  614. Jesse:

    In your “online audio” section, could you update the links for my books? Ancestor and EarthCore are now on Podiobooks.com:

    ANCESTOR:
    http://www.podiobooks.com/podiobooks/book.php?ID=85

    EARTHCORE:
    http://www.podiobooks.com/podiobooks/book.php?ID=24

    I also am currently running THE ROOKIE:
    http://scottsigler.podshow.com

    And I’ll let you know when INFECTION moves to Podiobooks.com, probably this month.

    Any chance for a review?

  615. stever on Tue, 12th Dec 2006 12:26 am
  616. The easiest way to do this is right at your fingertips on OSX. The underlying UNIX has a command called “cat”, which is short for “concatenate”, which is a horrible word that basically means “combine”. Understandably, you don’t want to get involved with command line stuff, so go here http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/15404 to download a simple drag-n-drop applescript for it. Drop your multiple files on the applescript icon, enter a new name for the completed file, and you’re done.

  617. stever on Tue, 12th Dec 2006 12:26 am
  618. The easiest way to do this is right at your fingertips on OSX. The underlying UNIX has a command called “cat”, which is short for “concatenate”, which is a horrible word that basically means “combine”. Understandably, you don’t want to get involved with command line stuff, so go here http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/15404 to download a simple drag-n-drop applescript for it. Drop your multiple files on the applescript icon, enter a new name for the completed file, and you’re done.

  619. Jesse on Sat, 16th Dec 2006 12:18 am
  620. Waycool titles!

  621. Jesse on Sat, 16th Dec 2006 12:18 am
  622. Waycool titles!

  623. Stephane on Sat, 16th Dec 2006 4:40 pm
  624. If you love thrilling suspense with an intelligent plot. If you dig being surprised at every turn. And if youre as easily addicted to anything good as I am. Listen to this book. It is so great. Ive been listening to the story from the beginning and I am still waiting for each episode religiously. I recommend this podcast. Great for lazy readers!!!!

  625. Stephane on Sat, 16th Dec 2006 4:40 pm
  626. If you love thrilling suspense with an intelligent plot. If you dig being surprised at every turn. And if youre as easily addicted to anything good as I am. Listen to this book. It is so great. Ive been listening to the story from the beginning and I am still waiting for each episode religiously. I recommend this podcast. Great for lazy readers!!!!

  627. Tim on Mon, 18th Dec 2006 10:37 am
  628. Awesome classic style radio adventure!

  629. Tim on Mon, 18th Dec 2006 10:37 am
  630. Awesome classic style radio adventure!

  631. andrion2 on Tue, 19th Dec 2006 3:50 pm
  632. From the author, in response to Kurt’s SFF Audio review of Soldier of the Legion:

    Aside from that, how did you like the story, Kurt? Come on, admit it. Don’t hold back. Tell us what you really think! You loved it, didn’t you?

    Truth is, if the story is as bad as you claim, it would not have been one of three finalists for the 2003 Benjamin Franklin Award in the “popular fiction” category. Nor would it have been a finalist for the 2002 ForeWord Magazine Book of the Year Award in two categories: Science Fiction and Audio Fiction. Also, it would not have been broadcast and rebroadcast nationally on XM Radio during 2005 and 2006, and it would not have won all the positive reviews which it has received.

    This story and the audio versions generated a lot of positive fan e-mails, everyone from kids to military officers serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, and they all enjoyed it and wanted news about the sequel. SFF Audio’s readers should read the first chapter, available in http://www.soldierofthelegion.com, and make their own decisions instead of ignoring the book based on Kurt’s review. Timberwolf’s audio is excellent.

    Marshall S Thomas

  633. andrion2 on Tue, 19th Dec 2006 3:50 pm
  634. From the author, in response to Kurt’s SFF Audio review of Soldier of the Legion:

    Aside from that, how did you like the story, Kurt? Come on, admit it. Don’t hold back. Tell us what you really think! You loved it, didn’t you?

    Truth is, if the story is as bad as you claim, it would not have been one of three finalists for the 2003 Benjamin Franklin Award in the “popular fiction” category. Nor would it have been a finalist for the 2002 ForeWord Magazine Book of the Year Award in two categories: Science Fiction and Audio Fiction. Also, it would not have been broadcast and rebroadcast nationally on XM Radio during 2005 and 2006, and it would not have won all the positive reviews which it has received.

    This story and the audio versions generated a lot of positive fan e-mails, everyone from kids to military officers serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, and they all enjoyed it and wanted news about the sequel. SFF Audio’s readers should read the first chapter, available in http://www.soldierofthelegion.com, and make their own decisions instead of ignoring the book based on Kurt’s review. Timberwolf’s audio is excellent.

    Marshall S Thomas

  635. decoderring on Wed, 20th Dec 2006 8:20 am
  636. Removing static or other ambient noise is one of the things that I don’t use Audacity for, for exactly that reason – it always leaves kind of a hollow, tinny feeling behind. Goldwave does a much nicer job of that, though I stick with Audacity for just about everything else, as I’m comfortable with it. I really don’t remember for sure, but I think Goldwave was a “free-for-thirty-days” or something or other. Anyway, poke around on the net and see if you can find it.

    What concerns me a little more is how static got there in the first place. Any time I’ve been cleaning up “static” it’s either been transmission interference on an old radio recording, or from a source with surface irregularities like an LP. (Yes, I am a big enough geek to encode from LPs, thank you for asking).

    If you’re hearing static on something you’ve recorded yourself, it suggests a problem with the process. It could be the computer’s fan as you suggest, but that usually sounds more like… well, a computer fan. White noise as opposed to static. There might be a short in your cable or microphone… I’m really just guessing as I don’t know anything about your setup… You might want to try running it through the “line in” port rather than the “mic” port and see if that helps clean things up a bit, if you’re not already doing that.

  637. decoderring on Wed, 20th Dec 2006 8:20 am
  638. Removing static or other ambient noise is one of the things that I don’t use Audacity for, for exactly that reason – it always leaves kind of a hollow, tinny feeling behind. Goldwave does a much nicer job of that, though I stick with Audacity for just about everything else, as I’m comfortable with it. I really don’t remember for sure, but I think Goldwave was a “free-for-thirty-days” or something or other. Anyway, poke around on the net and see if you can find it.

    What concerns me a little more is how static got there in the first place. Any time I’ve been cleaning up “static” it’s either been transmission interference on an old radio recording, or from a source with surface irregularities like an LP. (Yes, I am a big enough geek to encode from LPs, thank you for asking).

    If you’re hearing static on something you’ve recorded yourself, it suggests a problem with the process. It could be the computer’s fan as you suggest, but that usually sounds more like… well, a computer fan. White noise as opposed to static. There might be a short in your cable or microphone… I’m really just guessing as I don’t know anything about your setup… You might want to try running it through the “line in” port rather than the “mic” port and see if that helps clean things up a bit, if you’re not already doing that.

  639. The Time Traveler on Sat, 23rd Dec 2006 1:19 pm
  640. Bravo to Mark Nelson for not only taking up the SFFaudio challenge but for also doing such a commendable job. Also kudos to Jesse Willis for thinking of this competition that’s helping to generate so much interest in making public domain SF books into audiobooks for the betterment of society :)

  641. The Time Traveler on Sat, 23rd Dec 2006 1:19 pm
  642. Bravo to Mark Nelson for not only taking up the SFFaudio challenge but for also doing such a commendable job. Also kudos to Jesse Willis for thinking of this competition that’s helping to generate so much interest in making public domain SF books into audiobooks for the betterment of society :)

  643. The Time Traveler on Sun, 24th Dec 2006 1:10 pm
  644. That must of have been a future instance of myself who talked to PKD because I don’t recall it. Of course, time travel does addle the brain.

  645. The Time Traveler on Sun, 24th Dec 2006 1:10 pm
  646. That must of have been a future instance of myself who talked to PKD because I don’t recall it. Of course, time travel does addle the brain.

  647. Beam Me Up on Mon, 25th Dec 2006 3:26 pm
  648. Sweet Jesse! Thanks for the post. I really enjoyed Promises to keep and even though I am far from a professional, I put my heart as a fan into the production. The final installment of Promises to Keep will run saturday December 30th. I ran short of time with the Christmas story so I will have that and A new story by Shaun Saunders who postulates that the Mayan Calendar may be Very correct.

  649. Beam Me Up on Mon, 25th Dec 2006 3:26 pm
  650. Sweet Jesse! Thanks for the post. I really enjoyed Promises to keep and even though I am far from a professional, I put my heart as a fan into the production. The final installment of Promises to Keep will run saturday December 30th. I ran short of time with the Christmas story so I will have that and A new story by Shaun Saunders who postulates that the Mayan Calendar may be Very correct.

  651. Jason on Thu, 28th Dec 2006 3:27 pm
  652. Badge Of Infamy is great! The story is full of suspense, adventure, and interesting characters. The reading by Steven Wilson is exceptionally well done. I can hardly wait for the remaining chapters to be released. Thanks to SFF Audio for sponsoring the “make and audiobook challenge”.

  653. Jason on Thu, 28th Dec 2006 3:27 pm
  654. Badge Of Infamy is great! The story is full of suspense, adventure, and interesting characters. The reading by Steven Wilson is exceptionally well done. I can hardly wait for the remaining chapters to be released. Thanks to SFF Audio for sponsoring the “make and audiobook challenge”.

  655. moriond on Sat, 30th Dec 2006 2:29 am
  656. And check out the sffaudio’s April 2006 Profile on Dean Koontz to find more of his work available as audiobooks.

  657. moriond on Sat, 30th Dec 2006 2:29 am
  658. And check out the sffaudio’s April 2006 Profile on Dean Koontz to find more of his work available as audiobooks.

  659. LAN3 on Sat, 30th Dec 2006 11:18 pm
  660. A couple of errors mar this review; I really enjoyed this novel, which I both listened to and read concurrently.

    The Archimandrite Luseferous is not the leader of the Mercatoria; he conquered an arm of the galaxy that, owing to some destroyed wormholes, was cut off from the Mercatoria, the dominant government of the remainder of the galaxy still connected by established wormholes. In fact, the protagonist, Fassin Taak, is seconded into the Mercatoria early in the book, in order to fight Luserferous’s fleet. (It’s on the book jacket, even.) As I note above, the aggressive forces of Luseferous are from another galactic arm, not another galaxy; whether any of the plot takes place outside of the Milky Way is hard to say for certain, but the answer could well be no.

    Also, Luseferous only blew up cities and inflicted all sorts of individual cruelties, while Darth Vader blew up an entire planet and attempted the same again (and, more to the point, built not one but two stations capable of that feat). But Luseferous certainly does things with a more personal touch.

    But all in all, this is one of Banks’ best; part rebuttal to the Culture novels, as the protagonists are faced with the impenetrable Dwellers, so are many races faced with The Culture. And the rest is just brilliance; a multitude of original ideas found in the smallest nooks of the book. George Lucas is not fit pack a lunch for Iain Banks.

  661. LAN3 on Sat, 30th Dec 2006 11:18 pm
  662. A couple of errors mar this review; I really enjoyed this novel, which I both listened to and read concurrently.

    The Archimandrite Luseferous is not the leader of the Mercatoria; he conquered an arm of the galaxy that, owing to some destroyed wormholes, was cut off from the Mercatoria, the dominant government of the remainder of the galaxy still connected by established wormholes. In fact, the protagonist, Fassin Taak, is seconded into the Mercatoria early in the book, in order to fight Luserferous’s fleet. (It’s on the book jacket, even.) As I note above, the aggressive forces of Luseferous are from another galactic arm, not another galaxy; whether any of the plot takes place outside of the Milky Way is hard to say for certain, but the answer could well be no.

    Also, Luseferous only blew up cities and inflicted all sorts of individual cruelties, while Darth Vader blew up an entire planet and attempted the same again (and, more to the point, built not one but two stations capable of that feat). But Luseferous certainly does things with a more personal touch.

    But all in all, this is one of Banks’ best; part rebuttal to the Culture novels, as the protagonists are faced with the impenetrable Dwellers, so are many races faced with The Culture. And the rest is just brilliance; a multitude of original ideas found in the smallest nooks of the book. George Lucas is not fit pack a lunch for Iain Banks.

  663. m1fcj on Mon, 1st Jan 2007 3:48 am
  664. One of the stories you mentioned, “For I have Touched The Sky” was one of the saddest, most depressing stories I have ever read. Still, after many years, I cry after I think about it. Since then, I can’t stand reading Resnick.

    If I believed Resnick was truly critizing the situation, I’d be OK but I still think that his love of Africa, his love of their culture has skewed his POV and he is not critising the utopia of Kirinyaga but endorsing it.

    Still, anyone hasn’t read this story, I strongly suggest you read/listen to it and make up your own mind.

  665. m1fcj on Mon, 1st Jan 2007 3:48 am
  666. One of the stories you mentioned, “For I have Touched The Sky” was one of the saddest, most depressing stories I have ever read. Still, after many years, I cry after I think about it. Since then, I can’t stand reading Resnick.

    If I believed Resnick was truly critizing the situation, I’d be OK but I still think that his love of Africa, his love of their culture has skewed his POV and he is not critising the utopia of Kirinyaga but endorsing it.

    Still, anyone hasn’t read this story, I strongly suggest you read/listen to it and make up your own mind.

  667. Dante on Thu, 4th Jan 2007 3:13 am
  668. this site is fantastic! loads of free podcasts and audiobooks!

    i’ve discovered about podcasts and audiobooks quite recently, and i’m really enjoying this fantastic world of audio literature.

    i’m not really into spec fic (at least not yet). i’m still into classic audiobooks and academic lectures these days (such as TTC).

    how can i access the audio files via rss? i really don’t know what that means… :)

    thanks and more power to this great site!

  669. Dante on Thu, 4th Jan 2007 3:13 am
  670. this site is fantastic! loads of free podcasts and audiobooks!

    i’ve discovered about podcasts and audiobooks quite recently, and i’m really enjoying this fantastic world of audio literature.

    i’m not really into spec fic (at least not yet). i’m still into classic audiobooks and academic lectures these days (such as TTC).

    how can i access the audio files via rss? i really don’t know what that means… :)

    thanks and more power to this great site!

  671. Jesse on Thu, 4th Jan 2007 11:53 pm
  672. Hi Dante! Welcome to the site. RSS files can be accessed with a podcatcher (podcatching software). iTunes is good, if you have an iPod. Also good is the Juice podcatching software…

    http://juicereceiver.sourceforge.net/index.php

    There is also one I havent tried yet called Podcast Ready.

    http://www.podcastready.com/

    The idea behind RSS feeds for podcasts (also sometimes called XML feeds) is that you can subscruibe to a podcaster and never have to check and see when new mp3s are available. The software will automatically download whatever feed you subscribe to. If you have a portable mp3 player it can also automatically download the software to your mp3 player (when you plug it in).

    Hope that helps!

    Jesse

  673. Jesse on Thu, 4th Jan 2007 11:53 pm
  674. Hi Dante! Welcome to the site. RSS files can be accessed with a podcatcher (podcatching software). iTunes is good, if you have an iPod. Also good is the Juice podcatching software…

    http://juicereceiver.sourceforge.net/index.php

    There is also one I havent tried yet called Podcast Ready.

    http://www.podcastready.com/

    The idea behind RSS feeds for podcasts (also sometimes called XML feeds) is that you can subscruibe to a podcaster and never have to check and see when new mp3s are available. The software will automatically download whatever feed you subscribe to. If you have a portable mp3 player it can also automatically download the software to your mp3 player (when you plug it in).

    Hope that helps!

    Jesse

  675. Dante on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 6:56 am
  676. I have an iTune. That helps greatly, thanks. :)

  677. Dante on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 6:56 am
  678. I have an iTune. That helps greatly, thanks. :)

  679. Greg Weeks on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 8:39 am
  680. Here’s a link that will help find SF at PG.

    http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Science_Fiction_%28Bookshelf%29

    I’m in favor of any of the Piper, Norton, Smith or Campbell works that aren’t already done. I really like the Piper short fiction. The editor’s choice of Omnilingual is one of my favorites also.

    Greg Weeks

  681. Greg Weeks on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 8:39 am
  682. Here’s a link that will help find SF at PG.

    http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Science_Fiction_%28Bookshelf%29

    I’m in favor of any of the Piper, Norton, Smith or Campbell works that aren’t already done. I really like the Piper short fiction. The editor’s choice of Omnilingual is one of my favorites also.

    Greg Weeks

  683. Jesse on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 9:39 am
  684. In iTunes click on “advanced” then click on “subscribe to podcast” in the space provided plug in any of the URLs we give for podcast RSS/XML feeds and you will be subscribed to that podcast. :)

  685. Jesse on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 9:39 am
  686. In iTunes click on “advanced” then click on “subscribe to podcast” in the space provided plug in any of the URLs we give for podcast RSS/XML feeds and you will be subscribed to that podcast. :)

  687. Jesse on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 9:57 am
  688. Thanks Greg!

  689. Jesse on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 9:57 am
  690. Thanks Greg!

  691. Dante on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 11:59 pm
  692. Got it, thanks!

  693. Dante on Fri, 5th Jan 2007 11:59 pm
  694. Got it, thanks!

  695. Chad on Tue, 16th Jan 2007 3:59 pm
  696. This is a timely post for me — I am trying to determine whether I should buy XM or Sirius. I’m just about sold on XM at this point. Thanks for the post.

  697. Chad on Tue, 16th Jan 2007 3:59 pm
  698. This is a timely post for me — I am trying to determine whether I should buy XM or Sirius. I’m just about sold on XM at this point. Thanks for the post.

  699. Sayeth on Thu, 18th Jan 2007 9:05 am
  700. A new feature on Project Gutenberg should make the creation of an updated list easier: The Science Fiction Bookshelf. For other Sci-Fi related books, check out the Horror Bookshelf and the Precursors of Science Fiction.

  701. Sayeth on Thu, 18th Jan 2007 9:05 am
  702. A new feature on Project Gutenberg should make the creation of an updated list easier: The Science Fiction Bookshelf. For other Sci-Fi related books, check out the Horror Bookshelf and the Precursors of Science Fiction.

  703. DecoderRing on Fri, 19th Jan 2007 6:10 pm
  704. I didn’t think anyone else remembered this one! As a side note, Rick’s comedy group The Frantics has reunited after a long hiatus. I saw their live show in Toronto, it was awesome. They keep threatening to Podcast highlights from their old radio show “Frantic Times” but it hasn’t happened yet. If you remember Mr Canoehead (Canada’s Greatest Aluminium Crime-Fighter), you might want to stop by http://www.thefrantics.com and let them know that I’m not the only one waiting for this ‘cast to start.

  705. DecoderRing on Fri, 19th Jan 2007 6:10 pm
  706. I didn’t think anyone else remembered this one! As a side note, Rick’s comedy group The Frantics has reunited after a long hiatus. I saw their live show in Toronto, it was awesome. They keep threatening to Podcast highlights from their old radio show “Frantic Times” but it hasn’t happened yet. If you remember Mr Canoehead (Canada’s Greatest Aluminium Crime-Fighter), you might want to stop by http://www.thefrantics.com and let them know that I’m not the only one waiting for this ‘cast to start.

  707. The Time Traveler on Mon, 22nd Jan 2007 12:22 pm
  708. This is fantastic how our listeners are stepping up to the challenge. Jesse, nice cover.

    I think the participants are making this world a better place. I have to wipe the tears away. I joke, but I don’t. Okay, I do about the tears.

  709. The Time Traveler on Mon, 22nd Jan 2007 12:22 pm
  710. This is fantastic how our listeners are stepping up to the challenge. Jesse, nice cover.

    I think the participants are making this world a better place. I have to wipe the tears away. I joke, but I don’t. Okay, I do about the tears.

  711. Jesse on Mon, 22nd Jan 2007 1:53 pm
  712. I had no idea this challenge would pay such great dividends and I WHOLEHEARTEDLY AGREE! I’m super-juiced about each email as it comes in and the quality of the productions released so far is phenomenal too. Mark Nelson could have a career as a professional narrator. Steven H. Wilson’s entry is TOP NOTCH as well (look for a review soon).

  713. Jesse on Mon, 22nd Jan 2007 1:53 pm
  714. I had no idea this challenge would pay such great dividends and I WHOLEHEARTEDLY AGREE! I’m super-juiced about each email as it comes in and the quality of the productions released so far is phenomenal too. Mark Nelson could have a career as a professional narrator. Steven H. Wilson’s entry is TOP NOTCH as well (look for a review soon).

  715. Zach on Wed, 24th Jan 2007 7:22 am
  716. I may be wrong, but my understanding is that if something is in the public domain, it’s all right to release it as an audio book. As long as you’re reading off the public domain version, you should be fine, if someone wanted to do Triplanetary. (I Am Not A Lawyer).

  717. Zach on Wed, 24th Jan 2007 7:22 am
  718. I may be wrong, but my understanding is that if something is in the public domain, it’s all right to release it as an audio book. As long as you’re reading off the public domain version, you should be fine, if someone wanted to do Triplanetary. (I Am Not A Lawyer).

  719. Jesse on Wed, 24th Jan 2007 3:17 pm
  720. You’re correct Zach, I only removed Triplanetary from the challenge because it is already available in a single voiced unabridged narration. the point of the challnege was to spur some diversity in the audiobooks available to the public. If someone STILL wants to record and release their reading of Triplanetary they absolutely can.

  721. Jesse on Wed, 24th Jan 2007 3:17 pm
  722. You’re correct Zach, I only removed Triplanetary from the challenge because it is already available in a single voiced unabridged narration. the point of the challnege was to spur some diversity in the audiobooks available to the public. If someone STILL wants to record and release their reading of Triplanetary they absolutely can.

  723. Evo on Tue, 30th Jan 2007 2:27 pm
  724. Well that stinks, but it also might be an example of how radio is struggling to keep up in a world where media choice for consumers is larger than ever.

    Red Panda is enjoying a decent distribution with us at Podiobooks.com. I wonder what we can do to help all of those properties reach a wider audience?

    Syndicating non-standard programs across radio stations is hard — been there, done that. And without wide syndication deals, the number of listeners to non-standard programs on individual radio stations (terrestrial or satellite) is tiny.

