Bob Neufeld’s reading of the Phaedo, Plato’s account of the final day of Socrates (in 399 BC), is of professional audiobook quality. There’s no way I could overstate how impressed I am with this audiobook. Neufeld’s pronunciation and character discrimination are spot-on and the sound quality of the recording is absolutely stellar. If you haven’t read any Plato I think you’ll be amazed at how clear and compelling the dialogue is. Its an accessible introduction to the thought of Socrates (and Plato) in that it discusses a very down to earth subject: death.
Phaedo
By Plato; Translated by Benjamin Jowett; Read by Bob Neufeld
8 Zipped MP3 Files or Podcast – Approx. 3 Hours 4 Minutes [UNABRIDGED]
Publisher: LibriVox.org
Published: May 2, 2011
Socrates has been imprisoned and sentenced to death by an Athenian jury for not believing in the gods of the state and for corrupting the youth of the city. The dialogue is told from the perspective of one of Socrates’ students, Phaedo of Elis. Having been present at Socrates’ death bed, Phaedo relates the dialogue from that day to Echecrates, a fellow philosopher. By engaging in dialectic with a group of Socrates’ friends, including the Thebans Cebes and Simmias, Socrates explores various arguments for the soul’s immortality in order to show that there is an afterlife in which the soul will dwell following death. Phaedo tells the story that following the discussion, he and the others were there to witness the death of Socrates.
Podcast feed: http://librivox.org/rss/4421
iTunes 1-Click |SUBSCRIBE|
[Thanks also to Barry Eads]
Posted by Jesse Willis
Persons in the dialogue:
Phaedo
Echecrates of Phlius
Socrates
Attendant of the Prison
Apollodorus
Simmias
Cebes
Crito
I’ve said it before and other people have said it before — but yeah, the philosophical dialogue format is a lot more interesting when read out loud than when just read. It seems to drive actual students of philosophy crazy (ironically), but it’s a lot easier on us normal people.
Of course, the audio format also helps the reader argue more satisfyingly with the dialogue characters….