Commentary: What hardware do you use to listen to audiobooks and podcast?

SFFaudio Commentary

I’ve been listening to audiobooks my whole life.

It started as a young boy when adults would read me bedtime stories. Then, as I grew up, I turned to 8-tracks and LP records. Then for a long time in the 1980s and 1990s I was using cassettes almost exclusively.

For personal portability, with cassettes, I used about Sony Walkmans and Sanyo knock-off walkmans. At home I used ghetto blasters and clock radios with cassette players.

Eventually CDs came in, and I used them concurrently with cassettes. They were followed by MP3-CDs. Then I was using iPods (I owned four over the years, three Nanos and a Mini). Every technology that’s has come in has improved the accessibility and portability of audiobooks for me.

Today I pretty much use just one device for all my audiobook and podcast listening. That’s my iPhone 3GS.

I use it so much I had to start worrying about it holding a charge for the whole day.

The current solution I’ve come up with has been very satisfactory. I use three separate charging docking stations at home. All of them are identical, the Sony ICF-CS10iP. I have one at my computer, one in my bedroom, and one in my bathroom.

Sony ICF-CS10iP

In fact, I’ve liked it so much I bought a fourth for work and use it in my classroom. I gave one to my niece and one to my sister and my mom bought one for herself and I bought one for a friend too. They come with a little remote control, but I tend to have them near at hand most of the time.

When not at home listening I’ve used light and cheap over the ear earphones for most of my life. But I’ve always disliked the burden of cords. So, for about six months now, I’ve been using a Sony DR-BT160AS headset. I don’t like the fact that it is an in-ear ear-bud model, but the fact that it combines stereo earbuds with a microphone with a behind-the-neck mount and NO CORD at all make them a substantial improvement over every pair of headphones I’ve used before. It is rechargeable (with an internal battery) and sustains a charge for several hours of use. It’s Bluetooth enabled and works incredibly well at a distance of up to ten meters or so. In fact it actually works a little better when at a distance than it does when close up.

Unfortunately, like any pair of earbuds they aren’t truly comfortable, but their compact size, the built in microphone, and the lack of cables makes me very pleased to have a pair. I actually bought a second set shortly after the first so that I’ve got as a backup for when the first dies.

Sony DR-BT160AS Bluetooth earbuds

What hardware do you use to listen to audiobooks and podcast?

Posted by Jesse Willis

CBC Spark: Mary Robinette Kowal talks about her A Month Of Letters challenge

SFFaudio Online Audio

CBC Radio - SparkNora Young interviewed Mary Robinette Kowal on CBC Radio’s Spark podcast #172. Kowal talked to Young about her Month Of Letters challenge and how writing a letter by hand has changed the way she writes and thinks about writing.

|MP3|

Podcast feed: http://www.cbc.ca/podcasting/includes/spark.xml

A Month Of Letters

Posted by Jesse Willis

This Podcast Contains Spoilers: The Thing (2011)

SFFaudio Online Audio

This Podcast Contains SpoilersI hate “spoilers” – no, not the concept itself, I hate the use of the word. It’s very rarely accurate – how many “spoilers” actually ruin a short story, novel or movie?

If spoilers actually spoiled shit you’d need not see a stage production of Hamlet, or watch A Bridge To Far, or read A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur’s Court. That said, I think the use of the word has become near pandemic in amateur reviewing. Perhaps we are in the phase where the word has become so overused that it has become a dead metaphor?

Which leads me to point out this podcast, entitled This Podcast Contains Spoilers, and their intelligent, and persuasive, discussion of The Thing (2011).

Based on just this one episode of This Podcast Contains Spoilers I see it as an exemplar of a certain kind of fan based podcasts. Recorded conversation, by and with intelligent fans, well produced, personable and thorough.

|MP3|

Podcast feed: http://thispodcast.libsyn.com/rss

Here’s my take on the movie itself (written before listening to the podcast):

Let me tell you about The Thing (2011) … spoiler* … here’s the thing, it is just what you expect it to be!

First though I should tell you this is not a remake. It is a prequel. In fact, the film’s producers thought John Carpenter’s 1982 version so perfect they dared not remake it. They should be applauded for this. But the demands of Hollywood profiteering require that no potential goldmine ever go un-exploited, and hence we have a prequel with the same title, same structure, and the same ideas as the 1982 version.

All the elements of the original (itself a kind of remake/adaptation) are in this version. There are at least a dozen near scene-for-scene parallels between The Thing (2011) to the John Carpenter version (1982). The main difference between the two is the inclusion of two females characters – I’m betting the Hollywood profit formula meant a script with all male characters just couldn’t get greenlit these days.

As prequels go, this one is one of the best I’ve ever seen. The acting is solid, the cinematography and sound design are fine, and the script is pretty tight. But being that there are absolutely no new ideas in it, it is of no cognitive value. It’s scary. I was afraid to watch it at night. But I didn’t think any new thoughts while watching it. When you watch John Carpenter’s The Thing for the first time you shit your pants and think strange and cool thoughts. When you watch the 2011 version you just end up with shit in you pants.

And that’s the basic problem. I can’t think of a prequel that ever improved on the original – and this remake/prequel is wonderful example of why they can’t! The Thing (2011) is a noble failure. It is malconcieved, but finely executed, it is a creation which strives for the maximum greatness in the shadow of The Thing (1982) itself.

Among the many thoughtful choices in the 2011 version was the idea to provide more than a token amount of Norweigan – it might have been more interesting to do the whole thing in Norweigan but this is Hollywood, where such ideas can’t get greenlit. In fact I didn’t expect that Hollywood would allow for as much foreign language as is in it. I was actually surprised at how much of it wasn’t in English (maybe about 20% Norwegian)!

Apparently the producers wanted to make the most compatible prequel possible, taking note of the facts about the backstory and basing their starting point for the construction of the prequel script. You’d think they should be applauded for this. But the demands of Hollywood profiteering require that no potential goldmine ever go unexploited, and hence a prequel with the same title, and basic structure as the 1982 version.

Now let me tell you a little about the premise. The title creature digests and then mimics the original – creating an imperfect copy that must, due to its ravenous metabolism, give itself away after only a brief time upon the screen. It consumes the nearest living thing in a gruesome display of lustful gluttony.

Yep, this movie is metaphor for the Hollywood movie industry.

Posted by Jesse Willis

*If you’re watching a prequel it cannot be spoiled. You fucking know what happens.

The Bat Segundo Show #432 interview with Stephen Fry

SFFaudio Online Audio

The Bat Segundo ShowThe Bat Segundo Show, episode #432, has the host, Edward Champion, “basking in a pleasant tsunami of erudition” when he talks to Stephen Fry.

Among the many subjects discussed in this delightfully wide ranging conversation are Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged, how to write essays for exams, the Oxford manner, the ethics of the French Resistance, absolutism, and Brave New World.

|MP3|

Podcast feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/segundo

Posted by Jesse Willis