    Seems to me that this is content that begs to be consumed in a time-independent manner — either as download or in some type of physical delivery method.

    It’s worth pondering. And what can I do more to help?

  725. Evo on Tue, 30th Jan 2007 2:27 pm
  726. Well that stinks, but it also might be an example of how radio is struggling to keep up in a world where media choice for consumers is larger than ever.

    Red Panda is enjoying a decent distribution with us at Podiobooks.com. I wonder what we can do to help all of those properties reach a wider audience?

    Syndicating non-standard programs across radio stations is hard — been there, done that. And without wide syndication deals, the number of listeners to non-standard programs on individual radio stations (terrestrial or satellite) is tiny.

    Seems to me that this is content that begs to be consumed in a time-independent manner — either as download or in some type of physical delivery method.

    It’s worth pondering. And what can I do more to help?

  727. Jerry Stearns on Tue, 30th Jan 2007 3:45 pm
  728. Thanks, Jesse, for your support. Sound Affects is indeed being taken off the air on Saturdays. I have the opportunity to apply for other open time slots elsewhere in the week, but no guarantee that I’ll get one. I WILL be applying. After 13 years doing this show, I won’t go down easy.

    I don’t know if sending comments to the program director, Dan Richmond, will help or not. It’s okay to do it. I have some testimonials I will attach to my new proposal, and if anyone wants to send me one to include, I will use them. And when the pledge drive comes around in April, call and pledge, that’ll give them the message that there IS an audience out there.

  729. Jerry Stearns on Tue, 30th Jan 2007 3:45 pm
  730. Thanks, Jesse, for your support. Sound Affects is indeed being taken off the air on Saturdays. I have the opportunity to apply for other open time slots elsewhere in the week, but no guarantee that I’ll get one. I WILL be applying. After 13 years doing this show, I won’t go down easy.

    I don’t know if sending comments to the program director, Dan Richmond, will help or not. It’s okay to do it. I have some testimonials I will attach to my new proposal, and if anyone wants to send me one to include, I will use them. And when the pledge drive comes around in April, call and pledge, that’ll give them the message that there IS an audience out there.

  731. Jesse on Wed, 31st Jan 2007 2:43 pm
  732. I loved those when I was a kid too! Cool.

  733. Jesse on Wed, 31st Jan 2007 2:43 pm
  734. I loved those when I was a kid too! Cool.

  735. DecoderRing on Fri, 2nd Feb 2007 6:59 am
  736. Evo makes a good point about Podiobooks. When we re-released the first season of Red Panda Adventures through Podiobooks, they had already had a great run – but a lot of new folks are on board with our second season that have found us through Podiobooks. Folks with longer runs should really look at how a Podiobooks re-release can help them reach the large “one-stop-shopping” audience at Podiobooks. It’s been nothing but positive for us.

    But there is something about knowing that your show is out there, drifting over the airwaves, being discovered by people who didn’t seek it out… Those opportunities always mean a lot to us, and we were very grateful to Jerry for giving us one of those rare opportunities. Sound Affects will be much missed.

  737. DecoderRing on Fri, 2nd Feb 2007 6:59 am
  738. Evo makes a good point about Podiobooks. When we re-released the first season of Red Panda Adventures through Podiobooks, they had already had a great run – but a lot of new folks are on board with our second season that have found us through Podiobooks. Folks with longer runs should really look at how a Podiobooks re-release can help them reach the large “one-stop-shopping” audience at Podiobooks. It’s been nothing but positive for us.

    But there is something about knowing that your show is out there, drifting over the airwaves, being discovered by people who didn’t seek it out… Those opportunities always mean a lot to us, and we were very grateful to Jerry for giving us one of those rare opportunities. Sound Affects will be much missed.

  739. JackMangan on Sun, 4th Feb 2007 10:31 pm
  740. Thanks for the nice post, Jesse. SFFaudio rocks!

  741. JackMangan on Sun, 4th Feb 2007 10:31 pm
  742. Thanks for the nice post, Jesse. SFFaudio rocks!

  743. Audio Addict on Thu, 15th Feb 2007 11:38 am
  744. *giggles* now now, honestly I was simply thrilled to be asked- heck I was thrilled that I was even recommended for such an honor!

    :-)
    Dani

  745. Audio Addict on Thu, 15th Feb 2007 11:38 am
  746. *giggles* now now, honestly I was simply thrilled to be asked- heck I was thrilled that I was even recommended for such an honor!

    :-)
    Dani

  747. heronheart on Mon, 19th Feb 2007 10:08 am
  748. Personally, I just bought an Iaudio G3 because it allows me to bookmark within up to 20 different files of all the different types that it plays; MP3, OGG, WMA, etc.

    It looks to me like Markable just converts everything to AAC, which is something that Mediamonkey can be set up to do for free.

  749. heronheart on Mon, 19th Feb 2007 10:08 am
  750. Personally, I just bought an Iaudio G3 because it allows me to bookmark within up to 20 different files of all the different types that it plays; MP3, OGG, WMA, etc.

    It looks to me like Markable just converts everything to AAC, which is something that Mediamonkey can be set up to do for free.

  751. PaulJ on Wed, 21st Feb 2007 1:00 pm
  752. Shamefully and notably absent is The Time Traveler Show podcast!

    Not to mention… oh, never mind. :-(

  753. PaulJ on Wed, 21st Feb 2007 1:00 pm
  754. Shamefully and notably absent is The Time Traveler Show podcast!

    Not to mention… oh, never mind. :-(

  755. The Time Traveler on Wed, 21st Feb 2007 1:11 pm
  756. Thanks, Jesse, for the closing remark. And where is Rev Up Review? And where’s ____? Comment and fill in that blank people.

  757. The Time Traveler on Wed, 21st Feb 2007 1:11 pm
  758. Thanks, Jesse, for the closing remark. And where is Rev Up Review? And where’s ____? Comment and fill in that blank people.

  759. Jesse on Wed, 21st Feb 2007 8:16 pm
  760. Paul, I think I understand why Rev-up Review wasn’t added, not because any lack of SF relevance or quality, rather because it was less frequent. The Rev-Up review isn’t a weekly or bi-weekly show (as are most of the one listed AND The Time Traveler Show).

    It also seems likely that these mini-sections are made up a while in advance (possibly months). I note, for instance, they have 7th Son Book 1 (instead of Book 2) and they have Dragon Page listed as being hosted “Michael and Summer” rather than “Michael and Mike Stackpole.” That indicates they are way behind the times – perhaps as far back as December in making these sections up.

    The only cure I’d suggest is making RevUp Review more frequent – PLEASE PLEASE – … not that that helped The Time Traveler Show get listed.

  761. Jesse on Wed, 21st Feb 2007 8:16 pm
  762. Paul, I think I understand why Rev-up Review wasn’t added, not because any lack of SF relevance or quality, rather because it was less frequent. The Rev-Up review isn’t a weekly or bi-weekly show (as are most of the one listed AND The Time Traveler Show).

    It also seems likely that these mini-sections are made up a while in advance (possibly months). I note, for instance, they have 7th Son Book 1 (instead of Book 2) and they have Dragon Page listed as being hosted “Michael and Summer” rather than “Michael and Mike Stackpole.” That indicates they are way behind the times – perhaps as far back as December in making these sections up.

    The only cure I’d suggest is making RevUp Review more frequent – PLEASE PLEASE – … not that that helped The Time Traveler Show get listed.

  763. rajamaheswarg on Thu, 22nd Feb 2007 11:02 am
  764. EXCITING NOVELS WITH MUSIC AND SOUNDS

    It is the easiest way to download audio books, audio books on CD, MP3 audio books. No clubs to join. There is no monthly fees and no software to install. Begin your exciting journey into the world of audiobooks here audio books

  765. Scott Sigler on Thu, 22nd Feb 2007 11:48 am
  766. Some things are missing, but kudos to iTunes for including the original user-created stuff along with the standard Big Media fare. Whatever is missing, we can all still work together sharing promos, links and rerences to grow the scifi podcasting genre.

  767. Scott Sigler on Thu, 22nd Feb 2007 11:48 am
  768. Some things are missing, but kudos to iTunes for including the original user-created stuff along with the standard Big Media fare. Whatever is missing, we can all still work together sharing promos, links and rerences to grow the scifi podcasting genre.

  769. The Time Traveler on Thu, 22nd Feb 2007 9:20 pm
  770. Scott, that’s easy for you to say you made the list. Whahhh! (that’s my baby cry). Just kidding. And kudos to you, and yes, to iTunes too.

  771. The Time Traveler on Thu, 22nd Feb 2007 9:20 pm
  772. Scott, that’s easy for you to say you made the list. Whahhh! (that’s my baby cry). Just kidding. And kudos to you, and yes, to iTunes too.

  773. Chris on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 12:09 am
  774. FYI, XM and Sirius just announced a merger on February 19. See the press release here: http://xmradio.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=1423 .

  775. Jesse on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 1:36 am
  776. Rocket Ship Galileo’s cover is SUPERCOOL!

  777. Jesse on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 1:36 am
  778. Rocket Ship Galileo’s cover is SUPERCOOL!

  779. Chris on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 1:46 am
  780. FYI, XM and Sirius just announced a merger on February 19. See the press release here: http://xmradio.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=1423 .

  781. The Time Traveler on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 6:46 am
  782. Yes it is. After scanning it on placed it as my computer’s wallpaper.

  783. The Time Traveler on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 6:46 am
  784. Yes it is. After scanning it on placed it as my computer’s wallpaper.

  785. Jay Penney on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 7:36 am
  786. Just a heads up that these were actually posted to Audible.com, which means they are also available on iTunes.

  787. moriond on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 9:53 am
  788. Jesse,

    The WBAI Hour of the Wolf program and the interviews about Tiptree were mentioned and linked in the October 05, 2006 Online Audio entry about Julie Phillips’ book, James Tiptree, Jr.: The Double Life of Alice Sheldon. That entry also gave the start and stop times for the Sci-Fi Radio production of Tiptree’s Hugo and Nebula award-winning story, “Houston, Houston, Do You Read?” in the linked WBAI Hour of the Wolf broadcast, and included a link to a description of the Sci-Fi Radio production at the OTR Plot Spot. What I didn’t realize at the time of posting is that this radio program made it into Mark Time’s SF Audio Hall of Fame. You can see it if you click through the links in the entries about the Mark TIme and OGLE awards in your post below!

  789. moriond on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 9:53 am
  790. Jesse,

    The WBAI Hour of the Wolf program and the interviews about Tiptree were mentioned and linked in the October 05, 2006 Online Audio entry about Julie Phillips’ book, James Tiptree, Jr.: The Double Life of Alice Sheldon. That entry also gave the start and stop times for the Sci-Fi Radio production of Tiptree’s Hugo and Nebula award-winning story, “Houston, Houston, Do You Read?” in the linked WBAI Hour of the Wolf broadcast, and included a link to a description of the Sci-Fi Radio production at the OTR Plot Spot. What I didn’t realize at the time of posting is that this radio program made it into Mark Time’s SF Audio Hall of Fame. You can see it if you click through the links in the entries about the Mark TIme and OGLE awards in your post below!

  791. moriond on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 10:18 am
  792. The specific link should have been to the October 05, 2006 program (instead of the October 2006 archive page). The Sci-Fi Radio production of “Houston, Houston, Do You Read?” was the 1989 Mark Time SF Audio Hall of Fame entry.

  793. moriond on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 10:18 am
  794. The specific link should have been to the October 05, 2006 program (instead of the October 2006 archive page). The Sci-Fi Radio production of “Houston, Houston, Do You Read?” was the 1989 Mark Time SF Audio Hall of Fame entry.

  795. Jay Penney on Fri, 23rd Feb 2007 2:58 pm
  796. Just a heads up that these were actually posted to Audible.com, which means they are also available on iTunes.

  797. Jesse on Sat, 24th Feb 2007 4:23 pm
  798. I’m embarrassed to say I forgot about your links to the Hour Of The Wolf in that post. Good catch Moriond! :)

  799. Jesse on Sat, 24th Feb 2007 4:23 pm
  800. I’m embarrassed to say I forgot about your links to the Hour Of The Wolf in that post. Good catch Moriond! :)

  801. DecoderRing on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 5:37 pm
  802. Wow! I am surprised by this… I’ve got a bunch of Power Records material on mp3, but it’s all veeeeeeeery silly. Their superhero stuff was… well, it’s the occasional musical numbers that really make you want to chew your own foot off. I don’t need to hear Aquaman sing.

    I seem to remember their Star Trek stories being all right though (but maybe my memory is just being kind)

  803. DecoderRing on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 8:08 pm
  804. Wow! I am surprised by this… I’ve got a bunch of Power Records material on mp3, but it’s all veeeeeeeery silly. Their superhero stuff was… well, it’s the occasional musical numbers that really make you want to chew your own foot off. I don’t need to hear Aquaman sing.

    I seem to remember their Star Trek stories being all right though (but maybe my memory is just being kind)

  805. Bill Wiggus on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 9:14 pm
  806. Power Records did Conan the Barbarian??? Im surprised too. Didn’t that movie have tons of T&A? I would love to hear this. I found most Power Records recordings exciting as a kid but a little CHEESY now.

    The Star Trek recordings are still fun to listen to. I have a mp3. The actor who played Kirk sounds a lot like William Shatner. Greystoke The Legend of Tarzan still holds up. Stay away from the Incredible Hulk. HULK SMELLS BAD! LOTS OF CHEESE! BAD HULK!

  807. Bill Wiggus on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 9:55 pm
  808. Power Records did Conan the Barbarian??? Im surprised too. Didn’t that movie have tons of T&A? I would love to hear this. I found most Power Records recordings exciting as a kid but a little CHEESY now.

    The Star Trek recordings are still fun to listen to. I have a mp3. The actor who played Kirk sounds a lot like William Shatner. Greystoke The Legend of Tarzan still holds up. Stay away from the Incredible Hulk. HULK SMELLS BAD! LOTS OF CHEESE! BAD HULK!

  809. Steve on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 10:49 pm
  810. Wow, this post is almost totally out of the blue it was so unexpected for me. I’ve done very little promotion of the show so far, thanks for mentioning it, hope you’ve liked it!

    –Steve Riekeberg
    Host, Geek Cred

  811. Steve on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 11:51 pm
  812. Wow, this post is almost totally out of the blue it was so unexpected for me. I’ve done very little promotion of the show so far, thanks for mentioning it, hope you’ve liked it!

    –Steve Riekeberg
    Host, Geek Cred

  813. Jesse on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 11:52 pm
  814. Yep, enjoyed what I’ve heard so far – looking forward to more!

  815. Jesse on Mon, 26th Feb 2007 11:52 pm
  816. Yep, enjoyed what I’ve heard so far – looking forward to more!

  817. DecoderRing on Tue, 27th Feb 2007 5:54 pm
  818. Ah, excellent! Didn’t Kato quite suddenly become Filipino after Pearl Harbor? Y’know, right around the time that the Katzenmeyer Kids became Dutch? In any case, they certainly started mentioning it constantly around that time.

    Came by a nice bootleg set of the Green Hornet TV series. It’s amazing that the bad guys don’t shriek “It’s Kato!” when they burst in. He kicks everybody’s butt.

  819. The Time Traveler on Tue, 27th Feb 2007 7:53 pm
  820. I listened to “Doc” C. Brown last year. Really good stuff. He gets into current events and relates them to novels he’s teaching. If you’re a diehard Bushy, you might want to stay away though. He says he questions authority no matter who’s in power. Anyways, he brings up a little of interesting thoughts, and I can’t recommend it high enough.

  821. The Time Traveler on Tue, 27th Feb 2007 7:53 pm
  822. I listened to “Doc” C. Brown last year. Really good stuff. He gets into current events and relates them to novels he’s teaching. If you’re a diehard Bushy, you might want to stay away though. He says he questions authority no matter who’s in power. Anyways, he brings up a little of interesting thoughts, and I can’t recommend it high enough.

  823. DecoderRing on Tue, 27th Feb 2007 7:54 pm
  824. Ah, excellent! Didn’t Kato quite suddenly become Filipino after Pearl Harbor? Y’know, right around the time that the Katzenmeyer Kids became Dutch? In any case, they certainly started mentioning it constantly around that time.

    Came by a nice bootleg set of the Green Hornet TV series. It’s amazing that the bad guys don’t shriek “It’s Kato!” when they burst in. He kicks everybody’s butt.

  825. Julius on Fri, 2nd Mar 2007 5:24 pm
  826. Dude, I meant Starship Troopers the movie, not the book :P

  827. Julius on Fri, 2nd Mar 2007 5:54 pm
  828. Dude, I meant Starship Troopers the movie, not the book :P

  829. Jesse on Fri, 2nd Mar 2007 5:55 pm
  830. Are you saying the non-existent movie of Ender’s Game is superior to the movie Starship Troopers? :P

  831. Jesse on Fri, 2nd Mar 2007 5:55 pm
  832. Are you saying the non-existent movie of Ender’s Game is superior to the movie Starship Troopers? :P

  833. Shannon on Sun, 4th Mar 2007 8:21 pm
  834. Thanks so much Dani!

  835. Shannon on Sun, 4th Mar 2007 8:31 pm
  836. Thanks so much Dani!

  837. Bill on Wed, 7th Mar 2007 2:58 pm
  838. Bill here-post producer-writer and one of the voice actors having a ball with this-LOL! Just to let you all know that POTA ep#1 is online at brokensea.com and ep#2 releases next week! Also we have an original tale of Sci-fi (GUSU) and the Saga of the Grog and Gryphon (Original fantasy audio drama), so come on by and check them out-they’re free and they’re fun! Thanks for helping us out Jesse-YOU ROCK!

  839. Bill on Wed, 7th Mar 2007 3:13 pm
  840. Bill here-post producer-writer and one of the voice actors having a ball with this-LOL! Just to let you all know that POTA ep#1 is online at brokensea.com and ep#2 releases next week! Also we have an original tale of Sci-fi (GUSU) and the Saga of the Grog and Gryphon (Original fantasy audio drama), so come on by and check them out-they’re free and they’re fun! Thanks for helping us out Jesse-YOU ROCK!

  841. Audio Addict on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 1:18 pm
  842. Oh darn it- I was all set to get it, but they want me to download their software. :-(

    ~Dani

  843. Audio Addict on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 1:18 pm
  844. Oh darn it- I was all set to get it, but they want me to download their software. :-(

    ~Dani

  845. techarts on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 3:21 pm
  846. As one of the hosts of “Technology and the Arts,” I just want to thank you for the link to our blog/podcast.

    It was a pleasure to learn more about Gregg Taylor and Decoder Ring Theatre, and share the interview I did with him through our podcast.

    I hope everyone enjoys it.


    Brian Kelley
    Technology and the Arts

  847. techarts on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 3:29 pm
  848. As one of the hosts of “Technology and the Arts,” I just want to thank you for the link to our blog/podcast.

    It was a pleasure to learn more about Gregg Taylor and Decoder Ring Theatre, and share the interview I did with him through our podcast.

    I hope everyone enjoys it.


    Brian Kelley
    Technology and the Arts

  849. Jesse on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 8:27 pm
  850. Ya, the software isn’t great. They also don’t offer it through iTunes, even though all audiobook content on iTunes is from audible.

  851. Jesse on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 8:27 pm
  852. Ya, the software isn’t great. They also don’t offer it through iTunes, even though all audiobook content on iTunes is from audible.

  853. techarts on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 8:30 pm
  854. As one of the hosts of “Technology and the Arts,” I just want to thank you for the link to our blog/podcast.

    It was a pleasure to learn more about Gregg Taylor and Decoder Ring Theatre, and share the interview I did with him through our podcast.

    I hope everyone enjoys it.


    Brian Kelley
    Technology and the Arts

  855. techarts on Fri, 9th Mar 2007 8:30 pm
  856. As one of the hosts of “Technology and the Arts,” I just want to thank you for the link to our blog/podcast.

    It was a pleasure to learn more about Gregg Taylor and Decoder Ring Theatre, and share the interview I did with him through our podcast.

    I hope everyone enjoys it.


    Brian Kelley
    Technology and the Arts

  857. moriond on Sat, 10th Mar 2007 7:27 pm
  858. On a Mac you don’t need to download any other software to play Audible files. Jesse, some differences between getting the Audible version and buying through iTunes: (1)the Audible file will play on a number of mp3 players in addition to iPods, while with iTunes you can only play the file on your computer or on an iPod (2) you can re-download the file any number of times once you have “purchased” it from Audible — that goes for these free files, too. Very handy in case of a disk crash. You need to backup any purchases you make through iTunes because you only get the one download after you’ve purchased.

  859. moriond on Sat, 10th Mar 2007 7:27 pm
  860. On a Mac you don’t need to download any other software to play Audible files. Jesse, some differences between getting the Audible version and buying through iTunes: (1)the Audible file will play on a number of mp3 players in addition to iPods, while with iTunes you can only play the file on your computer or on an iPod (2) you can re-download the file any number of times once you have “purchased” it from Audible — that goes for these free files, too. Very handy in case of a disk crash. You need to backup any purchases you make through iTunes because you only get the one download after you’ve purchased.

  861. Jesse on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 3:06 am
  862. I want a mac!

  863. Jesse on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 3:06 am
  864. I want a mac!

  865. The Time Traveler on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 5:56 am
  866. Jack Vance rocks! plain and simple. Simply my favorite author.

  867. The Time Traveler on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 5:56 am
  868. Jack Vance rocks! plain and simple. Simply my favorite author.

  869. The Time Traveler on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 5:46 pm
  870. Good review, Jesse. I got to listen to this audiobook/lectures too. I found it very interesting, but also very narrowly focused around Tolkein. This is fine with me, but the title does make it sound like a more general overview of fantasy literture.

  871. The Time Traveler on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 5:46 pm
  872. Good review, Jesse. I got to listen to this audiobook/lectures too. I found it very interesting, but also very narrowly focused around Tolkein. This is fine with me, but the title does make it sound like a more general overview of fantasy literture.

  873. Jesse on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 11:30 pm
  874. Thanks! I’m itching to hear the Science Fiction one now, by the same prof!

  875. Jesse on Sun, 11th Mar 2007 11:30 pm
  876. Thanks! I’m itching to hear the Science Fiction one now, by the same prof!

  877. Fog on Mon, 12th Mar 2007 5:58 pm
  878. lol – I loved the lines you picked! Thanks for promoting the cavern on your great site!

  879. Fog on Mon, 12th Mar 2007 9:22 pm
  880. lol – I loved the lines you picked! Thanks for promoting the cavern on your great site!

  881. tpcomputerman on Tue, 13th Mar 2007 11:47 am
  882. Thank you so much for reviewing my story. I did a vanity search for Podiobook Ida hoping to one day find a review and I did. Thanks!

    Your comments were very fair and very balanced. Nothing I wouldn’t have said if I had listened to the story myself without being the writer.

    The intro and outros were a major mistake I regretted not too long after posting them. I’ve tried to get them removed but Podiobooks, as great as they are, are a bit slow in uploading updated chapters so, hopefully, one day, they’ll be gone. Ida was my first experence with Podcasting my novel, in truth I should have listened to a few more before starting but, oh well, I’m sort of the look before I leap kind of guy sometimes anyway.

    My next novel, The Arwen, went up on March 11th, I took all the mistakes I made with Ida and tried to fix them with that one. So, hopefully that one will be better.

    Once again, thanks for the review and listening to the story!

  883. tpcomputerman on Tue, 13th Mar 2007 4:21 pm
  884. Thank you so much for reviewing my story. I did a vanity search for Podiobook Ida hoping to one day find a review and I did. Thanks!

    Your comments were very fair and very balanced. Nothing I wouldn’t have said if I had listened to the story myself without being the writer.

    The intro and outros were a major mistake I regretted not too long after posting them. I’ve tried to get them removed but Podiobooks, as great as they are, are a bit slow in uploading updated chapters so, hopefully, one day, they’ll be gone. Ida was my first experence with Podcasting my novel, in truth I should have listened to a few more before starting but, oh well, I’m sort of the look before I leap kind of guy sometimes anyway.

    My next novel, The Arwen, went up on March 11th, I took all the mistakes I made with Ida and tried to fix them with that one. So, hopefully that one will be better.

    Once again, thanks for the review and listening to the story!

  885. moriond on Wed, 14th Mar 2007 12:25 pm
  886. Check this older sffaudio post to learn how to get other Dimension X and X Minus 1 episodes (but without the tailored episode artwork) from the Internet Archive.

  887. moriond on Wed, 14th Mar 2007 12:25 pm
  888. Check this older sffaudio post to learn how to get other Dimension X and X Minus 1 episodes (but without the tailored episode artwork) from the Internet Archive.

  889. scottra on Mon, 19th Mar 2007 6:34 pm
  890. Sounds fantastic, can’t wait to hear the whole thing!
    What’s the street date?

  891. scottra on Mon, 19th Mar 2007 6:48 pm
  892. Sounds fantastic, can’t wait to hear the whole thing!
    What’s the street date?

  893. Jesse on Mon, 19th Mar 2007 6:51 pm
  894. According to the website it’ll be the end of March 2007. :)

  895. Jesse on Mon, 19th Mar 2007 6:51 pm
  896. According to the website it’ll be the end of March 2007. :)

  897. Beam Me Up on Tue, 20th Mar 2007 2:57 pm
  898. Hey Jesse! Thanks for the listing my man. I don’t think you know just how much of a lift it is to be noticed by a blog of this stature. I know a mention here brings in lots of new listeners.

    I do my best to remind my listeners that there is such a great resource as SFFAudio available.

  899. Beam Me Up on Tue, 20th Mar 2007 11:02 pm
  900. Hey Jesse! Thanks for the listing my man. I don’t think you know just how much of a lift it is to be noticed by a blog of this stature. I know a mention here brings in lots of new listeners.

    I do my best to remind my listeners that there is such a great resource as SFFAudio available.

  901. sadaq on Fri, 23rd Mar 2007 8:48 am
  902. Thank you for not only writing this but arranging for this reading/performance.
    what I heard as I downloaded the files, it sounds very interesting.
    I suggest one site……
    Audio book

  903. sadaq on Fri, 23rd Mar 2007 2:56 pm
  904. Thank you for not only writing this but arranging for this reading/performance.
    what I heard as I downloaded the files, it sounds very interesting.
    I suggest one site……
    Audio book

  905. The Time Traveler on Wed, 28th Mar 2007 3:33 pm
  906. Woohoo!

  907. The Time Traveler on Wed, 28th Mar 2007 3:33 pm
  908. Woohoo!

  909. Michael on Thu, 29th Mar 2007 4:44 pm
  910. The Salmon of Doubt is an unfinished novel that began life as a Dirk Gently story but Douglas Adams thought about rewriting it as another Hitchhiker’s novel as he discovered there were concepts in the story that fit Hitchhiker’s more than it did Dirk Gently. Sadly, he passed on before he could finish the book.

  911. Jerry Stearns on Fri, 30th Mar 2007 9:06 am
  912. The MP3 link to part 2 of The Caves of Steel doesn’t work because the way they are posted the file name of the second part is different from the first part. The real file name is CavesofSteelPt2.mp3. Just substitute that. Drop the file name off the end, leaving /Stuff/ at the end of the URL and you can see the whole list of files there, most of which are mp3s.

  913. Michael on Fri, 30th Mar 2007 5:06 pm
  914. The Salmon of Doubt is an unfinished novel that began life as a Dirk Gently story but Douglas Adams thought about rewriting it as another Hitchhiker’s novel as he discovered there were concepts in the story that fit Hitchhiker’s more than it did Dirk Gently. Sadly, he passed on before he could finish the book.

  915. Jerry Stearns on Fri, 30th Mar 2007 9:07 pm
  916. The MP3 link to part 2 of The Caves of Steel doesn’t work because the way they are posted the file name of the second part is different from the first part. The real file name is CavesofSteelPt2.mp3. Just substitute that. Drop the file name off the end, leaving /Stuff/ at the end of the URL and you can see the whole list of files there, most of which are mp3s.

  917. Audio Addict on Mon, 2nd Apr 2007 6:38 pm
  918. Here’s to 4 more awesome years! :-)

    ~Dani

  919. Audio Addict on Mon, 2nd Apr 2007 6:38 pm
  920. Here’s to 4 more awesome years! :-)

    ~Dani

  921. Jesse on Fri, 6th Apr 2007 12:34 pm
  922. Hyperdave objected to direct links to the files. I’ve revised the post slightly.

  923. Jesse on Fri, 6th Apr 2007 12:34 pm
  924. Hyperdave objected to direct links to the files. I’ve revised the post slightly.

  925. panthanpress on Sat, 7th Apr 2007 7:48 pm
  926. Congrats to Escape Pod on 100 stories. I’ve always been impressed that it’s a paying market for authors, while a lot of ‘casts (like mine, Dateline Jasoom) remain the equivalent of fanzines. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. :)

  927. panthanpress on Sat, 7th Apr 2007 7:52 pm
  928. Wow. You’ve pointed me to some great audio/podcasts etc. Keep it up for many more years!
    Elmo

  929. panthanpress on Sun, 8th Apr 2007 10:10 am
  930. Congrats to Escape Pod on 100 stories. I’ve always been impressed that it’s a paying market for authors, while a lot of ‘casts (like mine, Dateline Jasoom) remain the equivalent of fanzines. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. :)

  931. The Time Traveler on Sun, 15th Apr 2007 8:06 am
  932. Mark Nelson is quite the prolific narrator. And of excellent quality too! Mark is also reading a story for The Time Traveler Show. All I’ll say for now is that it kicks ass. You read it here first!

  933. The Time Traveler on Sun, 15th Apr 2007 8:06 am
  934. Mark Nelson is quite the prolific narrator. And of excellent quality too! Mark is also reading a story for The Time Traveler Show. All I’ll say for now is that it kicks ass. You read it here first!

  935. Jesse on Sun, 15th Apr 2007 2:58 pm
  936. That’s quite a coup TT! I’m looking forward to hearing that show!

  937. Jesse on Sun, 15th Apr 2007 2:58 pm
  938. That’s quite a coup TT! I’m looking forward to hearing that show!

  939. DecoderRing on Tue, 17th Apr 2007 9:09 pm
  940. Do we have any idea why they’ve buried it at 11:30 am on a weekday, or is it just so they can point to the numbers later and say that nobody listens to audio drama?

    Seriously though, thanks for plugging this, I would never have even known it was happening if it weren’t for SFFAudio, and I listen to CBC every day.

  941. Audio Addict on Tue, 17th Apr 2007 11:42 pm
  942. It certainly is…. satirical. :-)

    ~Dani

  943. Audio Addict on Tue, 17th Apr 2007 11:42 pm
  944. It certainly is…. satirical. :-)

    ~Dani

  945. DecoderRing on Wed, 18th Apr 2007 12:09 am
  946. Do we have any idea why they’ve buried it at 11:30 am on a weekday, or is it just so they can point to the numbers later and say that nobody listens to audio drama?

    Seriously though, thanks for plugging this, I would never have even known it was happening if it weren’t for SFFAudio, and I listen to CBC every day.

  947. Jesse on Thu, 19th Apr 2007 1:46 am
  948. Actually I think that isn’t as much of a burial as any other time in the CBC radio schedule! The only thing that’d be better is to have it repeat. AND a podcast feed too (not much chance of that though). :(

  949. Jesse on Thu, 19th Apr 2007 1:46 am
  950. Actually I think that isn’t as much of a burial as any other time in the CBC radio schedule! The only thing that’d be better is to have it repeat. AND a podcast feed too (not much chance of that though). :(

  951. DecoderRing on Thu, 19th Apr 2007 10:57 am
  952. Yeah, a re-run would be nice. Something for us working stiffs in the eastern time zone who will be stuck behind a desk at every time the show airs across the country.

    It’s enough to force a fella to make three or four not-at-all IT-approved modifications to his work computer to allow him to record the program for later listening. Not that I endorse that….

  953. DecoderRing on Thu, 19th Apr 2007 11:06 am
  954. Yeah, a re-run would be nice. Something for us working stiffs in the eastern time zone who will be stuck behind a desk at every time the show airs across the country.

    It’s enough to force a fella to make three or four not-at-all IT-approved modifications to his work computer to allow him to record the program for later listening. Not that I endorse that….

  955. DecoderRing on Fri, 20th Apr 2007 11:09 am
  956. Yup. It’s a winner. You can do the typical Canadian thing and pull it apart over this or that… or you could just get on the bus. I suggest the latter. It’s funny and charming and it’s only going to get better as we move past the exposition.

    CBC owes these guys a re-run. Let it build a bit of buzz, then give it a second play on the weekend starting in a few weeks. C’mon CBC, we’ve paid for the darn thing – let’s make sure everybody gets a chance to enjoy it!

  957. DecoderRing on Fri, 20th Apr 2007 11:51 am
  958. Yup. It’s a winner. You can do the typical Canadian thing and pull it apart over this or that… or you could just get on the bus. I suggest the latter. It’s funny and charming and it’s only going to get better as we move past the exposition.

    CBC owes these guys a re-run. Let it build a bit of buzz, then give it a second play on the weekend starting in a few weeks. C’mon CBC, we’ve paid for the darn thing – let’s make sure everybody gets a chance to enjoy it!

  959. Audio Addict on Fri, 20th Apr 2007 11:54 am
  960. If I say I didn’t like it… will you blame it on me merely being American and “not getting it”?

    ;-)

    ~Dani

  961. Audio Addict on Fri, 20th Apr 2007 11:54 am
  962. If I say I didn’t like it… will you blame it on me merely being American and “not getting it”?

    ;-)

    ~Dani

  963. DecoderRing on Fri, 20th Apr 2007 1:38 pm
  964. Nope… but I would say give it a week. There was a lot of “introduction” going on there – I think this one is only going to get stronger.

  965. DecoderRing on Fri, 20th Apr 2007 4:27 pm
  966. Nope… but I would say give it a week. There was a lot of “introduction” going on there – I think this one is only going to get stronger.

  967. M&T's Dad on Tue, 24th Apr 2007 7:53 am
  968. I just found this from folling a link Dani put on talentquest! how do i claim a title?

  969. M&T's Dad on Tue, 24th Apr 2007 11:25 am
  970. I just found this from folling a link Dani put on talentquest! how do i claim a title?

  971. Jesse on Tue, 24th Apr 2007 11:53 am
  972. Hi M&T’s Dad, you can claim a title by emailing me:

    jessewillis@yahoo.com

    Tell me which title you’re going to record, approximately how long you think it will take. :D

  973. Jesse on Tue, 24th Apr 2007 11:53 am
  974. Hi M&T’s Dad, you can claim a title by emailing me:

    jessewillis@yahoo.com

    Tell me which title you’re going to record, approximately how long you think it will take. :D

  975. Krishnamurphy on Tue, 1st May 2007 5:35 pm
  976. Very much enjoyed Tim Rowe’s telling of the HG Wells story. Not normally a fan of sci fi, I really enjoyed it, and could well become a convert to the genre, now.
    Maybe Tim could read a larger work, and we could listen to episodes of other HG Wells’ better known novels?

  977. Krishnamurphy on Tue, 1st May 2007 7:52 pm
  978. Very much enjoyed Tim Rowe’s telling of the HG Wells story. Not normally a fan of sci fi, I really enjoyed it, and could well become a convert to the genre, now.
    Maybe Tim could read a larger work, and we could listen to episodes of other HG Wells’ better known novels?

  979. Carl on Thu, 3rd May 2007 6:59 am
  980. Well, when I think of female sci/fi authors, I think of CJ Cherryh and Connie Willis before I think of the others.

  981. Carl on Thu, 3rd May 2007 7:09 am
  982. I meant to suggest specific books by Cherryh and Willis. Cherryh’s The Pride of Chanur is a fascinating picture of potential alien culture and it’s exposure to the discovery of a new life form, humans, from the alien’s perspective. I think Bellwether by Connie Willis is a brilliant work on the prediction of fads.

  983. Julie D. on Thu, 3rd May 2007 9:07 am
  984. Connie Willis …

  985. Carl on Thu, 3rd May 2007 10:30 am
  986. Well, when I think of female sci/fi authors, I think of CJ Cherryh and Connie Willis before I think of the others.

  987. Julie D. on Thu, 3rd May 2007 10:30 am
  988. Connie Willis …

  989. DecoderRing on Sat, 5th May 2007 9:13 am
  990. …lol… actually, that was me writing in my very occasional position of ‘foreign correspondent’ for the audio addict page. dani is usually much more coherent than i ;)

  991. Audio Addict on Sat, 5th May 2007 1:00 pm
  992. Actually, I would love to take credit for such a fabulous quote. However, it was my foreign correspondent, Gregg Taylor who said such wonderful things about Dick Dynamo (to which he is absolutely correct!)

    ~Dani

  993. Audio Addict on Sat, 5th May 2007 1:00 pm
  994. Actually, I would love to take credit for such a fabulous quote. However, it was my foreign correspondent, Gregg Taylor who said such wonderful things about Dick Dynamo (to which he is absolutely correct!)

    ~Dani

  995. DecoderRing on Sat, 5th May 2007 1:58 pm
  996. …lol… actually, that was me writing in my very occasional position of ‘foreign correspondent’ for the audio addict page. dani is usually much more coherent than i ;)

  997. Jesse on Sat, 5th May 2007 2:05 pm
  998. Woops! Fixed. :D

  999. Jesse on Sat, 5th May 2007 2:05 pm
  1000. Woops! Fixed. :D

  1001. nick on Mon, 7th May 2007 3:51 pm
  1002. I like the idea of this story, and the production values are good. However, there are some things which put me off, and I abandoned listening. There are some weird accents amongst the case, and I don’t know if this is what they actually sound like, or if they are trying to speak in accents that they aren’t good at. I found the pacing really slow. It seemed to me an interminable time in which the characters were just arguing about whether they were going to go outside or not. Like they could stay inside forever! Also, I think sometimes with Darker Projects, they pay more attention to the sound effects than the drama. I got bored listening to footsteps.

  1003. nick on Mon, 7th May 2007 4:15 pm
  1004. I like the idea of this story, and the production values are good. However, there are some things which put me off, and I abandoned listening. There are some weird accents amongst the case, and I don’t know if this is what they actually sound like, or if they are trying to speak in accents that they aren’t good at. I found the pacing really slow. It seemed to me an interminable time in which the characters were just arguing about whether they were going to go outside or not. Like they could stay inside forever! Also, I think sometimes with Darker Projects, they pay more attention to the sound effects than the drama. I got bored listening to footsteps.

  1005. Maureen on Mon, 7th May 2007 8:54 pm
  1006. Lois McMaster Bujold.

  1007. Maureen on Mon, 7th May 2007 8:58 pm
  1008. Lois McMaster Bujold.

  1009. DecoderRing on Wed, 9th May 2007 8:38 am
  1010. Hoo-baby! This is how it’s done! B7 was due for a re-fit, I’m thrilled it took an audio turn.

  1011. DecoderRing on Wed, 9th May 2007 9:48 am
  1012. Hoo-baby! This is how it’s done! B7 was due for a re-fit, I’m thrilled it took an audio turn.

  1013. Brad on Wed, 9th May 2007 6:17 pm
  1014. Crap, I can’t find a way to access these? Where were you able to listen to them?

  1015. Brad on Wed, 9th May 2007 6:18 pm
  1016. Hey guys, I can’t seem to find a link to the media itself! Where is it?

  1017. Brad on Wed, 9th May 2007 6:26 pm
  1018. Ah, embarassment, I overlooked them….

  1019. Brad on Wed, 9th May 2007 10:35 pm
  1020. Crap, I can’t find a way to access these? Where were you able to listen to them?

  1021. Jesse on Wed, 9th May 2007 11:16 pm
  1022. My bad, Brad. Glad you found them.

  1023. Jesse on Wed, 9th May 2007 11:16 pm
  1024. My bad, Brad. Glad you found them.

  1025. Audio Addict on Fri, 11th May 2007 10:39 am
  1026. HEEHEEEE… SFFAudio is SO behind in the times! ;-)

    I kid, and this is an awesome show. My older daughter loves Dr. Floyd!

    Dani

  1027. Audio Addict on Fri, 11th May 2007 10:39 am
  1028. HEEHEEEE… SFFAudio is SO behind in the times! ;-)

    I kid, and this is an awesome show. My older daughter loves Dr. Floyd!

    Dani

  1029. Brad on Fri, 11th May 2007 5:19 pm
  1030. I’d really like to hear this from the beginning. I remember following the lead up to the first episode and then somehow lost track of it. Is there something equivalent to the BBC7’s play it again service for the CBC?

  1031. Brad on Fri, 11th May 2007 5:41 pm
  1032. I’d really like to hear this from the beginning. I remember following the lead up to the first episode and then somehow lost track of it. Is there something equivalent to the BBC7’s play it again service for the CBC?

  1033. Jesse on Fri, 11th May 2007 5:56 pm
  1034. Sadly, there is no CBC equivalent to the “listen again” service that’s used by the BBC radio stations. No podcast either. A big shame on both. :(

    There might be a CD release after the 10 episode run completes. And it may be re-broadcast at some point.

    We can try to let the CBC know we want more access to Canadia: 2056 by either calling the toll-free phone number (Canada only): 1-866-306-4636 or using the web-contact form located here:

    http://www.cbc.ca/contact/index.jsp

    I’ve already done so. If you want Canadia 2056 and other great CBC Radio Dramas podcast let them know!

  1035. Jesse on Fri, 11th May 2007 5:56 pm
  1036. Sadly, there is no CBC equivalent to the “listen again” service that’s used by the BBC radio stations. No podcast either. A big shame on both. :(

    There might be a CD release after the 10 episode run completes. And it may be re-broadcast at some point.

    We can try to let the CBC know we want more access to Canadia: 2056 by either calling the toll-free phone number (Canada only): 1-866-306-4636 or using the web-contact form located here:

    http://www.cbc.ca/contact/index.jsp

    I’ve already done so. If you want Canadia 2056 and other great CBC Radio Dramas podcast let them know!

  1037. marsha loftis on Sun, 13th May 2007 10:38 pm
  1038. thankyou, Morgan will be thrilled to see her story on display for others to hear and see. I fixed the cinderella story so that it is available. She has a couple of others stories I will repost as well.

  1039. marsha loftis on Mon, 14th May 2007 9:15 am
  1040. thankyou, Morgan will be thrilled to see her story on display for others to hear and see. I fixed the cinderella story so that it is available. She has a couple of others stories I will repost as well.

  1041. Hunter on Tue, 15th May 2007 6:30 am
  1042. Minor correction: “Sacred Fire” in the “Stalkers” audio is not by McCammon.

  1043. Hunter on Tue, 15th May 2007 6:40 am
  1044. Also, “Nightcrawlers” and “Something Passed By” are both unabridged, while “Boy’s Life” and “Gone South” are both abridged.

    Hunter

  1045. Hunter on Tue, 15th May 2007 10:30 am
  1046. Minor correction: “Sacred Fire” in the “Stalkers” audio is not by McCammon.

  1047. Jesse on Tue, 15th May 2007 12:57 pm
  1048. Thanks Hunter! Revised those details.

  1049. Jesse on Tue, 15th May 2007 12:57 pm
  1050. Thanks Hunter! Revised those details.

  1051. DecoderRing on Tue, 15th May 2007 4:32 pm
  1052. That’s great news, as is the fact they’ll be re-running Afghanda, which was almost over before I knew it was happening… But only the CBC would call something with no dates, times or even months a “schedule”.
    As usual, SFF does a better job of promoting CBC shows than those who are paid to do so… Thanks!

  1053. DecoderRing on Tue, 15th May 2007 8:20 pm
  1054. That’s great news, as is the fact they’ll be re-running Afghanda, which was almost over before I knew it was happening… But only the CBC would call something with no dates, times or even months a “schedule”.
    As usual, SFF does a better job of promoting CBC shows than those who are paid to do so… Thanks!

  1055. Jesse on Tue, 15th May 2007 8:22 pm
  1056. Thanks! :)

    I heard an episode of Afganada and was impressed – but it didn’t get much play on the site here because it is so unrelated to spec fic.

  1057. Jesse on Tue, 15th May 2007 8:22 pm
  1058. Thanks! :)

    I heard an episode of Afganada and was impressed – but it didn’t get much play on the site here because it is so unrelated to spec fic.

  1059. Brad on Fri, 18th May 2007 4:42 pm
  1060. Yes, please write that email! It’s ridiculous. Let’s let them know there’s some demand for this sort of thing outside of their regular broadcasting schedule. Had I been on the ball, I would have used this little script I once wrote just to grab these sorts of streamed broadcasts.

  1061. Brad on Fri, 18th May 2007 4:57 pm
  1062. Yes, please write that email! It’s ridiculous. Let’s let them know there’s some demand for this sort of thing outside of their regular broadcasting schedule. Had I been on the ball, I would have used this little script I once wrote just to grab these sorts of streamed broadcasts.

  1063. PaulJ on Sat, 26th May 2007 8:35 am
  1064. I read “Wax” when it was published in Interzone #201 — it’s a good story. There was also a sequel, “Wane,” in Interzone #203.

  1065. PaulJ on Sat, 26th May 2007 11:12 am
  1066. I read “Wax” when it was published in Interzone #201 — it’s a good story. There was also a sequel, “Wane,” in Interzone #203.

  1067. DecoderRing on Sat, 2nd Jun 2007 1:18 am
  1068. I’m still enjoying it a lot, though I haven’t heard this week’s episode yet… Anderson is pretty much just Fry from Futurama… but who cares, I like Futurama just fine!

  1069. DecoderRing on Sat, 2nd Jun 2007 11:48 am
  1070. I’m still enjoying it a lot, though I haven’t heard this week’s episode yet… Anderson is pretty much just Fry from Futurama… but who cares, I like Futurama just fine!

  1071. The Time Traveler on Sun, 3rd Jun 2007 6:38 pm
  1072. “Everyone needs a good bit of Dick now and then.” Is there something you’re trying to tell us, Jesse?

  1073. The Time Traveler on Sun, 3rd Jun 2007 6:38 pm
  1074. “Everyone needs a good bit of Dick now and then.” Is there something you’re trying to tell us, Jesse?

  1075. Jesse on Sun, 3rd Jun 2007 8:38 pm
  1076. Yes, deep down, everyone loves. Dick. ;)

  1077. Jesse on Sun, 3rd Jun 2007 8:38 pm
  1078. Yes, deep down, everyone loves. Dick. ;)

  1079. The Time Traveler on Mon, 4th Jun 2007 5:39 pm
  1080. My own, yes :)

  1081. The Time Traveler on Mon, 4th Jun 2007 5:39 pm
  1082. My own, yes :)

  1083. Jesse on Mon, 4th Jun 2007 7:28 pm
  1084. If I weren’t so high minded I’d suspect you think I meant something of a double entendre. ;)

  1085. Jesse on Mon, 4th Jun 2007 7:28 pm
  1086. If I weren’t so high minded I’d suspect you think I meant something of a double entendre. ;)

  1087. The Time Traveler on Tue, 5th Jun 2007 12:52 pm
  1088. We at SFFaudio.com are above such juvenile comments. Now I got to go and wax my time probe. :-) -:

  1089. The Time Traveler on Tue, 5th Jun 2007 12:52 pm
  1090. We at SFFaudio.com are above such juvenile comments. Now I got to go and wax my time probe. :-) -:

  1091. mstewart on Tue, 5th Jun 2007 6:01 pm
  1092. Hour 25 was the best audio show around until the host got too busy to keep up with it. What used to be a bi-weekly program is now a bi-yearly program. Very, very sad. Hour 25 is missed.

  1093. mstewart on Tue, 5th Jun 2007 10:10 pm
  1094. Hour 25 was the best audio show around until the host got too busy to keep up with it. What used to be a bi-weekly program is now a bi-yearly program. Very, very sad. Hour 25 is missed.

  1095. Jesse on Tue, 5th Jun 2007 10:15 pm
  1096. I one hundred percent agree. H25 on the net long before podcasting technology happened, but it never took up the technology. I suspect that the interminable delays between shows was in part due to the giant amount of website related was involved.

    I’ve been subscribed to H25’s newsletter (which is supposed to tell you when a new show is out) for years and haven’t received one email in all those years. :(

    There must be a podcaster in L.A. who can show them the ropes – if only for their old shows.

  1097. Jesse on Tue, 5th Jun 2007 10:15 pm
  1098. I one hundred percent agree. H25 on the net long before podcasting technology happened, but it never took up the technology. I suspect that the interminable delays between shows was in part due to the giant amount of website related was involved.

    I’ve been subscribed to H25’s newsletter (which is supposed to tell you when a new show is out) for years and haven’t received one email in all those years. :(

    There must be a podcaster in L.A. who can show them the ropes – if only for their old shows.

  1099. Ayeshalan on Wed, 6th Jun 2007 12:03 am
  1100. Thank you so much for the very kind and enthusiastic words! We’ve been working through the winter and spring to get this out, and it’s finally starting to come together. The story will continue to unfold through the summer — hope you enjoy the rest of it.
    Jamie Lawson
    Co-Producer, “Afterhell”

  1101. Ayeshalan on Wed, 6th Jun 2007 12:43 am
  1102. Thank you so much for the very kind and enthusiastic words! We’ve been working through the winter and spring to get this out, and it’s finally starting to come together. The story will continue to unfold through the summer — hope you enjoy the rest of it.
    Jamie Lawson
    Co-Producer, “Afterhell”

  1103. Jesse on Wed, 6th Jun 2007 12:48 am
  1104. I expect I will. The acting and writing on Afterhell are really TOP SHELF! I really appreciate the attention to detail (the name “Giallo” itself is a prime example). My only critique – and I’m not sure its even reasonable to expect you could change it – would be that some of the gun sound effects sound “canned.”

  1105. Jesse on Wed, 6th Jun 2007 12:48 am
  1106. I expect I will. The acting and writing on Afterhell are really TOP SHELF! I really appreciate the attention to detail (the name “Giallo” itself is a prime example). My only critique – and I’m not sure its even reasonable to expect you could change it – would be that some of the gun sound effects sound “canned.”

  1107. PaulJ on Fri, 8th Jun 2007 1:32 pm
  1108. The Haldeman download from iTunes U is 32 kbps, which is fine, but it’s left channel only. Is this normal?

  1109. Jesse on Sat, 9th Jun 2007 12:59 pm
  1110. Seems a bit odd that they’d do it that way. Probably its a mistake.

  1111. DecoderRing on Sat, 9th Jun 2007 5:48 pm
  1112. Oh, great googly-moogly! The artwork is stupendous! Stupendous I say!

  1113. DecoderRing on Sun, 10th Jun 2007 11:27 am
  1114. Just realized that in my original post on our site I spelled Eric Deckers’ name wrong. My fault. You can find his humour column online at http://www.kconline.com/deckers/

  1115. DecoderRing on Tue, 12th Jun 2007 9:01 pm
  1116. Sounds great… er… no idea what time of day these’ll be playing (he said hoping against hope it won’t be in the middle of the workday)?

  1117. Jesse on Tue, 12th Jun 2007 9:58 pm
  1118. No word yet, but I expect they will be in the same timeslot as Canadia 2056.

  1119. Jesse on Wed, 13th Jun 2007 12:21 pm
  1120. It appears that the Sci-Fiction, which was also axed from production by Sc-Fi channel has announcement on the SciFiction website stating that their site will no longer be hosting the text text from that magazine after Jun 15th!

    GRRR!!!

    They, at least were given a couple days warning. We poor audio folks were given NO WARNING at all. :(

  1121. Tim on Fri, 15th Jun 2007 5:05 am
  1122. Seems a little dated now, cool concept though. Just needs an update/rewrite.

    JT-Gigcast
    http://www.thegigcast.com

  1123. cbc on Fri, 15th Jun 2007 5:58 pm
  1124. Hey Jesse… the whole podcast question is a real pain in the butt for us. Basically we just can’t podcast dramas because of union agreements. The CBC doesn’t have agreements in place with certain unions such as ACTRA (the union representing Canadian actors) that allow us to podcast material featuring their members.

    Believe me, we would LOVE to podcast our dramas. But we’re just plain not allowed until we get those agreements sorted out.

    Should we get them sorted out soon? You bet your ass! Everybody would win. The CBC, the actors, especially the audience. Will we get the agreements sorted out soon?

    Probably not.

    Joe

  1125. Jesse on Sat, 16th Jun 2007 10:21 am
  1126. Thanks the info Joe! Glad to hear that there’s a desire to podcast CBC’s dramatic material within the CBC too.

    Time for ACTRA to get their act together. :)

    Such agreements seem to be starting in the U.K….

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6427133.stm

  1127. Jesse on Wed, 20th Jun 2007 12:53 pm
  1128. Jesse on Thu, 21st Jun 2007 3:26 pm
  1129. For those not keeping score the reason Dani had to keep her mouth shut is that she was one of the judges! :)

  1130. Brad on Mon, 25th Jun 2007 2:05 pm
  1131. Hi, Jesse, just to set the record straight, I just sent you a heads up, but I did not actually write what you have me quoted me as saying. That must be something written by a member of the production. I’m just a listener. There’s actually a totally different Brad who works on Second Shift. Thanks!

  1132. Jesse on Mon, 25th Jun 2007 10:57 pm
  1133. Do’H!

    Will adjust the post to reflect the facts. :D

  1134. PaulJ on Sat, 30th Jun 2007 2:52 am
  1135. There’s always the Librivox recording with multiple readers — some of whom you might (ahem) recognize…

  1136. Jesse on Sat, 30th Jun 2007 10:19 am
  1137. Good point! And the LIBRIVOX version is unabridged!

  1138. Audio Addict on Sun, 1st Jul 2007 6:06 pm
  1139. The Red Panda is absolutely worthy of being an SFF Audio essential! :-)

    Congrats to them on that, as well as congrats for having an awesome second season!

    ~Dani

  1140. The Time Traveler on Sun, 1st Jul 2007 6:33 pm
  1141. I’ll have to third that SFFaudio essential attribution. My personal fav podcast.

  1142. moriond on Wed, 4th Jul 2007 1:41 pm
  1143. Super Pal! was recently broadcast as a Radio Drama Revival! podcast and the following episode was an interview with Brian Price, producer of Great Northern Audio. See Radio Drama Revival!’s podcast at iTunesor check their RSS feed for episodes 11 and 12.

  1144. finalrune on Sun, 8th Jul 2007 3:45 pm
  1145. Hate to see kids chowing down fast food, but this offer is pretty neat — at least *something* will feed their minds!

  1146. Audio Addict on Thu, 12th Jul 2007 12:27 pm
  1147. …and a review of the podiobook is pending! :-)

    ~Dani

  1148. Shawn on Thu, 19th Jul 2007 8:18 pm
  1149. I will miss Voices Mur ! Loved this show! You and the producers are all ones that I follow. Thank you for the great time and consideration you put into these shows, even when you were not feeling at your best. I will be all ears on Pseudopod and the “Escape”. – Cheers! – Shawn

  1150. Jesse on Sun, 22nd Jul 2007 12:08 pm
  1151. I think it is pretty cool that Listening Library got it to us on the day of release! Was there a ring of your doorbell at midnight? :)

  1152. Julie D. on Sun, 22nd Jul 2007 12:40 pm
  1153. Picky, picky! :-D

    Thanks for the mention y’all! :-)

  1154. Jesse on Sun, 22nd Jul 2007 1:18 pm
  1155. Thank you. :)

    Jesse

  1156. Andrew on Mon, 23rd Jul 2007 10:30 am
  1157. James Tiptree, Jr., aka Alice Sheldon — the stories are amazing, and the recent biography is apparently very good. But above all I think of LeGuin, especially The Left Hand of Darkness and The Dispossessed (and the Earthsea books in the fantasy genre). Undeniably deserving of the name of literature.

  1158. Mirtika on Mon, 23rd Jul 2007 10:55 am
  1159. I wish it would podcast, cause I’d like to hear it here in the SE USA.

    Mir

  1160. DecoderRing on Mon, 23rd Jul 2007 8:05 pm
  1161. Dear C.B.C.,

    We all love you very much, even though you make us crazy sometimes.

    Some of us who love audio drama also have pesky things called “jobs” that make it impossible to listen to audio drama and comedy programs that you put on in the middle of a weekday with no re-run.

    Seriously. An evening time slot would kill you?

  1162. Stephen on Thu, 26th Jul 2007 10:23 pm
  1163. And we appreciate the support, too! Rock on. >8->

  1164. Garson on Mon, 30th Jul 2007 3:16 am
  1165. The “Skylark of Space” by E. E. Doc Smith is listed above as “in progress”. Blog readers may be interested to know that a commercial version of “Skylark of Space” is now available from the audio book company Books in Motion. (I have no connection with the company.)

  1166. Kevin on Tue, 31st Jul 2007 6:33 pm
  1167. Part 1 is a big link

    404 Not Found
    Sorry, we couldn’t find the file you are requesting
    starshipsofa/StarShipSofa_No_51_Science_Fiction_Classic_Robert_A_Heinlein_Part_1.mp3
    Please check the referring URL

  1168. Jesse on Tue, 31st Jul 2007 6:48 pm
  1169. Fixed. Thanks Kevin!

  1170. Carsten on Wed, 1st Aug 2007 4:05 am
  1171. Why is it, that “Dietrich” seems to be a favorite German name for anglophone writers, and why is it that they always spell it wrong? ;-)
    Cheers,
    Carsten

  1172. Gerry Alanguilan on Tue, 7th Aug 2007 11:24 pm
  1173. Star Surgeon is a book I remember fondly from High School. I felt bad when I finally had to return it. I’ve looked all over ever since for my own copy, so I’m glad I stumbled upon this audio book. Thanks to all those involved in making it!

  1174. D. on Thu, 9th Aug 2007 5:34 am
  1175. Seeing Ear Theatre still has John Kessel’s “A Clean Escape” in their archive. The streaming audio is still there last time I checked 08/09/07.

  1176. Jesse on Fri, 10th Aug 2007 1:31 pm
  1177. D,

    Unfortunately the SET version of A Clean Escape is no longer archived. Here’s where it was…

    http://www.scifi.com/set/playhouse/clean/

    Here’s the post about the whole debacle surrounding the SET pulldown:

    http://www.sffaudio.com/2007/06/wake-up-time-to-die-seeing-ear-theatre.html

  1178. D. on Fri, 10th Aug 2007 4:29 pm
  1179. That’s awful. And I was thinking about listening to it this weekend after having seen “A Clean Escape” on Masters of Science Fiction. I’m sure I’m not the only one looking for it. Hopefully it will turn up somewhere on the web.

  1180. Jesse on Fri, 10th Aug 2007 7:32 pm
  1181. It is a shame, a terrible shame.

    On the other hand, I recently got back an email from John Kessel himself, he had recorded the short story and has plans of reposting it to his website.

    I think the only likely place you’ll find a recording of the audio drama itself is on a cassette.

  1182. Scott on Thu, 23rd Aug 2007 8:15 am
  1183. At the Graphic Audio website, there’s a sample/trailer. Find it here.

  1184. Audio Addict on Sat, 25th Aug 2007 11:46 am
  1185. Heeheee… like I know anything. ;-)

    It was fun, Chris is a really nice guy and I was completely flattered to have been asked to be interviewed!

    Thanks Jesse.

    ~Dani

  1186. PaulJ on Tue, 28th Aug 2007 12:46 pm
  1187. If this is a Firefox plug-in, does that mean it works on Mac and Linux too?

    Idle curiosity – I use Audio Hijack Pro on a Mac. Right now in fact, to record the “It Just Stopped” stream. Which reminds me, could you mention when you post links to streaming audio whether it’s stereo or mono? (Airplay appears to be mono, which is a shame because audio drama is so much more effective when you can hear the whole auditory sound stage.)

  1188. Jesse on Tue, 28th Aug 2007 12:59 pm
  1189. Looks like no. The Freecorder site sez:

    “All Applian recording products are designed for the Microsoft Windows operating system.”

    As for adding a note for Stereo/Mono when posting links to Online Audio… I can try. Thinking back, most seem to be in mono. :(

  1190. moriond on Fri, 31st Aug 2007 2:08 pm
  1191. Links to Mission to the Unknown and The Myth Makers episodes at the Internet Archive have changed:
    Mission to the Unknown is now at MP3
    The Myth Makers episodes are now at:
    Episode 1 MP3 Temple of Secrets
    Episode 2 MP3 Small Prophet Quick Return
    Episode 3 MP3 Death of a Spy
    Episode 4 MP3 Horse of Destruction

    Looks like they changed some of the titles yesterday to make the file names shorter.
    And can you please check your email?

  1192. Jesse on Sun, 2nd Sep 2007 2:06 pm
  1193. Thanks for the update!

    Checking my email now. :)

  1194. Carsten on Wed, 5th Sep 2007 7:05 am
  1195. It is abridged. They say so in the end credits.

  1196. Jesse on Wed, 5th Sep 2007 10:54 am
  1197. Thanks. I’ve updated the post.

  1198. monkeymanswrath on Mon, 10th Sep 2007 7:12 pm
  1199. Is it my computer,or is the myth makers audio unavailable.If it is mine, does anyone know whats wrong?

  1200. Jesse on Mon, 10th Sep 2007 11:34 pm
  1201. Looks like Archive.org has pulled all the files. The reason quoted is: “The item is not available due to issues with the item’s content.”

  1202. Jesse on Sat, 15th Sep 2007 2:34 pm
  1203. I really like the cover art on this one.

  1204. moriond on Sun, 16th Sep 2007 10:08 pm
  1205. The Wolf Brother podcast was also run as part of a special promotion at audible.co.uk, where you could buy other books in the series as specially priced downloads. Audible.co.uk also released these episodes as a podcast, about a week after the Guardian releases, and all 14 episodes are still available as iTunes podcasts at Wolf Brother podcast. Selecting that link in your browser should take you to the Wolf Brother podcast page in the iTunes Store. If that doesn’t work, use the iTunes power search and select the podcasts category. Then type in “Wolf Brother” in the title field.

    moriond

  1206. huibstarlite on Mon, 24th Sep 2007 7:05 pm
  1207. Thanks for your comments about me being an audiobook narrator extraordinaire. I am currently working on Jules Verne’s “An Antarctic Mystery” I hope to have it done by December 1st. Esther aka Starlite

  1208. Scott on Tue, 2nd Oct 2007 11:02 am
  1209. How cool would that be?
    – Scott “Nowhere Near Toronto, but Starting to Wonder Why” Danielson

  1210. Bryan's workshop blog on Thu, 4th Oct 2007 10:26 am
  1211. Great catch. I’ve been following it, starting with one blog post.

    http://infocult.typepad.com/infocult/2007/09/red-monday-myst.html

  1212. PSGifford on Thu, 4th Oct 2007 8:08 pm
  1213. Exciting stuff!

    Paul

    http://www.psgifford.com

  1214. finalrune on Thu, 11th Oct 2007 6:05 am
  1215. Thanks a lot for the press! I’ve had a lot of fun putting together the line-up and since the audio horror world is alive and well, Halloween may as well be Christmas for all of us ;-) Sci-fi fans, especially, should definitely check out past episodes of the show — I’ve had great stuff from Dry Smoke and Whispers as well as the great sci-fi satire The Last Harbinger from Roger Gregg’s Crazy Dog Audio Theatre.

    I’d love to hear what people think about this programming and hope you tune in!

    Fred

    Writer, Producer, Host
    Radio Drama Revival
    FinalRune Productions

  1216. PaulJ on Thu, 11th Oct 2007 4:24 pm
  1217. I listened to the second episode yesterday – very promising. Inspired casting of Harry Enfield as Dirk Gently.

  1218. The Time Traveler on Sun, 14th Oct 2007 9:43 am
  1219. Lookin’ Good :)

  1220. Scott on Sun, 14th Oct 2007 11:08 am
  1221. Test comment. Thanks, Traveler!

  1222. Jason Penney on Mon, 15th Oct 2007 7:32 am
  1223. Site looks good.

    Any chance of you running CompleteRSS or something similar to get full content feeds back?

  1224. Jesse Willis on Tue, 16th Oct 2007 12:57 am
  1225. The new feed comes through identically on my Sage reader.

    But, I’ll see if I can’t get our blogmaster/AKA “webKzin Scott” to look into it.

  1226. ScottD on Thu, 18th Oct 2007 1:00 pm
  1227. Very cool! This isn’t a novelization of the movie, is it?

  1228. Jesse Willis on Fri, 19th Oct 2007 10:43 pm
  1229. One of the best Recent Arrivals lists ever!

  1230. Brad Bowman on Sat, 20th Oct 2007 10:47 pm
  1231. Last time i looked you couldn’t retrieve any claybourne episode from their podcast page, but fortunately the whole lot is available in one download from archive.org (and someone should leave a more upbeat comment than the single one there now).

  1232. Jesse Willis on Sun, 21st Oct 2007 11:09 am
  1233. No. I’m 99.9% sure this is the original novel, never before released as an unabridged audiobbook. PKD refused to allow a novelization of the movie to be made – at one point they even asked him to write the novelization!

  1234. Tee Morris on Mon, 22nd Oct 2007 7:58 pm
  1235. Thank you so much for this incredible review…that’s why it PAINS me to let you all know that due to technical issues, MOREVI: Remastered has been postponed for a month. Launch date will be 11.29.07.

    Again, thank you for this amazing review!

  1236. David Drage on Tue, 23rd Oct 2007 1:48 am
  1237. I have been trying to get this station to work since you first posted the story.

    It fails everytime!

    They don’t even have acontact email on their site so I can get help with it!

  1238. Jesse Willis on Tue, 23rd Oct 2007 2:12 am
  1239. Hmmm, it does seem to be offline at the moment.

    I found these contact details on the official press release.

    Joey Donovan
    Ad Astra Radio
    Ad Astra Communications, LLC

    joeydono [at] adastraradio.com
    Phone number 561-752-6986

  1240. starhawk on Tue, 23rd Oct 2007 9:35 am
  1241. I hope Johnny Chase comes to CD, or something. It sounds like an interesting series. Wish I had know about it when it was out in the 70’s.

  1242. Vintage Scifi on Wed, 24th Oct 2007 11:45 pm
  1243. Old Scifi is the bomb! I grew up watching that stuff all the time.

    [...] Smith may be familiar SFFaudio visitors as he was the reader for LibriVox’s releases of Tarzan Of The Apes and The Mysterious Island. The Keith Laumer blog, a fan blog for the late author, had this to say [...]

  1244. Ken Newquist on Mon, 29th Oct 2007 4:29 pm
  1245. Excellent — I’ll be including it in Nuketown Radio Active sometime in November.

  1246. tsdiva on Mon, 29th Oct 2007 4:52 pm
  1247. That is awesome! Thank you so much Gregg!

    [...] of their spooky stories, and the Science-Fiction Fantasy Audio Blog has posted some great links to scary stories on BBC7.  Oh, and did I forget to mention, there’s an hour-and-a-half, three part audio horror [...]

  1248. Orion on Wed, 31st Oct 2007 5:30 pm
  1249. I have wondered where I could get a hold of MP3s of the Seeing Ear Theatre shows for a long time. I’ll check this podcast out.

  1250. retro on Thu, 1st Nov 2007 10:13 am
  1251. I just love the classics!

    [...] Lesen? A Study in Emerald” Hören? Gaiman liest “A Study in Emerald” [...]

    [...] Local CustomBy Sharon Lee & Steve Miller;Read by Michael Shanks (Dr. Daniel Jackson From Stargate SG1)MP3 Disc or 8 CDs, Approx. 10.5 hrs – [UNABRIDGED]Publisher: Buzzy MultimediaPublished: 2004ISBN: 0965725596 (MP3 disc); 096572557x (CDs)READ OUR REVIEW [...]

  1252. Nabby on Mon, 5th Nov 2007 7:53 am
  1253. And kudos to Ellen McLain for the singing!
    http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=425

    [...] short story A Study in Emerald (found here in .pdf format) exists now in the putrid form of an audiobook. Succulent. Alluding to both the Sherlock Holmes canon and the Old Ones of the Cthulhu Mythos, this [...]

  1254. Summer on Wed, 7th Nov 2007 9:55 am
  1255. Thanks! Have I mentioned recently how much SFFAudio rocks?

  1256. Vinny on Thu, 8th Nov 2007 2:53 pm
  1257. I agree 100%. I listened to this book via my audible account. I gave it a great review on audible. Sadly, when I went to browse the scifi section today, I saw that Elric of Melniboné was no longer available at audible.com. Very sad. But for those looking for a great listen, check your library or order it online. It’s one of the few actually worth paying retail for. Gladto have discovered this site by the way.
    Later
    Vinny

  1258. David Drage on Sat, 10th Nov 2007 3:37 am
  1259. I will run your promo in my next show!

  1260. ScottD on Mon, 12th Nov 2007 3:13 pm
  1261. For those of you interested in Old English, Michael D.C. Drout has published a 3-CD set of Beowulf read in that language. I have a copy, and it’s interesting listening. Click here for more info.
    –Scott D

  1262. Dave Tackett on Mon, 12th Nov 2007 7:26 pm
  1263. Beowulf is an amazingly great epic poem! Great choice with the film coming up (hopefully this film won’t be a disappointment). I’ll have to listen to the LibriVox version before I see the film.

    ScottD, cool, I’ve been looking for a good site with spoken Old English and the Anglo-Saxon Aloud site has most of the great short poems in MP3. Thank you.

  1264. Brian on Mon, 12th Nov 2007 8:50 pm
  1265. I have a copy on cassette tape… and I’m trying to find an mp3 or convert what I have to CD. It is one of the best short stories I’ve ever heard… the copy I have was formerly a library copy… and its been played countless times… the last several by me. :)

    [...] available in etext form, but not so much on audio, so comes our 2nd Annual SFFaudio Challenge! Last year’s Challenge netted listeners around the world six previously unrecorded audiobooks. And just like last [...]

  1266. debbie on Thu, 15th Nov 2007 6:12 pm
  1267. I do not particularly like Mr. Martin’s writings [I have another of his books]but I purchased Dreamsongs volume one because Adrian Paul was doing two of the stories. If Adrian Paul did more audio book readings, I would purchase more of them. I enjoy listening to him. Roy Dotrice is good at reading stories also, I remember him as “Father” in “Beauty and the Beast”. But if I had to choose, it would be Adrian.

  1268. ScottD on Fri, 16th Nov 2007 9:46 am
  1269. I became a fan of Martin after reading “A Game of Thrones”. I hadn’t read much of his fiction before that one. When it came out on audio, I listened to it, too – Roy Dotrice reads it.

    Has Adrian Paul read anything else? He’s excellent.

  1270. Jesse Willis on Fri, 16th Nov 2007 11:51 pm
  1271. I couldn’t resist either. LibriVox is wonderous!

    [...] first time the prestige paperbook press has released free audio versions of their wares. There was Wax by Elizabeth Bear, Rude Mechanicals by Kage Baker and The Sagan Diaries John Scalzi. I’m just wondering when [...]

    [...] paperbook press has released free audio versions of their wares. There was Wax by Elizabeth Bear, Rude Mechanicals by Kage Baker and The Sagan Diaries John Scalzi. I’m just wondering when full fledged audiobook lineup will [...]

    [...] audio versions of their wares. There was Wax by Elizabeth Bear, Rude Mechanicals by Kage Baker and The Sagan Diaries John Scalzi. I’m just wondering when full fledged audiobook lineup will appear in the Subterranean [...]

    [...] was best known at the time for his work on CBC Playhouse and the cult favorite adventure series, Johnny Chase: Secret Agent of Space.  Stories were developed from original tales and adaptations of classic stories and even from a [...]

    [...] 2. Bread Overhead* By Fritz Leiber; Read by Mark F. Smith 1 |MP3| – Approx. 38 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] *There is also a variant reading of the same story by another LibriVox reader HERE. [...]

    [...] 8. The Repairman* By Harry Harrison; Read by Anton 1 |MP3| – 29 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] *There is another reading of this tale HERE. [...]

  1272. Sean Brodrick on Mon, 19th Nov 2007 3:11 pm
  1273. Thanks for doing the Jack Vance podcast. I enjoyed it immensely. I just recently finished “Tales of the Dying Earth”, which was a thing of beauty. While I wanted to strangle Cugel the Clever sometimes, it was worth seeing him through to the end.

    I read “The Moon Moth” when it came out a long, long time ago. I had forgotten that Vance was the author, but now that I think back, it has all his trademark expertise and techniques. I plan to go listen to the audio link you gave here. Thanks for having a great site — I’m putting you on my favorites links

  1274. Dave Tackett on Wed, 21st Nov 2007 7:05 pm
  1275. Good story! I’d be in the other camp about its fit in SFFaudio except for two things. 1 It’s quite good, well read, and interesting. 2. The webmaster is always 100% correct about what’s appropriate for his/her site. So good pick (especially for reason #1)

  1276. Jesse Willis on Thu, 22nd Nov 2007 12:57 pm
  1277. Yeah. Hell, I know it isn’t super-obvious as a typical horror story, but I’ve got to stick by my guns when it comes to it being a “moral horror” story – otherwise it isn’t appropriate for SFFaudio.com. The Gospel According To Mark has the same vitality that pervades so much of Science Fiction and Fantasy.

  1278. Jason Penney on Mon, 26th Nov 2007 6:38 am
  1279. Thanks so much for listing the contents. I was fairly confused about how complete the Dreamsongs audiobooks are (Amazon has them listed as abridged).

    It seems that the single volume print edition (UK only?), the two volume print edition, and the three volume audio edition all contain the same contents in the same order, just split up in different ways. If anyone knows better please let me know.

    The fact that neither the packaging, nor the audible.com listing contain the contents make it difficult to make an informed purchase. The fact that V1 in print and V1 in audio do not cover the same ground just adds to that.

    [...] what today is? Yup, it’s Red Monday! That countdown clock website turned out to mean something after all! I got this chilling email early this morning… You are [...]

  1280. Maureen on Tue, 27th Nov 2007 6:51 pm
  1281. I’d like to claim “Legacy”, the Trigger Argee story. :)

    [...] prizes I figured we’d run out of challengers too, especially considering we’ve got the All New 2nd Annual SFFaudio Challenge to consider. But, I’m pleased to say I was [...]

    [...] D. Farquhar from Prometheus Radio Theatre (and Star Surgeon fame) has written in to claim The Black Star Passes by John W. Campbell. This is one of the titles [...]

    [...] Here’s an audiobook we received from Playaway.  We reviewed the Playaway earlier this month.  Read the review. [...]

  1282. Steve Riekeberg on Wed, 28th Nov 2007 3:38 pm
  1283. Not normally one to “too my own horn”, so to speak, but I just released an episode of Geek Cred featuring an interview with J. Marcus Xavier about Red Monday. Pretty interesting stuff if I do say so myself.

  1284. Jesse Willis on Wed, 28th Nov 2007 9:31 pm
  1285. One more title has been claimed! The Black Star Passes by John W. Campbell is now in production!

    [...] By Evelyn E. Smith; Read by Betsie Bush 1 |MP3| Approx. 34.5 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] *This is an SFFaudio Challenge #2 [...]

    [...] 1 |MP3| Approx. 33 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] *There are two other readings of this story available too! Here and [...]

    [...] 4. Bread Overhead* By Fritz Leiber;Read by Betsie Bush 1 |MP3| Approx. 33 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] *There are two other readings of this story available too! Here and here. [...]

    [...] SFFaudio Challenge entrant Paul Campbell (he’s working on Rebels Of The Red Planet) has been podcasting his Science Fiction audio drama series Estalvin’s Legacy since early this summer. This promising series features “Mystery, Adventure, Romance, Disaster and War across Alternate Realities” – all that and a cast of a dozen U.K voice actors! There are three episodes out so far. I’ve listened to the first, it drops you straight into the middle of a cast of complex characters with a backstory that begins to be revealed – very promising! And Estalvin’s Legacy has possibly the best tagline for an audio drama series I’ve ever heard: “The universe exists – for now.” [...]

  1286. Dave Tackett on Sun, 2nd Dec 2007 8:47 pm
  1287. Huzzah, I love these collections! I’ve already listened to “The Blue Tower” (No surprise there Evelyn E. Smith is one of my favorites from the 1950s mags) and was quite pleased with the reading! LibriVox rules! Can’t wait till I have time to listen the rest.

  1288. Maureen on Mon, 3rd Dec 2007 12:20 pm
  1289. Shrug. They want you to use that ugly mp3 format that makes the weird whistling noise in the middle of your track, and then they want you to have the pictures attached to the file. Probably they want you to eat fried liver of your own free will, too.

    Considering I’m having a hard enough time convincing my own system not to mark all my mp3s “read-only” (and there seems to be no way to stop it from calling them “blues”), I think this is a bit too technically difficult for most of us.

    [...] Smith. Betsie has made this audiobook PUBLIC DOMAIN and it is included in the LibriVox anthology: Short Science Fiction Collection Vol. 002. As the first to complete a title from our challenge Betsie has first choice from any one of the [...]

  1290. Evo on Mon, 3rd Dec 2007 2:49 pm
  1291. Maureen,

    “Weird whistling”? Sounds like a someone who used too much noise reduction and a very low bit/sample rate when they kicked out the .mp3 file. I can tell you that the .mp3 format doesn’t natively add whistles at any point in a track.

    And by “Pictures attached to the file”, I assume you mean the ability to include a single image (not images) inside of the data so that it displays on certain MP3 players. Yes, you’ll find that all of the files on Podiobooks.com have the artwork — usually of the cover of the book — attached. Is there an issue with doing that, either from the listener or the creator point of view?

    “Fried liver”. Gross. Even my grandmother wouldn’t make anyone eat that, although she swears by it.

    Regarding the “blues”: that’s a setting inside of the MP3 file as well. We ask for all of our authors to tag ours as “podcast”, since that’s how they’re made available.

    All things considered, I think you’ve listened to an MP3 that someone shoddily threw together. That’s unfortunate. Try a few more. I think you’ll be a bit happier with the results.

    Oh, and I’m not at all sure what you mean by “read-only”. I come from the IT world, where read-only would in this case be appropriate, but I think you may be attaching a different meaning.

    Evo Terra
    Podiobooks.com

  1292. Time Traveler on Mon, 3rd Dec 2007 6:39 pm
  1293. This is a crackin’ good story. The pacing is excellent throughout. It took me two days to listen to it.

  1294. Time Traveler on Tue, 4th Dec 2007 12:51 pm
  1295. Wow! Yes the new show comes out today, baring technical snafus. And it’s a doozy :)

    [...] P.S. FREE Apocalypse Al! [...]

  1296. Starlite on Wed, 5th Dec 2007 3:43 pm
  1297. Thankyou for posting this. C S Lewis is my most favorite author!! I even read his whole sci-fi trilogy…

  1298. Jesse Willis on Wed, 5th Dec 2007 8:47 pm
  1299. My pleasure. :)

    [...] old-fashioned pulpy goodness? Have a look, and a listen to the first chapter |MP3| of the newest SFFaudio Challenger’s [...]

  1300. Scott on Mon, 10th Dec 2007 8:51 am
  1301. Hi, Maureen. I see Evo has already responded, and other than having Star Surgeon hosted with them, I’m not really affiliated with Podiobooks. From your comment, though, it sounds to me like you are somebody who attempted to submit something to them but weren’t able to get it quite to the technical specifications? Admittedly, it does take some effort to make sure the files are all correct and consistent, however that’s pretty much a necessity prior to the guys at podiobooks doing all they need to do afterward to get it set up on their site. If what I’ve said is true, I can only suggest that you read up on audio files and formats and use this as a functional way to learn more about something that you obviously have a deep enough interest in to comment about…!

    Cheers,

    –Scott

    [...] Queen Of The Black Coast (A Conan Novelette) By Robert E. Howard; Read by Bill Hollweg |GET IT HERE| Claimed: November 15th 2007 Completed: Dec 12th 2007 [...]

    [...] The Blue Tower By Evelyn E. Smith; Read by Betsie Bush Claimed: November 18th 2007 Completed: November 30th 2007 [...]

    [...] Earlier this year we told you about audible.com’s big push for more Science Fiction and Fantasy. The staff at audible.com [...]

    [...] We’ve some exciting news regarding audible.com. Earlier this year we told you about audible’s big push for more Science Fiction and Fantasy. Since then the staff at audible.com have been acquiring new titles and new providers at a serious clip. Now we’ve got more news on that front. Here’s the list of some of the upcoming releases – I’m almost certain these are all ‘exclusive to audible’ titles. Included amongst them are the follow up book to our latest SFFaudio Essential designee! [...]

  1302. ScottD on Thu, 13th Dec 2007 3:41 pm
  1303. Rainbow’s End! Spin! Axis!
    That’s terrific news!

    [...] P.S. FREE Apocalypse Al! [...]

  1304. Mark on Fri, 14th Dec 2007 9:38 pm
  1305. I am a HUGE fan of Black Shadow. It is a great first podcast novel from Steve Saylor and I am really looking forward to more audio from him soon…..

    M

  1306. Julie D. on Mon, 17th Dec 2007 12:52 pm
  1307. Also check out Classic Tales Podcast. He’s two-thirds of the way through and it is a fantastic rendition.

  1308. PaulJ on Mon, 17th Dec 2007 1:56 pm
  1309. I heard this when it broadcast on Radio 4 a couple of months go. Excellent stuff, well worth listening to more than once. The casting of Harry Enfield as Dirk Gently was a master-stroke.

  1310. Jesse Willis on Mon, 17th Dec 2007 4:10 pm
  1311. I’ve added it to the list thanks Julie!

  1312. Brad Bowman on Tue, 18th Dec 2007 12:00 pm
  1313. I listened to the first two episodes using the Radio 4 listen again feature, capturing and re-encoding the tracks to mp3 format so I could listen to them on my iPod. Unfortunately, I then missed the rest of the show and was wondering when they would be available for sale. Unfortunately, the BBC online shop won’t ship to the US. Any idea when and where it will be distributed to the states?

  1314. Brad Bowman on Tue, 18th Dec 2007 12:02 pm
  1315. Also, thanks for upgrading the blog engine here and especially for changing the commenting feature so I no longer need jump through a bunch of hoops to post.

  1316. Laura on Tue, 18th Dec 2007 12:08 pm
  1317. Yes I heard it on Radio 4 as well – I guess they’ll be repeating it again sometime as well.

    Brad (and other US listeners) it’s available from Amazon.co.uk as well and they ship to the US. Hopefully it’ll make its way to an American distributor at some point as well.

  1318. Brad Bowman on Tue, 18th Dec 2007 1:55 pm
  1319. Good news. Thanks, Laura.

    [...] >> Listen the book << [...]

    [...] a Conan adventure also featuring a wily she-pirate named Valeria and is one of the titles from the Second Annual SFFaudio Challenge. Mark has already released the 4 of the 7 chapters of this novella. Red Nails first appeared in [...]

  1320. Gregg Taylor on Thu, 20th Dec 2007 12:26 pm
  1321. …Wait a sec… they’re actually including a re-run that people who have jobs can listen to? Shazam! Now if they’d just figure out that a schedule needs not merely days and times, but start dates, we might actually have something here…

  1322. Jesse Willis on Thu, 20th Dec 2007 2:36 pm
  1323. Matt Watts on his blog, a hile back mentioned that they’d start the re-runs in January. Now official word since then on the start date or the chance of a podcast release yet either.

  1324. Trader’s Diary » Happy Hollandaise on Fri, 21st Dec 2007 11:14 am
  1325. [...] Time Crime by H. Beam Piper. As part of the SFFAudio.com 2nd Audio Challenge, I’ll be lending voice to a classic sci fi author. Look for this to wrap by the end of [...]

  1326. Fred Karasek - kf6hqc on Sun, 23rd Dec 2007 9:31 am
  1327. I Totally love this novelette, I wish there were more. Sam Mowry does the most excellent job of reading this story. I felt like I was there.Good show old boy what.
    Treat yourself to this tasty story and be ready to laugh.

  1328. Mike on Sun, 23rd Dec 2007 5:23 pm
  1329. Great song. Very catchy.

  1330. solak on Wed, 26th Dec 2007 1:58 am
  1331. It is available on audible.com. You can make it your free sample if you use the URL http://audible.com/maccast

    [...] Also, I wrote a review of the audiobook back in 2004. Check it out HERE. [...]

    [...] P.S. Free Apocalypse Al! [...]

  1332. SFFaudio » Blog Archive » BBC 7 has Blake's 7 on Thu, 27th Dec 2007 3:23 pm
  1333. [...] broadcasting the Sci-Fi Channel UK’s audio drama series of Blake’s 7! This was the show we told you about back in May, written by Doctor Who writer Ben Aaronovitch this series is morally complex, deeply noir, and [...]

  1334. Evo Terra on Fri, 28th Dec 2007 11:34 am
  1335. You’ll not be disappointed in Nathan’s books, Jesse.

    There were quite a few titles which we didn’t make this list due to our criteria. I’m thinking about going through everything and making an “editor’s choice” list where I ignore size of audiene. That’ll help some of the books that came to us late in 2007.

    E.

  1336. Josh on Fri, 28th Dec 2007 1:06 pm
  1337. Quarter, Half and Full Share are excellent, although I could’ve done without the erotica.
    Billibub Baddings is super with a lovely atmosphere.
    Shadow Falls was oddly confusing, just the sort of thing I love.

    The Arwen, Badge Of Infamy, Eastern Standard Tribe, The Failed Cities Monologues, How to Disappear Completely and The Immortals I haven’t checked out.

    The rest I gave a try, however they didn’t appeal to me for one reason or another.

  1338. katherineE on Fri, 28th Dec 2007 5:03 pm
  1339. Crescent gets my vote for my number one favorite of 2007. It’s a unique and challenging story in a dark and brilliantly realized world. Think Stephen King meets Firefly, toss in some Bladerunner and Alien (Ridley Scoot w00t!) for good measure. Very, very dark and enjoyable. Billi Baddings was great–just a lot of good fun–as was the Failed Cities Monologues (not fun like Baddings). I hope at least these three make it on the “editor’s choice” as mentioned by Evo. And One Among the Sleepless should get an honorary mention :)

    And hats off to Podiobooks.com. The quality of work seems to get better all the time!

  1340. Milo on Fri, 28th Dec 2007 6:28 pm
  1341. Nathan Lowell is an excellent author, narrator, and audio editor. If you like the trilogy above, also check out his podiobook South Coast. How to Disappear Completely is also excellent.

    I’m puzzled as to why Singularity didn’t make the top ten. I think you reviewed it here, and it is certainly a great book.

  1342. Mike C. on Sat, 29th Dec 2007 10:15 am
  1343. What a cool song! Thanks!

  1344. Nathan Lowell on Mon, 31st Dec 2007 1:08 pm
  1345. Wow. I thought my ears were burning.

    Thanks for all the nice comments about the books!

    2007 was a heck of a ride and I’m looking foward to 2008.

    [...] the inception of the SFFaudio in 2003, and especially since the SFFaudio Challenge back in 2006, there have been many queries directed my way about copyright. I’ve had no [...]

  1346. Brad Bowman on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 9:21 am
  1347. How are the episodes (he asks as he primes his stream ripping apparatus)? It looks like Radio One has a 6 minute spot set aside for it, although they mark it as “TBA” which conforms to your earlier link to a post about the lack of actual publicity for the show.

  1348. Brad Bowman on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 11:21 am
  1349. Hmmm, I seemed to have missed it…again. Did it actually play? Perhaps Friday.

  1350. Jerry Stearns on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 11:51 am
  1351. The reviewer of Dune for AudioFile is Brian Price, my partner in the Great Northern Audio Theatre. I’d recognize that voice anywhere. He’s been writing reviews for AudioFile for some time, and last year began doing audio reviews for them.

  1352. Jesse Willis on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 12:44 pm
  1353. Its on at 11:00 PM today not 11 AM. Its playing in Afganada’s slot. Although based on the CBC Radio One hotsheet it sez its playing at 11 am:

    http://www.cbc.ca/radioshows/HOTSHEET/20080102.shtml

    ” 10. CANADIA 2056: ***also heard Friday at 11:30 (noon NT) on CBC Radio One***

    Head back into outer space today as Canadia 2056 returns. It’s the weird and wacky comedy drama starring Matt Watts from Steve the First and Steve the Second. It is the year 2056. The United States has launched an armada to destroy an alien threat. Canada sends the nation’s only publicly-funded spacecraft, The Canadia – a ship with a single purpose. Flush. To plunge the Americans’ toilets. Travel with them! Canadia 2056, this morning at 11:30 (noon NT) on CBC Radio One. “

  1354. Jesse Willis on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 12:47 pm
  1355. Thanks Jerry. I’ve updated the post. :)

  1356. Phil Rossi on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 1:08 pm
  1357. My ears were burning, too!

    Thanks!

  1358. Brad Bowman on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 1:08 pm
  1359. Ah-hah! It was just my inability to read the post that was getting in the way. Thanks, Jesse.

  1360. Brad Bowman on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 3:15 pm
  1361. You’re so going to be in the Elite Cadets now… (pardon me for commenting so much today).

  1362. Jesse Willis on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 4:24 pm
  1363. Comments are 100% welcome, never hesitate to post.

  1364. Gregg Taylor on Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 7:14 pm
  1365. And let us all say a prayer of thanks that we’re finally getting to hear the show outside of working hours… and just kind of ignore the fact that our tax dollars paid for someone to write the phrase “weird and wacky comedy drama”. It’s a very enjoyable series that just gets better throughout season 1.

  1366. Paul Harrison on Fri, 4th Jan 2008 4:39 pm
  1367. I remember the series well. Like so much heard on CBC at the time, it was unique and original. Do let me know if there are further developments.

    [...] And here’s a link back to our hastily assembled time shifting guide for U.S. listeners. [...]

  1368. Gregg Taylor on Mon, 7th Jan 2008 7:16 pm
  1369. Oh man… it must have taken them seconds to find that completely unrelated image of the space shuttle, which does not appear in Canadia 2056, docking with the international space station, which will be even more a piece of useless space junk by 2056 than it is now. C’mon CBC old girl… these guys are making you a damn fine show here – could you maybe, y’know… Try a little harder? Or even just some?

    *ahem* Sorry… that just kind of slipped out.

    Oh, and Free Apocalypse Al!

  1370. Jesse Willis on Tue, 8th Jan 2008 10:17 pm
  1371. The budget must have been blown on the advertizing for the CBC TV schedule shows like The Border, JPod and such.

    [...] had a post a few days ago about the Barnes & Noble Media original interviews. Here are the direct links to [...]

  1372. Jesse Willis on Fri, 11th Jan 2008 9:39 pm
  1373. You’re a star Charles!

  1374. Fred on Sun, 13th Jan 2008 4:41 pm
  1375. Hey, thanks for the great coverage! I know you’ve covered some other things in the past, and SFF lovers ought not to be disappointed with my programming. Check out past work by “Dry Smoke and Whispers” for serious sci-fi and my own “Fall of the Hero” for a twist on the classic fantasy hero story.

    Gregg’s “Salmon of Blackpool” is more gritty realistic drama, but as you say above, it’s well worth hearing even by fans of other genres. Still, if it’s SF you’re dying to hear, I’ve also featured his “The Last Harbinger,” which is a biting sci-fi satire that again, showcases something different that can be done with this art form.

    Thanks again, and keep on listening!

    Fred
    Writer/Director/Producer
    http://www.radiodramarevival.com
    http://www.finalrune.com

  1376. random on Sun, 13th Jan 2008 7:34 pm
  1377. Parts 2 and 3 give me an “access denied” page.

  1378. Jesse Willis on Mon, 14th Jan 2008 2:22 am
  1379. I’ve fixed the links and the files appear to be working now. I think the ARTC podcast server may have had a shuffle recently.

  1380. Jesse Willis on Mon, 14th Jan 2008 2:24 am
  1381. Keep up the great work Fred!

  1382. Ash on Mon, 14th Jan 2008 8:26 am
  1383. Great production.
    Thank you for this.
    An inspiration for me.

  1384. Monte on Tue, 15th Jan 2008 11:12 pm
  1385. The link for Part 3 appears to be broken.

  1386. Jesse Willis on Tue, 15th Jan 2008 11:24 pm
  1387. Thanks Monte, I think I’ve got that link fixed now. :)

  1388. Lost Carcosa » Lovecraft at SFFAudio on Wed, 16th Jan 2008 9:11 am
  1389. [...] First, they have a reading of Despair, and another of “Herbert West: Reanimator”, both read by Marlo Dianne. You can find both here. [...]

    [...] podcast her first public domain SF novel. Since then she’s narrated an impressive collection: The Lani People by J.F. Bone, The Devolutionist by Homer Eon Flint, Star Hunter by Andre Norton, Little Fuzzy by H. Beam Piper [...]

    [...] F. Smith, the narrator behind The First Men in the Moon, Greylorn, Tarzan Of The [...]

    [...] Conan By Robert E. Howard; Read by Mark Kalita |GET IT HERE| Claimed: November 20th 2007 Completed: January 6th 2008 “Red Nails, a tale featuring the legendary Conan the Barbarian, was written by Robert E. [...]

  1390. Scott Sigler on Sat, 19th Jan 2008 12:24 pm
  1391. Subscribed! Will check it out soon.

  1392. Gary Farber on Sat, 19th Jan 2008 3:20 pm
  1393. Olmsted. Not “Olmstead.”

    The list of links is here; an account of Andy’s funeral the day before yesterday. Comments about Andy here.

  1394. Jesse Willis on Sun, 20th Jan 2008 12:49 pm
  1395. Fixed. :)

    [...] argue that. I’d argue that instead it is one of the greatest novels of all time. The very first review on SFFaudio was an out of print audiobook from Books On Tape. I bought it on eBay in 2003, I haven’t seen [...]

  1396. Brad Bowman on Mon, 21st Jan 2008 7:23 am
  1397. Yeah, I really do need to update that thing. A lot more work has been done on it that isn’t detailed in the blog, but then the project got stalled by getting a job and having a kid.

  1398. David Accampo on Mon, 21st Jan 2008 4:59 pm
  1399. Jesse–

    Thanks for the kind words! We’ve been getting a great response to the season finale, so I’m glad to count you among those who liked how we wrapped up the season!

    And Brad, fear not! Wormwood Season 2 is being written as I type this!

    [...] A mention of our Season Finale from the fine folks as SFF Audio.com. [...]

  1400. jparris on Tue, 22nd Jan 2008 6:29 pm
  1401. I’d also like to see a copy of peter watts excellant book blindsight done justice http://www.rifters.com/real/shorts/PeterWatts_Blindsight.pdf

  1402. Jesse Willis on Wed, 23rd Jan 2008 1:28 am
  1403. Jparris, that’s a very interesting suggestion. It appears the novel is creative commons! Which means someone could make a non-commercial audiobook of it. COOL!

    [...] Carlson, he of Radio Tales Of The Strange & Fantastic, has written in to remind us of The Twilight Zone radio dramas over on the Twilight Zone Radio [...]

  1404. KMO on Sun, 27th Jan 2008 6:34 pm
  1405. I would like to see a book by Octavia E. Buttler added to the list. I’m working my way through this series now. I’m listening to the last class discussion on the Foundation Trilogy now. Can’t wait for the discussion of Darwin’s Radio.

  1406. Julie D. on Tue, 29th Jan 2008 1:34 pm
  1407. O’ audiobook, you of your flowing tears, you make me covetous…

    Indeed, I couldn’t have said it better myself…all those hours of melodious storytelling beyond my grasp. :-D

  1408. darusha on Tue, 29th Jan 2008 10:12 pm
  1409. Wow, what great company to be in!

    Just to clear up the question marks on the entry for Beautiful Red, I’m the author and I read the novel in the podcast version. Also, the podcast is, indeed, the unabridged text.

  1410. Jesse Willis on Tue, 29th Jan 2008 10:48 pm
  1411. Revised!

    [...] KING KONG $5.00 – 5 CDs By Edgar Wallace and Merian C. Cooper. Novelization by Delos W. Lovelace; Read by Stefan Rudnicki |READ OUR REVIEW| [...]

  1412. Scott on Sat, 2nd Feb 2008 9:56 pm
  1413. Great titles! King Kong is worth that just to listen to the last CD, which contains commentary by several different people (like Harlan Ellison and Orson Scott Card) about King Kong the movie(s).

    [...] Red got a nice mention on SFFaudio recently.  If you like SF and you like audio fiction, do yourself a favour and [...]

  1414. Time Traveler on Tue, 5th Feb 2008 8:16 am
  1415. It’s nice to be on vacation and doing a fast update of email and the blogosphere find such a nice review :)

  1416. Beautiful Red » Blog Archive » SFFaudio on Tue, 5th Feb 2008 6:38 pm
  1417. [...] Red got a nice mention on SFFaudio [...]

  1418. AHS on Thu, 7th Feb 2008 6:34 am
  1419. Hi! The first file doesn’t seem to be downloadable. Thanks!

  1420. Jesse Willis on Thu, 7th Feb 2008 12:38 pm
  1421. AHS, there’s something tricky about that first Heinlein file, I think I’ve got it fixed now.

  1422. Tars Tarkas on Thu, 7th Feb 2008 2:18 pm
  1423. There are far more than 2 races on Mars! While the first novel is chiefly concerned with the Red and Green races, we learn of the Yellow, Black, White (of several different varieties) and other races which sprang from the original Tree of Life.

  1424. Jack Yan on Thu, 7th Feb 2008 10:56 pm
  1425. Thank you for the link, Charles. I am not a regular sci-fi fan so I wouldn’t have known about this if your page hadn’t come up in Google.

  1426. AHS on Fri, 8th Feb 2008 11:18 am
  1427. Yes, it’s working for me now. Thanks so much!

    [...] Hollywood screenwriter and his self-destructive subject. It is a magical achievement – on par with Infidel. The artistry and artists that created Salmon worked together to conjure what can only be described [...]

  1428. Brad Bowman on Fri, 8th Feb 2008 12:43 pm
  1429. This has to be one of the finest audio drama productions I’ve ever heard. The acting couldn’t have been better. It was just fantastic.

  1430. Talking Website on Fri, 8th Feb 2008 10:08 pm
  1431. Great stuff. Thanks for the post.

  1432. PaulJ on Sat, 9th Feb 2008 1:14 pm
  1433. “Subscribe to the podcast via this feed:

    http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheDrabblecast

    This points to The Sci Phi Show…

  1434. Fred on Sat, 9th Feb 2008 2:25 pm
  1435. Jesse… Wow, thanks for the sensational review! Glad to hear that “Salmon of Blackpool” is finding its worthy audience… I was completely floored the first time I heard it even after having been impressed by all of Gregg’s earlier work. “Salmon” is drama of the type that you just wished was being produced more often in audio, the kind of stuff that would bring audio back to the masses if it only got further out there!

    At least, for those of us who enjoy GOOD stories.

    Definitely check out the interview this week to hear about the fun back-story from Roger himself, as well as some (rather bleak) commentary on the state of audio drama in general today:

    http://www.radiodramarevival.com/episode-56-more-words-from-roger-gregg/

    Thanks again!
    Fred

  1436. Charles on Sat, 9th Feb 2008 5:51 pm
  1437. Sorry about that. It’s fixed now.

  1438. Jesse Willis on Sat, 9th Feb 2008 6:34 pm
  1439. Just listened! It was terrific, depressing, but terrific. :)

    We should get a campaign going to get RTE to do more Crazy Dog.

  1440. Yuri Rasovsky on Mon, 11th Feb 2008 12:10 pm
  1441. I agree with youy assessment of “I Am Legend and Other Stories,” except I think my reading of the short stories is not all that good.

  1442. Christiana Ellis on Mon, 11th Feb 2008 9:00 pm
  1443. Hey, it was an honor for the show too! We were glad to have you!

  1444. Misque Writer on Tue, 19th Feb 2008 4:23 pm
  1445. “I capitalize the Science Fiction the way many folks capitalize the “H” in “Him” when referring to God.”

    Okay, that is the funniest reason I have heard for capitalizing SF! I usually don’t capitalize it because I worry people will mistakenly think I am describing my affection for the city of San Francisco.

  1446. Scott on Wed, 20th Feb 2008 9:25 am
  1447. I want to add my BRAVO! here, too. Really, really excellent! Can’t wait for more Crazy Dog.

  1448. Time Traveler on Wed, 20th Feb 2008 2:22 pm
  1449. hahaha – Yeah, right – time travel doesn’t exist.

  1450. Joe Remy on Thu, 21st Feb 2008 8:18 am
  1451. I can add further confirmation that the HPLHS’ “At the Mountains of Madness” is an excellent purchase. The included “notes and clippings” are great, and the audio drama is superb.

  1452. Allen on Thu, 21st Feb 2008 2:05 pm
  1453. Nice to hear something else with the infamous David Ault from DarkerProjects.com!

  1454. Time Traveler on Thu, 21st Feb 2008 3:41 pm
  1455. Here’s ten I’d love to see. Hmmm, maybe Wonder Audio could publish them (like I haven’t thought of that before).

    1. The Space Merchants by Fred Pohl and C.M. Kornbluth
    2. The Book of Skulls by Robert Silverberg.
    3. Starship by Brian Aldiss
    4. Hothouse by Brian Aldiss
    5. The Demolished Man by Alfred Bester (would have to go beyond traditional audiobook narration on the Bester novels due to the strange typography.)
    6. Man Plus by Fred Pohl
    7. The End of Eternity by Isaac Asimov
    8. Darker Than You Think by Jack Williamson
    9. Lyonese Trilogy by Jack Vance (okay, it’s three books, so sue me)
    10. Dying Inside by Robert Silverberg

  1456. Jesse Willis on Thu, 21st Feb 2008 3:49 pm
  1457. Space Merchants!

    Terrific list TT!

    Demolished Man was released UNABRIDGED at one point. It may be out of print now.

  1458. Tim R. Mortiss on Fri, 22nd Feb 2008 4:04 am
  1459. Audiobooks of the Lyonesse trilogy do exist, although they may be difficult-to-impossible to find and purchase. I tried, and I failed!

  1460. Nabby on Fri, 22nd Feb 2008 1:17 pm
  1461. Excellent choices, Jesse. The Star My Destination. Yes. Stand on Zanzibar. Yes. SF gets no better than this.

    I believe Mote in God’s Eye, another absolute all-time classic, was released as an unabridged reading but I can’t provide any info on that.

    How about:

    The Dragon Masters, and the Star King novels, by Jack Vance
    The City and the Stars by Arthur C. Clarke
    A Voyage to Arcturus by David Lindsay
    Dragon’s Egg by Robert Forward
    Colossus, and The Fall of Colossus, by Dennis Jones
    Tau Zero by Poul Anderson
    World of Ptaavs by Larry Niven
    The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Le Guin
    A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle
    More Than Human by Theodore Sturgeon

    Btw, if any of these HAVE been done, I’d love to hear about it!

  1462. Nabby on Fri, 22nd Feb 2008 1:28 pm
  1463. I’m reading that the BBC did produce a radioplay version of Bester’s The Stars My Destination, called Tiger! Tiger! (the novel was also, at one time, published under this name). Man, I’d like to hear that. Gully Foyle’s got to be an interesting fellow for an actor to play. ; )

  1464. Jesse Willis on Fri, 22nd Feb 2008 3:22 pm
  1465. Nabby,

    The City and the Stars by Arthur C. Clarke

    was released by a company called Landmark audiobooks. I bought a cassette copy on ebay years ago. It is a treasure.

    Colossus, and The Fall of Colossus, by Dennis Jones

    Great idea! Love the movie.

    World of Ptaavs by Larry Niven

    Another one I’d kill for.

    The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Le Guin

    Has been released by Blackstone Audiobooks. :)

    A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle

    Has too, I think it was Listening Library

    Great list.

  1466. Tim R. Mortiss on Sat, 23rd Feb 2008 2:36 am
  1467. An audiobook of David R Bunch’s “Moderan” would be an interesting experiment.

    I also would like some story by R. A. Lafferty to be adapted. Or maybe one of his novels, like “The Devil is Dead”.

  1468. Nabby on Sun, 24th Feb 2008 9:12 pm
  1469. Cool Jesse. Thanks a bunch for the update.

  1470. Frank Davis on Mon, 25th Feb 2008 8:46 am
  1471. The picture for The Sagan Diary is missing. Can this be fixed, for the page. http://www.sffaudio.com/?p=917
    Frank

  1472. Jesse Willis on Mon, 25th Feb 2008 11:13 am
  1473. Fixed. :)

  1474. sam on Mon, 25th Feb 2008 4:29 pm
  1475. i just saw that TOS episode and was like “that has got to be a Q, or at least where they got the idea.” i feel so special now.
    PS. i am one of those fans who is looking forward to the new movie. it is the reason i DVRed my first episode of star trek. but i guess ya just can’t please some people. >.

    [...] back and get Volume #001 and Volume #002 [...]

    [...] back and get Volume #001 and Volume #002 [...]

  1476. SeaGull on Tue, 26th Feb 2008 4:16 pm
  1477. All these links are dead, unfortunately. Anyone have good links?

  1478. Jesse Willis on Tue, 26th Feb 2008 5:23 pm
  1479. Tony Smith, the host of StarShipSofa, has deliberately removed all the files from his server. :(

    He sez they will be available for purchase soon.

  1480. SeaGull on Wed, 27th Feb 2008 12:08 pm
  1481. …and available through torrent the day after…

    [...] is one of Crazy Dog Audio Theatre’s odder ventures. It has been released on CD, and was broadcast on RTÉ (Radio Ireland) in 2006. One part of Audio Gothic is entitled Marsyas: The Hippest Satyr. [...]

  1482. Jim Deneen on Sat, 1st Mar 2008 5:34 am
  1483. My 2 cents on the HPLHS “At the Mountains of Madness”. It is a excellent audio drama disk. Well worth it and I highly recommend it for all Lovecraft fans. Very well acted and produced.
    They are also releasing the “Dunwich Horror” very soon on CD. Im glad to see these stories brought to some form of media after all the horribly made modernized movies based on Lovecrafts work. I also look for to the “The lurker in the Darkness” which is done like the HPLHS movie “Call of Cthulhu” except it is a B/W talkie.

  1484. Marc on Sat, 1st Mar 2008 2:53 pm
  1485. I got this record not long after discovering Conan in Marvel Comics in the summer of 1975. I remember when listing to it how deeply and thoughly I felt like I was magically being whisked away to the time of the Hyborian Age. To witness the deeds of that age’s greatest Hero. Ah to be fifteen again. Unfornutely several years later when I joined the Navy my Fundy X-tian Mother threw away or burned,the record, as well as about at the time, $500.00 worth Conan and REH related Books, Comics, Portfolios, fanizines etc. That I had collected using my own hard earned $. I think if I still had everything that I had aquired then. It would be valued well over $20,000 in todays market.
    I would sure like to get my hands on a copy of it, in any form, to beable to lesson to it again.

  1486. Hakan on Sun, 2nd Mar 2008 1:49 am
  1487. I had listened to this way back and it is a very good adaptation. Having read the book, watched the movie, I still very much liked this version.

  1488. Hakan on Sun, 2nd Mar 2008 1:55 am
  1489. It should work – BBC has a fine history of adapting books to audio. The BBC adaptation of Anansi Boys was very good, with Lenny Henry doing a very good job of playing a serious character, him being a great comedian.

    I still think the two best stories out of that book were A Gift From the Culture and Descendant, State of the Art coming the third.

  1490. Mike on Sun, 2nd Mar 2008 4:05 pm
  1491. Marc, and Jesse, and anyone else who would like to hear this again, I have posted mp3 versions of both sides here:

    http://www.mediafire.com/?n2nomu2bged

    http://www.mediafire.com/?jai4mdrmtlg

    I, too bought this when it first came out, and still have it!!

    Enjoy,
    Mike

  1492. Scott D on Mon, 3rd Mar 2008 11:03 am
  1493. Woo hoo! That’s fantastic news. Bravo, Matt Watts!

  1494. Jane GC on Tue, 4th Mar 2008 7:07 am
  1495. One of the very best adapted books on radio. It scares me more than the book!

    [...] up from last Sunday’s Ordeal In Space, BBC Radio 7 and The 7th Dimension are airing their recording of The Green Hills Of Earth. This is [...]

  1496. ACertainMrDoe on Sat, 8th Mar 2008 6:59 am
  1497. Is it possible that for parts 5, 6 and 7 the links are corrupt?

    [...] informs me that he has completed his challenge title! This is the third completed title in our Second Annual SFFaudio Challenge. All 7 of the 7 chapters of this novella are available for download COMPLETE and UNABRIDGED! [...]

  1498. Jesse Willis on Sat, 8th Mar 2008 11:08 am
  1499. Hmmm, try the links now Mr. Doe!

    [...] MP3, około 20 minut; StarShip Sofa podcasts By The Falls by Harry Harrison [...]

  1500. Jesse Willis on Sun, 9th Mar 2008 10:10 pm
  1501. Hey World Fantasy Convention 2008 is being held in Calgary! That’s close to me. Who’s going?

  1502. Charles on Sun, 9th Mar 2008 11:51 pm
  1503. If you’re willing to pay for my ticket…

  1504. Jesse Willis on Mon, 10th Mar 2008 12:43 am
  1505. Well, if I go I would probably drive. So if you can make it to Vancouver I can get you the rest of the way!

  1506. SFFaudio » Blog Archive » UPDATED Author Pages on Mon, 10th Mar 2008 4:09 pm
  1507. [...] the H.P. LOVECRAFT page we’ve added the links to more than THIRTY online audiobooks, novellas, short stories and [...]

  1508. Jay King on Mon, 10th Mar 2008 10:47 pm
  1509. Thanks for the plug, Jesse.

    At the same site, folks can also check out ten short short stories from News From the Edge, written and read by my brother, Carter Willet (name derived from two Lovecraft characters) and embellished with sound by me. They take place on an intergalactic transport terminal not far from the planet Trixxid.

    And my peoplecritters live at http://hiddenmissives.blogspot.com.

  1510. SFFaudio » Blog Archive » UPDATED Author Pages on Tue, 11th Mar 2008 12:27 am
  1511. [...] ANDRE NORTON’s page includes several full length novels and a few short stories. [...]

    [...] With a mere six podcasts completed Dial P For Pulp has already proven itself as a reliable source for great pulpy fiction. The host, David Drage, talks about pulp magazines, pulp authors, pulp books, the pulp era and games inspired by pulp. Older shows include stories by H. Rider Haggard and Robert E. Howard, but it is the most recent show, another Howard tale, that interests us the most. It’s a short story taken for the Second Annual SFFaudio Challlenge! [...]

  1512. Judy on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 3:03 am
  1513. What is the status of the A. E. Van Vogt books? Public domain or not? They are even hard to find in libraries…

  1514. Judy on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 3:26 am
  1515. Heinlein, The Star Beast

    A. E. Van Vogt The Null-A novels; Mind Cage;

  1516. Des Griffin on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 7:13 am
  1517. This reading is magical! Why cannot it be available on a CD? Zappa’s interpretation is truly stupendous!

  1518. Tim Bennett on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 9:30 am
  1519. Isn’t there an eight episode called This Trick’ll Kill You?

    I love the TV show and these radio programmes. It’s a shame they made so few (there are only eight aren’t there?).

    Island of death is the best I think and is a great take of The Most Dangerous Game.

  1520. Jesse Willis on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 11:15 am
  1521. Ya, the only released seven of the eight episodes made. I think “This Trick’ll Kill You” is the correct title.

  1522. Jesse Willis on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 11:17 am
  1523. You can always record it for future listening. I use a browser plugin called “FREECORDER” you can get that here:

    http://www.freecorder.com

  1524. Jesse Willis on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 11:22 am
  1525. Judy,

    Lots of Heinlein novels are available from Blackstone audio and Full Cast Audio. And in Fact, Star Beast is available here:

    http://www.fullcastaudio.com/tek9.asp?pg=products&specific=jocncne0

    The Null-A series are not yet adapted to audio. They’d certainly be welcome to a lot of people.

  1526. Jesse Willis on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 11:27 am
  1527. They are hard to find. I don’t know of any PD Van Vogt, but Slan was released recently as an unabridged audiobook…

    http://www.sffaudio.com/?p=1282

    and there was an audio drama version done in the 1990s.

  1528. Scott D on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 1:13 pm
  1529. I’ve listened to two of these so far – “Terminal” by Chaz Brenchley and “The Merchant and the Alchemist’s Gate” by one of my favorite all-time writers, Ted Chiang.

    They were both terrific stories, and they were both well-narrated. Kudos to Tony and his StarShipSofa!

  1530. Time Traveler on Fri, 14th Mar 2008 5:36 pm
  1531. Way to go, Scott!

    [...] Equally as exciting is the follow up to John Scalzi’s SFFaudio essentially designated Old Man’s War… [...]

    [...] P.S. Free Apocalypse Al! [...]

    [...] P.S. Free Apocalypse Al! [...]

    [...] a lot of great questions, I explained about how SFFaudio got started, the SFFaudio Challenges (1 and 2) and my love of audiobooks and audio drama. We also chatted extensively about the state of [...]

    [...] lot of great questions, I explained about how SFFaudio got started, the SFFaudio Challenges (1 and 2) and my love of audiobooks and audio drama. We also chatted extensively about the state of the [...]

  1532. Kenneth Kim on Wed, 19th Mar 2008 8:31 pm
  1533. U R A SMART GUY.
    FEEL BETTER NOW JESS? :)
    HARRY POTTER IS THE GREATEST BOOK THAT I HAVE EVER READ IN MAI ENTIRE LIFE! U DON DARE TO SAY IT IS ONLY GOOD FOR KIDS!
    I WILL PROVIDE IT TO U SOON!

  1534. Scott D on Wed, 19th Mar 2008 9:23 pm
  1535. Great interview, Jesse!
    And I stand by my love of the Potter books, mister. :)

  1536. Dogberry on Thu, 20th Mar 2008 12:50 pm
  1537. Looks like fun. Do you know if they have anyway to listen to this other than ‘real time’? Thanks!

  1538. Jesse Willis on Thu, 20th Mar 2008 12:58 pm
  1539. Not really, which is why we bitch so much about there being no podcast for the show. Other than tuning into one of the five time zones it is broadcast in, (or listening during the re-airing – it airs twice, once in the morning and once in the evening during the week) – the only way to listen would be to record it during the broadcast and then listen to it at another time. I normally use FREECORDER, to record it using my web-browser but I somehow missed it the first episode – luckily a friend of mine got it using AUDACITY.

  1540. Paul on Thu, 20th Mar 2008 3:21 pm
  1541. Jesse, can you find out if that can system is cheaper than Skype?
    Got to save my pennies where I can. Also, I have been doing it all wrong! All you have to do is think up stuff to say! lol wow, no more research for this boy.

    Paul
    Beam Me Up

  1542. Time Traveler on Thu, 20th Mar 2008 5:00 pm
  1543. Okay Jesse. You’re a great talker as you are a writer. So go buy a good USB Mic and start your own podcast. Really, you could be a podcast star :-)

    And yes the Harry Potter books are good. But then again, there’s a lot of great stuff out there that you can listen to that’s just as good and better.

  1544. Jesse Willis on Thu, 20th Mar 2008 10:52 pm
  1545. :D

  1546. Jesse Willis on Thu, 20th Mar 2008 10:54 pm
  1547. USB mics are expensive I hear. And, I don’t think I could have a podcast of my own because my opinions and ideas can only exist in opposition to someone else’s. ;)

  1548. Noreen on Fri, 21st Mar 2008 10:49 am
  1549. Yes, Way to go!! I am sooo proud of you!! Mom

  1550. Lord of the rings audio books on Sat, 22nd Mar 2008 11:32 pm
  1551. Audio books are here to stay . I am in love with them . Not only its interesting to hear voices , you can enjoy them while moving. I hear audio books all the time in my car . One of my friend is so crazy about audio books . He takes long routes to get back to his home . You can find some cheaper audio book library online .

  1552. Chris Rogers on Sun, 23rd Mar 2008 1:45 am
  1553. Conrad is by far my favouite English-language writer, and I have listened to many of his works as audiobooks. This is certainly one of the better renditions. Some of the readings are in Upper Class English accent that do not work at all with Conrad. Listening to William Zappa I am with Marlowe on deck of the boat in the Thames Estuary. I am with him on the steamer on the river. My only quibble is that this is an abridgement, which to me is an amputation of another great book. The 3 CD set is available through ABC shops for $30 – $35 Au. I think that it is good value.

  1554. Charles on Sun, 23rd Mar 2008 10:13 am
  1555. Just got around to listening to the podcast. Great interview. Ditto with the Time Traveler. What you need is a co-host to bounce off ideas! =P

  1556. Jesse Willis on Sun, 23rd Mar 2008 10:53 am
  1557. Thanks Charles. I’ve just finished recording another “Hey Want To Watch A Movie” (Blade Runner -The Final Cut) – lot’s of discussion there, including talk about the different versions of the Dune audiobooks.

  1558. Jesse Willis on Sun, 23rd Mar 2008 10:55 am
  1559. It’s abridged? Aww, that sucks.

  1560. Rick Roberts on Mon, 24th Mar 2008 9:43 am
  1561. When you click on the mp3 link it takes you to the Escape Pod download.

  1562. Jesse Willis on Mon, 24th Mar 2008 11:14 am
  1563. It looks like somebody fixed the link, its working now.

    [...] 15 – Juno, Kind Of Posted March 25, 2008 In which Gareth Higgins and Jett Loe discuss Arthur C. Clarke, Ivan Dixon, Paul Scofield, Cachao” Lopez, Anthony Minghella, Red Planet, Martian Chronicles, [...]

  1564. Maureen on Tue, 25th Mar 2008 11:19 am
  1565. Um… there is no original ST episode named “Wink of an Eye”. Not in American syndication, anyway.

  1566. Jesse Willis on Tue, 25th Mar 2008 7:54 pm
  1567. Check it out here, it may jog your memory….

    http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Wink_of_an_Eye

    [...] P.S. Free Apocalypse Al! [...]

    [...] Another in S.M. Stirling’s alternate planet series (a parallel world first introduced in The Sky People), have a listen to the Dragon Page interview/chat with Stirling |MP3|, it too sounds like a cool book, The Sky People earned an SFFaudio Essential designation… [...]

    [...] Tomb By H.P. Lovecraft; Read by Ryan McCluskey 1 Part – [UNABRIDGED?] Broadcaster: BBC Radio 7 / The 7th Dimension [...]

    [...] and came up with 28 separate entries.  Mark’s name first popped up as the first winner in SFFaudio’s Challenge to make an audiobook.  Since then he’s done numerous stories and novels for LibriVox; and [...]

    [...] The Terminal Experiment By Robert J. Sawyer [READ OUR REVIEW] [...]

    [...] Timescape By Gregory Benford [READ OUR REVIEW] [...]

    [...] the folks at The Texas Radio Theatre Company. And that got them all fired up over the idea of the 2nd Annual SFFaudio Challenge – and so they’ve staked a claim for [...]

  1568. Maureen on Mon, 31st Mar 2008 4:16 pm
  1569. Oh, I can’t wait to hear this!

  1570. Jesse Willis on Mon, 31st Mar 2008 4:21 pm
  1571. Ya it should be awesome. :D

  1572. The Time Traveler on Mon, 31st Mar 2008 5:20 pm
  1573. Yup! That sounds cooler than cattle mooin’ on American Idol. [sorry about that]. That Fantastic Universe cover is by Virgil Finlay. Finlay was the best interior SF illustrator. Not one of the best, but THE BEST. Some of his covers are classic, while most don’t measure up to his interior art. This one I have to say is one of his better covers. Not classic, but durn good!

  1574. Rich on Mon, 31st Mar 2008 5:22 pm
  1575. By they way, Reg also is working on the NEW Schlock Audio projects too.

    I’m not sure when he’ll get started, but it should be pretty soon after he’s through with a play he’s in… (I’m working with him in a stage production of MARVIN’S ROOM – at the Contemporary Theatre of Dallas)

    [...] P.P.S. Is it just me or does Deck Rhynamo sound exactly like Decoder Ring Theatre’s Deck Gibson? [...]

  1576. jacey on Tue, 1st Apr 2008 1:38 pm
  1577. HAHAHA!!!
    I can’t believe you called me a Yoko!!
    I’m glad you listen. Your reviews are my favorite.

  1578. Rick Roberts on Tue, 1st Apr 2008 5:02 pm
  1579. Anyone have the link for ep 4? I can’t get their site to fully load today….have checked it everyday since ep 3 came out and never saw 4.

    Thanks
    Rick

  1580. Jonesy Watson on Tue, 1st Apr 2008 5:12 pm
  1581. Hey Rick. The site is updated with all the episodes today. I checked. Happy Dicking! :D

    By the way, Deck Rynamo DOES sound a lot like Deck Gibson! That is really crazy.. sounds like Decoder Ring Theatre’s got a super fan!

  1582. Gregg on Tue, 1st Apr 2008 10:38 pm
  1583. Really? I haven’t heard it yet… but could it possibly have anything or everything to do with… the Date? April 1st? Anyone? Bueler?

    Really?

  1584. Jesse Willis on Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 12:22 am
  1585. I see the two parts of Episode 4 are found here:

    http://www.dickdynamo.com/?page_id=4

  1586. Jesse Willis on Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 9:25 am
  1587. Hey Jacey …. ummm… about that Yoko Ono comment…. I ummmm … really, you know, respect Yoko’s work …. like you know… ummm … like she was totally better than The Beatles … ummm like you know … with all her performance art and stuff …ya, performance art, that’s the ticket.

    Yoko was way better than The Beatles and …. resenting her for breaking up Dick Dynamo – I mean The Beatles … is totally not what I meant. ;)

    Seriously you guys rawk!

  1588. The Time Traveler on Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 9:36 am
  1589. Way to go Scott! You sick, sick bastard :)

  1590. jacey on Wed, 2nd Apr 2008 2:08 pm
  1591. too late, Mr. Willis. I already quoted you on my myspace profile.
    Never heard of Deck Gibson, but Deck Rynamo was surely first. Jon wrote it when he was 10 years old.

  1592. Jonathan Levin on Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 6:18 pm
  1593. Would love to have the series on CD. Used to listen to it faithfully. A nice companion to “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy,” which is available via the BBC (not sure if they ship to North America). Let me know developments.

  1594. anthony on Thu, 3rd Apr 2008 9:01 pm
  1595. Jesse, Thank you very much for the post – we gravely applicate all the support we get! hope you enjoyed the show – by the way we just pod casted out our origin comic of dick dynamo if your interested in checking it out! hope to hear from you again.

    Thank you
    Anthony of dick dynamo

    [...] Lit2Go is a free online collection of stories and poems in MP3 format designed for use in Florida’s public schools (the service is funded by a grant from the Florida Department of Education). We’ve previously linked to their very serviceable reading of Frankenstein (BTW I’ve just now added a link to the NEW podcast feed for it). [...]

  1596. Seth on Fri, 4th Apr 2008 2:36 pm
  1597. Any clue if/when the book will be released on Audible.com?

  1598. Seth on Fri, 4th Apr 2008 3:23 pm
  1599. Hmm, guess I’ll have to do a Kessell Run.

    Sorry, know that joke’s probably been made a million times, couldn’t resist.

  1600. Jesse Willis on Fri, 4th Apr 2008 3:29 pm
  1601. I am betting quite soon.

    [...] ago, then StarShip Sofa recorded one, now there are a few more on the website! So, we are adding an AUTHOR FOCUS page for Kessel and here is what will be on [...]

  1602. Brad Bowman on Mon, 7th Apr 2008 8:08 am
  1603. Do you know if B7 ships to the States?

  1604. Brad Bowman on Mon, 7th Apr 2008 8:10 am
  1605. It’s good to be reminded of this podcast from time to time. Thanks.

  1606. Jesse Willis on Mon, 7th Apr 2008 1:24 pm
  1607. Yes they do! Shipping is free within the U.K. but they ship worldwide.

  1608. Brad Bowman on Mon, 7th Apr 2008 1:58 pm
  1609. Nice, I was a bit of a slacker and didn’t bother with the 5 minute episode they posted online as I couldn’t listen to them on my iPod. So thanks for putting this show back on my radar screen.

  1610. Miguel on Tue, 8th Apr 2008 12:27 pm
  1611. Looks like someone took those mp3s and packaged them together in an unofficial Age of Persuasion Podcast.

    Go here:

    http://themainframe.ca/2008/03/05/age-of-persuasion-podcast/

    And there’s a link to subscribe in iTunes.

    Alternately, if you use another podcatcher, the feed is also here:

    http://feeds.feedburner.com/ageofpersuasionpodcast

  1612. Chris Lester on Tue, 8th Apr 2008 5:46 pm
  1613. Thanks for all your kind words, Nick! I feel very privileged that I’ve gotten so many excellent people to help bring these stories to life, and it gives me great satisfaction to see that others are enjoying the show.

    Keep it on the bright side!

    [...] Campbell took the SFFaudio Challenge and has released his recording of Charles L. Fontenay’s classic science fiction tale Rebels [...]

  1614. Gregg Taylor on Wed, 9th Apr 2008 9:45 am
  1615. Strongly agree! The best new audio drama I’ve heard in I don’t know how long… I’d say in terms of quality updates and reimagining of a beloved series, this actually rates above BSG, as it maintains the spirit of the original perfectly, while making it fresh and exciting.

    I had a lot of trouble with the website that offered the streams, and never did hear the “Liberator” as a result… damn good to see this quality work offered in this format!

  1616. Al on Thu, 10th Apr 2008 6:41 pm
  1617. I ran into this audiobook by accident. I loved the story when I first read it years ago and now I’m thrilled to relive it on my ipod during my commute.

    Thank you!!!!!

  1618. MichaelP on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 8:20 am
  1619. Any update on Axis being released on audible.com? I just finished Spin and loved it!

    [...] it all out HERE or by clicking the AUTHORS PAGES tab [...]

  1620. PaulJ on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 3:06 pm
  1621. “Check it all out HERE or by clicking the AUTHOR PAGES tab above.”

    Me clicky. Me get nuthin but empty page….

  1622. Jesse Willis on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 6:00 pm
  1623. that’s strange!

    Here’s the link…

    http://www.sffaudio.com/?page_id=1243

    what browser are you using?

  1624. paul on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 6:23 pm
  1625. Jesse, yep, the Resnick page is empty. Matter of fact your link to the names works, but the one that I got from the rss feed didnt. obtw I have so Resnick material on my archive page as well if your interested. http://penbay.org/wrfr/bstories/archive.htm

  1626. Jesse Willis on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 10:10 pm
  1627. Both Pauls, it appears that our Resnick page does not work using at least one version of Internet Explorer! I’ll ask Scott to have a look as to what might be causing it (other than IE’s suckage).

  1628. Jesse Willis on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 10:18 pm
  1629. Okay try it now boys! I’ve added one of your Resnick’s to the page to Paul C.! The other one has some sort of issue – let me know when it’s working. LOL! :D

  1630. Xinia Summers on Sat, 12th Apr 2008 10:14 am
  1631. Exellent book.
    I would also recomend Jules Verne audiobooks on Librivox.
    They are very well read and good to listen.

    [...] Click here for our review of The Goose Girl. [...]

  1632. Skip on Tue, 15th Apr 2008 10:02 am
  1633. There’s actually even less worry than normal about the outcome of these crises, because on the Vorkosigan books they haven’t been being published in chronological order. They’re still really good, though, in my opinion.

  1634. Charles Tan on Tue, 15th Apr 2008 5:40 pm
  1635. You do know that whenever I put my name in Technorati, most if not all of the links redirect me here. =)

    And I’m worth $0.00.

  1636. tsdiva on Wed, 16th Apr 2008 5:46 pm
  1637. Hey and the Addict blog is worth $1600! wooHOO!
    http://blogshares.com/blogs.php?checkid=4183020

    As for changing anything- no! The best move was coming to WP, it looks fabulous.

  1638. Jason Penney on Wed, 16th Apr 2008 6:57 pm
  1639. I was hoping that Audible would have Infected by now, but their seems to be something going on between Audible and Random House. Does anyone know what’s happening?

  1640. Jason Penney on Fri, 18th Apr 2008 7:46 am
  1641. Not perhaps easily changeable, but it seems not a lot of posts here get comments. When they do, they seem to be hit-and-run (not a lot of back and forth, but a bunch of one off unrelated comments).

    [...] By Alan E. Nourse; Read by RK Wilcox 1 |MP3| – Approx. 16 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] Publisher: LibriVox.org Published: [...]

  1642. Jesse Willis on Sat, 19th Apr 2008 12:35 am
  1643. Yup, Jason, your right. Maybe audio folks just aren’t that chatty? But if that’s true why do I get more email comments than website comments?

    Hmmmm, maybe we’re not being provocative enough. I’ll try poking sticks into more bees-nests.

    [...] William Dufris reprises his SFFaudio Essential reading duties with this, the second Scalzi novel to be audiobook’d. Dufris has a secret [...]

    [...] Glassman reviewed Metamor City for [...]

    [...] more production and voices from other favorite podcasters. Read our review of the original version HERE, then set sail with Rafe and Askana [...]

  1644. electricaura on Sun, 20th Apr 2008 3:18 pm
  1645. I purchased 26 episodes on cassette from season 2 from a guy I found on line about 5 years back. It’s the whole series where the sun gets blown up and humanity has to find a new place to live. It’s awesome to hear it again!

    I’ll try and find him again and I will post the link if I do…

  1646. Jesse Willis on Mon, 21st Apr 2008 9:10 pm
  1647. I keep trying to think of some way to get some reviews of Wonder Audio on SFFaudio.

    All I can say is that some of the audiobooks you’ve released – I’m thinking of stuff like Fondly Fahrenheit by Alfred Bester – is ABSOLUTELY SFFaudio Essential quality.

  1648. The Time Traveler on Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 1:29 pm
  1649. Woot, Woot, indeed. Thanks for the prompt posting, Jesse. Excuse me now while I have my geekgasm!

    [...] that B7 Productions has just announced a series of prequel audio adventures to follow up on their SFFaudio Essential Blake’s 7 – Audio Adventures! From the press [...]

  1650. Brad Bowman on Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 3:02 pm
  1651. That’s great news! Coincidentally, I just started listening to the first “season” as it were today and I’m seriously hooked on it.

  1652. Jesse Willis on Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 3:47 pm
  1653. Ya, I like how their calling it the “first season” now. :D

  1654. Brad Bowman on Thu, 24th Apr 2008 10:14 am
  1655. This is the series that sold me on audiobooks actually. (Or perhaps that was Nigel [Whatshisname]’s readings of Pratchett’s Discworld books.) In any event, I would never have read the Dresden stories in print–the writing is simply dreadful. And yet, Marsters’ reading gives them a dimension that makes them not only palatable but enjoyable. In the later books the flubs are actually extensive, with Marsters swearing when he gets it wrong. It doesn’t detract much somehow; actually, the missteps reminded me of listening to the Fourth Tower of Inverness where, in various parts, they just left the mistakes right in.

    It’s good to see that another book is coming out though.

  1656. Thursday Review Round-up « Urban Fantasy Land on Thu, 24th Apr 2008 11:39 am
  1657. [...] the audio version of Fool Moon [...]

  1658. Michael Bekemeyer on Thu, 24th Apr 2008 4:28 pm
  1659. It’s interesting. As you can tell from my review that I’m not a big fan of errors in audio books. But, the idea of leaving them in, on purpose sounds a little interesting and maybe a little fun.

  1660. Maureen on Fri, 25th Apr 2008 5:26 am
  1661. When Nadia May did an audiobook of a Ngaio Marsh mystery, set in New Zealand during WWII, and when she filled in the text description of a male Maori elder singing the traditional greeting song by _singing the song_ as to the Maori born, I became a big fan.

  1662. Blue Tyson on Fri, 25th Apr 2008 5:51 am
  1663. Veronica Giguere, who does the Secret World Chronicle is really good.

    [...] Views of Olduvai Gorge By Mike Resnick; Read by Jonathan Davis Audible Download – 2 Hours 20 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] Publisher: Audible [...]

    [...] single voiced narration (there is a FREE VERSION with multiple serial [...]

    [...] as part of the 2nd Annual SFFAudio Challenge, Rebels Of The Red Planet is now a FREE UNABRIDGED audiobook! All props go to Paul Campbell of [...]

    [...] read by Grover Gardner. There are several volumes out, and we’ve reviewed a couple of them (The Vor Game and Mirror Dance) before this one. I have little to add to the positive assessment of [...]

  1664. Charles Tan on Mon, 28th Apr 2008 6:28 pm
  1665. As much as I want to take credit for posting this, this wasn’t me… =)

  1666. Jesse Willis on Tue, 29th Apr 2008 12:03 am
  1667. That’s weird, you’re right, I posted this one. Hmmm, maybe this is the god of audiobooks trying to tell you to try this one Charles? – I’ll fix the error.

    [...] the way, this audiobook was previously released Audible.com as a promotion for 2007 ComicCon attendees, that version had DRM, this one is naked [...]

  1668. doc on Fri, 2nd May 2008 8:39 pm
  1669. Friday May 2, 2008- Interview with the Founder of Free Comic Book Day, Joe Field owner of Flying Colors Comics in Concord, California. Mr. Joe Field talks about his store’s 20th Anniversary, the history of Free Comic Book Day, meeting and later working for Stan Lee of Marvel Comics, Issue 286 of the Fantastic Four and how Joe Field with Marvel tied it to Stockton California. The Will Eisner Spirit of Comics Retail Award is discussed, as is ComicsPro, the Comics Professional Retail Organization. A Thankyou to Bob Borden of Fantasy Books and Games and Craig Culpepper of Kings Comics and Games. website http://www.heroesofsciencefictionandfantasy.com voicemail 1-206-333-1297

    [...] Mostly this consists of shorter pieces and interviews that have been podcast, but have a look HERE, and if you find any more ELIZABETH BEAR audio please let me [...]

    [...] novel The Wonder Stick. I first read a Coblentz story in the Blackstone Audio collection called A Galaxy Trilogy (Volume I). That novel came from the tail end of Coblentz’s carreer. Julie’s recorded chapters 1 [...]

  1670. Julie D. on Tue, 6th May 2008 11:32 am
  1671. Wow, now those are what I call some good comments! Thanks so much Jesse! :-)

  1672. Jesse Willis on Tue, 6th May 2008 1:24 pm
  1673. My pleasure Julie – you’re doing the good work.

  1674. Tony on Wed, 7th May 2008 2:13 pm
  1675. Julie read a great Gywneth Jones story for the one and only…. get ready for it…………. StarShipSofa: The Audio Science Fiction Magazine!
    http://cdn4.libsyn.com/starshipsofa/Gywneth_Jones_La_Cenerentola.mp3

  1676. Julie D. on Thu, 8th May 2008 12:58 pm
  1677. WOOHOO! I am so excited about this … thanks Jesse!

  1678. Jason Penney on Fri, 9th May 2008 9:43 am
  1679. Does anyone know if you can buy this as a download from somewhere?

    Apparently Audible.com and Random House aren’t getting along. Not sure what it’s about, but I hope it’s worth the lost sales.

    [...] Campanella, the wonderful narrator of the wonderful The Merchant And The Alchemist’s Gate at StarShipSofa, has just premiered Lester Dent’s The Man of Bronze bookcast on his own podcast! Here’s [...]

  1680. Blue Tyson on Fri, 9th May 2008 7:05 pm
  1681. JLA: Exterminators isn’t from a comic.

    Given it says the author is Christopher Golden, who wrote this novel.

    Presumably they have just made an audiobook out of that.

    Certainly isn’t the first DC novel to have audio, as far as I remember.

    [...] novel by Sharon Lee and Steve Miller is entirely available as a podcast novel. I listened and reviewed the first novel in this series, it was released by Buzzy Multimedia. This is about the 12th novel [...]

    [...] Taylor Kent, of the Snark Infested Waters and Misfit Christians podcasts, has claimed This World Is Taboo by Murray Leinster from our First Annual SFFaudio Challenge! [...]

    [...] part of SFFaudio’s “Make an Audiobook” challenge, I am doing a reading of This World Is Taboo by Murray Leinster. You can find more details [...]

    [...] Show, has has an exclusive podcast interview with Rudy Rucker. You may recall that The Sci Phi Show ran a short Rucker story called Panpsychism Proved a while back. Jason talks to Rudy about the “singularity”, the philosophical idea of panpsychism [...]

    [...] Andre Norton novel “Voodoo Planet” (details of which have just been added to our ANDRE NORTON author’s page) with an unabridged release of Norton’s The Time [...]

    [...] Over Warlock By Andre Norton; Read by R.J. Davis 19 Zipped MP3s or Podcast – 7 Hours 18 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] Publisher: [...]

  1682. Jim on Mon, 19th May 2008 5:26 am
  1683. It’s a nice idea but I definitely think the delivery is too slow.

  1684. Paul Campbell on Mon, 19th May 2008 10:10 am
  1685. They could both have been quicker. The May feels quicker, so they may have already had that comment. They just need to go further.

    I thought there was a voice track missing at first. If there had been a voice track it would have been more interesting. Tell us about the releases.

  1686. Jim Harris on Tue, 20th May 2008 3:14 pm
  1687. This is a case where less would be more. The RSS feed for new releases is about perfect. Just the idea that a new book is out on audio by a favorites writer is all I need to know.

  1688. Richard Edwards on Wed, 21st May 2008 7:50 am
  1689. Hi Jesse:

    First, thanks for your long term support of our podcasts. You were one of the very first bloggers to write an entry about our show, way back on Episode 3 on Batman Begins. Hard to believe that was almost 4 years ago! Even now, two of our most downloaded episodes in our film series include our analysis of Batman Begins and Blade Runner. Second, thanks for finding a reason to write about our Noircon podcasts. I think our Cybernoir panel has a lot of things that could interest sci fi fans, especially in terms of the logics of digital culture–as in the hybridization of noir and sci fi in such great films as Blade Runner, Dark City and the Matrix. While we don’t focus much on sci fi in the enhanced podcast, we definitely address the role that digital logics play in contemporary storytelling, the delivery of new content and the role of the audience. Thanks again for all of your support.

    Best, Rich Edwards
    Co-Host, Out of the Past: Investigating Film Noir and Behind the Black Mask: Mystery Writers Revealed

  1690. Jesse Willis on Wed, 21st May 2008 9:14 am
  1691. Thanks Rich, you and Shannon put out two absolutely terrific podcasts. It’s always a pleasure to hear you guys talk about a movie or interview an author. The depth and dissection you provide in both is absolutely unmatched in any other media. I’m hoping you can get Lawrence Block and Donald Westlake onto Behind The Black Mask: Mystery Writers Revealed. Any chance of that?

    [...] Despoilers Of The Golden Empire by Randall Garrett (read all about that awesome podcast audiobook HERE). But Maureen’s latest project will likely garner even more attention for the name attached [...]

    [...] Dream Quest of Unknown Kadath By H.P. Lovecraft; Read by Maureen O’Brien Podcast – [UNABRIDGED] Podcaster: Maria Lectrix Podcast: May 2008 – [...]

    [...] the third of Burrough’s Tarzan novels. Don’t start with this book, go back to the original (also done up by LibriVox). First published in serial for in All-Story Cavalier Magazine in 1914, it was bound into hardback [...]

  1692. Nate Lowell on Sat, 24th May 2008 7:14 am
  1693. Thanks! This ia a great list to be Number 1 on :)

    Seems somehow fitting that a book about traveling should be on a list of books to listen to while you travel.

  1694. Gregg Taylor on Sat, 24th May 2008 9:43 am
  1695. Hey! Look at us hanging out with Conan Doyle and Frank Baum!

  1696. Nate Lowell on Sun, 25th May 2008 1:49 pm
  1697. Cool, huh?

    And I need a fix

    “Kit Baxter! Behave yourself!”

    “Yass, boss.”

    Miss it :)

  1698. Gregg Taylor on Sun, 25th May 2008 10:39 pm
  1699. Miss it? We just ran episode thirty-six eight days ago! Holy smokes…

    If you’re waiting for the Podiobooks re-run of season three… maybe you shouldn’t. We’re moving the Decoder Ring Mansion and Lord only knows when I’ll get ’round to that.

    If, on the other hand, you are already jonesing for season four, we do have a sweet summer run of Matt Wallace’s “Deck Gibson: Far Reach Commander” coming up to calm those shakes!

    cheers,

    Gregg

  1700. Evo on Mon, 26th May 2008 3:51 pm
  1701. Relegated to second-class status again. It’s because I spell “theatre” funny, isn’t it Gregg? I can take it…

    E.

  1702. Gregg Taylor on Mon, 26th May 2008 7:58 pm
  1703. I swear it’s only because everything is packed in boxes except the computer, my chair and a bare bulb hanging overhead!

    Seriously though, with packing, moving and unpacking, I’m hoping it will be earlier than July before I get the Podiobooks re-release out, but it sure won’t be much earlier than that!

    [...] Audible.com and Blackstone Audio RoyaltiesSFFAudio shares some information from Robert J. Sawyer on the royalties he receives from audiobooks.Tags: Blackstone Audio, audible.com, Audiobooks, Robert J. Sawyer, royalties, [...]

  1704. Carsten on Fri, 30th May 2008 8:07 am
  1705. The heir to E.A. Poe and Borges… Well, there’s nothing like a well-developed ego I’d say. ;-)

  1706. Jesse Willis on Fri, 30th May 2008 11:31 am
  1707. Harlan certainly doesn’t suffer from false modesty. I think it refreshing.

  1708. Jesse Willis on Fri, 30th May 2008 11:38 am
  1709. I just watched the newest movie version THE INVASION, starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig. It strays further away from the book than the previous two films, but comes off more plausible (no seed pod problems), and has its own philosophical knife that’ll make you think about what we really want from life.

    [...] Essentials [...]

    [...] Essentials [...]

    [...] Essentials [...]

    [...] Essentials [...]

  1710. Brian Murphy on Sun, 1st Jun 2008 6:57 pm
  1711. Huh, I’ll have to check that out. Not having seen any previews for it, I didn’t know The Invasion was a remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

  1712. Jesse Willis on Sun, 1st Jun 2008 7:54 pm
  1713. I didn’t know it was based on the novel either (until the end credits). Reading up about it on wikipedia, it looks like “The Invasion” was a big flop. I was very pleased by it, pleased and admiring, but I also didn’t have any expectations going in.

  1714. Jesse Willis on Mon, 2nd Jun 2008 10:23 pm
  1715. This is a very good interview! Rick Kleffel knows his stuff and he gets Cory talking about his work better than most I’ve heard.

    [...] Essentials [...]

    [...] onto the science fiction scene with his stellar narration of Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash (SFFaudio review here). Since then, in the science fiction genre, he’s been almost exclusively reading Random [...]

    [...] Audible.com has published a few more of Robert J. Sawyer’s novels: The Neanderthal Trilogy is there (Hominids, Humans, and Hybrids). They also have his Nebula winning novel The Terminal Experiment, published by Recorded Books. We reviewed it back in 2003. [...]

  1716. Julie D. on Thu, 5th Jun 2008 11:13 am
  1717. I remember reading this book a long time ago. I also really enjoyed it … until the end which I felt was a real cop out a la one of Gene Roddenberry’s favorite scenarios.

  1718. Jesse Willis on Thu, 5th Jun 2008 12:18 pm
  1719. I don’t recall the end all that well, but I very much liked the novel and I do remember it gave me a strong desire to visit the Royal Ontario Museum!

  1720. Julie D. on Thu, 5th Jun 2008 12:22 pm
  1721. Yes, I will never forget that museum!

  1722. Jesse Willis on Thu, 5th Jun 2008 3:14 pm
  1723. This is another terrific interview! Great find Charles!

  1724. Charles Tan on Thu, 5th Jun 2008 5:37 pm
  1725. Thanks!

    [...] Mutiny, Book 1 By Mike Resnick; Read by Jonathan Davis Audible Download – 7 Hours and 35 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] Publisher: Audible [...]

  1726. Rick Roberts on Fri, 6th Jun 2008 3:36 pm
  1727. Several things wrong with this site as interesting as it sounds…so I’ll bypass it.

    1st…pay site so I skip those
    2nd…flashplayer..us dialups have to have it disabled to do anything online
    3rd…mp3 is the only way to go…forget the m4u and whatever

    Sad…could have been a good show.

    0 out of 5 stars on this one.

  1728. Brad Bowman on Fri, 6th Jun 2008 6:16 pm
  1729. Good lord, did they spend enough on the flash programming? It’s crazy. I’m not averse to paying for good audio drama, but I have to agree that site is a usability nightmare. It’s even worse considering I’m a UNIX user and flash is not generally agreeable with my platform. This will take some hacking just to listen too.

  1730. Robert J. Sawyer on Fri, 6th Jun 2008 7:52 pm
  1731. Hi, Jesse. Thanks for posting this. As it happens, I received an email today from Heather Brown at the CBC saying that I should be receiving their proposed script for ROLLBACK in mid-July. Canadians have a love affair with CBC Radio that goes deeper than anything Americans have with, say, NPR; to me, having a novel featured on the CBC is way, way cool; I’m totally thrilled.

    By the way, a few years ago, BETWEEN THE COVERS did the fantasy SHADOW OF ASHLAND, by World Fantasy Award nominee (and one of my best friends) Terence M. Green — and it was read by Michael Hogan, who has since gone on to be Col. Saul Tigh on the reimagined BATTLESTAR GALACTICA.

    Also: look forward later this year to an unabridged recording of my FLASHFORWARD … ;)

    Cheers,

    Rob

  1732. Carsten on Sat, 7th Jun 2008 5:06 am
  1733. Hi,
    I mostly agree with you, Jesse, as well as with the two people who’ve already commented.
    Flash is not necessarily bad. There are great ways to employ Flash, which even I as “usability guy” have to say. However, not in the way it is currently implemented on that site. For God’s sake, it can’t be that hard to have a “skip intro” button! (If there is one, it is well hidden, which is equally as bad)
    The thing that annoys *me* most is that there is a lack of transparency. From my personal and professional experience more and more people are quite willing to pay for quality stuff on the web as long as the price is perceived to be fair and there is sufficient transparency, i.e. “how much does it cost, how can I pay?” This reeks of Let’s try to get them “addicted” [as you have so aptly put it]and not put them off by the price.’
    That is, in my opinion exactly the wrong way. It’s what budget airlines used to do (and still do) but slowly get steer away from as customers get more and more aware – and wary – of this practise.
    Just my two (Euro-)cents,
    C.

    [...] Mutiny, Book 1 By Mike Resnick; Read by Jonathan Davis Audible Download – 7 Hours 35 Minutes [UNABRIDGED] Publisher: Audible [...]

  1734. Tony on Sun, 8th Jun 2008 6:54 am
  1735. Jesse…. you got comments spot on. I discovered this a while ago and thought… eh! Something not right here and your reviews points out what was not right!

  1736. Jesse Willis on Mon, 9th Jun 2008 1:26 pm
  1737. Any idea how historically accurate the history in this novel is? I love historical SF novels that stick to the history as closely as possible.

    [...] is getting re-aired. The program in question was scripted by the same guy who did the phenomenal Chillers – Four Tales of Terror series. Of it Rich sez: Mike Walker’s award winning radio play, Alpha, is an accessible, if [...]

  1738. Alan David Justice on Mon, 9th Jun 2008 6:55 pm
  1739. It runs pretty close to the facts, insofar as they are known. I based many of the incidents in the novel on material from primary source documents kept at the abbey of St Albans. Of course, the story is fiction, so it’s not all perfectly factual. Part of the pleasure of researching this book was digging around in the old chronicles. The main (historical) characters existed, and filled the roles they have in to book. Not everything they did in the story came out of the written history, though. Otherwise, what would be the point of writing the book?

    “Communion” is available in print at lulu.com, barnesandnoble.com, and amazon.com, or as a free audiobook on podiobooks.com

  1740. Julie D. on Tue, 10th Jun 2008 9:19 am
  1741. All I can say is that it sure FELT accurate! :-)

    [...] oraz “The Repairman” (mp3 – kolekcja Librivox, drugie opowiadanie też dostępne tu) – dwa krótkie dziełka, polecam. Pierwsze o tajemniczym wynalazku, drugie w typowym dla autora [...]

  1742. Christof Laputka on Wed, 11th Jun 2008 11:25 am
  1743. Hey everyone,

    My name is Christof Laputka and I’m the author and creator of The Leviathan Chronicles. First of all, I want to thank you all for the time you took to check out the website and listen to Chap. 1. I also want to thank you for the comments you posted. I think most of them are well reasoned and I want you to know that I’m listening and will implement changes in short order. But I think there may be a misunderstanding on a few issues that I’d like to clarify.

    1) I know that the site being in Flash is a mixed bag. My vision for Leviathan was to accomplish two things: One, to create the most compelling audio drama that reflected the genre of “modern” darker science fiction with the best available talent and special effects. Two, I wanted the website to be a fully immersive universe for the story line. I wanted some visual aspects to explain certain concepts as well as create an interactive venue for discussion between listeners and the Author. There are also gaming aspects (i.e. the hunt for Easter Eggs, like the one on the home page) that I want to promote and will develop further as time goes on. In other words, I wanted the site to be more then just a download page for mp3 files. I thought this would be a welcome addition to the world of science fiction and more than one traditionally sees with audio drama of this type. Flash was the best medium to accomplish this. That being said, I fully acknowledge the fact that requiring the latest version may be an impediment to some listeners. Frankly, if I could do it over, I would do it differently. But it’s my belief (too optimistic perhaps) that eventually technology will catch up and it will be more easily accessible by more viewers/listeners. But I recognize the limitations and I’m doing everything I can to make it more accessible to people.

    2. One comment was that all the Flash would be a distraction during subsequent visits. First of all, the intro video is only played once during a viewer’s first visit. After that, one goes directly to the home page. Additionally, one can always link directly to the podcast page (http://www.leviathanchronicles.com/#/the_podcast/) and bypass anything else. In addition, I purposely created the iTunes page if people don’t want to deal with the website at all. I’m open to any other suggestions as to how to make the site better and more usable.

    3. RSS feed. This is an important point and thank you guys for bringing it up. You guys are right and an RSS feed will be created by the end of the week. Obviously, you always can go to iTunes to actively subscribe but there should be something on the website. Good point.

    4. Audio format. Downloads for iTunes have to be in m4a format. I can’t do anything about it. But the Downloads from the site come in mp3 format. If someone is having a different experience, please let me know.

    5. The pricing issue. Once again, this is my fault. I appreciate your comments and you guys are right. Let me start by clarifying that all episodes in Season 1 (Eps 1-25) are and will be free. There may be an “audiobook” version in the future that one would purchase on iTunes or Audible, but that’s not what we’re talking about here. When the website was designed, I had an e-commerce function created as I was figuring out what direction to take the project. Originally, the idea was to charge $.99 per episode, but I quickly moved away from that idea after listening to some resistance in the podcasting/audio drama community. In my defense, nobody has been required to enter any financial information into the site to get any episodes. The payment area wasn’t intended to be used. That being said, I understand the criticism that some of those e-commerce functions were still “visible” thus leaving someone to question why they should commit their valuable time to an audio drama without knowing the cost. That is a totally valid point and I will change the website to make that more clear. I really apologize for the confusion and I will take immediate steps to make sure that people understand the first 25 eps are free.

    I also think this is a good time to explain the format and scope of the project. The Leviathan Chronicles is something that I have been writing and developing for the past two years and has required significant time and resources. I wanted to create as grand a scope as possible because I really love this medium of story telling. Leviathan will be 50 episodes in total. Season 1 is the first 25 episodes (which will be one complete story arc). We will then take a hiatus for a few months while we do the prep work for Season 2 (the last 25 eps). One new episode is dropped every 10 days which I’d like to believe is a pretty ambitious output for 45 min – 1 hour episodes of this scope and quality.

    With the above comments in mind, I sincerely hope that you’ll give Leviathan another chance. No matter what, I really appreciate your comments and the suggestions you’ve offered. I hope you’ll appreciate the effort that went into trying to create something very ambitious and forgive some initial mis-steps on my part. They will be corrected quickly.

    Thanks again everyone, take great care and I wish you all great listening.

    Christof

  1744. Jay on Thu, 12th Jun 2008 9:02 am
  1745. Rick. You’re on dial-up! Jeez! Why don’t you use a telegraph. It’s 2008 why would you use dial-up? Park your Stutz Bearcat, relax on the barca-ounger and listen to Al Jolson on the Victrola phonograph. I saw an RSS feed for both the news and the episodes. Artwork and content is fantastic.

    [...] Street By H.P. Lovecraft; Read by Glen Hallstrom 1 |MP3| – Approx. 14 Minutes [...]

  1746. jim Jimmerson on Fri, 13th Jun 2008 3:20 pm
  1747. Sadly I find most Librox readings are horrible. I love the idea but hate the quality.

  1748. Carsten on Sat, 14th Jun 2008 3:55 am
  1749. @Jay, I don’t want to start a flame war here, so… well, I won’t. ;-)
    However, I think you’re forgetting something. One the one hand I agree with you and Christof insofar as you cannot always wait for the dissemination of a technology to be almost complete before you employ it. There would hardly be any progress then.
    On the other hand, you have to keep in mind that in the times of the internet your potential audience has become global. I am German. Only in the last couple of weeks I bought one audio drama and one audio book from US publishers online. And I download much more stuff that is available for free. My favorite info site for English language audio dramas and books is run by US americans and Canadians (hint, hint! But enough of the sliming ;-) )Maybe you aware of the fact that technologically (and otherwise I would like to think) Germany is be no means a “backwater” country. Still, the town I live in while I am in Germany and not in the UK did not have DSL until about 1 1/2 years ago. Simply because the responsible telcom provider was willing to make the necessary investments to allow 20,000 people to have fast internet access. I don’t want to speculate about the situation in countries that are (even only slightly) less developed. And let me not even start about the amount of people who have to use special means to access the internet at all, but can do so quite easily (let me tell you that from my professional experience) as long as the respective website is just a little accomodating in that respect.
    Don’t get me wrong, I am not even saying that only because of any “ethical” considerations. It makes perfect business sense. The internet offers perfect opportunities for content publishers to significantly widen the scope of their audience in ways that were never available to them before. Of course I do understand that publishers (especially if there is no big money backing them up) must consider the cost-benefit-ratio. I do not know whether Christof has the budget to, say, offer a text